Printer Friendly

Opinion: The Times They Are a-Changin': Make Room for a Paperless World.

Summary: The debate is no longer confined to few academics in distant universities. It is now a widely prevalent, mainstream topic of discussion. How will the news of the future be distributed? The jury is still out, but not completely. Increasingly, we are driven to believe that the future will be paperless. Some argue that the AaepaperAAE will be taken out of the AaenewspaperAAE within a few years. Their logic might have come across as farfetched in the late 1990s, but it can hardly be dismissed in 2010.

The debate is no longer confined to few academics in distant universities. It is now a widely prevalent, mainstream topic of discussion. How will the news of the future be distributed? The jury is still out, but not completely. Increasingly, we are driven to believe that the future will be paperless. Some argue that the AaepaperAAE will be taken out of the AaenewspaperAAE within a few years. Their logic might have come across as farfetched in the late 1990s, but it can hardly be dismissed in 2010.

Two American intellectuals added their voices to the chorus of those predicting that print media will not continue to define the news for long. In October 2009, Leonard Downie Jr., Vice President at large and former Executive Editor of The Washington Post, and Michael Schudson, Professor of Communication at Columbia UniversityAAEs Graduate School of Journalism, co-authored a 98-page paper entitled, AaeThe Reconstruction of American JournalismAAE.

Here, they made the assertion that: Aonewspapers and television news are not going to vanish in the foreseeable futureAaBut they will play diminished roles in an emerging and still rapidly changing world of digital journalism, in which the means of news reporting are being re-invented, the character of news is being reconstructed, and reporting is being distributed across a greater number and variety of news organizations, new and old.Ao

The idea is not a new one. In August 24, 2006, The Economist published an article entitled, AaeWho killed the newspaper?AAE, which claimed that, AoOf all the AaeoldAAE media, newspapers have the most to lose from the Internet. Circulation has been falling in America, western Europe, Latin America, Australia and New Zealand for decadesAain the past few years the web has hastened the decline.Ao

While we freely refer to the digital media revolution as Aonew mediaAo, few dare classify print newspapers as AooldAo. The Economist did, nearly four years ago. Considering the speed at which the digital media world is moving Au with the introduction of new gadgets and the level of internet penetration throughout the world Au print papers are now most definitely old and aging.

The magazine also made an interesting reference to Philip Meyer, whose works include Precision Journalism: A Reporter's Introduction to Social Science Methods and Newspaper Ethics in the New Century: A Report to the American Society of Newspaper Editors. In his most recent book, The Vanishing Newspaper, Meyer calculates that Aothe first quarter of 2043 will be the moment when newsprint dies in America as the last exhausted reader tosses aside the last crumpled edition.Ao

More, digital media is making waves not just in the constant improvement of news and information technology, but also influencing the level of trust readers have in the new media. Indeed, it is just about how the news is conveyed Au digitally or on paper - but how our perception of the news is changing altogether.

American intellectual and best-selling author John Mearsheimer didnAAEt neglect to reference the Internet in one of the most important and honest assessments on AoThe Future of PalestineAo. In his recent speech, he stated that Aothe Internet is a game changer. It not only makes it easy for the opponents of apartheid to get the real story out to the world, but it also allows Americans to learn the story that the New York Times and the Washington Post have been hiding from them.Ao

Those familiar with the book Manufacturing Consent, by Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky understand well that traditional media coverage of news is largely determined by AaefiltersAAE which allow competing interests to determine what we read and watch, and thus our perception of the world. The Internet, despite all of its shortcomings, is much more equitable and democratic.

That should not discount the fact that poorer countries still do not have the kind of internet availability, speed and access so widespread in the developed world. But the fact that an online community newspaper has a fighting chance, like any other mainstream newspaper, is certainly worth celebrating as an achievement.

There is also another reason why we will continue to go digital, and why it will only be matter of years before the pendulum turns in favor of paperless media world.

The latest Climate Change conference in Copenhagen failed to set limits on carbon emissions or to come up with any serious or binding agreements. It was a colossal disappointment. But that failure was political more than scientific. Very few still argue that global warming is a hoax, or believe that the environment is sustainable, considering our long-unchecked way of life. More, recycling is no longer a fad. Some countries are debating laws that make recycling mandatory, and to punish violators.

Considering all of this, it is difficult to imagine that years from now we will continue to use and discard newspapers so readily, as if the paper on which news is printed doesnAAEt come from trees, and as if discarded papers donAAEt constitute landfill.

Bob Dylan continues to be right. The Times They Are a-Changin'. And itAAEs time that we also appreciate that change, not resist it; work with it, not against it. There is no shame in embracing change. When the first commercially successful transatlantic telegraph cable was completed in July 1866, some must have thought that humanity had reached the zenith of achievements as far as the field of communications was concerned.

Now telegraphs are only found in museums and are coveted collectorsAAE items. Instead, hundreds of millions of people routinely and conveniently send texts, sounds, images and videos through their cell phones without much fuss or excitement. Although the concept is still the same, the medium has so dramatically changed.

The same can be said about news. The news industry will never die; in fact, in a globalized and interconnected world, we will seek news more than ever before. But the medium will inevitably change, and there is nothing we can do to stop it. It is telling that the most featured and bestselling item from Amazon.com is the Kindle digital reader, and that iPad has been topping news related to publishing technology all around the world.

The Times They Are a-ChanginAAE. And weAAEd better change accordingly.

2009 - The Tripoli Post

Provided by Syndigate.info an Albawaba.com company
COPYRIGHT 2010 Al Bawaba (Middle East) Ltd.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2010 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:The Tripoli Post (Tripoli, Libya)
Article Type:Editorial
Date:May 25, 2010
Words:1136
Previous Article:Opinion: Libyan tourism policy: From aspirations to reality.
Next Article:Gaddafi to Obama: Stand by the Suffering Palestinian People.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters