On the infrastructure and identity of the eyes of Cyphophthalmi based on a study of Stylocellus sp. (Opiliones, Stylocellidae).
The exceptional position of these eyes in some Cyphophthalmi is enigmatic and raises the question of homology with respect to other eyes in Opiliones. Clarifying the homology of the stylocellid eyes is not a trivial task (see also Sharma & Giribet 2006). Embryology evidently shows that the medially positioned eyes of most Opiliones are true median (primary) eyes (Moritz 1957; Murioz-Cuevas 1981). Since Cyphophthalmi is now regarded as the sister group to all other Opiliones (Shultz 1998; Giribet et al. 1999, 2002), it may be questioned whether these stylocellid (and pettalidid) eyes are displaced median eyes or whether they are true lateral eyes retained only in these groups (Stylocellidae and Pettalidae) as a plesiomorphy (Shear 1993b; Giribet et al. 2002). As a contribution towards solving this fundamental problem, the eyes of a stylocellid species were investigated here for the first time using light and electron microscopy.
Two males of Stylocellus sp. collected in Thailand (Krabi Province, Khao Phanom Bencha National Park, rain forest, 22.VII.2005, 8[degrees]14'19.9"N, 98[degrees]55'11.0"E) by P. Schwendinger were, after videotaping, cut into pieces with a razor blade and fixed in cold 3.5% buffered glutaraldehyde (phosphate buffer pH 7.4; 0.1M) for about 2 h. A 2%, buffered Os[O.sub.4]-solution for another 2 h was used for post-fixation. The specimens were then dehydrated in graded ethanol series and embedded in Araldite. Ultrathin sections (70 nm) were obtained with a Leica-Ultracut using a diamond knife. Sections were stained with uranylacetate and lead citrate. Semithin sections (400 nm) stained according to Richardson et al. (1960) were used for general orientation with a light microscope Olympus BX60 with digital camera DP 10 (LM). A JEOL JEM-1011 transmission electron microscope (TEM) was used for examining the sections. For 3-D reconstruction Amira software (Mercury Computer Systems GmbH) was used. One specimen, fixed in the same way as the one used for TEM, was studied after critical point drying with a Zeiss DSM 940A scanning electron microscope (SEM).
In the living animals, the eyes are distinct and shiny due to their almost smooth lenses, which slightly project (Figs. 1,4). Sections through the eyes reveal that they are prominent, nearly spherical structures comprising a uniconvex cuticular lens, a thin electron-dense lentigen layer and a group of cells arranged spherically forming the sensory part, i.e., the retina. The latter is partly surrounded by a thick layer of pigment cells containing numerous mostly densely staining granules. The optic nerve leaves the structure penetrating this latter layer (Figs. 2, 3, 19).
[FIGURES 1-3 OMITTED]
Lens.--The slightly projecting lens is composed of multi-layered cuticle (thickness: about 50[micro]m) which appears hardly modified when compared to the adjacent cuticle (Figs. 5, 6). The cuticle seems to be strongly sclerotized. A very thin epicuticle is found (Fig. 5). The outer surface of the lens is covered with protuberances, which are slightly smaller than those found in adjacent parts (Fig. 4, inset).
Lentigen layer.--The lentigen layer is composed of flat, densely staining cells containing densely staining nuclei. A thin basal lamina is present (Figs. 5, 7). The lentigen layer is continuous with the epidermal layer (Figs. 2, 6).
Retina.--The nearly hemispherical retina is composed of a layer of epithelial retinular cells containing basally (or peripherally) located nuclei with a distinctive arrangement of heterochromatin (Fig. 6). The patches of heterochromatin are attached to the nuclear envelope, which here does not show nuclear pores, and they are regularly interrupted by heterochromatin-free regions (Figs. 8, 9, 19). In these latter regions many nuclear pores are located (Fig. 9).These nuclei are not found in the region of the retina directed toward the lens (Figs. 3, 5). Adjacent to the nuclei, conspicuous and quite large whorls of membranes occur. In the center of these whorls, dense granules are frequently located (Figs. 8, 10). In this nuclear region and slightly towards the center of the retina, the cells contain many moderate-densely staining granules, which originate from small Golgi bodies (Fig. 11). Further centrally, the cytoplasm of these cells is dominated by numerous cisterns or lamellae arranged (in the sections) in circles, which frequently contain more of such circles. It seems that some of the dense granules come into contact with these cisterns and may discharge their contents in the space between the membranes (Figs. 7, 12). There are also cytoplasmic processes interdigitating with similar structures of a neighboring cell (Figs. 13, 14). Though a regular arrangement of rhabdomeric microvilli was not found, we postulate that this area represents a simple closed rhabdom. Furthermore, a small area of irregularly arranged microvilli which are provided by cells similar to those just described was found rather close to the origin of the optic nerve (Figs. 15, 16). In this region, representing a rather disordered open rhabdom, centrioles were found (Fig. 17 inset). The retinular cells are connected by small zonulae adhaerentes (Fig. 16). The optic nerve is composed of processes of the retinular cells which are found at the periphery of the structure converging upon the origin of the nerve (Figs. 17, 19, 21). In addition to these retinular cells which are easily recognized because, e.g., of the very peculiar nuclei, we found a few nuclei which were distinctly smaller and more dense (Figs. 3, 6, 19). These nuclei likely belong to glial cells which extend with flat processes between the retinular cells. Similar nuclei were also found in the optic nerve. Rarely small cell processes were observed containing small vesicles. These processes likely represent nerve endings (Fig. 18). The retinular cells may differ with regard to electron-density of their cytoplasm. They are also partly shrunk with distinct intercellular spaces running between each other. Such differences may reflect different physiological phases. The retina is surrounded by a thin basal lamina. In one of the eyes we observed a thin cross-striated muscle fiber (Figs. 9, 20) between the basal lamina and the layer of retinular cells.
[FIGURES 4-6 OMITTED]
Pigment layer.--Pigment cells are not only found surrounding the retinular cells, but also distant from the eye. These cells are evidently derived from connective tissue or fat bodies. However, they are distinctly concentrated around the retinular cells leaving free only the part of the retina under the lens. The pigment cells are dominated by very densely staining granules, which surround a moderate to densely staining ovoid cytoplasm and nucleus (Figs. 2, 6, 19). However, there are also larger electron-lucent inclusions or small vacuoles containing irregularly shaped components. Furthermore, some of the inclusions seem to contain crystalline material. These latter inclusions are found only opposite to the lens (Fig. 20). The layer of pigment cells is bordered by a thin basal lamina.
[FIGURES 7-10 OMITTED]
A few cells of unknown function are found between the basal lamina of the pigment cells and the basal lamina surrounding the retina. A small trachea enters the pigment layer.
Optic nerve.--The optic nerve leaves the retina at the posterior inner border of the eye (Figs. 3, 19). It penetrates the layer of pigment cells and is composed of more than 40 axons (Figs. 19, 21). The axons are moderately densely stained and contain numerous microtubules, some mitochondria and occasionally also some of the granules described from the retinular cells (see above). The axons are accompanied and surrounded by extensions of glial cells, which are more electron-lucent than the axons themselves. A thin basal lamina surrounds the nerve. A small trachea runs along with the nerve but outside its basal lamina (Fig. 21).
Extant Arachnida typically have one pair of median (primary) eyes and up to five pairs of lateral (secondary) eyes (Paulus 1979, 2004; Weygoldt & Paulus 1979; Giribet et al. 2002) classified as ocelli. Exceptions are, besides Opiliones (see below), Pseudoscorpiones (Weygoldt 1969), and anactinotrichid mites (Anactinotrichida = Parasitiformes s.l.) (Alberti 2006; Dunlop & Alberti 2007), which have no median eyes, and the eyeless Palpigradi. The extant Ricinulei are usually considered to lack eyes although they bear more or less distinct light spots on the cuticle that may be associated with light reception. A similar situation is found in Schizomida (e.g., Moritz 1993).
[FIGURES 11-14 OMITTED]
The presence of laterally positioned eyes in Cyphophthalmi is remarkable for two reasons. First, presence of eyes in this group was, until recently, regarded as exceptional, being restricted to some species of Stylocellidae (the detection of eyes in Pettalidae as reported above makes this less peculiar). Second, the lateral position of these eyes is remarkable since eyes of Opiliones are usually located medially and are frequently referred to as median eyes (e.g., Kaestner 1935; Paulus 2004), although several cases of a lateral migration of the median eyes are known in Laniatores. Hence the question with regard to Stylocellidae (and Pettalidae) is whether these eyes represent lateral eyes homologous to those occurring in most of the other Arachnida or whether these eyes are displaced median eyes, as is the case in the abovementioned derived Laniatores, as already discussed by Juberthie (1964). However, Shear (1993a, b) homologized stylocellid eyes with arachnid lateral eyes because of the presence of a tapetum indicative of many lateral eyes; a tapetum is always lacking in median eyes. This interpretation of the stylocellid eyes was accepted by Giribet et al. (2002). Another possibility could be that these eyes are secondarily evolved, as those detected in oribatid mites (Alberti & Fernandez 1988). The evidence presented here refutes this latter hypothesis.
The eyes of Stylocellus sp. are largely composed of the same components as the median eyes of other Opiliones (e.g., Purcell 1894; Scheuring 1914; Juberthie 1964; Curtis 1970; Schliwa 1979; Meyer-Rochow & Liddle 1988). These authors observed cuticular lenses, which are often biconvex, contrasting with the simple uniconvex lens of Stylocellus. A vitreous (glassy) body is located under the lens, which is comprised of a modified epidermal layer and hence corresponds to the less modified lentigen layer in Stylocellus. A pronounced vitreous body is evidently not developed in Stylocellus. The preretinal and postretinal membranes correspond to the basal laminae of the lentigen layer, retina and pigment cell layer. The retina of Stylocellus evidently is comparable to the more complex retina of other harvestmen. As in other Opiliones there is a conspicuous layer of pigment cells.
Peculiarities of the Stylocellus eyes are mainly found in the retina, which unfortunately is yet not completely understood based solely on the studied material. The reason for this is the peculiar arrangement and shape of retinular cells, which do not show an evident regular organization of the retina, and the limited material available for this study. At present we can distinguish two cell types, retinular cells (receptor cells) and glial cells (corresponding probably to the sheath cells of Schliwa 1979). We could furthermore recognize distinct regions in the retina: a nuclear region with conspicuous whorls of membranes and numerous dense granules, a region characterized by many membranes or lamellae and interdigitations between neighboring cells. These interdigitations may be regarded as forming a poorly developed closed rhabdom. Finally we found a region with distinct, but irregularly arranged microvilli forming a rather disordered, open rhabdom. Remarkably, this latter part of the retina is not found close to the lens but, instead, opposite to it, close to the origin of the optic nerve, suggesting an inverse (indirect) orientation. The retina thus shows a differentiation into a distal and a proximal part with a distal, closed and everse rhabdom and a proximal open and inverse rhabdom. However, we could not yet discriminate different types of retinular cells, i.e., (proximal) retinular cells and distal retinular cells, contributing to these rhabdoms (see Schliwa 1979). All the retinular cells show similar ultrastructure, except for varying cytoplasmic densities as mentioned above. We also could not detect the arhabdomeric (or eccentric) cells known from other Opiliones, as well as from other chelicerates including Limulus (e.g., Fahrenbach 1975, 1999; Fleissner & Siegler 1979; Schliwa 1979; Kaiser & Alberti 1991; Alberti & Coons 1999). However, the few processes representing putative nerve endings may indicate an efferent innervation known also from other chelicerate eyes, which have been shown to induce the movements of pigment granules according to a circadian clock in scorpions (Fleissner & Schliwa 1977; Fleissner 1986). Displacement of pigments as an adaptation to varying light intensities has long been known from, e.g., spiders and may also be induced through stimuli by these efferent nerves (e.g., Scheuring 1914; Fahrenbach 1999). Membranous cisterns or lamellae have also been described from other arachnid eyes including Opiliones (e.g., Schliwa 1979). In Stylocellus the very conspicuous whorls of membranes in the nuclear region are most remarkable. We suggest that all these membranous structures are signs of a high membrane turnover, probably related to circadian changes of sensitivity as reported from other chelicerates (e.g., Blest 1978; Fleissner 1986; Fahrenbach 1999).
[FIGURES 15-18 OMITTED]
A remarkable feature is the presence of different types of granules in the pigment cells. Besides densely staining pigment granules, there are lucent granules containing irregular inclusions or even crystalline material. These inclusions seem to be concentrated in the background of the eye and may represent a tapetum (corroborating Shear's observation 1993a, b) and thus correspond to the peculiar positioned proximal, open rhabdom of the retina (see above). Presence of a tapetum is interpreted as an adaptation to nocturnal life, but may also be advantageous to species living in cryptic environments, as is the case of Cyphophthalmi. It is lacking, e.g., in the diurnal jumping spiders (Eakin & Brandenburger 1971).
It can be concluded that the eyes of Stylocellus largely correspond structurally to those known from other Opiliones, though being much simplified. In contrast to other eyes described from harvestmen, Stylocellus' eyes appear to present a partly inverse retina directed towards a tapetum suggesting that these eyes might really represent lateral (secondary) eyes (Shear 1993a, b). However, the tapetum of Stylocellus differs strikingly from the tapeta known from spiders, whip scorpions and whip spiders, or the early derivative opilioacarid mite Neocarus texanus (Chamberlin & Mulaik 1942). In these taxa, tapeta represent distinct layers of specialized cells containing flat crystalline material (Scheuring 1914; Baccetti & Bedini 1964; Homann 1971; Meyer-Rochow 1987; Kaiser & Alberti 1991; Weygoldt 2000). This is evidently not the case in Stylocellus. Here the putative tapetum is simply a modification of certain pigment cells. Tracing the optic nerve into the brain may help to solve this problem of eye homology in Stylocellus. Also clarifying embryonic development of the eyes would be helpful. Do they develop by invagination as the typical median eyes of Chelicerata including Opiliones (Moritz 1957; Paulus 1979, 2004)? In any case it is evident that the presence of eyes in most Stylocellidae (and most Pettalidae) is a plesiomorphic character within Cyphophthalmi (Sharma & Giribet 2006; Boyer et al. 2007), and therefore the lack of eyes in all members of the families Neogoveidae, Ogoveidae, Sironidae and Troglosironidae must be a derived adaptation to a cryptic mode of life pretty much limited to the leaf litter environments, caves, or the soil.
[FIGURES 19-21 OMITTED]
Following our observations, which did not show fundamental differences in the laterally positioned eyes of Stylocellus with those of Phalangida, the interpretation that median (primary) eyes moved laterally in the evolution of Cyphophthalmi and later disappeared in most taxa of mite harvestmen seems most likely to us. In accord with the study of Munoz-Cuevas (1981) on eye regression in Ischyropsalis species, the simplified lens and the absent vitreous body may be regarded as signs of regression in the eyes of Stylocellus.
While stylocellid eyes are conspicuous and located in front of the ozophores, pettalid eyes seem to have suffered a process of internalization. Pettalid eyes are, when found, located at the base of the ozophore (e.g., in Chileogovea, Pettalus, and some Rakaia), while species of Aoraki, Austropurcellia, Neopurcellia, and some Rakaia have the eyes incorporated into the ozophore (Sharma & Giribet 2006; Boyer & Giribet 2007). This type of eye is only visible in light microscopy, but not appreciated through scanning electron microscopy, as the eye lacks a cuticular lens entirely. Whether this particular pettalid eye is ultrastructurally similar to the stylocellid eye described in this study remains to be determined.
We are indebted to Peter Schwendinger (MHNG) for providing a live specimen for study. We also wish to thank H. Fischer, P. Michalik, and Ch. Putzar (all University of Greifswald) for technical assistance. Paula Cushing, Jeff Shultz and an anonymous reviewer provided comments that helped to improve this article.
Manuscript received 17 December 2007, revised 8 June 2008.
Alberti, G. 2006 [for 2005]. On some fundamental characteristics in acarine morphology. Atti della Accademia Nazionale Italiana di Entomologia. R.A. 53:315-360.
Alberti, G. & L.B. Coons. 1999. Acari--Mites. Pp. 515-1265. In Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates, Vol. 8C. (F.W. Harrison, ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
Alberti, G. & N.A. Fernandez. 1988. Fine structure of a secondarily developed eye in the freshwater moss mite Hydrozetes lemnae (Coggi, 1899Acari: Oribatida). Protoplasma 146:106-117.
Baccetti, B. & C. Bedini. 1964. Research on the structure and physiology of the eyes of a lycosid spider. I.--Microscopic and ultramicroscopic structure. Archives Italiennes de Biologie 102:97-122.
Blest, A.D. 1978. The rapid synthesis and destruction of photoreceptor membrane by a dinopid spider: a daily cycle. Proceedings of the Royal Society (London) B 200:463-483.
Boyer, S.L., R.M. Clouse, L.R. Benavides, P. Sharma, P.J. Schwendinger, I. Kuranarathna & G. Giribet. 2007. Biogeography of the world: a case study from cyphophthalmid Opiliones, a globally distributed group of arachnids. Journal of Biogeography 34:2070-2085.
Boyer, S.L. & G. Giribet. 2007. A new model Gondwanan taxon: systematics and biogeography of the harvestman family Pettalidae (Arachnida, Opiliones, Cyphophthalmi), with a taxonomic revision of genera from Australia and New Zealand. Cladistics 23:337-361.
Curtis, D.J. 1970. Comparative aspects of the fine structure of the eyes of Phalangida (Arachnida) and certain correlations with habitat. Journal of Zoology (London) 160:231-265.
Dunlop, J.A. & G. Alberti. 2008. The affinities of mites and ticks: a review. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 46:1-18.
Eakin, R.M. & J.L. Brandenburger. 1971. Fine structure of the eyes of jumping spiders. Journal of Ultrastructure Research 37:616-663.
Fahrenbach, W.H. 1975. The visual system of the horseshoe crab, Limulus polyphemus. International Review of Cytology 41:285-349.
Fahrenbach, W.H. 1999. Merostomata. Pp. 21-115. In Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates, Volume 8A. (F.W. Harrison, ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
Fleissner, G. 1986. Die innere Uhr und der Lichtsinn von Skorpionen und Kafern. Die Naturwissenschaften 73:78-88.
Fleissner, G. & M. Schliwa. 1977. Neurosecretory fibres in the median eyes of the scorpion, Androctonus australis L. Cell and Tissue Research 178:189-198.
Fleissner, G. & W. Siegler. 1979. Arhabdomeric cells in the retina of the median eyes of the scorpion. Die Naturwissenschaften 65:210-211.
Giribet, G. & S.L. Boyer. 2002. A cladistic analysis of the cyphophthalmid genera (Opiliones, Cyphophthalmi). Journal of Arachnology 30:110-128.
Giribet, G., G.D. Edgecombe, W.C. Wheeler & C. Babbitt. 2002. Phylogeny and systematic position of Opiliones: a combined analysis of chelicerate relationships using morphological and molecular data. Cladistics 18:5-70.
Giribet, G., M. Rambla, S. Carranza, M. Riutort, J. Baguna & C. Ribera. 1999. Phylogeny of the arachnid order Opiliones (Arthropoda) inferred from a combined approach of complete 18S, partial 28S ribosomal DNA sequences and morphology. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 11:296-307.
Gutjahr, M., R. Schuster & G. Alberti. 2006. Ultrastructure of dermal and defence glands in Cyphophthalmus duricorius Joseph, 1868. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica, supplementum 1:41-48.
Homann, H. 1971. Die Augen der Araneae. Anatomie, Ontogenie und Bedeutung fur die Systematik (Chelicerata, Arachnida). Zeitschrift fur Morphologie der Tiere 69:201-272.
Janczyk, F.S.W. 1956. Anatomie von Siro duricorius Joseph im Vergleich mit anderen Opilioniden. Sitzungsberichte der Osterreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-naturwis senschaftliche Klasse. Abteilung I. 165:475-522.
Joseph, G. 1868. Cyphophthalmus duricorius, eine neue Arachnidengattung aus einer neuen Familie der Arthrogastren-Ordnung entdeckt in der Lueger Grotte in Krain. Berliner Entomologische Zeitung 12:241-250.
Juberthie, C. 1964. Recherches sur la biologie des Opilions. Annales de Speleologie 19:5-238.
Kaestner, A. 1935. Opiliones. Pp. 300-393. In Handbuch der Zoologie, Volume 3. (W. Kukenthal & T. Krumbach, eds.). Walter de Gruyter Verlag, Berlin und Leipzig.
Kaiser, T. & G. Alberti. 1991. The fine structure of the lateral eyes of Neocarus texanus Chamberlin and Mulaik, 1942 (Opilioacarida, Acari, Arachnida, Chelicerata). Protoplasma 163:19-33.
Martens, J. 1978. Spinnentiere, Arachnida: Weberknechte, Opiliones. Pp. 1-464. In Die Tierwelt Deutschlands, Teil 64. (K. Senglaub, H.-J. Hannemann & H. Schumann, eds.). G. Fischer-Verlag, Jena.
Meyer-Rochow, V.B. 1987. Aspects of functional anatomy of the eyes of the whip-scorpion Thelyphonus caudatus (Chelicerata: Arachnida) and a discussion of their putative performance as photoreceptors. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 17:325-341.
Meyer-Rochow, V.B. & A.R. Liddle. 1988. Structure and function of the eyes of two species of opilionid from New Zealand glow-worm caves (Megalopsalis tumida: Palpatores, and Hendea myersi cavernicola: Laniatores). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 233:293-319.
Moritz, M. 1957. Zur Embryonalentwicklung der Phalangiiden (Opiliones, Palpatores) unter besonderer Berucksichtigung der ausseren Morphologie, der Bildung des Mitteldarmes und der Genitalanlage. Zoologische Jahrbucher, Abteilung fur Anatomie 76:331-370.
Moritz, M. 1993. Unterstamm Arachnata. Pp. 64-442. In Lehrbuch der Speziellen Zoologie (begr. von A. Kaestner), 4th Edition. Band. 1: Wirbellose Tiere. 4th Teil: Arthropoda. (H.E. Gruner, ed.). G. Fischer Verlag, Jena, Germany.
Munoz-Cuevas, A. 1981. Developpement, rudimentation et regression de l'oeil chez les opilions (Arachnida) recherches morpholo giques, physiologiques et experimentales. Memoires due Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, nouvelle serie, serie A, Zoologie 120:1-117, pl. 1-10.
Paulus, H.F. 1979. Eye structure and the monophyly of the Arthropoda. Pp. 299-383. In Arthropod Phylogeny. (A.P. Gupta, ed.). Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Paulus, H.F. 2004. Einiges zur Stammesgeschichte der Spinnentiere (Arthropoda, Chelicerata). Pp. 547-574. In Diversitat und Biologie von Webspinnen, Skorpionen und anderen Spinnentieren. (K. Thaler, ed.). Denisia 12, Linz, Austria.
Pinto-da-Rocha, R., G. Machado & G. Giribet. 2007. Harvestmen The Biology of Opiliones. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 597 pp.
Purcell, F. 1894. Uber den Bau der Phalangidenaugen. Zeitschrift fur wissenschaftliche Zoologie 58:1-53, Tables 1, 2.
Richardson, K.C., L. Jarett & E.H. Finke. 1960. Embedding in epoxy resinsfor ultrathinsectioning in electronmicroscopy. Stain Technology 35:313-325.
Scheuring, L. 1914. Die Augen der Arachnoideen. II. Zoologische Jahrbucher, Abteilung fur Anatomie 37:369-464, Tables 31-34.
Schliwa, M. 1979. The retina of the phalangid, Opilio ravennae, with particular reference to arhabdomeric cells. Cell and Tissue Research 204:473-495.
Sharma, P. & G. Giribet. 2006. A new Pettalus species (Opiliones, Cyphophthalmi, Pettalidae) from Sri Lanka with a discussion on the evolution of eyes in Cyphophthalmi. Journal of Arachnology 34:331-341.
Shear, W.A. 1993a. The genus Troglosiro and the new family Troglosironidae (Opiliones, Cyphophthalmi). Journal of Arachnology 21:81-90.
Shear, W.A. 1993b. New species in the opilionid genus Stylocellus from Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines (Opiliones, Cyphophthalmi, Stylocellidae). Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society 9:174-188.
Shultz, J.W. 1998. Phylogeny of Opiliones (Arachnida): an assessment of the "Cyphopalpatores" concept. Journal of Arachnology 26:257-272.
Weygoldt, P.1969. The Biology of Pseudoscorpions. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 145 pp.
Weygoldt, P. 2000. Whip Spiders (Chelicerata: Amblypygi). Their Biology, Morphology and Systematics. Apollo Books, Stenstrup, Denmark. 163 pp.
Weygoldt, P. & H.F. Paulus. 1979. Untersuchungen zur Morphologie, Taxonomie und Phylogenie der Chelicerata. I. Morphologische Untersuchungen. Zeitschrift fur zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung 17:85-116.
Gerd Alberti (1,3), Elisabeth Lipke (1) and Gonzalo Giribet (2): (1) Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University, Zoological Institute & Museum, Johann-Sebastian-Bach-Strasse 11/12, D-17487 Greifswald, Germany; (2) Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology & Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA (3) Corresponding author. E-mail: email@example.com
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Alberti, Gerd; Lipke, Elisabeth; Giribet, Gonzalo|
|Publication:||The Journal of Arachnology|
|Date:||May 1, 2008|
|Previous Article:||Microhabitat use by Peucetia flava (Oxyopidae) on the glandular plant Rhyncanthera dichotoma (Melastomataceae).|
|Next Article:||Success of managed realignment for the restoration of salt-marsh biodiversity: preliminary results on ground-active spiders.|