Printer Friendly

Optical fiber: blown or conventional? Costs, and ease of installation and repair are determining factors.

Blown optical fiber (BOF) is an alternative to the standard installation of a fiber-optic cable plant. British Telecom first developed BOF in the early 1980s, and it was used first commercially in Europe and then Japan. BOF is used in both military and commercial environments, each with different challenges.

BOF does not produce tensile stresses on the fiber because instead of applying all the stress and pressure at the end of the cable, the fiber floats through re-installed microducts under no tension. By installing fiber in this manner, the potential of creating microbends and cracks that could lead to increased attenuation is eliminated. Other benefits of BOF are added flexibility in installation options, capacity for future growth, lower cable attenuation and a reduction in splices.

British Telecom has leased this technology to two companies. One is Sumitomo Electric Corp. of Triangle Park, N.C., which refers to it as FUTUREFLEX Air Blown Fiber (ABF).

The other company licensed by British Telecom is General Cable/ NEXTGEN Fiber Optics. General Cable/NEXTGEN, with a U.S. office in Highland Heights, Ky., has licensed its BLOLITE product to shipyards like Northrop-Grumman Newport News and Portsmouth Naval, both in Virginia. BLOLITE has been adopted by the Navy as one of the cabling methods for all new LAN backbones for both large and small platforms, as well as in more than 100 blown optical fiber installations in the United States.

The concept of blowing fiber cables has been around for some time. BOF was thought of as a subcomponent of loose tube fiber-optic cable technology. This is one of the most widely used methods in the optical fiber cable industry to protect optical fibers from water, temperature and external influences that cause mechanical damage and deterioration of the optical performance of fibers.


Loose tube can be composed of one or more plastic layers, and is filled with a water-blocking jell. BOF, however, is not recommended in an aerial application due to potential condensation developing inside the tubes. Loose-tube cable is designed to protect the fibers from the rigors of installation, as well as the installed environment.

The microducts in the BOF cabling are made of a sheath material that can be polyethylene for external use or low-smoke zero halogen for interbuilding or intrabuilding, and military installations. Tests on the tubes include temperature, humidity and water immersion. The fibers are broken out from the tube at interconnection boxes, and a furcation or breakout unit may be used to build up the fiber, providing additional protection and strength so a connector can be attached for routing or connection to the end device.

In the Sumitomo configuration, tube cables act as the highway for the fiber--a key element of the fiber link. Cables are available in various sizes, with the fiber blown using low-pressure compressed air or nitrogen.

Once the tubes are installed, fiber bundles or individual fiber strands containing either single-mode, 50-micron or 62.5-micron multimode fibers are blown in. These fibers can be blown in at rates of up to 150 feet per minute. Currently, the maximum distance a group of eight fibers can be blown is up to 3,280 feet horizontally and 1,000 feet vertically. Modifications to the blowing unit can add four additional fibers that can be blown simultaneously. This will decrease the horizontal distance to 1,640 feet.

General Cable/NEXTGEN BOF technology is based on simultaneously blowing individual optical fibers. To facilitate the blowing process, an additional, textured-acrylate coating is extruded onto standard optical fibers. This additional coating provides color and a dimpled surface, which creates a viscous drag that picks up the fiber by friction. This allows the fibers to float in a stress-free manner through the center of the tubes during the installation process.


A tractor feed is used to feed the fibers into the tubes until the friction is sufficient enough to pick up the fiber and move it through the tubes. In the Sumitomo blowing process, where fibers are blown in as a bundle, a tip is placed on the end of the fiber bundle, keeping it from getting caught on the joints of the push-fit connectors where the tube cables connect together.

The fibers are manufactured so they will feed through the blow head without jamming it and slide along the inner tubes. Sumitomo places a low-friction surface material on the fiber bundles, while NEXTGEN puts it on the walls of the tubes.

Another advantage of BOF is that a large amount of dark fiber for future growth does not need to be installed. In addition, fewer installation technicians may be required. With a conventional system, a minimum of a four-person team might take three days to complete a 3,000-foot installation. With BOF, a two-person team can perform the installation in less than one day after the microducts are installed.

From a design perspective, BOF creates continuous cable runs, so there is no need for costly splicing. Any path can be created once the tube plant is in place. As the network changes, fiber and drops can be added or systems can be reconfigured. The need to plan a network in advance or guess at the future requirements five years down the road is not necessary.

When a break occurs in a cable, a BOF install is easier to repair than conventional fiber. A conventional cable would have to have each individual fiber spliced and the damaged section would have to be sealed and protected--or the damaged section would have to be replaced with two enclosures.

Installation costs for BOF may be slightly higher at first due to the cost of installing the infrastructure and the cost for material. The offset is that labor costs are cheaper and, in most instances, there is no need to install protective inner duct. As a result, the initial installation costs of both conventional fiber cable and BOF are relatively the same.

If the requirement is for long cable runs or where there are only a few fibers and no growth is anticipated, then a traditional cabling method may be preferred. If the future holds additional growth, unknowns and configuration changes, then BOF may be the preferred installation.

For more information from Kitco Fiber Optics:

Kevin Barks is with Kitco Fiber Optics in Virginia Beach, Va.
COPYRIGHT 2004 Nelson Publishing
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Infrastructure; Blown optical fiber
Comment:Optical fiber: blown or conventional? Costs, and ease of installation and repair are determining factors.(Infrastructure)(Blown optical fiber)
Author:Barks, Kevin
Publication:Communications News
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jul 1, 2004
Previous Article:Disaster recovery on a budget: learn how an enterprise solved its storage needs through replication software.
Next Article:Fan tray.

Related Articles
Seeing into the world of fiber optics for security.
Testing tips for network managers.
A-dillar, a-dollar, some money-saving scholars.
Optical fiber arrives at many types of desktops.
Air-blown fiber links past, present, future.
OFS Access Advantage System supports 20km triple play fiber to the premises.
Switches enable fiber to the desk: economical, wall-mountable, managed devices support optical uplinks and copper ports.
Why choose multimode fiber? Total lifecycle costs may be lower and network flexibility greater than with single-mode fiber.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters