Printer Friendly

News updates.

News updates

* On July 9, the Food and Drug Administration issued final rules banning the use of six different types of sulfites in fresh produce. Used to prevent wilting and discoloring, these compounds can initiate life-threatening allergic reactions in asthmatics (SN:8/17/85,p.100). The rules take effect in 30 days.

* Practical ramifications of the new U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings law are being tested by a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court last week. The action, which could have broad implications for any of those whose federal funds were withheld under the law, seeks to test whether the government can keep money it has already impounded under the law. Last week the high court ruled that the role of a key actor in that impoundment--the Comptroller General, head of the General Accounting Office -- was unconstitutional (SN:7/12/86,p.22). In its suit, the National Treasury Employees Union asks that more than $1 billion in congressionally authorized 1986 cost-of-living adjustments be released to the union's more than 1 million retirees.

* On June 20, President Reagan signed the 1986 Safe Drinking Water legislation (SN:5/31/86,p.341), making it the first major environmental bill to become law this year.
COPYRIGHT 1986 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1986, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:sulfite ban, Supreme Court ruling on Gramm-Rudman, Safe Drinking Water Act
Publication:Science News
Date:Jul 19, 1986
Previous Article:Making medium-weight elements now.
Next Article:Custom-designing drug doses to fit the genes.

Related Articles
FDA to ban sulfites from fresh produce.
FDA embraces stealth tort 'reform' in proposed OTC drug rules.
Spreading the pro-civil-justice message.
Proper pleadings prevent preemption problems: to defeat a defendant's argument that your client's claims are barred by federal preemption, begin with...
More questions about punitive damages.
Shareholder options actions proceed against directors.
In student harassment case, N.J. court holds schools to high standard.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters