Printer Friendly

Oracles defeat makes it harder to squeeze money from Java.

Oracle's defeat makes it harder to squeeze money from Java

SAN FRANCISCO: Oracle's defeat in a two-year-old lawsuit against Google will make it harder for the software company to harness demand for mobile devices and benefit from its $7.4 billion Sun Microsystems purchase.

A federal judge ruled on May 31 that Google didn't violate Oracle's copyrights on programming interfaces related to the Java computer language, which came as part of the 2010 Sun acquisition.

That means Google doesn't have to pay Oracle to use elements of Java in its Android operating system, the software used in more than 300 million mobile devices.

And since Apple doesn't use Java in its iPhones, Oracle misses out on a chance to make money from the world's two biggest providers of smartphone software just as Sun's hardware business shrinks.

"One of the crown jewels of the Sun acquisition was Java," said Brent Thill, an analyst at UBS in San Francisco, who has a buy rating on Oracle.

"They had grand aspirations of being able to take the ubiquitous platform of Java and monetise it at a potentially higher rate. There are some questions now about what their ability to monetise this is."

Google and Oracle have jousted since August 2010 to resolve Oracle's allegation that Google ripped off software code and programming tools to build Android.

When Oracle announced the Sun deal in 2009, Larry Ellison, chief executive, called Java "the single most important software asset we have ever acquired," and he has been working to increase the $220 million in licensing fees Sun made from Java in 2008.

No bonanza

"This question of, 'Why hasn't anyone been able to make money from Java ' is kind of a cliche in our industry," said Andy van Dam, a computer science professor at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, who teaches a course on Java and has written a textbook on it. "It's never been a bonanza for anyone."

The Java programming language, created at Sun in the mid-90s, is free for anyone to use. Java lets developers write programmes that work across a variety of operating systems and computers by translating their code into instructions various machines can understand. Part of the reason Oracle sued was to prevent

Google and other companies from coming up with software that runs functions like Java without taking an official licence.

When software developers write programmes in Java, Oracle has a greater chance of selling its other products, such as computer servers or middleware, used to knit together various applications.

For instance, if corporate technology departments creating business software choose Microsoft's .Net technology, they might gravitate toward Microsoft's operating system, middleware and database software, and servers running Intel chips, which compete with Oracle's products.

Oracle's hardware sales may drop 11 per cent to $6.3 billion this year.

and slide for a fourth consecutive period in the fourth quarter, which ended in May, Walter Pritchard, an analyst at Citigroup, wrote in a report.

Oracle's database, middleware and business applications revenue may climb 9 per cent this year to $26.2 billion and account for 70 per cent of the company's sales.

Oracle's share of worldwide server revenue declined 7.4 per cent in the first quarter to 5.9 per cent of a $12.4 billion market, according to market researcher Gartner.

Android dominance

At issue in the court proceedings, which began on April 14, was Google's use of instructions called application programming interfaces, which help developers create a wide range of programmes - from operating systems to smartphone applications.

Google says it legally used the APIs -- a central building block of computer programmes - to come up with its own compatible version of Java for Android without taking a license to use it.

In 2007, Google released Android using open-source technologies, including the Linux operating system and Apache Harmony, open-source software that replicates Java's functions. Mountain View, California-based Google gives Android away to smartphone and tablet makers, then makes money through resulting mobile app sales and users' searches. Android devices now have 51 per cent of the US smartphone market, according to market researcher ComScore.

Ellison testimony

"Google didn't want a platform Sun controlled," said Al Hilwa, an analyst at market researcher IDC. "They wanted to bulldoze through things and move much faster."

Oracle executives, who initially sought $1 billion in damages from Google for infringing copyrights, have said in court proceedings that Google copied Java's functions without signing a contract to use it. That risks creating multiple, incompatible versions of the language, in turn hampering other developers' ability to use it effectively.

"Just because something is open source doesn't mean you can do whatever you want with it," Ellison said on the witness stand on April 17.

To be sure, Oracle gained much more than Java when buying Sun, including the Solaris operating system and Sparc chips. The business is 'enormously profitable' and the deal has 'already paid for itself' given Sun's cash, Ellison said at a technology-industry conference on May 30.

Appeal plans

"Java is only one component of the Sun acquisition," said UBS's Thill. "They have had favorable legal battles in the past -- they can't win 'em all. I don't think this disrupts the overall story."

Still, the court ruling may set back Oracle's growth prospects. US district judge William Alsup ruled on May 31 in San Francisco that elements of Oracle's APIs are free for anyone to use and Google didn't infringe any of Oracle's copyrights. Alsup said earlier in the trial that even though the jury decided there was infringement, Google wasn't liable for damages because the jury deadlocked on the question of whether the company's copying constituted "fair use."

Oracle plans to appeal, Deborah Hellinger, a company spokeswoman, said in an e-mail after the decision. As Oracle seeks to make more money from Java than Sun ever did, its best chance now may be on an appeal.

"If Larry Ellison knows anything, it's how to make money," said Scott Kveton, CEO of Urban Airship, a Portland, Oregon, maker of software that developers can use in mobile apps. The fight against Google was "Oracle saying, 'We want a piece of the action.'"

(Follow on Facebook and on Twitter for updates that you can share with your friends.)

Muscat Press and Publishing House SAOC 2012

Provided by an company
COPYRIGHT 2012 Al Bawaba (Middle East) Ltd.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2012 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Times of Oman (Muscat, Oman)
Date:Jun 6, 2012
Previous Article:Positive trend on BSE.
Next Article:Marriott in expansion mode; to hire workers.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters