Nexus for state sales and use tax.
From the state's perspective, collection of use tax by an out-of-state seller requires only collection of a tax and remittance to the state. If a transaction tax attaches at the time the product sold is delivered to the in-state resident, the seller has the best means and opportunity to collect the use tax statutorily due. Further, with the explosion of electronic commerce and Internet sales growing geometrically, potential erosion of the (taxable) sales and use tax base presents a daunting picture to most state tax administrators.
On the other hand, out-of-state sellers point to state registration requirements, additional administrative burdens and Supreme Court case law as several reasons why collection of the states' use tax should not be their concern. The fact that sales of the same product by instate sellers with offices, stores or other business locations in the state to the same resident customers would require that sales tax be charged, is simply a choice in the form of doing business.
The primary concern of sellers of tangible personal property to residents of other states is the sales and use tax nexus standards applied in states where customers reside or accept delivery of their products. Therefore, it is the destination state(s) where "nexus focus" must lie.
Recent changes to Idaho's nexus statute, in its attempt to respect Quill (yet at the same time expand its "reach" to out-of-state sellers) highlight this focus. The Idaho statute summarized below is strikingly similar to nexus laws applied in most states, just more recent in enactment.
One State's Response
As discussed in Quill, "physical presence" comes in several forms, yet is limited by what constitutes de minimis presence. (Of course, states and sellers will dispute exactly how much contact is de minimis, but the fact remains that this concept must be considered in all questions of nexus.) The state of Idaho recently amended its statute regarding the definition of "retailer engaged in business." Under the new law, the following activities will result in an out-of-state seller being considered a retailer doing business in Idaho:
* Maintenance, occupation or use (permanently or temporarily) of an office, place of distribution, sales or sample room, warehouse or other place of business or for storing goods;
* Use of a representative, agent, salesperson or solicitor operating in Idaho for the purpose of selling, delivering, installing or taking orders for any tangible personal property (not necessarily a resident salesperson);
* Receipt of rental payment from a lease of personal property located in Idaho; or
* Service or installation of property located in the state.
Other provisions include rules for franchisors, licensors and affiliated taxpayers. Finally, the Statement of Purpose in the new law states, "the bill strengthens the ability of Idaho to require out-of-state retailers, particularly mail order and Internet marketers to collect Idaho Sales tax, [and] adds language to insure the Act reaches the full extent of Idaho's constitutional power"
It is clear that states are restricting their view of "physical presence" in an effort to impose collection and remittance requirements on out-of-state sellers. It may be prudent for sellers with out-of-state activities to review their nexus status in other states, particularly if such sellers use traveling salespersons, rent property, maintain inventories or engage in post-sale activities in the destination states.
FROM THOMAS DELONG, CPA, ZAINER RINEHART CLARKE DFK CPAs, SANTA ROSA, CA
Philip E. Moore, CPA, MBA Brown, Dakes & Wannall, P.C. DFK International Fairfax, VA
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||The Tax Adviser|
|Date:||Oct 1, 1999|
|Previous Article:||Nexus for state corporate income tax.|
|Next Article:||Nongrantor CLTs offer planning opportunities.|