NY: patient suffered from bedsores before death: patient's incompetency barred limitations defense.
COURT'S OPINION: The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, reversed the judgment of the lower court. The court held, inter alia, that the Supreme Court had properly ordered a hearing on the patient's mental condition during the time in question. However, the court disagreed with the lower court's determination. The court found that the plaintiff presented significant testimony by a board certified medical expert that the patient, after suffering a stroke, was "significantly cognitively impaired." The court noted that the plaintiff's medical expert opined that the patient fluctuated between a stuporous and obtunded level of consciousness and, although there were times that he was alert and could answer "yes" or "no" rationally, there was no time when he could communicate his wants, needs, and feelings. Additionally, the patient's hospital records indicated that by early August 1999, he had an inability to speak, and a depressed level of consciousness, was confused and lethargic, and opened his eyes to stimuli but could not follow commands. Schulman v. Jacobowitz, 797 N.Y.S.2d 547 -NY (2005)
Meet the Editor & Publisher: A. David Tammelleo, JD, is a nationally recognized authority on health care law. Practicing law for over 40 years, he concentrates in health care law with the Rhode Island firm of A. David Tammelleo & Associates. He has presented seminars on medical, nursing and hospital law throughout the United States. In addition to his writings as Editor of Medical Law's, Nursing Law's & Hospital Law's Regan Reports, his legal articles have been published in the most prestigious health law journals. A profile writer, his thousands of articles, as well as his achievements as an attorney and lecturer, have won him recognition in Martindale-Hubbell's bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers, Marquis Who's Who in American Law, Who's Who in American and Who's Who in the World.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Medical Law Cases of Note|
|Author:||Tammelleo, A. David|
|Publication:||Medical Law's Regan Report|
|Date:||Jul 1, 2005|
|Previous Article:||'Mass' removed by surgeon was patient's kidney.|
|Next Article:||NY: was surgery patient depicted in videotape?: court upholds jury verdict for defendant surgeon.|