Printer Friendly

Natural parasitism of the citrus leafminer (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) over eight years in seven citrus regions of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

The citrus leafminer (CLM) Phyllocnistis citrella Stainton (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) was first recorded in Brazil in March 1996 in Sao Paulo State (Prates et al. 1996). Larvae of P citrella may reduce the foliar area by compromising new leaf growth and by reduced photosynthesis in the damaged leaves (Schaffer et al. 1997). Necrosis and defoliation also are induced by the larvae, thus hindering plant development, particularly in younger plants. In addition to the direct damage, the presence of the CLM may facilitate the incidence and increase the severity of citrus canker, a disease caused by the bacterium Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri (Xanthomonadales: Xanthomonadaceae) (Chagas et al. 2001; Jesus Jr. et al. 2006; Hall et al. 2010).

Hymenoptera of the genera Galeopsomyia, Cirrospilus (Eulophidae), Elasmus (Elasmidae), Pachyneuron (Pteromalidae), and Telenomus (Scelionidae) were the first CLM parasitoids identified in citrus groves in Brazil (Penteado-Dias et al. 1997). Other parasitoids were subsequently reported, including Horismenus spp. (Eulophidae), Eupelmus sp. (Eupelmidae), and Conura sp. (Chalcididae) (Costa et al. 1999). After the introduction of CLM in the Americas, 3 new species belonging to the Eulophidae family were described: Cirrospilus floridensis Evans, Cirrospilus neotropicus Diez and Fidalgo, and Galeopsomyia fausta LaSalle (LaSalle & Pena 1997; Evans 1999; Diez & Fidalgo 2003). All 3 species occur in Brazil and were found to be the most frequent parasitoids in Sao Paulo from 1997 to 1999, particularly the eulophid G. fausta (Paiva et al. 2000; Sa et al. 2000).

In 1998, the encyrtid Ageniaspis citricola Logvinovskaya (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) was introduced in Brazil, as part of a classical biological control program. This species was soon established in several Brazilian states (Sao Paulo, Parana, Minas Gerais, Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina, Goias, Bahia, Rio de Janeiro, Piaui, and Rio Grande do Norte) (Chagas et al. 2002; Parra et al. 2004). It became the most common CLM parasitoid, with native parasitoids occurring at lower levels (Sa et al. 2000). The estimated A. citricola parasitism was approximately 30% in post-release samples (1998-2000) (Chagas et al. 2002).

The combination of the damage caused by CLM and the occurrence of citrus canker highlighted the importance of the management and control of this insect, which generally involves only chemical control in nurseries and young trees. The use of cupric bactericides to prevent the occurrence of canker and insecticides for leafminer control became usual in endemic areas. However, the use of insecticides for CLM control has been incompatible to its biological control efforts in many cases (Villanueva-Jimenez & Hoy 1998; Villanueva-Jimenez et al. 2000).

In Brazil, the use of insecticides in citrus groves increased dramatically after Huanglongbing (HLB) was found in 2004, as part of the HLB mitigation, aimed at controlling the insect vector Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Liviidae), and, we hypothesized that this could strongly affect the CLM parasitism. From 2003 to 2008, the use of insecticides in citrus, mainly in Sao Paulo State, increased 6-fold (Neves et al. 2010). In this scenario, the aims of this study were (i) to estimate the CLM parasitism by A. citricola and native parasitoids in citrus-growing regions of Sao Paulo State (northern, northeastern, central, western, and southern) between 2000 and 2008, and (ii) to compare how 2 periods, i.e., prior to HLB with lower number of insecticide sprays and after HLB with higher number of sprays, affected CLM parasitism.

Materials and Methods

A total of 130 samplings were carried out in sweet orange (Citrus sinensis [L.] Osbeck) groves (Hamilin, Pera, and Valencia cultivars) located in different regions of Sao Paulo State, Brazil (Fig. 1). Samples were taken from Dec 2000 to Nov 2008 in northern (Barretos, 1 grove), northeastern (Franca, 6 groves), central (Bauru, 3 groves; Casa Branca, 2 groves; Sao Carlos, 4 groves), western (Lins, 4 groves), and southern (Botucatu, 4 groves) regions of the state (Tables 1 and 2). The leaves with intact CLM pupal chambers were collected in a random sampling during 60 min in 4 ha orange groves. According to the availability of infested leaves, we obtained samples with an average of 65 (10 to 275) pupal chambers.

The parasitism rate was obtained from each sample, despite the variable sample size. The leaves were collected and stored in plastic bags with 4 holes (DAC[R] 25 ' 36 cm) containing wet cotton to prevent the desiccation of the leaves and pupae. The leaves were then transferred to the laboratory on the same day of sampling for parasitoid identification and parasitism rate estimation. The pupal chambers were opened, and the pupae found were separated for identification. The identification of P citrella, A. citricola, and G. fausta was possible from the pupal morphology. The pupae of other species were transferred to properly closed Petri dishes with moist filter paper until adult emergence. The emerged parasitoids were identified by comparison with reference collections and with keys proposed by Penteado-Dias et al. (1997) and Schauff et al. (1998). The parasitism rate was calculated as the proportion (percentage) of pupal chambers with the presence of parasitoid related to the pupal chamber inspected.


These orange groves were rarely sprayed with insecticides before 2004--if needed, only once a year with petroleum oil or dimethoate. After 2005, insecticide use was intensified, from 12 to 24 times a year, to suppress HLB vector D. citri, using different materials (i.e., beta-cyfluthrin, bifenthrin, chlorpyrifos, cypermethrin, dimethoate, fenpropathrin, phosmet, imidacloprid, pyriproxifen, thiamethoxam).

The data were organized by region and season: Jan to Mar (summer), Apr to Jun (fall), Jul to Sep (winter), and Oct to Dec (spring). Data (parasitism rates) were transformed by arcsine (sqrt (x+100) and compared using analysis of variance with the F test (P < 0.05).


Of the 130 samplings, A. citricola was found in 119 (91.5%), and native parasitoids were recorded in 45 (34.6%). The most frequent native parasitoid was the eulophid G. fausta, which was present in 44 samples (33.8%). Cirrospilus sp., another eulophid, occurred in 17 samples (13.1%). The parasitoid Elasmus sp. was the rarest and was present in only 2 samples (1.5%).

Because only 1 sample was obtained in 2002, this rate was not included in Fig. 2. The lowest CLM parasitism rates by A. citricola were estimated for 2000 and 2007, when few samples were obtained. In 2000, the parasitism rate was 21.0 [+ or -] 16.7% (mean [+ or -] SEM; n = 4), and in 2007 it was 24.9 [+ or -] 10.0% (n = 6) (Fig. 2). In the other 6 years, the annual CLM parasitism rates ranged from 49.7 [+ or -] 7.7% in 2003 to 63.5 [+ or -] 5.7% in 2005 (Fig. 2). Differences in CLM parasitism by A. citricola (F = 4.44; df = 6, 123; P = 0.0004) and native hymenopterans (F = 5.12; df = 6, 123; P = 0.0001) were detected when the sampled regions were compared (Table 3). The parasitism rate by A. citricola was lower in the Barretos (northern) than in the other regions (Barretos' other regions: F = 19.29; df = 1, 128; P < 0.0001). In other regions, CLM parasitism rates by introduced parasitoids did not differ (Bauru' Botucatu' Casa Branca 'Franca' Lins' Sao Carlos: F = 1.34; df = 5, 112; P = 0.25). The parasitism by native species was significantly higher in Franca (northeast) with 9.4 [+ or -] 2.3% (Franca' other regions: F = 25.45; df = 1, 128; P < 0.001). In all other regions, the parasitism rates by native species were lower (< 5%) (Table 3) and similar among them (Barretos' Bauru' Botucatu' Casa Branca' Lins' Sao Carlos: F = 1.31; df = 5, 103; P = 0.27).

CLM parasitism by A. citricola was similar between seasons (Table 3). The estimated rates were 60.0 [+ or -] 4.2% in summer, 43.8 [+ or -] 5.3% in spring, 43.0 [+ or -] 7.8% in winter, and 54.4 [+ or -] 13.5% in fall. The largest samples were collected during spring and summer (n = 45 and 60, respectively), most likely due to the greater availability of new citrus flush, resulting in higher numbers of hosts. The occurrence of native CLM parasitoids was low during all seasons, approximately 4.0%, and did not differ among the seasons (F = 1.20; df = 3, 126; P = 0.31) (Table 3).

The estimated CLM parasitism by A. citricola before HLB (from 2000 to 2004, n = 77) did not differ significantly from the parasitism after HLB (from 2005 to 2008, n = 53) (F = 0.71; df = 1, 128; P = 0.40). The parasitism rates ranged from 0% to 100% in both periods, indicating a high variability of CLM parasitism by A. citricola in the sampled areas. The increased use of insecticides in citrus groves, after 2004, when HLB was reported, did not reduce the level of CLM parasitism in Bauru, Botucatu, Casa Branca, Franca, Lins, and Sao Carlos (Table 4).


A shift from the native ectoparasitoids of CLM to the introduced endoparasitoid A. citricola was observed in Sao Paulo. Before this insect was introduced in Brazil, the niche was temporarily occupied by eulophid insects, particularly G. fausta and Cirrospilus sp., and less frequently by Elasmus and Horismenus. However, A. citricola has prevailed in Sao Paulo since 2001. The G. fausta occurrence, before the introduction of A. citricola, was reduced from 98% to 38%, and 60% parasitism was found for the introduced parasitoid (Sa et al. 2000). The replacement of CLM native parasitoids by A. citricola also occurred in Florida (USA) after its introduction in 1994. In Florida, A. citricola parasitism rates increased from 2% to 86%, and the parasitism rates by native species decreased from 30% to 2% (Pomerinke & Stansly. 1998).

The CLM parasitized by A. citricola in C. sinensis groves in Sao Paulo State was stable from 2001 to 2006 (excluding 2002), ranging from 55% to 65%. The contribution of native eulophid insects (G. fausta and Cirrospilus sp.) was low, with a parasitism rate of 4.0%. After the introduction of A. citricola, the parasitism rate of this introduced species was estimated to exceed 30% in the southern and central regions of Sao Paulo (Chagas et al. 2002). In fact, the parasitism rate reached 76%, even in areas with pesticide application (Parra et al. 2004).

The smallest CLM parasitism rate by A. citricola was recorded in Barretos, a northern region of Sao Paulo, where high temperatures and low relative humidity prevail throughout the year. Thus, the climate may have exerted a negative effect on the introduced parasitoid. Chagas et al. (2002) reported an average parasitism rate of only 4.4% (varying from 0 to 14%) for the same region, and it was suggested that this was most likely due to the high humidity requirements of A. citricola adults (Edwards & Hoy 1998). Thus, the less favorable northern climate did not hinder the establishment of the insect but may have limited its efficiency. According to the Koppen classification, the weather on the Sao Paulo plateau (north of Sao Paulo State) is Aw and Cw, with little or no rainfall in fall and winter. The annual precipitation ranges from 1,500 mm to 2,000 mm, in spring and summer. Additionally, the average temperatures in the north region are higher than those in the south region.

The increased incidence of citrus canker in Sao Paulo observed in 1999 was associated with the introduction of CLM in Brazil in 1996 (Belasque Jr. et al. 2010). A connection between insect damage and disease was later described and characterized by Chagas et al. (2001) and Jesus Jr. et al. (2006). It is assumed that the CLM introduction effectively completed the pathosystem, causing changes in the epidemiology and spatial distribution of citrus canker. During the decade 2000, the incidence of the disease dropped considerably (Belasque Jr. et al. 2010). While CLM contributed to the increased incidence of citrus canker, the parasitoid A. citricola was of paramount importance for (indirectly) reducing the disease during that decade.

The increased use of insecticides in citrus after the identification of HLB in Brazil (Neves et al. 2010) in 2004 did not seem to affect negatively the parasitism of CLM by A. citricola. The A. citricola parasitism rates were similar before and after HLB. CLM is abundant in Sao Paulo citrus groves and may occur when flush is available. The similar presence of A. citricola throughout the year indicates that flush is available for CLM and, consequently, for its parasitoids. Thus, an adequate availability of CLM hosts may lead to higher A. citricola parasitism rates (Jahnke et al. 2006).

Parasitism of early stages of CLM by A. citricola, i.e., of eggs and 1st instars (Edwards & Hoy 1998), may allow this parasitoid to occupy the niche before the native parasitoids, which parasitize only the final stages of the insect cycle (Foelkel et al. 2008). No studies regarding CLM parasitoid competition in Brazil have been reported. It remains unknown whether larvae parasitized by the specialist A. citricola may also be parasitized by generalist eulophids or if eulophids are able to recognize and avoid an already-parasitized host. Lioni & Cividanes (2004) previously reported hyperparasitism of A. citricola pupae by G. fausta. Additionally, the predation of CLM larvae by feeding C. neotropicus adults has been shown in the laboratory, contributing to increased mortality (Foelkel et al. 2008).

The G. fausta eulophid is a koinobiont ectoparasitoid. This is an unusual combination because the female does not paralyze or kill the host at oviposition, increasing the risk of mortality of the offspring (Llacer et al. 2005). This behavior can reduce the number of hosts killed by G. fausta, although it typically parasitizes the pupa. The native host of G. fausta is unknown. However, it was found very soon after P citrella was introduced in America (LaSalle & Pena 1997).

The highest parasitism rate by native Hymenoptera was recorded in the northeastern region of Sao Paulo State (Franca). In this region, there are large areas of coffee cultivation, and citrus production was initiated recently. One of the Eulophidae species that occurs on the coffee leafminer, Leucoptera coffeella (Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae), is C. neotropicus (Melo et al. 2007), which also occurs on P citrella (Jahnke et al. 2005, 2007; Foelkel et al. 2008). However, G. fausta, which has not been reported to occur on L. coffeella, was the predominant species found in orange groves in the northeastern region. Therefore, the high parasitism rate by native species in this region does seem to be related not to the coffee cultivation but to the initial citrus groves.

The higher occurrence of native parasitoids may be related to the groves' age. In 2 samples from a 1-yr-old orange grove collected in Jan 2003 in Sao Carlos, the parasitism rates by G. fausta and A. citricola were 22% and 17%, respectively. In a 10-yr-old grove, at the same location and date, only parasitism by A. citricola was observed, 88.0%. This finding suggests that generalist parasitoids parasitize the first CLM infestations in young plants. As the orange trees grow, however, generalist parasitoids are replaced by A. citricola, the more competitive species.

The CLM mortality caused by arthropod predators is significant, and in some regions these predators are more important than parasitoids (Amalin et al. 2002; Xiao et al. 2007). Native biological control agents, predators, and generalist parasitoids should be evaluated, and possibly the introduction of specialist parasitoids should be avoided, even for exotic insect pests (Michaud 2002). In Brazil, native natural predators and parasitoids have not been adequately studied. Particularly in Sao Paulo, the role of predators and the efficiency of native parasitoids were limited. Lioni & Cividanes (2004) found that the key factors influencing CLM mortality were A. citricola parasitism and predation in 3rd instars. Thus, A. citricola parasitism (estimated to be between 55% and 65%) and the additional contribution of the native parasitoid species have helped control CLM, even in highly disturbed agricultural environments with intense insecticide use and other chemical inputs, indicating that the natural biological control (conservation) is not always disrupted by chemical control.

References Cited

Amalin DM, Pena JE, Duncan RE, Browning HW, McSorley R. 2002. Natural mortality factors acting on citrus leafminer, Phyllocnistis citrella, in lime orchards in South Florida. BioControl 47: 327-347.

Belasque Jr J, Barbosa JC, Bergamin Filho A, Massari CA. 2010. Provaveis consequencias do abrandamento da metodologia de erradicado do cancro citrico no Estado de Sao Paulo. Tropical Plant Pathology 35: 314-317.

Chagas MCM, Parra JRP, Namekata T, Hartung JS, Yamamoto PT. 2001. Phyiiocnistis citrella Stainton (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) and its relationship with the citrus canker bacterium Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri in Brazil. Neotropical Entomology 30: 55-59.

Chagas MCM, Parra JRP, Milano P, Nascimento AM, Parra ALGC, Yamamoto PT. 2002. Ageniaspis citricola criacao e estabelecimento no Brasil, pp. 377-394 In Parra JRP, Botelho PSM, Correa-Ferreira BS, Bento JMS. [eds.], Controle biologico no Brasil: parasitoides e predadores. Manole, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Costa VA, Sa LAN, Lasalle J, Nardo EAB, Arellano F, Fuini LC. 1999. Indigenous parasitoids (Hym, Chalcidoidea) of Phyllocnistis citrella Stainton (Lep, Gracillariidae) in Jaguariuna, Sao Paulo State, Brazil: preliminary results. Journal of Applied Entomology 123: 237-240.

Diez PA, Fidalgo P. 2003. Cirrospilus neotropicus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), an indigenous biocontrol agent of the citrus leafminer, Phyllocnistis citrella (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae). Entomological News 114: 98-104.

Edwards OR, Hoy MA. 1998. Biology of Ageniaspis citricola (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), a parasitoid of the leafminer Phyllocnistis citrella (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 91: 654-660.

Evans GA. 1999. A new species of Cirrospilus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) and two new synonymies of parasitoids reared from the citrus leafminer, Phyilocnistis citrella (Lepidoptera Gracillariidae). Florida Entomologist 82: 448453.

Foelkel E, Redaelli LR, Jahnke SM, Losekan PB. 2008. Aspectos biologicos de Cirrospilus neotropicus Diez & Fidalgo (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), parasitoide de Phyllocnistis citrella Stainton (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae). Neotropical Entomology 37: 279-287.

Hall DG, Gottwald TR, Bock CH. 2010. Exacerbation of citrus canker by citrus leafminer Phyllocnistis citrella in Florida. Florida Entomologist 93: 558-566.

Jahnke SM, Redaelli LR, Diefenbach LMG. 2005. Complexo de parasitoides de Phyllocnistis citrella (Lepidoptera, Gracillariidae) em dois pomares de citros em Montenegro, RS, Brazil. Iheringia 95: 359-363.

Jahnke SM, Redaelli LR, Diefenbach LMG. 2006. Parasitismo de Phyllocnistis citrella Stainton (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) em pomares de citros em Montenegro, RS. Neotropical Entomology 35: 357-363.

Jahnke SM, Redaelli LR, Diefenbach LMG, Dal Soglio FK. 2007. Structure and composition of the assemblage of parasitoids associated to Phyllocnistis citrella pupae Stainton (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in citrus orchards in Southern Brazil. Neotropical Entomology 36: 746-751.

Jesus Jr WC, Belasque Jr J, Amorim L, Christiano RSC, Parra JRP, Bergamin Filho A. 2006. Injuries caused by citrus leafminer (Phyllocnistis citrella) exacerbate citrus canker (Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri) infection. Fitopatologia Brasileira 31: 277-283.

Lasalle J, Pena JE 1997. A new species of Galeopsomyia (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae: Tetrastichinae): a fortuitous parasitoid of the citrus leafminer, Phyiiocnistiscitrella (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae). Florida Entomologist 80: 461-470.

Lioni ASR, Cividanes FJ. 2004. Tabela de vida ecologica do minador-dos-citros, Phyllocnistis citrella Stainton (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae). Neotropical Entomology 33: 407-415.

Llacer E, Urbaneja A, Garrido A, Jacas JA. 2005. Morphology and development of immature stages of Galeopsomyia fausta (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae: Tetrastichinae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 98: 747-753.

Melo TL, Castellani MA, Nascimento ML, Menezes Jr AO, Ferreira GFP, Lemos OL. 2007. Comunidades de parasitoides de Leucoptera coffeella (Guerin-Meneville & Perrottet, 1842) (Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae) em cafeeiros nas regioes oeste e sudoeste da Bahia. Ciencia e Agrotecnologia 31: 966-972.

Michaud JP. 2002. Classical biological control: a critical review of recent programs against citrus pests in Florida. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 95: 531-540.

Neves MF, Trombin VG, Milan P, Lopes FF, Pereira FC, Kalaki RB. 2010. O retrato da citricultura brasileira. Markestrat, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.

Paiva PEB, Gravena S, Amorim LCS. 2000. Introdujo do parasitoide Ageniaspis citricola Logvinovskaya para controle biologico da minadora das folhas dos citros Phyllocnistis citrella Stainton no Brasil. Laranja 21: 149-154.

Parra JRP, Bento JMS, Chagas MCM, Yamamoto PT. 2004. O controle biologico da larva-minadora-dos-citros. Visao Agricola 2: 64-67.

Penteado-Dias AM, Gravena S, Paiva PEB, Pinto RA. 1997. Parasitoides de Phyilocnistis citrella (Stainton) (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae: Phyllocnistinae) no estado de Sao Paulo. Laranja 18: 79-84.

Pomerinke MA, Stansly PA. 1998. Establishment of Ageniaspis citricola (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) for biological control of Phyllocnistis citrella (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in Florida. Florida Entomologist 81: 361-372.

Prates HS, Nakano O, Gravena S. 1996. A minadora das folhas de citros Phyilocnistis citrella Stainton, 1856. CATI, Campinas, Brazil.

Sa LAN, Costa VA, Oliveira WP, Almeida GR. 2000. Parasitoids of Phyllocnistis citrella in Jaguariuna, State of Sao Paulo, Brazil, before and after the introduction of Ageniaspis citricola. Scientia Agricola 57: 799-801.

Schaffer B, Pena JE, Colls AM, Hunsberger A. 1997. Citrus leafminer (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in lime assessment of leaf damage and effects on photosynthesis. Crop Protection 16: 337-343.

Schauff ME, Lasalle J, Wijesekara GA. 1998. The genera of chalcid parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) of citrus leafminer Phyllocnistis citrella Stainton (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae). Journal of Natural History 32: 1001-1056.

Villanueva-Jimenez JA, Hoy MA. 1998. Toxicity of pesticides to the citrus leafminer (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) and its parasitoid Ageniaspis citricola (Hymenoptera Encyrtidae) evaluated to assess their suitability for an IPM program in citrus nurseries. BioControl 43: 357-388.

Villanueva-Jimenez JA, Hoy MA, Davies FS. 2000. Field evaluation of integrated pest management-compatible pesticides for the citrus leafminer Phyiiocnistis citrella (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) and its parasitoid Ageniaspis citricola (Hymenoptera Encyrtidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 93: 357-367.

Xiao Y Qureshi JA, Stansly PA. 2007. Contribution of predation and parasitism to mortality of citrus leafminer Phyllocnistis citrella Stainton (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) populations in Florida. Biological Control 40: 396-404.

Paulo Eduardo Branco Paiva *, and Pedro Takao Yamamoto

University of Sao Paulo, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Department of Entomology and Acarology, 13418-900, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil

* Corresponding author; E-mail:

Caption: Fig. 1. Location of Sao Paulo State in Brazil and the citrus regions sampled.
Table 1. Month, year, and number of samplings for citrus
leafminer parasitism in Sao Paulo orange groves.

Region         Month.year (samplings)      Sample      No. of
                                          size (n)    samplings

Barretos      I.2001(4), II.2001(3),      16 to 25       12
              X.2001(1), XII.2003(3),

Bauru         XII.2000(1), I.2001(4),     11 to 179      17
              II.2001(4), XII.2001(1),
              XI.2002(1), XII.2003(1),
              X.2005(1), II.2006(2),
              XI.2006(1), II.2008(1)

Botucatu      XII.2000(1), II.2001(4),    22 to 118      20
              I.2003(2), V.2004(1),
              XII.2005(2), II.2005(5),
              XII.2006(1), II.2008(2),

Casa Branca   XII.2000(1), I.2001(3),     10 to 200      14
              II.2001(1), I.2003(2),
              XI.2004(3), I.2005(1),
              VIII.2005(1), XI.2006(2)

Franca        II.2004(1), XII.2004(4),    29 to 275      21
              IX.2005(2), XI.2005(4),
              XII.2006(1), III.2007(1),
              IV2007(2), II.2008(1),
              IV2008(1), VI.2008(1),
              VII.2008(1), IX.2008(1),

Lins          XII.2000(1), I.2001(2),     22 to 130      20
              II.2001(8), XII.2003(2),
              IX.2005(1), XI.2005(3),
              V.2008(1), VI.2008(1),

Sao Carlos    I.2001(2), II.2001(2),      42 to 120      26
              XII.2001(1), I.2003(8),
              III.2003(2), XI.2003(1),
              XII.2003(1), IX.2005(1),
              X.2005(2), IX.2006(1),
              XI.2006(1), X.2007(1),
              XI.2007(1), III.2008(1),

Table 2. Mean temperature ([degrees]C), annual
precipitation (mm), altitude (meters above sea
level), and the Koppen classification of Sao
Paulo citrus-growing regions.

Region        Temperature         Precipitation
              ([degrees]C)            (mm)

              Minimum   Maximum

Barretos       17.4      31.8         1,254
Bauru          16.0      29.1         1,331
Botucatu       15.3      26.1         1,359
Casa Branca    15.1      28.0         1,310
Franca         15.8      27.0         1,594
Lins           16.3      29.5         1,300
Sao Carlos     15.3      27.0         1,423

Region        Altitude       Koppen
                (m)      classification

Barretos        540            Aw
Bauru           530            Aw
Botucatu        840           Cwa
Casa Branca     679            Aw
Franca          1000           Aw
Lins            484            Aw
Sao Carlos      830           Cwa

dima-dos-municipios-paulistas.html (last accessed 16
Dec 2014).

Table 3. Parasitism rates (mean [+ or -] standard error of mean)
of Phyllocnistis citrella by Ageniaspis citricola and native
parasitoids in 7 Sao Paulo citrus-growing regions
and in different seasons of the year.

Region                     n (1)   A. citricola

                                   Mean ([+ or -] SEM)    Range

Barretos (northern)         12     12.8 ([+ or -] 5.7)     0-70.6
Bauru (central)             17     59.2 ([+ or -] 8.6)      0-100
Botucatu (southern)         20     70.2 ([+ or -] 6.6)      0-100
Casa Branca (central)       14     62.3 ([+ or -] 9.5)    10.2-100
Franca (northeastern)       21     56.5 ([+ or -] 6.0)     0-92.3
Lins (western)              20     44.5 ([+ or -] 7.7)      0-100
Sao Carlos (central)        26     52.6 ([+ or -] 7.2)      0-100
F, P value (df = 6, 123)           F = 4.44, P = 0.0004

Season                       n     Mean ([+ or -] SEM)    Range

Spring                      45     43.8 ([+ or -] 5.3)     0-95.0
Summer                      69     60.0 ([+ or -] 4.2)      0-100
Fall                         7     54.4 ([+ or -] 13.5)   13.6-100
Winter                       9     43.0 ([+ or -] 7.8)     0-80.0
F, P value (df = 3, 126)           F = 2.96; P = 0.034

Region                     Natives

                           Mean ([+ or -] SEM)    Range

Barretos (northern)        0.9 ([+ or -] 0.7)     0-8.8
Bauru (central)            2.5 ([+ or -] 1.2)     0-17.6
Botucatu (southern)        3.2 ([+ or -] 1.1)     0-18.0
Casa Branca (central)      1.5 ([+ or -] 1.0)     0-12.0
Franca (northeastern)      9.4 ([+ or -] 2.3)     0-39.0
Lins (western)             0.5 ([+ or -] 0.3)     0-4.5
Sao Carlos (central)       3.1 ([+ or -] 1.2)     0-22.0
F, P value (df = 6, 123)   F = 5.12, P = 0.0001

Season                     Mean ([+ or -] SEM)    Range

Spring                     3.6 ([+ or -] 1.1)     0-39.0
Summer                     2.5 ([+ or -] 0.6)     0-22.0
Fall                       6.7 ([+ or -] 3.9)     0-24.0
Winter                     5.5 ([+ or -] 2.6)     0-20.7
F, P value (df = 3, 126)   F = 1.20; P = 0.31

(1): samplings

Table 4. Parasitism rates (mean [+ or -] standard error
of mean) of Phyllocnistis citrella by Ageniaspis citricola
in 7 Sao Paulo citrus-growing regions, before (2000-2004)
and after (2005-2008) HLB detection.

Region                  Low insecticide use

                        n (1)   Mean ([+ or -] SEM)

Barretos (northern)     11       7.8 ([+ or -] 2.5)
Bauru (central)         12      56.6 ([+ or -] 10.1)
Botucatu (southern)      9      65.2 ([+ or -] 10.7)
Casa Branca (central)   10      58.1 ([+ or -] 11.8)
Franca (northeastern)    5      61.7 ([+ or -] 5.6)
Lins (western)          13      38.2 ([+ or -] 9.5)
Sao Carlos (central)    17      53.4 ([+ or -] 9.1)

Region                  Intensive insecticide use

                        n (1)   Mean ([+ or -] SEM)

Barretos (northern)      1      70.6 (-)
Bauru (central)          5      47.9 ([+ or -] 18.4)
Botucatu (southern)     11      64.3 ([+ or -] 8.7)
Casa Branca (central)    4      49.5 ([+ or -] 18.2)
Franca (northeastern)   16      49.3 ([+ or -] 7.2)
Lins (western)           7      46.9 ([+ or -] 13.7)
Sao Carlos (central)     9      43.2 ([+ or -] 12.1)

Region                   F, df res,
                          P value

Barretos (northern)          --
Bauru (central)         0.08,15,0.87
Botucatu (southern)     0.00,18,0.98
Casa Branca (central)   0.05,12,0.81
Franca (northeastern)   2.29,19,0.15
Lins (western)          0.34,18,0.56
Sao Carlos (central)    0.68,24,0.41

(1): samplings

Fig. 2. Annual parasitism of Phyllocnistis citrella by
Ageniaspis citricola in Sao Paulo orange groves
(n = samplings).

P. citrella parasitism by A. citricola

2000 (n = 4)    21.0
2001 (n = 40)   54.5
2003 (n = 23)   49.7
2004 (n = 9)    55.6
2005 (n = 18)   63.5
2006 (n = 14)   58.6
2007 (n = 6)    24.9
2008 (n = 15)   57.2

Note: Table made from bar graph.
COPYRIGHT 2015 Florida Entomological Society
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Paiva, Paulo Eduardo Branco; Yamamoto, Pedro Takao
Publication:Florida Entomologist
Article Type:Report
Date:Jun 1, 2015
Previous Article:Effects of large temperature fluctuations on hatching and subsequent development of the diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae).
Next Article:Area freedom in Mexico from Mediterranean fruit fly (diptera: tephritidae): a review of over 30 years of a successful containment program using an...

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters