Printer Friendly

No intent to disenfranchise smaller dioceses.

Dear editor,

Re: Intentional? (September letters). It is both entirely inaccurate and highly inappropriate to suggest that there was a deliberate intention to disenfranchise smaller "conservative" dioceses by choosing Winnipeg or a hotel for the site of General Synod 2007. The two largest costs associated with General Synod are travel and accommodation. Travel costs for all are borne by the General Synod budget, thereby ensuring equity for all, irrespective of distance from the meeting location. Accommodation and meal costs are charged back to each diocese, again a fair method, since the size of delegations varies depending on diocesan population.

Winnipeg is a different market than Ontario. Since 1992, General Synod has been in Ottawa, Toronto, Montreal, Waterloo, Ont., and St. Catharines, Ont. The costs associated with hosting Synod in Winnipeg are simply higher than they are in the more populous Ontario and Montreal markets. The fact that Synod is in hotels (another source of frequent complaint) has added a mere seven per cent to the cost which the University of Manitoba had quoted us, and indeed could prove to be even less costly than the University would have been, depending on double occupancy.

This promises to be an excellent General Synod. Many people are hard at work and those in Winnipeg are to be commended for the amazing job they are doing to welcome us all in June. Indeed, we will draw the circle wide, and even wider still.

Dean Peter Wall

Chair, General Synod Planning

Committee

Hamilton, Ont.
COPYRIGHT 2006 General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:LETTERS
Author:Wall, Peter
Publication:Anglican Journal
Article Type:Letter to the editor
Geographic Code:1CANA
Date:Oct 1, 2006
Words:249
Previous Article:Survey provides a snapshot of Journal readers.
Next Article:Regret, not repent.


Related Articles
Huron diocese rejects lobbying campaign: material `unclear', (Archbishop Percy) O'Driscoll argues.
(Bishop Jim) Cruickshank makes resignation official.
Parishes pray by the calendar.
Bishops agree on 'shared' ministry: revised plan accepted.
Calgary bishop bows out of troubled diocese.
Conference will gather conservative voices: essentials enjoys uneasy truce in some dioceses.
Essentials appeals for funds while Brandon bishop slams its actions.
Dioceses question cost of Synod meeting: high price tag may prevent full participation.
Open letter rebukes retired Carey: archbishop calls accusations 'baseless'.
Arctic seeks funds to rebuild cathedral: Iqaluit's igloo church 'unsalvageable' after November arson.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters