No buzz from birdseed.
The latter expression translates into 1/14,000 of a percent or 0.000000714--less than one part per million, or 714 nanograms per gram, an order of magnitude less that the figure expressed in numbers.
What's sad is that the dogma-driven, blind-to-science-and-reality DEA would have rejected a shipment with this negligible THC content. This is zero tolerance with a vengeance.
By comparison, the FDA fails to take action on foodstuffs that contain surprising amounts of the persistent flame retardant family, polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in fat content, This is nothing short of profit protection and corporate political contributions driving decisions that fly in the face of the public interest. The fetus-worshippers should push to outlaw breast feeding since in the United States the level of PBDEs in breast milk, while minuscule, is still one or two orders of magnitude greater than in other countries and growing rapidly.
While birds have evolved with hemp seed in their diets, human infants have only been exposed placentally and via breast-feeding to PBDEs and PCBs for the last forty years, but at an exponentially growing rate for the former. Emerging data on this insidious threat shows that it's a considerable risk. Does the FDA want to protect our progeny or protect corporate profits? Considering the actions of the Bush administration, Humanist readers already know the answer.
Gene E. Bray
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||letters to the editor|
|Author:||Bray, Gene E.|
|Article Type:||Letter to the Editor|
|Date:||Nov 1, 2004|
|Previous Article:||The issue at hand.|
|Next Article:||Thinking twice about transhumanism.|
|Newsletter shakes up high-tech PR industry.|
|Next comes regulation: with the legislative session over, regulators gear up. (Government Relations).|
|The author's response.|
|Cling to your message.|