One step forward, two steps back.
The lessons from GM's trials and tribuations should be carefully benchmarked by the folks at Ford. The Dearborn crew has an excellent opportunity to copy some of GM's plans, starting with bringing some of the breakthrough products from Europe over to our shores. Where's our new Focus? Why wasn't the Galaxy or S-Max given a passport to enter U.S. showrooms? What about the next-generation Mondeo? All of these products, and many more, would give Ford the much needed emotion lacking in several of its products. Along those lines, I thought badge engineering was a product of the '80s and '90s, but it seems Ford's stuck on that retro tune, as the '08 Ford Escape and Mercury Mariner attest. When are they going to get with the program and develop vehicles that have truly unique interiors and exteriors, while sharing the same guts? Why do beltlines have to be the same? Why are all products required to share the same doors? The list goes on and on. Heck, even Chrysler has figured out that you can build truly unique looking vehicles off the same platform, just look at the Dodge Caliber, Jeep Compass and Patriot and the Chrysler Sebring (OK, so the design is less than appealing) and the Dodge Avenger concept as proof.
Some inside Ford tell me that the automaker is on this path. Problem is that others will always be one or two steps ahead if Ford keeps following the trails they leave behind. The new Ford management team needs to take the dramatic steps to assure that they will be a truly global player and leverage their global resources to the best of their ability.
By Kevin M. Kelly, Senior Editor, firstname.lastname@example.org
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Kelly, Kevin M.|
|Publication:||Automotive Design & Production|
|Date:||Nov 1, 2006|
|Previous Article:||Sell the furniture.|
|Next Article:||Deutsch: connecting with Formula One.|