Printer Friendly

NASA: fine tuning of momentum.

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration's requested budget for fiscal year 1986, about $7.89 billion, represents a roughly 5 percent increase over the one within which it is now working. Agency administrator James M. Beggs calls it "modest, though forward looking," but within the generalizations and overall figures are some suprising, though small, changes of momentum, both up and down.

Included, for example, would be a second year (insofar as formal listing in the budget is concerned)) of studies to define plans for a U.S. space station, a multibillion-dollar project on whose behalf Beggs and other officials have been speechifying, lobbying and globe-trotting in search of support and collaboration from other countries as well as from various factions within the United States. For FY '85, the administration sought, and got, $150 million to get those studies under way, and projected a $250 million sum for the following year. (Thereafter, when construction begins, the numbers are to get bigger in a hurry, with $1.2 billion projected for FY '87.) But with budget deficits still looming before the administration, the proposed plan seeks only $230 million--a $20 7illion difference that NASA says would lead to slowing down the "phase B definition studies" of the station from 18 to 21 months.

This does not mean that the administration is tempering its commitment to the project, however. Last week, in fact, U.S. space station advocates received a boost when the first ministerial-level gathering in eight years of officials from the member countries of the European Space Agency (ESA) voted to accept President Reagan's invitation for the Europeans to take part. ESA's major contribution would be a laboratory module called Columbus, which would be attached to the station but which could also be detached as the basis for an independent European station. An indication of the worth of ESA's support of the U.S. station was provided by G.M.V. Van Aardenne of the Netherlands, chairman of the ministerial conference, who is reported to have said that the ESA member countries would be increasing their contributions to ESA by 70 percent by 1990.

A subtler item in NASA's newly requested budget in $62.9 millin from research and analysis (R&A) of planetary scientists regard R&A as the measure of the administration's (including NASA's own) commitment to getting the most out of planetary spacecraft missions, which have often had consideraly higher price tags in the first place.

The proposed increase is small, but it also marks the first time in four annual budget cycles that NASA has not requested less money for planetary R&A than it received the previous year. And the numbers might have been smaller still were it not for the restoration of funds by congressional committees responding to concerns voiced by the scientific community. In FY '83, the administration requested $35.5 million; Congress raised the amount to $50.3 million. The next year, the request was for $45.5 million, a $4.8 million reduction -- which was restored on Capitol Hill to $59.5 million. The year after that, NASA again sought a lower amount, $54.5 million, which Congress "re-upped"
COPYRIGHT 1985 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1985, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:National Aeronautics and Space Administration budget
Author:Eberhart, Jonathan
Publication:Science News
Date:Feb 9, 1985
Previous Article:More for cleanups, acid rain studies.
Next Article:Weathering the budget storm.

Related Articles
An inflatable U.S. $pace $tation.
Space base heads back to the drawing board.
Congressional Aide Says Goldin Should Go.
The Public Policy Conference: MS activists will follow the money trail.
Major grant helps keep the love light burning.
"From Runway to Roadway".
EEOC data prove employment discrimination still rife.
What's new on our Web site.
New publications for professionals.
Washington outlook.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters