NEW REMAINS OF MICROSTONYX (SUIDAE, ARTIODACTYLS) FROM THE MIOCENE OF PAKISTAN.
Keywords: Suidae, Chinji, Siwaliks, Paleontology, Taxonomy
Microstonyx Pilgrim 1926 is a typical suid found in the Miocene of Europe and Asia (Pearson 1928; Erdbrink 1969; Made et al., 2013) including the Subcontinent (Made and Hussain 1989). Microstonyx is a large suid having a massive skull, with wide and flat dorsal surface. The dental morphology of well-known and dominant species of the genus, Microstonyx mjor, is very similar to Hippopotamodon sivalense. It is differentiated from Hippopotamodon in having an elongated snout, small canine, and shallow mandible. I3 is largely elongated, having posterior lingual cingula, inflated zygomatic arches. Posterior edge of the orbit is well behind the third upper molar, long diastema between canine and P2. Canine is always reduced regardless the sex of an individual. P1 is generally absent.
Lydekker (1877) named the genus and species Hippopotamodon sivalense for material from the Siwaliks (Pakistan). It is described mostly because of its large size. The cheek teeth are highly complicated with additional accessory conule like those of Hippopotamodon which was wrongly marked as Sus titan by Lydekker (1884), Potamochoerus titan by Stehlin (1899), Dicoryphochoerus titan by Pilgrim (1926), Colbert (1935), Schmidt-Kittler (1971) and Thenius (1972). The legitimacy of Dicoryphochoerus chisholmi and Dicoryphochoerus instabilus is unverifiable because of lacking material (Colbert 1935). The genus Dicoryphochoerus titan was initially incorporated in genus Sus by Lydekker (1884). In 1926, Pilgrim shifted the genus Sus to the genus Dicoryphochoerus. The genus Dicoryphochoerus titanoides is generally a small size variant of the species Dicoryphochoerus titan (Pilgrim 1926). As indicated by Colbert (1935), this species is related to Dicoryphochoerus chisholmi.
The species Dicoryphochoerus vagus is in synonymy with species Sus hysudricus (Colbert 1935). Pickford (1988) put together the whole material of genus Dicoryphochoerus under one species Hippopotamodon sivalense. He gave an account on genus and species Hippopotamodon sivalense in detail giving a long list of its synonymy including the species Hippopotamodon sivalense, Dicoryphochoerus titanoides and Dicoryphochoerus robustus which are by viewed as Microstonyx major. Made and Hussain (1989) raised the question of whether Microstonyx should be included in Hippopotamodon but did not resolve the question. Fortelius et al. (1996) included Dicoryphochoerus meteai in M. antiquus and transferred that species to Hippopotamodon, but not the other 2 European species (Made et al. 2013). Microstonyx is known by two species in Europe i.e. Microstonyx antiquus Kaup 1833 (Holotype from Eppelsheim) and Microstonyx major Gervais, 1848/1852 (Holotype from Cucuron).
The third species i.e. Microstonyx erymanthius founded by Roth and Wagner (1854) from Pikermi, gave the status of a subspecies of Microstonyx major by Made et al. (1992). Thenius (1972) suggested that M. antiques and M. major were contemporaneous but lived in different habitats. Ginsburg (1980) noted that Microstonyx antiquus found in MN 9-10 and Microstonyx major in MN 11-12. Made and Moya-sola (1989) proposed that the species Microstonyx major comprises two subspecies i.e. Microstonyx major major and Microstonyx major erymanthius. According to Made et al. (1992) the later is more progressive than the former. Upto now the genus Microstonyx has been recorded from large number localities in Europe and Asia (Made and Hussain, 1989). Most of European material is known from Spain and France. It has been extensively studied by Golpe-Posse (1972, 1979, 1980), Made and Moya-sola (1989) and Made et al. (1992).
One evidence of Microstonyx major has been recorded from the SE European populations and late Miocene of Turkey (Kostopoulos et al., 2001; Liu et al., 2005). The study is based on two isolated upper molars from the localities of Ava and Kund (Fig. 1), belonging to middle Chinji and Nagri formations, district Chakwal, Punjab, Pakistan.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The material comes from the Lower and Middle Siwalik subgroups of Pakistan. The teeth were partially filled with cement and mud. These sediments were removed with the help of light hammer, chisels and fine needles. During the preparation the broken parts were assembled by using elfy. The photographs were taken with Pentax digital camera by using accessory lenses. A Vernier caliper is used for the measurements. Each specimen shows both the collection years as well as the specimen number of that year e.g. PUPC 85/71. The lower figure shows the collection year and the upper figure indicates the serial number of the respective year. The following acronyms are used: PUPC, Punjab University, paleontological collection stored in Zoology Department Lahore, Pakistan; lM2, upper left second molar; rM3, right third upper molar; MN, European land mammal zone.
Order ARTIODACTYLA Owen 1848
Family SUIDAE Gray 1821
Subfamily SUINAE Lydekker 1877
Genus Microstonyx Pilgrim 1926
Microstonyx major Gervais 1848 (Fig. 1; Table 1-3)
Synonymy: Sus major Gervais 1848: Pl. XII Fig. 2; Microstonyx major Kazanci et al. 1999: 507; Dicoryphochoerus titanoides Pilgrim 1926; Dicoryphochoerus robustus Pilgrim 1926: 42-473, Pl. XIV, Figs. 9-11.
Diagnosis: Smaller than Microstonyx antiquus. P1 present but P1 absent (probably lost in early life). Canine much reduced.
Horizon: Lower Vallesian to Middle Turolian of Europe (Made et al., 1992); Nagri Formation of the Siwalik Group (Made and Hussain, 1989).
Geographic distribution: The species is known from Europe (Made and Moya-Sola, 1989; Made, 1988; Made et al., 1992), Russia (maimov, 1951), Turkey (Ozansoy, 1965), Iran (Campbell et al., 1980), China (Erdbrink, 1969; Pearson, 1928) and Nagri, district Chakwal, Punjab, Pakistan (Made and Hussain, 1989).
Specimens and localities: PUPC 85/71, lM2 from middle Nagri Formation, Ava, district Chakwal, Punjab, Pakistan. PUPC 84/87, rM3 from middle Chinji Formation, Kund (Chinji), district Chakwal, Punjab, Pakistan.
lM2: The tooth is excellently preserved and slightly worn (Fig. 2). Only the anterior pair of cups and the median conule have been worn. The tooth is somewhat longer than broader (Table 1). The anterior and posterior cingulu are strong; the posterior cingulum is relatively weak and the labial cingulum is indicated by a low vertical ridge labially. The principal suid grooves are quite prominent in all the four cusps. Apart from the principal groove, accessory grooves are present in all the cusps. The metacone is triangular shape, it is provided with three suid grooves which is divided into three lobes, each of the three lobes is further bifurcated by a very shallow groove; these grooves have disappeared in the paracone because of the wear. However, its tripartite division is still very clear. The hypocone shows two accessory grooves anteriorly and one posteriorly. The protocone is similar to the hypocone.
The anterior and posterior accessory conules are almost of equal size and are somewhat smaller than the median accessory conule. All the three conules are fairly raised. The transverse valley is quite open and is not blocked by the median accessory conule. The protocone and hypocone are low in vertical height, provided with the anterior, posterior and median grooves. The paracone and metacone are vertically higher than the lingual cusps, provided with the prominent suid grooves.
rM3: The last upper molar is damaged posteriorly (Fig. 2). The anterior cingulum is strong, there is a cingular tubercle anterolingually which is even larger than the anterior and median accessory conules. The cingulum is represented by a cingular tubercle lingually, blocking the entrance of the transverse valley. The cingulum is also present labially in the middle of transverse valley. The proto-and paracones are rounded, having a pyramidal tubercle. Apart from the principal suid grooves, one accessory groove may be seen at the anterior face of each of the four principal cusps. The protocone bears an accessory groove posteriorly. The anterior and median accessory conules are equally large and high. The former is anteroposteriorly compressed. They are provided with three suid grooves which form a definite lobe labio-lingually. The hypocone and metacone are damaged posteriorly along with post talon. The cingulum is quite thick crenulated all around the crown surface.
Comparison: The teeth are large sized representing suid morphology. The large Siwalik suids include Tetraconodon, Sivachoerus, Hippopotamodon and Microstonyx. Tetraconodon and Sivachoerus have qualities expanded P3-4. The cheek teeth of Hippopotamodon are expansive to a great degree. The studied material is neither gigantic to put in the genus Hippopotamodon nor too small to be referred to the other Siwalik suid genera. Morphometrically, the specimens are pretty match with the transitional Siwalik genus Microstonyx (Made and Hussain, 1989). Metrically, the molars are within the variation limit of the species Microstonyx major (Table I). A careful study of morphological features of the specimens and their measurements (Table 2-3) indicates their affinity to the species Microstonyx major.
Table 1. Measurements of M2 and M3 in European and Pakistani material of the species Microstonyx major.
###Pakistani material###European material
###PUPC collection###B. 354###(mean deduced by Made et al. (1992)
###According to###According to
###Pickford (1988).###Made and Hussain (1989).
M2###29.5###26.0 88.0###29.0###25.5 88.0###29.0 25.2 87.0###30.5 26.5###87.0
M3###46.0e 30.6 67.0e###46.5###31.0 67.0###45.6 30.5 67.0###44.5 29.0###65.0
Table 2. Comparative measurements of P3-M2 in Ind. Mus. B. 714 and the mean value(M) of the dimensions for P3-M2 in the species Microstonyx major deduced by Made et al. (1992). *According to Pickford (1988) the anteroposterior length is 24.5 and width is 15.6. The latter dimension is the same as measured from the figure illustrated by Pilgrim (1926, pl.XIV, fig. 10) the former when measured came to be 21.5 instead of 24.5.
Table 3. Transverse width of P3-M2 (Ind. Mus. B.714) of Dicoryphochoerus robustus Pilgrim (= Microstonyx major Gervais) and the range of transverse width of P3 - M2 of Hippopotamodon sivalense deduced by Made et al. (1992).
Microstonyx is a common faunal element in the Miocene faunas of SE Europe Greece, Yugoslavia, Bulgaria, Turkey, Spain and France (Thenius, 1972; Ginsburg, 1988; Made and Moya-Sola, 1989; Made et al., 1992, 1997; Pickford, 1993; Fortelius et al., 1996; Hunermann, 1999). In the Subcontinent the genus Microstonyx was erected by Pilgrim (1926) from the Siwaliks. The dimensions of the holotypes are almost close to Sus titan, Sus praecox and Dicoryphochoerus robustus (Made and Hussein, 1989). Nevertheless, the Subcontinental large suids can be divided into two groups: Hippopotamodon-like suids and Microstonyx-like suids. The very large species includes Hippopotamodon sivalense and a smaller species can be named Microstonyx major. Both groups have almost same morphology but differ in dimensions. Microstonyx is characterized in having long upper second and third incisors. The feature suggests that Microstonyx was an able rooter, extracting the food from the soil (Made et al., 2013).
The species appears to be very flexible on ecological changes, providing population of smaller size in more arid condition and a large form of M. major is probably northern in origins, where savanna wood land like environment predominate (De Bonis et al. 1992). At the beginning of the Turolian (MN11), the increase of aridity the predominance of open landscapes allowed a smaller form of Asiatic origin towards the west of Greece where it survive until the middle of Turolian (MN12). During the middle of Turolians period, the large forms seem to disappear temporarily from the study area. During the late Turolian (MN13), the species appears to be geographical restricted to the areas of more humid condition where the increase of the forested environment allowed Microstonyx major to be progressive. The ecological adaptations are associated with the increase of the size of a species.
Conclusions: Microstonyx major, a rare suid species is reported from the outcrops of localities Ava and Kund in the Pakistani Siwaliks. This is the second report of this species from the Siwaliks after Made and Hussain (1989). M. major shows close morphological resemblance with the other Siwaliks species Hippopotamodon sivalense and further research could ascertain a possible synonymy.
Campbell, B.G., M.H. Amini, R.L. Bernor, W. Dickenson, W. Drake, R. Morris, J.A. Van Couvering, and J.A.H. Van Couvering (1980). Maragheh: A c1assic late Miocene vertebrate locality in north western Iran. Nature. 287: 837-841.
Colbert, E.H. (1935). Distribution and Phylogenetic studies on Indian Fossil Mammals. IV. The phylogeny of Indian Suidea and the origin of the Hippopotamidae. Amer. Mus. Novit. 799:1-24.
De Bonis, L., G. Bouvrain, D. Geraads and, G. Koufos (1992). Diversity and paleoecology of Greek late Miocene mammalian faunas. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 91(1): 99-121.
Erdbrink, D.P. (1969). A collection of mammalian fossils from S. E. Shansi, China. III. Publicaties van het Natuurhistorisch Genootschap in Limburg. 19: 17-24.
Fortelius, M., J.V.D. Made, and R.L. Bernor (1996). Middle and Late Miocene Suoidea of Central Europe and the Eastern Mediterranean: evolution, biogeography, and paleoecology. the evolution of Western Eurasian Neogene mammal faunas. Columbia University Press, New York. 28: 348-377.
Gervais, P. (1848). 1852-Zoologie et Paleontology francaises. A. Bertand, Paris. 3.
Ginsburg, L. (1980). Xenohysus venitor, Suid nouveau du Miocene Inferieurde France, Geobiuos. 13 (6): 861-877.
Ginsburg, L. (1988). Contribution a l'etude du gisement Miocene superieur de Montredon (Herault). 4: les artiodactyles Suidae. Palaeovertebrata mem. Ext: 57-64.
Golpe-Posse, J.M. (1972). Suiformes del Terciarioespanol y susyacimientos. Paleont. Evol. 2:1-197.
Golpe-Posse, J.M. (1979). Contribucion al studio de la denticion maxilar de Microstonyx antiquus (Kaup, 1833). Bull Inf. Inst. Paleont. Sabadell. 11:20-24.
Golpe-Posse, J.M. (1980). Le genre Microstonyx en Espagne et ses relations avec les autrese speces du meme genre hors d'Espagne. Palaeovertebrata mem. jubil: 213-231.
Gray, J.E. (1821). On the Natural arrangement of vertebrate animals. London. Med. Reposit. 15(1): 296-310.
Hunermann, K. A. (1999). Superfamily Suoidea. The Miocene Land Mammals of Europe. Dr Pfeil, Munchen: 209-216.
Kaup, J.J. (1833). Description d'ossements fossiles de Mammiferes.2 J.G. Heyer, Darmstadt: 31.
Kazanci N., S. Sen, G. Lu Seyitoglu, L. Bonis, G. De Bouvrain, H. Araz, B. Varol and L. Karadenizli (1999). Geology of a new late Miocene mammal locality in Central Anatolia, Turkey. Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences, Paris, Sciences de la Terre et des Planetes 329: 503-510.
Kostopoulos, D.S., N. Spassov, and D. Kovachev (2001). Contribution to the study of Microstonyx: evidence from Bulgaria and the SE European populations. Geodiversitas 23 (3): 411-437.
Liu, L.P., D.S. Kostopoulos, and M. Fortelius (2005). Suidae (Mammalia, Artiodactyla) from the late Miocene of AkkasA,dagEi, Turkey, Geodiversitas 27 (4): 715-733.
Lydekker, R. (1877). Notices of new and rare Mammals from the Siwaliks. Rec. Geol, Surv. India, 10:76-83.
Lydekker, R. (1884). Indian Tertiary and Post-Tertiary vertebrata. Siwalik and Narbada bunodont suina. Mem. Geol. Surv. India. Pal, Indica Ser.10, 3(2): 35-104.
Made, J.V.D. (1988). Sus nanus nov. sp., a Pliocene dwarf pig from Capo Figari (Northern Sardinia): Bollettino della Societa Paleontologica Italiana. 27(3): 367-378.
Made, J.V.D. (1997). The fossil pig from the late Miocene of Dorn-Duerkheim 1 in Germany. Cour. Forschungs.-Institut Senckenberg. 197: 205-230.
Made, J.V.D and S. Moya-Sola (1989). European Suinae (Artiodactyla) from the late Miocene onwards. B Soc. Paleontol. Ital. 28: 329-339.
Made, J. V. D and S. T. Hussain (1989). Microstonyx major (Suidae, Artiodactyla) from the type area of Nagri formation, Siwalik group, Pakistan. Estudios. Geol. 45: 409-416.
Made, J. V. D., P. Montoya, and L. Alcala (1992). Microstonyx (Suidae, Mammalia) from the Upper Miocene of Spain. Geobios. 25 (3): 395-413.
Made, J. V. D., E. Gulec, and A. C. Erkman (2013). Microstonyx (Suidae, Artiodactyla) from the Upper Miocene of Hayranli-Haliminhani, Turkey. Turk. J. Zool. 37: 106-122.
Owen, R. (1848). Description of teeth portions of jaws of two extinct anthracotheriod quadruped. discovered in the Eocene deposits on the N.W. coast of the Isle of Wight. Quart. Jour. Geol. Soc. London. 4:103-104.
Ozansoy, F. (1965). Elude des gisements continenleaux et des Mammiferes du Cenowique de Turquie. Mem. Soco Geol. France, 44, 102, 1-91.
Pearson, H.S. (1928). Chinese fossil Suidae. Paleontol Sinica (C)5 (5): 1-75.
Pickford, M. (1993). Old world suoid systematics, phylogeny, biogeography and biostratigraphy. Paleontologia i Evolucio. 26-27: 237-269.
Pickford, M. (1988). Revision of the Miocene Suidea of the Indian subcontinent. Munchner Geowiss, Abh. A. (12): 1-92.
Pilgrim, G.E. (1926). The fossils Suidae of India. Pal. Indica. n.s. 8(4): 1-65.
Roth, J. and A. Wagner (1854). Die fossilen Knochenueberreste von Pikermi Griechenland. Abhandlungen der bayerische Akademie Wissenschaft. 7: 371-464.
Schmidt-Kittler, N. (1971). Die Obermiozane Fossilagerstatte Sandelzhausen 3. Suidae (Artiodactyla, Mammalia). Mitt. Bayer. Staatssamml. Palaeont. Hist. Geol. 11:129-170.
Stehlin, H.G. (1899). Ueber die Geschinchte des Suiden-Gebisses. Abh Schweiz, Palaeont. Ges. 26:1-527
Thenius, E. (1972). Microstonyx antiquusaus dem Alt-Pliozone Mittel-Europes. Zur Taxonomie und Evolution der Suisae (Mammalia). Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, 76:539-586.
Trofimov, B.A. (1951). On the fossil pigs of the genus Microstonyx. Doklady. Akademia. Nauk. SSSR. 76, 881-884.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Z. Ahmad, K. Aftab, S. Azad and M. A. Khan|
|Publication:||Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences|
|Date:||Oct 31, 2019|
|Previous Article:||HIERARCHICAL FEEDING AND HABITAT SELECTION BY WHITE RHINOCEROS (CERATOTHERIUM SIMUM SIMUM) IN A MARGINAL HABITAT.|
|Next Article:||EFFECT OF RECYCLED POULTRY BEDDING TREATED WITH PHENOLIC COMPOUNDS EXTRACTED FROM POMEGRANATE PEEL ON IN VITRO DIGESTION ACTIVITY OF RUMEN MICROBES.|