Printer Friendly

Olfactory neuroblastoma: a case report and review of the literature.

Abstract

Malignant tumors of the nasal cavity are rare. We report the case of an elderly woman who consulted us with a 4-year history of progressive nasal obstruction, occasional epistaxis, facial pain, and watering of the eyes. A diagnosis of olfactory neuroblastoma was established by histopathology and confirmed by immunohistochemistry. On staging, the mass was classified as a Kadish stage B tumor. The mass was excised via a lateral rhinotomy approach, and the tumor was peeled away completely from the cribriform plate with endoscopes. The patient underwent postoperative radiation, and she was free of recurrence at follow-up 15 months later.

Introduction

Malignant tumors of the nasal cavity are rare. Olfactory neuroblastomas (esthesioneuroblastomas) account for only 6% of these neoplasms. (1) Fewer than 1,000 cases have been reported in the literature since this tumor was first described more than 75 years ago. (2) These lesions can be easily missed because the presenting symptoms mimic those of benign tumors of the nose. They are often discovered incidentally during septoplasty or polypectomy. (3) Because olfactory neuroblastomas are so uncommon, few data exist with respect to optimum management strategies, although diagnostic and treatment modalities have improved over the past 2 decades. (3-5) Treatment recommendations range from a minimally invasive approach (6) to craniofacial resection combined with radiotherapy. (7)

In this article, we report a new case of olfactory neuroblastoma.

Case report

A 67-year-old woman consulted us with a 4-year history of progressive nasal obstruction, occasional epistaxis, facial pain, and watering of the eyes. On rhinoscopy, a polypoid mass was seen in the roof of her nose; the mass was not attached to the septum or lateral wall. Her vision in both eyes was normal, and her eye movements were unrestricted. Findings on the remainder of the head and neck examination were unremarkable. The patient had undergone two surgical procedures elsewhere--3 and 1 years prior to presentation--during which intranasal excision of the mass had been attempted. These operations ultimately failed because of an incomplete removal of the mass and a lack of postoperative radiotherapy.

We performed an intranasal biopsy with local anesthesia, which was completed with minimal bleeding. On histopathologic analysis, the tumor was identified as an olfactory neuroblastoma (figure 1, A). This finding was confirmed by immunohistochemistry, which was positive for chromogranin, synaptophysin, neuron-specific enolase, and neurofilament (figure 1, B). Computed tomography (CT) confirmed that the tumor arose from the cribriform area; no intracranial extension was seen (figure 2, A). The ipsilateral anterior and postethmoid cells were involved, but the maxillary and sphenoid sinuses were free of tumor. The mass was removed via a lateral rhinotomy approach, and the tumor was peeled away completely from the cribriform plate with endoscopes.

Two weeks after surgery, the patient received 6,000 cGy of radiation in 30 fractions. At follow-up 15 months later, she was free of recurrence (figure 2, B).

Discussion

Olfactory neuroblastomas arise from olfactory neuroepithelium, which extends from the roof of the nose to the area of the superior turbinates and a portion of the nasal septum. (7) From there, they can readily extend into the cribriform plate of the ethmoid sinus. Most of the cases described in the literature involved adults, but 1 case has been reported in a child as young as 2 years of age. (8)

Symptoms. The most common symptoms of olfactory neuroblastoma are nasal obstruction, epistaxis, and headache (patients with extensive tumors may have orbital symptoms such as proptosis and excessive lacrimation). (9) Because most of these symptoms are similar to those of benign nasal disease, olfactory neuroblastoma is often missed during its early stages and not diagnosed until it has reached an advanced stage.

Investigation. High-resolution CT and magnetic resonance imaging can be used as complementary investigations to precisely delineate the extent of the tumor and to define the involvement of the cribriform plate, anterior cranial fossa, and retromaxillary space. Endoscopic examination is essential for evaluating the extent of the tumor and for obtaining a biopsy specimen.

Microscopic analysis. The typical histologic appearance of an olfactory neuroblastoma includes the presence of characteristic cells separated into nests or compartments by fibrovascular septae, neurofibrillary intercellular matrices, and rosette formations. The histologic diagnosis is often confounded by the various arrangements of cells packed in sheets and by an architecture that is similar to many neurogenic tumors. Immunohistochemistry, however, can lead to a definitive diagnosis; this tumor is positive for neuroendocrine markers such as chromogranin, synaptophysin, neuron-specific enolase, and protein gene product 9.5. (10)

Staging. Because malignant lesions of the nasal cavity are so rare and because many different histologic types of tumors abound, no approved classification and staging system has been universally accepted.

* The Hyams classification (grades I through IV) is based on histologic differentiation; the grade IV designation is used to describe undifferentiated sinonasal carcinomas. (11)

* More well accepted is the Kadish classification system (stages A through C), which is based on the clinical spread of the tumor: stage A tumors are confined to the nasal cavity, stage B lesions involve the sinuses, and stage C masses revolve the middle cranial fossa and the retrobulbar orbit. (12) Reservations about the Kadish system are based on the premise that there are minimal differences in the biologic behavior of stage A, B, and C tumors. Nevertheless, tumors in each of these classifications behave differently with respect to progression and metastasis and, therefore, survival patterns are different.

* Biller et al introduced yet another classification system, which takes into account the size of the primary tumor and the presence or absence of regional and distant metastasis. (13)

Treatment. Surgical resection is the clear treatment of choice, but opinions vary as to its extent. Billet et al recommended craniofacial resection of all tumors, regardless of whether they invade the anterior cranial fossa or are confined to the nasal roof. (13) They advocated resection of the dura over the cribriform plate, the olfactory bulb, the entire ethmoid labyrinth, and the anterior and posterior walls of the frontal sinus.

Preoperative irradiation appears to have no beneficial effect. Postoperatively, some authors have recommended radiotherapy only for advanced tumors, while others have suggested that it should be administered to all patients regardless of tumor stage. (14) As of now, craniofacial resection combined with radiotherapy is considered the gold standard in the management of these tumors. (15)

Radical surgery of early lesions (Kadish stages A and B) is not performed at all centers. The results of transnasal endoscopic resection followed by radiation have been reported to be comparable to those of craniofacial resection. (15) The pursuit of minimally invasive techniques has also led to the use of endoscopic resection of the tumor combined with stereotactic irradiation of the frontal skull base with a gamma-ray knife. (6) This approach obviates the need for skin incisions and midface degloving and avoids the morbidity associated with conventional radiation therapy (e.g., optic neuropathy or retinopathy). Neck dissection is indicated only in the presence of nodes; elective dissection appears to be unnecessary.

The role of induction chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiation therapy has not been defined. We know that olfactory neuroblastoma is chemosensitive and responsive to platinum-based agents, (16,17) but chemotherapy is currently reserved for unresectable or recurrent tumors and for metastases.

Metastasis. Olfactory neuroblastomas have the potential to spread regionally. Neck metastasis can occur early in the disease or many years later. Rinaldo et al reviewed 320 cases at 15 centers and found that the incidence of both synchronous and metachronous neck metastases varied greatly, ranging from 5 to 100% (mean: 23.4%). (10) As is true for most head and neck cancers, cervical lymphadenopathy augurs poorly and increases the risk of distant metastasis, most often to bones. (18)

Recurrence. Despite aggressive therapy, recurrence can develop soon after treatment or even several years later. Researchers at the Mayo Clinic reported that 42% of local recurrences developed within 5 years postoperatively and that 1 case recurred as late as 10 years after surgery. (19) In a review of 40 patients, Eden et al reported a recurrence rate of 55%; two-thirds of these patients had locoregional disease, and 39% of them developed recurrences within 5 years of combined-modality (surgery plus radiation) treatment. (20) Finally, researchers at the University of Iowa reported 5-and 10-year actuarial disease-free survival rates of 56 and 42%, respectively. (4)

In conclusion, olfactory neuroblastoma requires aggressive surgical resection and radiation therapy. Patients must be followed carefully with the understanding that locoregional recurrences are common and may arise several years after treatment. The prognosis for long-term survival is poor.

References

(1.) Svane-Knudsen V, Jorgensen KE, Hansen O, et al. Cancer of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses: A series of 115 patients. Rhinology 1998;36:12-14.

(2.) Berger L, Luc H, Richard R. L'Esthesioneuroepitheliome olfactif. Bull Cancer (Paris) 1924;13:1410-21.

(3.) Argiris A, Dutra J, Tseke P, Haines K. Esthesioneuroblastoma: The Northwestern University experience. Laryngoscope 2003;113: 155-60.

(4.) Simon JH, Zhen W, McCulloch TM, et al. Esthesioneuroblastoma: The University of Iowa experience 1978-1998. Laryngoscope 2001;111:488-93.

(5.) Lund VJ, Howard D, Wei W, Spittle M. Olfactory neuroblastoma: Past, present, and future? Laryngoscope 2003;113:502-7.

(6.) Walch C, Stammberger H, Anderhuber W, et al. The minimally invasive approach to olfactory neuroblastoma: Combined endoscopic and stereotactic treatment. Laryngoscope 2000;110:635-40.

(7.) Broich G, Pagliari A, Ottaviani F. Esthesioneuroblastoma: A general review of the cases published since the discovery of the tumour in 1924. Anticancer Res 1997;17:2683-2706.

(8.) Woerner S J, Lazerson J, Munn RJ, Turner EA. Olfactory neuroblastoma (esthesioneuroblastoma) in a 2-year-old boy. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1986;3:167-74.

(9.) Levine PA, Gallagher R, Cantrell RW. Esthesioneuroblastoma: Reflections of a 21-year experience. Laryngoscope 1999;109: 1539-43.

(10). Rinaldo A, Ferlito A, Shaha AR, et al. Esthesioneuroblastoma and cervical lymph node metastases: Clinical and therapeutic implications. Acta Otolaryngol 2002; 122:215-21.

(11.) Hyams VJ. Tumors of the upper respiratory tract and ear. In: Hyams VJ, Batsakis JG, Michaels L, eds. Atlas of Tumor Pathology. 2nd series, fascicle 25. Washington, D.C.: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1988:240-8.

(12.) Kadish S, Goodman M, Wang CC. Olfactory neuroblastoma. A clinical analysis of 17 cases. Cancer 1976;37:1571-6.

(13.) Biller HF, Lawson W, Sachdev VP, Som P. Esthesioneuroblastoma: Surgical treatment without radiation. Laryngoscope 1990; 100:1199-1201.

(14.) Dulguerov P, Calcaterra T. Esthesioneuroblastoma: The UCLA experience 1970-1990. Laryngoscope 1992;102:843-9.

(15.) Casiano RR, Numa WA, Falquez AM. Endoscopic resection of esthesioneuroblastoma. Am J Rhinol 2001;15:271-9.

(16.) McElroy EA, Jr., Buckner JC, Lewis JE. Chemotherapy for advanced esthesioneuroblastoma: The Mayo Clinic experience. Neurosurgery 1998:42:1023-7, discussion 1027-8.

(17.) Wade PM, Jr., Smith RE, Johns ME. Response of esthesioneuroblastoma to chemotherapy. Report of five cases and review of the literature. Cancer 1984:53:1036-41.

(18.) Koka VN, Julieron M, Bourhis J, et al. Aesthesioneuroblastoma. J Laryngol Otol 1998;112:628-33.

(19.) Morita A, Ebersold MJ, Olsen KD, et al. Esthesioneuroblastoma: Prognosis and management. Neurosurgery 1993:32:706-14, discussion 714-15.

(20). Eden BV, Debo RF, Larner JM, et al. Esthesioneuroblastoma. Long-term outcome and patterns of failure The University of Virginia experience. Cancer 1994:73:2556-62.

From the Section of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.

Reprint requests: Dr. Shehzad Ghaffar, Senior Instructor, Section of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Stadium Rd., Karachi-74800, Pakistan. Phone: 92-21-493-0051, ext. 4770 or 4767; fax: 92-21-493-2095; e-mail: sgm@akunet.org
COPYRIGHT 2005 Vendome Group LLC
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 
Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Salahuddin, Iftikhar
Publication:Ear, Nose and Throat Journal
Date:Mar 1, 2005
Words:1900
Previous Article:Surgical-handling properties of the titanium prosthesis in ossiculoplasty.
Next Article:Preoperative computerized dynamic posturography as a prognostic indicator of balance function in patients with acoustic neuroma.
Topics:


Related Articles
Childhood cancer clue.
Genetic clue to cancer prognosis.
EPA suspects ELF fields can cause cancer.
Antitumor gene finds long-lost sibling.
Cystosarcoma phyllodes metastatic to the mandible: report of a rare case and literature review. (Original Article).
Olfactory neuroblastoma.
The role of endoscopic sinus surgery in the diagnosis and treatment of metastatic orbital carcinoid tumors.
Follicular dendritic cell sarcoma of the tonsil: a case report and literature review.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters