Printer Friendly

Netanyahu Needs to Explain His Intentions.

By GeorgeAaHishmeh AaAaAa <p>This was clearly illustrated at the recent meeting in Geneva of the UN HumanAaRights Council which endorsed a report that details evidence of war crimesAa committed by the Israeli army (and Hamas) during its assault on Gaza last AaDecember. Of the 47 members of the Human Rights Council, only 6 countriesAa opposed the report, namely the United States, Italy, The Netherlands, Hungary,Aa Slovakia and the Ukraine, while 25 others supported it, 11 abstained and 5 castAa no vote.

The Council particularly chastised Israel - not Hamas - for failing toAa cooperate with the UN mission, led by the highly respected South African jurist, Richard Goldstone. Taher Al Nono, spokesman of the Hamas government in Gaza, said Hamas would Aainvestigate the recommendations of the report. But Israeli Prime MinisterAa Benjamin Netanyahu promised a lengthy diplomatic battle to "delegitimise" the UNAa charges.

Writing in Real Clear World, a blog, Goldstone elaborated last Saturday his Aastance on the Council's action, explaining that he was motivated to undertakeAa the Gaza mission because he was "a Jew who supported Israel and its people allAa my life." He recalled that he had investigated "serious violations ofAa international law in his own country, South Africa, and in the former YugoslaviaAa and Rwanda as well as cases of "fraud and theft by governments and politicalAa leaders ... in connection with the UN Iraq Oil for Food programme." He had alsoAa pointed out that he had spoken on behalf of the International Bar AssociationAa against human rights violations in many countries, including Sri Lanka, China,Aa Russia, Iran, Zimbabwe and Pakistan.

"I would have been acting against those principles and my own convictions and conscience if I had refused a request from the United Nations to investigateAa serious allegations of war crimes against both Israel and Hamas" during theAa 23-day Israeli invasion of Gaza, Goldstone said. His expectation was that Israel would cooperate in the investigation becauseAa of his record and "the terms of his mission's mandate," but he now thinks thatAa Israel's refusal to do so was "a grave error," adding that those who feel thatAa his report "failed to give adequate attention to specific incidents or issuesAa should be asking the Israel government why it failed to argue its cause." Israel missed "a golden opportunity," he emphasised, to actually have a fairAa hearing from a UN-sponsored inquiry.

But Goldstone's most alarming observation about the Israeli action was what Aahe saw in Gaza. "I was surprised and shocked by the destruction and misery Aathere. I had not expected it. I did not anticipate that the IDF [Israel's military] would have targeted civilians and civilian objects. I did not anticipate seeing the vast destruction of the economic infrastructure of Gaza including its agricultural lands, industrial factories, water supply and sanitation works. These are not military targets. I have not heard or read any (Israeli) government justification for this destruction." No wonder Netanyahu has opted not to comply with the Council's suggestion that Israel conduct its own credible investigation into the war-crimes that the Israeli military has undertaken there. The focus here is on Netanyahu because he did not allow, while Hamas did, the Goldstone team to visit the battle scenes where rockets from Hamas's militia hit the Israeli border areas.

Navi Pillay, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, herself a South African, added more muscle to Goldstone when she endorsed his war-crimes report despite Israeli warnings that it would undermine Middle East peace. One columnist in Haaretz went further by depicting Goldstone as "Israel's Frankenstein's monster."


The consequences of the critical UN report on the American Jewish community was evident in Washington, D.C. The new Israeli Ambassador to the US, Michael Oren, turned down an invitation to participate next week in the first annual conference of the so-called J Street group, a left-leaning Jewish organization that supports the Obama administration's call for a freeze on Israeli colonies. The Israel embassy said in a statement that it "has been privately communicating its concerns over certain policies of the organization that may impair theAa interests of Israel."

Netanyahu owes it to his people, if not the world, to explain his much-awaited intentions and not rhetoric. Otherwise he should not be shocked to see more countries follow in the footsteps of Turkey, which has recently downgraded its close ties with Israel when it cancelled a joint military exercise which was to include the US forces. Turkey is the only Muslim state that has significant ties with Israel.

- George S. Hishmeh is a Washington-based columnist. He contributed this article to

Copyright 2009

Provided by an company
COPYRIGHT 2009 Al Bawaba (Middle East) Ltd.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2009 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:The Palestine Chronicle (Mountlake Terrace, WA)
Date:Oct 22, 2009
Previous Article:Israeli Police Don Arab Disguise.
Next Article:Tariq Mehanna: Obama's Latest Muslim Target.

Related Articles
Palestinians reject Israeli terms.
Bibi should not be overconfident.
Has Bibi won the first round?
Netanyahu draws 'friendly fire' over secret trip to Russia.
Netanyahu says Israel needs to be recognized as Jewish state.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters