New Rumen Ciliate, Entodinium kastamonicum, New Species (Ophryoscolecidae: Entodiniomorphida) from Turkish Domestic Cattle, Bos taurus Taurus.
Abstract In the course of examining the rumen contents obtained from 25 domestic cattle (Bos taurus taurus) in the vicinity of Kastamonu, Turkey, a new species belonging to the genus Entodinium, viz., Entodinium kastamonicum new species with seven morphotypes was identified.
The seven new morphotypes of this new species, E. kastamonicum m. kastamonicum n. m., E. kastamonicum m. lobatum n. m., E. kastamonicum m. rudidorsospinatum n.m., E. kastamonicum m. monospinosum n. m., E. kastamonicum m. bifidum n. m., E. kastamonicum m. bispinosum n.m. and E. kastamonicum m. trispinosum n. m. were identified on the basis of differences in their caudal spines and lobes. The morphological characteristics of these protozoa are described and their relationship to similar entodiniid species are discussed.
Key words: Entodinium kastamonicum n. sp., rumen ciliate, Bos taurus taurus.
Other than several reports from Turkey on
rumen ciliate protozoa in domestic cattle (Gocmen and Oktem, 1996; Gocmen et al., 2001a, b, 2003; Oktem and Gocmen, 1996), no additional research
in this respect from various locations in Turkey has
Obviously, knowledge of rumen ciliate composition and the establishment and the comparison of the faunal similarities and differences between the hosts would yield specific information on the geographical distribution of both the hosts and the ciliates, the feeding habitats and physiology of the hosts and their specific ciliates.
Specifically, some species and morphotypes have been detected only in certain areas and appear to be host specific (Dehority, 1978; Dogiel, 1927; Gocmen and Oktem,
1996; Imai, 1988; Ito and Imai, 1990).
Faunation of young ruminants or transfaunation between adults occurs only as a result of direct contact between animals. A mother can transfer protozoa to her young by grooming in which case the protozoa present in her mouth from rumination are passed in the saliva. Also, an adult can salivate on feed or pasture and another animal
then ingests the protozoa with the feed (Dehority,
2003; Fuente et al., 2006).
Rumen protozoa, which can play an important role by contributing nutrients to the host animal (Hungate, 1966; Ogimoto and Imai, 1981), also play a role in the digestion of carbohydrate and protein containing feedstuffs by secreting sacharolytic and proteolytic enzymes (Coleman and Laurie, 1974; Nagasawa et al., 1992; Shinchi and Abe, 1987a, b; Shinchi et al., 1986; Williams,
The aim of this study was to describe a new
ciliate species and its morphotypes belonging to family Ophryoscolecidae from cattle in the vicinity of Kastamonu and in addition, to clarify their relationship with those species already known.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Samples of rumen contents were obtained from 25 domestic cattle (Bos taurus taurus) at the slaughterhouse near Kastamonu, Turkey between March 2012 and December 2012.
The rumen wall was cut with a knife and a
sample removed via a catheter as soon as possible of the animal was killed (Dehority, 1984). A well- mixed sample of the rumen contents was diluted with an equal volume of 18.5% formalin.
A portion of each samples was also immediately fixed and stained in methylgreen formalin saline (MFS) solution for total and differential counts (Gocmen and Gurelli, 2009; Ogimoto and Imai, 1981). The MFS served as a nuclear stain and Lugol's iodine was used to stain skeletal plates. This procedure was used to preserve the integrity of the cell and its internal structure.
Total cell counts were made at 400x
magnification with a Neubauer hemocytometer counting chamber. The Neubauer hemocytometer counting chamber has slender grooves cut at regular intervals. The number per 1 ml of rumen contents can be calculated by the following formula:
N = 10 / 4 x a x d
where N is number of ciliates per 1 ml of rumen contents, a is number of ciliates in 4 divisions on the Neubauer hemocytometer and d is sample dilution.
Differential counts of species were estimated from smear slides with a total of 400 to 650 cells identified for each species (Gocmen and Gurelli,
All cell measurements were made and specimens were examined with a Leica DM 3000 microscope and imaging system.
Drawings of the new species and its morphotypes were based on photomicrographs and observations of the cells stained with MFS (Ogimoto and Imai, 1981).
Terminology for orientatiton used in describing the structure of the ciliate species conforms to the conventional system of ciliate phylum proposed by Dogiel (1927).
Entodinium kastamonicum, new species
Table I lists measurements and morphometric ratios of Entodinium kastamonicum. The body is ovoid and slightly tapered anteriorly and posteriorly. The posterior end rounded with lobes or spines. Ventral and dorsal body sides are convex. Oral lips are thick and do not protrude beyond the convex curve of the anterior end.
The oral ciliary zone extends for approximately 1/3 of the cell length from the anterior end. The vestibulum is funnelshaped, bending dorsally. The macronucleus is spherical or occasionally elipsoidal, lies on the dorsal side and is located near the middle of the cell. The micronucleus is elipsoidal in shape and is located ventrally at the anterior end of the macronucleus. The contractile vacuole lies above the macronucleus.
The cytoproct is narrow at angle of ca. 45deg to main body axis and terminated bending towards the dorsal side of the body.
Table I.- Dimensions of Entodinium kastamonicum new species from Turkish domestic cattles
Mean+-SD Range SE
Length 44.2+-5.1 32.3-60.0 1.0
Width 36.2+-3.04 30.5-42.1 0.6
Length-weight 1.2+-0.1 1.0-1.4 0.1
Macronucleus length 10.3+-1.7 6.4-12.6 0.3
Macronucleus width 8.8+-1.2 5.9-11.0 0.2
Micronucleus length 2.0+-0.6 1-3.5 0.1
Micronucleus width 1.7+-0.6 0.6-2.9 0.1
Habitat, type host and type locality
The rumen of domestic cattle (Bos taurus taurus) in Kastamonu, Turkey.
Entodinium kastamonicum, new species is named after the location where the new species was found.
The speciemens are held in the endocommensal ciliates of herbivorous collection of the Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Art, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu, Turkey. Holotype and paratypes are on the slide numbered as ERC-1.
E. kastamonicum, new species occurred only in Turkish domestic cattle no:14 (frequency of apearance is 4%) and constituted 55.4 % of total ciliate protozoa, 61.0 x104 protozoa per ml rumen contents.
Seven morphotypes may be distinguished based on the number and shape of caudal processes.
1. Entodinium kastamonicum morphotype kastamonicum n. m. (Figs. 1A, 2a)
Two round lobes at the posterior end of the body, not at the same level. Ventral lobe is more posterior than dorsal lobe.
2. Entodinium kastamonicum morphotype lobatum n.m. (Figs. 1B, 2b)
Slightly pointed ventral lobe is present.
3. Entodinium kastamonicum morphotype rudidorsospinatum n.m. (Figs. 1C, 2c)
Pointed spine located on the ventral posterior end.
4. Entodinium kastamonicum morphotype monospinosum n.m. (Figs. 1D, 2d)
A second spine is located on the ventral posterior end, on the right side.
5. Entodinium kastamonicum morphotype bifidum n.m. (Figs 1E, 2e)
Two spines are located on the ventral side at the posterior end.
6. Entodinium kastamonicum morphotype bispinosum n.m. (Figs. 1F, 2f)
Two spines are on the ventral posterior end and a sharp spine on the dorsal posterior end.
7. Entodinium kastamonicum morphotype trispinosum n.m. (Figs. 1G, 2g, h)
Three sharp spines of about equal length on the posterior end.
Entodinium kastamonicum, new species closely resembles Entodinium constrictum Dehority 1974, in shape of the body and macronucleus and the position of contractile vacuole. However, it does not have a constriction or identation in the body wall on the ventral side at the level of vestibulum.
The length and width ratio is much lower (Table I). E. kastamonicum m. trispinosum closely resembles E. triacum m. triacum Buisson, 1923, but the shape of macronucleus and the location of micronucleus are different. E. kastamonicum is also closely related to E. orbicularis Bush and Kofoid, 1948 and E. protuberans Bush and Kofoid, 1948, because of macronucleus shape and location of contractile vacuole.
However, E. kastamonicum n. sp. is narrower than E. orbicularis and the location of micronucleus is different. The length and the width of the E. kastamonicum n. sp. is larger than E. protuberans and also the location of micronucleus is different.
Many reports (Dogiel, 1927; Gocmen and Oktem, 1996; Imai et al., 2004; Ito and Imai, 1990) suggested that the shape and number of caudal spines were poor characters for the determination of species and subspecies, because wide and continuous variation has been observed in these characters in some rumen ciliates.
Thus these features are considered to be unsuitable taxonomical characteristics for an assignment to species and subspecies.
The variation of caudal processes has been recognized in protozoa from the same host by Ito and Imai (1990) and Gocmen and Oktem (1996). For these reasons, it has been suggested that the term "morphotype" is more appropriate for the classisfications of rumen ciliates according to the caudal processes (lobes or spines).
The reason for the formation of caudal spines in rumen ciliates has not been determined. Ito et al. (1995) suggested that the feeding habit of animals might increase the percentage of ciliates without caudal spines.
Lubinsky (1957) advocated that when animals are fed a diet with low starch value, ciliates without caudal appendages are predominant, while ciliates with well-developed caudal spines become predominant when the food is rich in starch. Coleman (1980) considered that Entodinium species develop caudal spines to protect against engulfment.
However, Imai et al. (2002) concluded that spine formation in rumen ciliates is not a response to predation, host diet or ciliate densities.
To date, no species has been found in the literature that is identical to the new species found in this study. On this basis, it has been described as a new species and named Entodinium kastamonicum, with seven morphotypes.
I would like to express my appreciation to the Kastamonu University Scientific Research Project Commission, which supported this study in a Project (KUBAP-01/2012-16) and Prof. Dr. Burk A. Dehority of Department of Animal Sciences, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University for his kind help in checking the manuscript.
BUISSON, J., 1923. Sur quelques infusoires nouveaux ou peu connus parasites des mammiferes. Ann. Parasitol. Hum. Comp., 1: 209-246.
BUSH, M. AND KOFOID, C.A., 1948. Ciliates from the Sierra
Nevada bighorn sheep, Ovis canadensis Sierra Grinnel.
Univ. Calif. (Berkeley) Publ. Zool., 53: 237-262.
COLEMAN, G.S., 1980. Rumen ciliate protozoa. In: Advances in parasitology (eds. W.H.R. Lumsden, R. Muller, and J.R. Baker), Academic Press, Sydney, pp. 205-250.
COLEMAN, G.S. AND LAURIE, J.I., 1974. The metabolism of starch, glucose, amino acids, purines, pyrimidines and bacteria by three Epidinium spp. isolated from the rumen. J. Gen. Microbiol., 85: 244-256.
DEHORITY, B.A., 1974. Rumen ciliate fauna of Alaskan moose (Alces americana), musk-ox (Ovibos moschatus) and Dall mountain sheep (Ovis dalli). J. Protozool., 21:
DEHORITY, B.A., 1978. Specificity of rumen ciliate protozoa in cattle and sheep. J. Protozool., 25: 509-513.
DEHORITY, B.A., 1984. Evaluation of subsampling and fixation procedures used for counting rumen protozoa. Appl. environ. Microbiol., 48: 182-185.
DEHORITY, B.A., 2003. Rumen microbiology. Notthingham
University Press, Nottingham.
DOGIEL, V.A., 1927. Monographie der Familie
Ophryoscolecidae. Arch. Protistenkd., 59: 1-288.
FUENTE DE LA G., SKIRNISSON, K. AND DEHORITY, B.A., 2006. Rumen ciliate fauna of Icelandic cattle, sheep, goats and reindeer. Zootaxa, 1377: 47-60.
GOCMEN, B., TOSUNOGLU, M. AND FALAKALI, B.,
2001a. New rumen ciliates from Turkish domestic cattle (Bos taurus L.): 3. Entodinium oektemae n. sp. and Entodinium imaii n. sp. (Entodiniidae, Entodiniomorphida). Turk. J. Zool., 25: 269-274.
GOCMEN, B., FALAKALI-MUTAF, B. AND TOSUNOGLU, M., 2001b. New rumen ciliates from Turkish domestic cattle (Bos taurus L.): IV. Eudiplodinium dehorityi n. sp. Acta Parasitol. Turcica, 25: 305-307.
GOCMEN, B., DEHORITY, B.A. AND RASTGELDI, S.,
2003. Ciliated protozoa in the rumen of Turkish domestic cattle (Bos taurus L.). J. Eukaryot. Microbiol.,
GOCMEN, B. AND GURELLI, G., 2009. The occurence of the rumen ciliate Entodinium constrictum Dehority, 1974 (Entodiniidae, Entodiniomorphida) from domestic sheep. North-Western J. Zool., 5: 301-306.
GOCMEN, B. AND OKTEM, N., 1996. New rumen ciliates from Turkish domestic cattle (Bos taurus L.) I. The presence of Entodinium dalli Dehority, 1974 with a new forma E. dalli f. rudidorsospinatum n.f. and comparisons with Entodinium williamsi n.sp. Europ. J. Protistol., 32: 513-522.
HUNGATE, R.B., 1966. The rumen and its microbes.
Academic Press, New York.
IMAI, S., 1988. Ciliate protozoa in the rumen of Kenyan zebu cattle, Bos taurus indicus, with the description of four new species. J. Protozool., 35: 130-136.
IMAI, S., MATSUMOTO, M., WATANABE, A. AND SATO, H., 2002. Establishment of a spinated type of Diplodinium rangiferi by transfaunation of the rumen ciliates of Japanese sika deer (Cervus nippon centralis) to the rumen of two Japanese short horn calves (Bos taurus taurus). J. Eukaryot. Microbiol., 64: 578-583.
IMAI, S., SHINNO, T., IKE, K., MORITA, T. AND SELIM, H.M., 2004. Fourteen morphotypes of Entodinium ovumrajae (Ophryoscolecidae, Entodiniomorphida) found in the dromedary camel of Egypt. J. Eukaryot.
Microbiol., 51: 594-597.
ITO, A. AND IMAI, S., 1990. Ciliated protozoa in the rumen of Holstein-Friesian cattle (Bos taurus taurus) in Hokkaido, Japan, with the description of two new species. Zool. Sci., 7: 449-458.
ITO, A., IMAI, S., MANDA, M. AND OGIMOTO, K., 1995.
Rumen ciliates of Tokara native goat in Kagoshima, Japan. J. Vet. Med. Sci,. 57: 355-357.
LUBINSKY, G., 1957. Studies on the evolution of the Ophryoscolecidae (Ciliata: Oligoisotricha). I. A new species of Entodinium with "caudatum", "loboso-spino- sum" and "dubardi" forms, and some evolutionary trends in the genus Entodinium. Can. J. Zool., 35: 111-
NAGASAWA, T., UCHIDA, T. AND ONODERA, R., 1992.
Exopeptidase activity of mixed rumen ciliate protozoa.
Anim. Sci. Technol., 63: 481-483.
OGIMOTO, K. AND IMAI, S., 1981. Atlas of rumen microbiology. Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo.
OKTEM, N. AND GOCMEN, B., 1996. Turkiye evcil sigir (Bos taurus taurus) iskembesinden yeni bir siliyat turu, Entodinium basoglui sp. nov. (Entodiniomorphida: Ophryoscolecidae) ve yeni bir grup, Entodinium dilobum grubu hakkinda. Doga Turk. J. Zool., 20: 271-
SHINCHI, S. AND ABE, M., 1987a. Species of rumen ciliate protozoa which produce extracellular protease and influence of bacteria on its activity. Jpn. J. Zootech. Sci., 58: 72-79.
SHINCHI, S. AND ABE, M., 1987b. Decomposition of soluable casein by rumen ciliate protozoa. Jpn. J. Zootech. Sci., 58: 833-838.
SHINCHI, S., ITOH, T., ABE, M. AND KANDATSU, M.,
1986. Effect of rumen ciliate protozoa on the proteolytic activity of cell-free rumen liquid. Jpn. J. Zootech. Sci.,
WILLIAMS, A.G., 1979. Exocellular carbohydrase formation by rumen holotrich ciliates. J. Protozool., 26: 665-672.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Date:||Jun 30, 2014|
|Previous Article:||Insecticidal Activity of Actinomycetes Isolated from Salt Range, Pakistan against Mosquitoes and Red Flour Beetle.|
|Next Article:||Comparative Efficiency of Propylene Glycol and Polyethylene Glycol in Enhancing Percutaneous Absorption and Release of a Drug Through Silicone...|