Printer Friendly

Nuclear DNA content in Galaxias maculates (Teleostei: Osmeriformes: Galaxiidae)/contenido de ADN nuclear en Galaxias maculatus (Teleostei: Osmeriformes: Galaxiidae).

Galaxias maculatus (Galaxiidae), is a small short-life fish, that inhabits in freshwater, estuarine and marine environments, having circum-antarctic distribution, and occurring in South America, Oceania and South Africa (Campos, 1984). In Chile, G. maculatus is distributed from central to the southern region (32 [degrees]-53 [degrees]S) (Campos, 1970), and in recent years estuarine and inland water populations have been cultured with commercial purpose. At present, many data from this species are widely known such as distribution, systematic, biogeography and reproduction (Campos, 1970, 1973, 1979, 1984, 1985; Peredo & Sobarzo, 1993, 1994; Barriga et al., 2002; Cussac et al., 2004), and have been applied in programs focused to its intensive production (Barile et al., 2003). However, other attractive antecedents for aquaculture such as the genome structure has not been studied for G. maculatus. The only genome data known for this species include chromosome number (2n = 22), karyotype morphology (Campos, 1972; Merrilees 1975; Johnson et al., 1981), and mitochondrial DNA sequences, but all have been focused to its biosystematics circumscription within the eusteleostean (Waters et al., 2000; Ishiguro et al., 2003).

Respect to the genome structure, the DNA content information is used in a wide number of biological fields, since it is positively correlated with a wide variety of cellular and organismal parameters, which is known as nucleotypic effect (Bennett, 1972). Regarding to fishes, the DNA content of about 1,354 species has been estimated and represents the largest data set for any vertebrate group (Gregory et al., 2007). Within the Osteichthyes, the Salmoniformes are one of the best-studied fish groups with regard to DNA content, with about 37 species assessed. Many of these species belong to the genera Oncorhynchus, Salmo and Salvelinus, all of them of interest for aquaculture field. Different is the case of the close-related order Osmeriformes with 240 recognized species, where the DNA content has been assessed just in 10 species (Gregory, 2007), but the genus Galaxias has not been examined.

The aim of the present study is to estimate the DNA content of the diploid genome in freshwater individuals of G. maculatus from a natural population in Hornopiren locality, Region de Los Lagos, Chile. The specimens have been maintained in hatcheries at the Aquaculture School of the Universidad Catolica de Temuco.

Measurements of nuclear DNA content (2C-value) were done microdensitometrically in erythrocytes obtained from adult specimens, using the software Image Pro-Plus 4.0. The blood was dispersed on slides, air dried, fixed in methanol-acetic acid (3:1 v/v) at 4 [degrees]C for 24 h and stained with the Feulgen reaction (hydrolysis with 5N HCl for 60 min at room temperature, staining with Schiff's reagent for 60 min, followed for three washes of 5 min each in sulphurous water). The software captures black and white image from the microscope Nikon Eclipse 400 and analyses the different structures visible on the images. Nuclear optic density (OD) is calculated by the software according to the formula OD = [log.sub.10](1/T) = - [log.sub.10] T; where T = intensity of transmitted light/intensity of incident light. From this estimation, the computer integrates the values of OD obtained for each one of the pixels and it calculates the integrated optical density (IOD = [SIGMA]OD). For G. maculatus, values of IOD of 199 individuals nuclei were determined. The IOD values were converted to absolute mass of DNA by comparison with erythrocyte smears of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, 2C = 5.5 pg, 2n = 58-60) (Hartley & Home, 1985) a common standard to determine DNA content in fishes using flow cytometry (Tiersch et al., 1989) or Feulgen microdensitometry (Carvalho et al., 2002). The standard erythrocyte smears were included at the same staining runs and IOD estimations that the cells of G. maculatus. The 2C-value was determined using the equation CVu = CVs x (IODu/IODs). In the equation, CVu = 2C value of G. maculatus; CVs = 2C value of standard; IODu = average IOD of G. maculatus; IODs = average IOD of standard. DNA content of the haploid genome (or C-value) was indirectly estimated as 2C/2, where 2C corresponds to the estimated somatic DNA content and 2 is the number of chromosome sets of the genome (2n = 22, n = 11). The C-value in picograms (mass of ADN in pg) was expressed in megabase pairs (Mbp) using the relations 1 pg = 980 Mbp proposed by Cavallier-Smith (1985). To evaluate the nucleotypic effect over cell dimensions, the average sperm heads diameter [(higher length in lim + lower length lim)/ 2] was determined in G. maculatus and compared with the average sperm heads diameter of the standard rainbow trout (t-Student at confidence level of 95%). The sperm smears of both species were done by semen dilution in freshwater, and then the sperm heads were observed in phase contrast with a Nikon Eclipse 400 microscope. The sperm heads were measured using the software QCapture Pro 5.1 and photographed with a digital camera QImaging Micropublisher 3.3.

The 2C-value of G. maculatus measured in erythrocytes was estimated to be 2.21 [+ or -] 0.12 pg (average IOD = 4.99 arbitrary units), with a coefficient of variation of 5.4%. Due to G. maculatus is diploid (2n = 22, n = 11) (Campos, 1972; Merrilees, 1975; Johnson et al., 1981) its C-value is 1.105 pg and is equivalent to 1,082.9 megabase pairs (Mbp). The IOD value for erythrocytes of rainbow trout was 12.44 [+ or -] 1.12 arbitrary units with a coefficient of variation of 9% (Figs. la and lb). The average sperm head diameter of G. maculatus (2.18 [+ or -] 0.07 [micro]m) was lower than the average sperm head diameter determined for the standard rainbow trout (2.93 [+ or -] 0.08 [micro]m) (p < 0.05) (Figs. 2a and 2b), which is coincident with the differences observed between their C-values.

In fishes, the C-value varies in different degrees among the different groups examined. In the case of the teleostean order Osmeriformes, the lower C-value has been described for the anadromous Osmerus eperlanus (Osmeridae) with 0.62 pg (607.6 Mbp) whereas the higher C-value was described for the marine Bathylagus pacificus (Bathylagidae) with 3.2 pg (3,136 Mbp) (Gregory, 2007). The C-value of G. maculatus documented here for the first time, is within the range previously described for osmeriform species and near to the average C-value of 1.2 pg described for teleost. It is remarkable that the smallest fish C-value has been described for the puffer-fish Fugu rubripes with C = 0.4 pg (392 Mbp) (Tetraodontidae), whereas the largest C-value has been reported for the lung-fish Protopterus aethiopicus with C =130 pg (127,400 Mbp) (Protopteridae) (Gregory, 2007). In an updated eukaryotic genome size database was reported that the average C-value for all fish groups pooled is 20.6 pg (Gregory et al., 2006)

It is widely known that the C-value is a genomic character positively correlated with phenotypic parameters such as cell size, duration of mitotic cycle, meiosis and gametogenesis, embryo development complexity, metabolic rate, oxygen consumption and the life cycle span (Gregory, 2002a, 2002b; Olmo, 2003; Gallardo et al., 2003, 2004). At present, the relationship between genome size and cell size is well established in fishes (Gregory, 2007). The present study, shows the significant differences in average sperm head diameter between G. maculatus and O. mykiss to be coincident with the differences observed in their C-values. These differences suggest the occurrence of so-called nucleotypic effect in gametes of those Protacanthopterygii fishes, such as has been previously described by comparing erythrocyte dimensions between both species (Jaramillo, 2005). Additionally, lower haematological parameters (e.g. low erythrocyte number per plasma volume, low hemoglobine content per cell) were observed in G. maculatus when compared with O. mykiss and other salmoniform species (Jaramillo, 2005), which can also be evidence of nucleotypic effect regarding a physiological level. Although obvious physiological implications (e.g. swimming daily activity, metabolic rate, oxygen consumption) might be related with those lower haematological parameters of G. maculatus (Jaramillo, 2005), little has been investigated in fishes (Lay & Baldwin, 1999), but abundant information on nucleotypic effect regarding physiologic patterns is available for amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals (Gregory, 2001, 2002b). Therefore, all the information available for vertebrate classes might be used as theoretical basis to understand the fish tendency relationship among DNA content and physiological parameters, data that should be complemented with experimental assays in species maintained in controlled systems such as the hatcheries.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

In the future, other species of the family Galaxiidae could be included in studies on DNA content (e.g. Galaxias platei, G. globiceps, Brachigalaxias bullocki, B. gothei, Aplochiton zebra, A. marinus, A. taeniatus), where the nucleotypic effect in co-family members analyzed together may be assessed by mean of cell dimensions or by the efficiency in physiologic (metabolic rate, oxygen consumption, salinity equilibrium, haematological parameters) and reproductive processess (meiosis and gametogenesis, embryonic development), all phenotypic characters of importance in aquaculture production. On the other hand, the study of nucleotypic effect might be an important parameter to evaluate future results of possible polyploidy induction in Galaxias cultured species (e.g. G. maculatus, G. platei), on the basis that polyploidy induction is a chromosome manipulation technique whose purpose is increasing the chromosome sets (and nuclear DNA content) and consequently the body-biomass of fishes. Body-biomass increase obtained by polyploidization which has been of valuable interest for salmonids and cyprinids aquaculture (Chorrout et al., 1986; Valdebenito et al., 1996; Gomelsky, 2003; Comber & Smith, 2004; Pineda et al., 2004), would be also applicable to other fishes species.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Financed by project DGIUCT 2005-4-02 and FONDEF AQ04I1006. Thank to Dr. Julio R. Gutidrrez for reading the manuscript.

Received: 14 September 2007; Accepted: 14 January 2008.

REFERENCES

Barile, J., A. Borquez, E Dantagnan, A. Mardones, J. Quevedo, I. Salgado, I. Valdebenito & R. Vega. 2003. Antecedentes para el cultivo del puye Galaxias maculatus (Pisces: Galaxiidae). Grdfica Sur, 144 pp.

Barriga, J., M. Battini, E Macchi, D. Milano & V Cussac. 2002. Spatial and temporal distribution of landlocked Galaxias maculatus and Galaxias platei (Pisces: Galaxiidae) in a lake in the South American Andes. N.Z. J. Mar. Fresh. Res., 36: 345-359.

Bennett, M. 1972. Nuclear DNA content and minimum generation time in herbaceous plants. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., B 181: 109-135.

Campos, H. 1970. Galaxias maculatus (Jenyns) en Chile, con especial referencia a su reproduccion. Bol. Mus. Nac. Hist. Nat., 31: 5-20.

Campos, H. 1972. Karyology of three galaxiid fishes Galaxias maculatus, G. platei, and Brachygalaxias bullocki. Copeia, 1972: 368-370.

Campos, H. 1973. Migration of Galaxias maculatus (Jenyns) (Galaxiidae: Pisces) in Valdivia estuary, Chile. Hidrobiologia, 43(3-4): 301-312.

Campos, H. 1979. Avances en el estudio sistematico de la familia Galaxiidae (Osteichthyes: Salmoniformes). Archiv. Biol. Med. Exp., 12: 107-118.

Campos, H. 1984. Gondwana and neotropical galaxoid fish biogeography. In: T. Zaret (ed.). Evolutionary ecology of neotropical freshwater fishes. Dr. W Junk, The Hague, pp. 113-125.

Campos, H. 1985. Distribution of the fishes in the Andean rivers in the South of Chile. Archiv. Hydrobiologie, 12: 169-191.

Carvalho, M., C. Oliveira, M. Navarrete, O. Froehlich & F. Foresti. 2002. Nuclear DNA content determination in Characiformes fish (Teleostei, Ostariophysi) from the Neotropical region. Genet. Mol. Biol., 25(1): 49-55.

Cavalier-Smith, T. 1985. Eukaryotic gene numbers, non-coding DNA, and genome size. In: T. Cavalier-Smith (ed.). The evolution of genome size. J. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 69-103.

Chorrout, D., G. Chevassus, F. Krieg, A. Haape, G. Burger & E Renard. 1986. Production of second generation triploid and triploid rainbow trout by mating tetraploid males and diploid females-potential of tetraploid fish. Theor. Appl. Genet., 72: 193-206.

Comber, S. & C. Smith. 2004. Polyploidy in fishes: pattern and processes. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 82: 431-442.

Cussac, V, S. Ortubay, G. Iglesias, D. Milano, M. Lattuca, J. Barriga, M. Battini & M. Gross. 2004. The distribution of South American galaxiid fishes: the role of biological traits and post-glacial history. J. Biogeogr., 31: 103-121.

Gallardo, M., J. Bickham, G. Kausel, N. K61er & R. Honeycutt. 2003. Gradual and quantum genome size shifts in the hystricognath rodents. J. Evol. Biol., 16: 163-169.

Gallardo, M., O. Garrido, R. Bahamonde & M. Gonzalez. 2004. Gametogenesis and nucleotypic effects in the tetraploid red vizcacha rat, Tympanoctomys barrerae (Rodentia, Octodontidae). Biol. Res., 37: 767-775.

Gomelsky, B. 2003. Chromosome set manipulation and sex control in common carp: a review. Aquat. Living Resour., 16: 408-415.

Gregory, R. 2001. The bigger the C-value, the larger the cell: genome size and red blood cell size in Vertebrates. Blood Cell. Mol. Dis., 27(5): 830-843.

Gregory, R. 2002a. Genome size and developmental complexity. Genetica, 115: 131-146.

Gregory, R. 2002b. A bird's-eye view of the C-value enigma: genome size, cell size, and metabolic rate in the class Aves. Evolution, 56: 121-130.

Gregory, T.R., J.A. Nicol, H. Tamm, K. Kullman, I.J. Leitch, B.G. Murray, D.F. Kapraun, J. Greilhuber & M.D. Bennett. 2006. Eukaryotic genome size databases. Nucleic Acids Res., 35: 332-338.

Gregory, R. 2007. Animal genome size database. [http://www.genomesize.com]. Revised: 30 August 2007.

Hartley, S. & M. Home. 1985. Cytogenetic techniques in fish genetics. J. Fish Biol., 26: 575-582.

Ishiguro, N., M. Miya & M. Nishida. 2003. Basal euteleostean relationships: a mitogenomic perspective on the phylogenetic reality of the 'Protacanthopterygii'. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 27 (3): 476-488.

Jaramillo, N. 2005. Estudio hematologico basico del puye (Galaxias maculatus) (Jenyns,1842) en estado postlarval y adulto. Tesis de Licenciado en Ciencias de la Acuicultura, Universidad Catolica de Temuco, Temuco, 86 pp.

Johnson, C., G. White & A. Bick. 1981. Cytotaxonomy of seven species of Galaxias (Pisces: Galaxiidae) in Tasmania. Genetica, 56: 17-21.

Lay, E & J. Baldwin. 1999. What determines the size of teleost erythrocytes? Correlations with oxygen transport and nuclear volume. Fish Physiol. Biochem., 20: 31-35.

Merrilees, M. 1975. Karyotype of Galaxias maculatus from New Zealand. Copeia 1975(1): 176-178.

Olmo, E. 2003. Reptiles: a group of transition in the evolution of genome size and of the nucleotypic effect. Cytogenet. Genome Res., 101: 166-171.

Peredo, S. & C. Sobarzo. 1993. Microestructura del ovario y ovogenesis en Galaxias maculatus (Jenyns, 1842) (Teleostei: Galaxiidae). Biol. Pesq., 22: 23-32.

Peredo, S. & C. Sobarzo. 1994. Actividad gonadica estacional de Galaxias maculatus (Jenyns,1842) en el rio Cautfn, IX Region, Chile. Bol. Soc. Biol. Concepcion, 65: 65-70.

Pineda, H., J. Jaramillo, D. Echeverri & M. Olivera. 2004. Triploidfa en trucha arcoiris (Oncorhynchus mykiss): posibilidades en Colombia. Rev. Col. Cienc. Pec., 17(1): 45-52.

Tiersch, T., R. Chander, S. Wachtel & S. Elias. 1989. Reference standards for flow cytometry and application in comparative studies of nuclear DNA content. Cytometry, 10: 706-710.

Valdebenito, I., R. Vega, D. Alfaro & C. Sobarzo. 1996. Induccion comercial a triploidfa en trucha arcoiris (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Agr. Sur, 24(2): 223-228.

Waters, J., L. Dijkstra & G. Wallis. 2000. Biogeography of a southern hemisphere freshwater fish: how important is marine dispersal? Mol. Ecol., 9(11): 1815-1821.

Pedro Jara-Seguel (1), Ivan Valdebenito (2), Claudio Palma-Rojas (3) & Christian Rebolledo (2)

(1) Escuela de Ciencias Ambientales, Facultad de Recursos Naturales, Universidad Catolica de Temuco Casilla 15-D, Temuco, Chile

(2) Escuela de Acuicultura, Centro de Genomica Nutricional Agroacuicola-CGNA, Facultad de Recursos Naturales Universidad Catolica de Temuco, Casilla 15-D, Temuco, Chile

(3) Departamento de Biologia, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de La Serena Casilla 599, La Serena, Chile

Corresponding author: Pedro Jara (pjara@uct.cl)
COPYRIGHT 2008 Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso, Escuela de Ciencias del Mar
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Short Communication
Author:Jara-Seguel, Pedro; Valdebenito, Ivan; Palma-Rojas, Claudio; Rebolledo, Christian
Publication:Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research
Date:Jan 1, 2008
Words:2527
Previous Article:First results on qualitative characteristics and biological activity of nematocyst extracts from Chrysaora plocamia (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa)/primeros...
Next Article:Composition and taxonomic analysis of the fish fauna in the Gulf of Tribuga, northern Colombian Pacific/composicion y analisis taxonomico de la...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters