Printer Friendly

New AJCC column highlights evidence for common clinical practices.

[ILLUSTRATIONS OMITTED]

Nursing care is increasingly complex and demanding. New equipment, new procedures and new science all vie for attention. How can nurses quickly assess the latest research on a particular topic? Nursing practice must be based on the best available evidence, and all members of the critical care team must be cognizant of the latest science if they are to provide the best, most effective and safest-possible patient care.

A new, regular feature in the American Journal of Critical Care, "Clinical Evidence Review," seeks to unveil available scientific evidence to answer common questions faced in contemporary clinical practice. Is normal saline instillation prior to endotracheal suctioning helpful or harmful? How important is lead positioning in ST segment monitoring? What is the best way to manage intracranial hypertension? Are the results of blood pressure measurements at sites other than the forearm reliable?

These and other practical clinical questions are the focus of the new feature, written by Margo A. Halm, RN, PhD, CCRN, a clinical nurse specialist and director of nursing research and quality at United Hospital in St. Paul, Minn., where she leads and mentors staff in principles of clinical research and evidence-based practice.

According to co-editor Kathy Dracup, RN, DNSc, the idea for this feature came from AJCC's readers themselves. "In our readership surveys, nurses consistently ask for evidence-based practice recommendations that are easy to access. Everyone recognizes that the days of basing nursing care on tradition, tenure and tenacity are over, but how can clinicians quickly find the answers to their clinical questions? Halm's feature is designed to provide those answers."

In her first column, Halm discusses chest tube manipulation, offering an overview of the evidence dealing with whether milking or stripping chest tubes increases patency and prevents cardiac compression in postoperative cardiac surgery patients. Based on current evidence, she notes that "stripping chest tubes may significantly increase negative intrathoracic pressures that could cause harm," thereby impairing patients' postoperative recovery.

The article, "To Strip or Not to Strip? Physiological Effects of Chest Tube Manipulation," appears in the November 2007 issue of AJCC.

AJCC is a peer-reviewed scientific journal published six times a year (January, March, May, July, September and November) by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. The journal offers evidence-based interdisciplinary knowledge to advance the science and art of high-acuity and critical care practice. AACN members receive AJCC as a membership benefit. To read Clinical Evidence Review and other valuable AJCC content online, visit www.ajcconline.org.
COPYRIGHT 2007 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:AACN News
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Nov 1, 2007
Words:411
Previous Article:Sample NTI 2007 online.
Next Article:Nursing Economics (July 1, 2007)--"Moral Distress: Recognizing It to Retain Nurses." "Increasing the proportion of worksites that provide...
Topics:


Related Articles
My first 50 years of critical care (1956-2006).
Carla Joliat's contributions to be honored in May.
EBR: new name, new features for AJCC journal club.
Cancer of the oesophagus is a distressingly common cancer in men and women.
American Academy of Nursing conference report.
Nursing interventions & clinical skills, 4th ed.
Evidence-Practice Gaps Report Volume 1: A Review of Developments: 2004-2007.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters