Printer Friendly

New York appellate court expands liability for review services.

A New York appellate court ruled that a third party could sue a CPA firm that performed services for a client.

In this case, the accounting firm performed bookkeeping and review services for its client, Globe Office Supply, Inc. Bank of Tokyo, a creditor of the company, alleged it agreed to extend credit to Globe based on financial statements prepared by the CPA firm. Globe subsequently went bankrupt. The bank brought suit against the accounting firm, alleging it relied to its detriment on the financial statements in extending credit to Globe and that the financial statements negligently misrepresented Globe's financial status.

The accounting firm filed a motion to dismiss the claim, arguing the bank was not in privity with it and therefore could not sustain an action against it. The trial court held there was privity because the accountants performed internal accounting services for Globe.

On appeal, the appellate court said an accountant who performed write-up services for a client was a de facto employee of that client. Accordingly, the firm did not act as independent accountants for Globe but, rather, served as internal accountants. Its staff's status as de facto employees established privity and allowed the bank to sue the firm for negligence. (Bank of Tokyo v. Saul N. Friedman, Appellate Division, First Department of the New York State Supreme Court)
COPYRIGHT 1994 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1994, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Bank of Tokyo v. Friedman
Author:Baliga, Wayne
Publication:Journal of Accountancy
Article Type:Brief Article
Date:Jul 1, 1994
Words:222
Previous Article:Illinois Supreme Court rules on economic loss doctrine.
Next Article:Passive losses get audit guide.
Topics:


Related Articles
Liability for estate tax extension.
California Supreme Court vacates Union Bank case.
Florida court sends mixed message on solicitation ban.
Challenging federal appellate review of damage awards: lawyers should cite the forgotten second clause of the Seventh Amendment.
Accountants not liable to shareholders says Florida Court.
Lender suit against accountants barred.
Appellate court sustains breach-of-contract action.
Do-it-yourself brain surgery, or why you may need an appellate specialist.
Online research strategies for the bookish lawyer: lawyers with more legal than technical know-how can still use the many computer tools available to...
They're back ...: audit rotation and other issues re-emerge.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters