On the mature larva of the western eyed click beetle Alaus melanops LeConte, 1863 with comparison to related species (Coleoptera: Elateridae).
Unlike larval morphology, the morphology of adults is relatively well studied and described (Casari 2003). Larvae of only 3 species have been described to date (blind click beetle A. myops (F., 1801), eastern eyed click beetle A. oculatus (L., 1758), and A. nobilis Salle, 1855 (Boving & Craighead 1931; Peterson 1960; Becker 1991; Casari 2002).
Larvae of Alaus are among the largest predators living in various kinds of dead wood (Dajoz 2000). Despite being intensively studied, especially in the temperate and boreal zones (Siitonen 2001; Bobiec et al. 2005; Stokland et al. 2012), this unique habitat is still poorly known. Some of the gaps in the knowledge result from the scarcity of data on the morphology of immature stages of many saproxylic beetles, which form a significant proportion of all species living in decayed wood and play important roles in the ecosystem (Speight 1989).
The larvae of the genus Alaus are characterized by large size, yellow coloration of body with black head (Fig. 2), distinctly flattened body, semicircular epicranial ridge punctate and setose internally, triangular submentum, mandibles without inner teeth, and 10th abdominal segment with strong teeth (Casari 2002). In this paper, we describe the morphology of the larva of A. melanops and provide taxonomically important characters.
Materials and Methods
The specimens of Alaus melanops LeConte, 1863 were obtained from USA (Oregon, leg. A. Smolis). The larvae were preserved in alcohol. Before examination, they were boiled for 3 to 10 min In 10% KOH, rinsed with distilled water, and placed In distilled water for about an hour to clean and soften the cuticle. All structures were placed in glycerin mounts. Larval structures were examined with a Nikon Eclipse E 600 phase contrast microscope with a drawing tube, and a Nikon SMZ-800 binocular microscope. Photographs were taken with a Canon 500D attached to a Nikon Eclipse SOi and a Nikon D5100 camera attached to a Nikon SMZ-800. Image stacks were processed using Combine ZM (Hadley 2O1O). Plates with figures of selected structures were prepared from larvae. The description and terminology used in this paper follow Casari (2002). Body length was measured along midline from head apex to apex of last abdominal tergum.
The following abbreviation was used in this study:
DIBEC--collection of the Department of Invertebrate Biology, Evolution and Conservation, Institute of Environmental Biology, Faculty of Biological Science, University of Wroctaw, Przybyszewskiego 63/77, Wroctaw, Poland.
Subfamily Agrypninae Candeze, 1857
Tribe Hemirhipini Candeze, 1857
Genus Alaus Eschscholtz, 1829
Alaus melanops LeConte, 1863 (Figs. 1-19)
United States of America: Oregon State, Deschutes County, east slope of Cascade Range, Deschutes National Forest, 11 km NW of Sisters Town, SE slope of Black Butte Mountain, ponderosa pine forest of the Ponderosa Pine Zone (Franklin & Dyrness 1988), 3 larvae ex decayed log, 2-VI-2009, leg. A. Smolis (DIBEC).
Larva, last instar. Length: 45 mm, width of pronotum: 8 mm. Body dorsoventrally flattened. Yellow with black head and dark reddishbrown prothorax; meso-, metanotum, and legs reddish-brown; legs brown. Head (Figs. 2 and 4) prognathous, depressed; dorsal epicranial ridge irregular, semicircular, from frontal arms to near base, very coarsely and irregularly punctate and setose internally (setae not represented); ventral epicranial ridge almost straight, not reaching margins, with row of coarse setose punctures externally; each epicranial plate dorsally with one lateral inclined row of setae, starting in front of stemma and directed outside, and another ventrally parallel lateral margin. One subelliptical stemma dorsolaterally placed at base of each antenna. Coronal suture (Figs. 1 and 8) long; dorsally weak groove extending between frontal arms. Endocarina absent. Frontal suture lyreshaped. Clypeus (= nasale) (Figs. 11 and 12) tridentate dorsally, teeth directed upward; 5 setae on each side of central tooth; integument ventrally rugose, clothed with short setae, and with transverse anterior carina. Anterior margin of clypeus (Fig. 11) distally fringed by ramified yellowish setae; 5 setae on each side of clypeus; 1 row with 5 setae (1 distinctly longer) near border of darker area, 1 short seta more laterally; each half with 11 setae (3 grouped below clypeus) and 1 on each side, near middle of narrower area.
Antennae (Figs. 9 and 10): basal segment dorsally bearing 12 setae (5 broken off, Fig. 9), ventrally bearing 4 setae (Fig. 10); 2nd segment dorsally bearing 10 setae (4 broken off, Fig. 9), ventrally bearing S setae (4 broken off, Fig. 10); apex of 2nd segment with tiny laterointernal cupuliform appendix; distal segment short and cylindrical, distally with 1 extremely long and 2 short setae and 2 dorsal sensorial pores near base.
Mandibles (Fig. 13) much elevated dorsally near acetabulum, deeply grooved laterally on median half; 2 dorsal setae present; penicillus short and brush-like.
Maxillolabial complex (Fig. 14): stipites elongate, membranous in narrow irregular distal area, bearing ventrally 11 setae near anterior half of lateral margin (7 forming a group) and dorsally 12 setae on anterior fourth; galea (Fig. 15) palpiform and 2-segmented; apex of distal segment conical and rounded, bearing 1 cupuliform membranous appendix with microsetae and 4 setae (l distinctly wide and long). Lacinia lobe-like (Fig. 15), membranous at apex, fringed by ramified setae; maxillary palp 4-segmented (Figs. 3, 4, 16 and 17), basal segment ventrally bearing 2 or 3 setae and 10 or 11 sensorial pores (Fig. 17), 2nd segment dorsally with 11 setae (probably 3 of which are broken off, Fig. 16) and ventrally with 10 (probably 3 of which are broken off, Fig. 17), 3rd segment dorsally with 3 setae (Fig. 16) and ventrally 4 (but 1 probably broken off, Fig. 17), 4th segment dorsally with more than 10 thin and relatively short setae near base (Fig. 16) and ventrally with 4 short setae (probably 3 of which are broken off, Fig. 17).
Prementum transverse, hexagonal, membranous in anterior half, bearing 3 ventral setae on each side, arranged in transverse row at border of darker area (internal longest), 2 microsetae near base and 8 sensorial pores near middle (Fig. 19); dorsally with 4 pairs of sensorial pores and 2 pairs of short setae (Fig. 18). Postmentum (Fig. 14) elongate, narrowly triangular (narrowed in distal half with apex constricted, membranous distally, 4 setae on each side near anterior border of darker area (below prementum) and 4 setae (1 broken off) near apex.
Labial palp 2-segmented (Figs. 18 and 19); basal segment dorsally bearing 14 or 15 setae (Fig. 18), ventrally bearing only 2 or 3 setae (Fig. 19); distal segment bearing 7 thin dorsal setae near base, ventrally bearing only 2 short setae (1 broken off) near base (Fig. 19).
Length of pronotum equal to combined length of meso- and metanotum, bearing a transverse row of 19 or 20 long setae (parallel to anterior margin, interrupted at middle), and 2 long and 2 short setae on each side (parallel to posterior margin near lateral angle). Mesosternum with 1 lateroanterior pair of well-developed spiracles, each with 1 seta near internal borders.
Legs: coxa narrow, transverse, bearing moderately stout setae on distal third and long simple setae near margin; trochanter trapezoidal with stout and short setae on basal half and simple and long setae near posterior margin, and 1 short seta near anterior margin; femur elongate with stout and short setae near posterior margin and 2 simple setae at anterior margin; tibia elongate with stout and short setae near lateral and posterior margins, 5 simple setae near middle and 2 (1 longer) near anterior margin; tarsungulus bearing 2 basal setae.
Each side of abdominal segments I--VI11 bearing a pair of laterodorsal anterior spiracles smaller than thoracic ones. Segment IX (Figs. 7 and 8) strongly notched in narrow almost parallel apical area; apex bearing 2 setose well-developed upward-directed tubercles on each side; dorsally with setose tubercles, irregularly arranged, decreasing in size towards base of segment; some marginal larger (Fig. 5). Segment X (Fig. 7) tubular, ventrally bearing 17 to 22 tubercles on each side (4 or 5 posterior larger) and 2 posterior distal hooks; anal orifice surrounded by long setae (Fig. 6).
Larvae develop inside dead and rotting wood of standing or fallen logs of different tree species, e.g., ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa Douglas ex C. Lawson) (Figs. 20 and 21), Jeffrey pine (P.jeffreyi Balf.), lodgepole pine (P. contorta Douglas ex Loudon), Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco) (Pinales: Pinaceae), and several oak species (Quercus; Fagales: Fagaceae). They are predators and attack various insects (e.g., tenebrionid larvae) and other arthropods. Some authors suggest possibility of feeding on rotting wood. Adults, unlike the larvae, feed on nectar and can be observed out of the wood, especially from May to Jul. Adults are sometimes attracted to light (Lane 1971; Furniss & Carolin 1977; Evans & Hogue 2006).
In the original description of the species, LeConte (1863) mentioned A. melanops only from California and Oregon (USA). To date it has been recorded also from British Columbia (Canada), Colorado, Washington, Idaho, Utah, Arizona, Montana, and New Mexico (USA) (Evans & Hogue 2006; compare with map at http://bugguide.net).
Among the known larvae of Alaus (Casari 2002), the mature larva of the western eyed click beetle A. melanops is most similar to the blind click beetle A. myops (compare with Table 1). It is worthy to note that a cladistic analysis based on the adult morphology placed A. melanops close to A. zunianus as sister taxa (Casari 2008). The observed morphological similarity between A. melanops and A. myops (at larval level) contradicts this result and suggests their close relationship. Besides, the current distribution of A. melanops (western North America: British Columbia, Washington, Utah, Oregon, Idaho, Montana, California, Colorado, Arizona, New Mexico; after http://bugguide.net) versus A. myops (eastern North America: Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee, West Virginia, Virginia, Ohio, New Jersey, Maryland, Massachusetts; after http://bugguide.net) could suggest allopatric speciation, probably caused by several glacial periods in the history of the North American continent. In this context, the phylogeography of North American Alaus species is still unclear, and genetic and ecological studies are required to shed light on it.
This research was supported by the Department of Invertebrate Biology, Evolution and Conservation, Institute of Environmental Biology, Faculty of Biological Science, University of Wroclaw (project no. 1076/S/IBS/2015).
Becker E. 1991. Elateridae (Elateroidea), pp. 410-417 In Stehr FW [ed.], Immature Insects, Volume 2. Kendall/Hunt Publishing, Dubuque, Iowa, USA.
Bobiec A, Gutowski JM, Laudenslayer WF, Pawlaczyk P, Zub K. 2005. The Afterlife of a Tree. WWF Poland, Warsaw, Poland.
Boving AG, Craighead FC. 1931. Illustrated synopsis of the principal larval forms of the order Coleoptera. Entomologica Americana, New York 11: 1-352.
Casari SA. 2002. Larvae of Alaus myops, A. oculatus, Chalcolepidius porcatus, Hemirhipus apicalis and generic larval characterization (Elateridae, Agrypninae, Hemirhipini). Iheringia, Serie Zoologia, Porto Alegre 92: 93-110.
Casari SA. 2003. New species of Alaus Eschscholtz, 1829 (Coleoptera : Elateridae, Agrypninae, Hemirhipini). Annales de la Societe entomologique de France (n.s.) 39: 315-333.
Casari SA. 2008. Cladistic analysis of Hemirhipini with establishment of Propalaus gen. nov. (Coleoptera: Elateridae, Agrypninae). Papeis Avulsos de Zoologia (Sao Paulo) 48(16): 139-180.
Dajoz R. 2000. Insects and Forests. The Role and Diversity of Insects in the Forest Environment. Lavoisier, London-Paris-New York.
Evans AV, Hogue JN. 2006. Field Guide to Beetles of California. University of California Press, USA.
Franklin JF, Dyrness CT. 1988. Natural Vegetation of Oregon and Washington. Oregon State University Press, USA.
Furniss RL, Carolin VM. 1977. Western Forest Insects. USDA Forest Service Miscellaneous Publication No. 1339. Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Hadley A. 2010. Combine ZM Software, new version. A. Hadley, Derby, United Kingdom. Available from http://www.hadleyweb.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/ CZP/News.htm (last accessed 14 Jan 2013).
Lane MC. 1971. Family Elateridae [excl. Cardiophorinae], p. 8 In Hatch MH [ed.], Beetles of the Pacific Northwest, Volume 5. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington, USA.
LeConte JL. 1863. New species of North American Coleoptera. Part I. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collection, Washington 167: 1-86.
Peterson A. 1960. Larvae of Insects. An Introduction to Nearctic Species. Part II. Coleoptera, Diptera, Neuroptera, Siphonaptera, Mecoptera, Trichoptera. Published by the author, Columbus.
Siitonen J. 2001. Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecological Bulletins 49: 11-41.
Speight MCD. 1989. Saproxylic invertebrates and their conservation. Nature and Environment Series, Council of Europe, Strasbourg 42: 1-82.
Stokland JN, Siitonen J, Jonsson BG. 2012. Biodiversity in Dead Wood. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA.
Marcin Kadej *, Adrian Smolis, and Dariusz Tarnawski
Department of Invertebrate Biology, Evolution and Conservation, Institute of Environmental Biology, Faculty of Biological Science, University of Wroclaw, Przybyszewskiego 63/77, PL-51-148 Wroclaw, Poland
* Corresponding author; E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Caption: Figs. 1 and 2. Alaus melanops LeConte, 1863. 1, Adult (habitus, dorsal); 2, larva (habitus, dorsal).
Caption: Figs. 3-8. Alaus melanops LeConte, 1863, larva. 3, Head, dorsal; 4, head, ventral; 5, abdominal segments VIII-X, lateral; 6, anus on abdominal segment X; 7, abdominal segment IX, dorsal; 8, abdominal segments IX--X, ventral.
Caption: Figs. 9-19. Alaus melanops LeConte, 1863, larva, 9, Antenna, dorsal; 10, antenna, ventral; 11, clypeus (= nasale), dorsal; 12, frons, dorsal; 13, mandible, dorsal; 14, hypopharyngeal complex, dorsal; 15, galea and lacinia, dorsal; 16, maxillary palp, dorsal; 17, maxillary palp, ventral; 18, labium, dorsal; 19, labium, ventral, Kadej et al.: Morphology of the larva of Alaus melanops
Caption: Figs. 20-21. Habitats of Alaus melanops LeConte, 1863 in Oregon, USA, forest of Ponderosa Pine Zone.
Table 1. Comparison between larvae of some of North American Ataus species. Characteristics A. melanops A. myops (R, 1801) LeConte, 1863 Number of setae on 1 long and 2 short 1 long and 2 short antennal appendix setae setae Apex of galea rounded and tapered blunt and widened Number of setae 4 3 on apex of galea Length of basal setae long (longer than long (longer than on 1st segment of or equal to length or equal to length labial palp of segment) of segment) Number of setae 1 and 2 2 and 4 on cardo and cardines Number of setae on 5 3 each side of central clypeal tooth Shape of the base slightly narrowed rounded of frons Position of lateral near middle of near middle of setae of frons lateral margin anterior margin Length of setae long (at least 3 or long (at least 3 or on segment IX 4 times longer than 4 times longer than tubercles) tubercles) Shape of indentation V-shaped V-shaped between apices of segment IX Tuberculation of distinct distinct dorsal side of segment IX Number of tubercles 17-22 17 on segment X Characteristics A. oculatus (L., 1758) Number of setae on Only 1 long seta antennal appendix Apex of galea rounded and tapered Number of setae 3 on apex of galea Length of basal setae short (distinctly on 1st segment of shorter than length labial palp of segment) Number of setae 3 and 6 on cardo and cardines Number of setae on 4 each side of central clypeal tooth Shape of the base rounded of frons Position of lateral near middle of setae of frons lateral margin Length of setae short (maximum twice as on segment IX long as tubercles) Shape of indentation U-shaped between apices of segment IX Tuberculation of feeble dorsal side of segment IX Number of tubercles 16 on segment X
Please note: Some tables or figures were omitted from this article.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Research Papers|
|Author:||Kadej, Marcin; Smolis, Adrian; Tarnawski, Dariusz|
|Date:||Dec 1, 2015|
|Previous Article:||Sucrose triggers honeydew preference in the ghost ant, Tapinoma melanocephalum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).|
|Next Article:||Diel flight activity patterns of the red palm weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) as monitored by smart traps.|