Printer Friendly

NIH limits animal studies at Columbia.

NIH limits animal studies at columbia

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) last week suspended a portion of its funding for animal resarch at Columbia University in New York City after an unannounced site inspection by the agency turned up serious animal-care deficiencies. This is the first such suspension ordered since the agency's new animal-welfare accreditation rules went into effect Dec. 31 (SN: 11/2/85, p. 281).

The suspension involves only research conducted at the university's health sciences division -- which includes the medical school -- and is limited to studies using vertebrates, including dogs and sheep, above the level of rodents. Columbia hopes that its immediate steps to overcome the stated deficiencies will permit reinstatement of curtailed research funds within six weeks, according to university spokes-person Mae Rudolph. Though the university did not disclose how many research studies are affected, it said that at least 75 percent of the animals used in health sciences research are rodents.

A preliminary, unpublished report by NIH's surprise-inspection team challenged the adequacy of the division's veterinary care program, the sterility maintained during major surgery, the housing for dogs under quarantine and the techniques used to minimize health risks to laboratory personnel.

These deficiencies, cited as reasons for the suspension in a Jan. 27 letter to Columbia by NIH Director James B. Wyngaarden, were no surprise to university officials. Last year, recognizing that there were deficiencies, the health sciences division began a major, long-range program of improvements," the university noted in a statement issued earlier this week. Moreover, Columbia requested and got an audience with NIH animal-care officials last December to discuss these deficiencies and the university's attempts to rectify them, according to William Dommel, assistant director of NIH's Office of Protection from Research Risks, in Bethesda, Md., which oversees animal-welfare rules.

The unannounced site visit, Dommel says, was triggered by two things: letters to NIH officials, including its director, complaining about the care and abuse of laboratory animals; adn the university's own report on its animal-care program -- a report required (under the new NIH animal-welfare rules) of all research institutions receiving funds from the Public Health Service, NIH's parent agency.

Dommel's office is in the preliminary phase of reviewing more than 600 other animal-welfare assurance reports submitted under those new rules.
COPYRIGHT 1986 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1986, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:National Institutes of Health
Author:Raloff, Janet
Publication:Science News
Date:Feb 8, 1986
Previous Article:New molecular analysis for genetic disorder.
Next Article:Shuttle loss sets back space program.

Related Articles
New animal welfare rules.
NIH limits gene experiments done abroad.
PE will get kids moving again.
The Public Policy Conference: MS activists will follow the money trail.
What we are doing about symptoms that can't be measured easily.
Stem cells & MS: what the investigators see.
... About living with MS in India.
Employers put teens at risk, study says.
Traveling hip hop.
Sex--perhaps a good idea after all.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters