Multidetector Computed Tomography Findings of Auto-Evacuated Secondary Acquired Cholesteatoma: A Morphologic and Quantitative Analysis.
A cholesteatoma is a benign but clinically destructive lesion histologically described as a well-demarcated cystic mass formed from the keratinizing stratified squamous epithelium [1-3]. Surgical resection is the only treatment option for removing cholesteatomas from the middle ear [3-8].
The diagnosis of cholesteatoma is based on the clinical signs and symptoms, primarily discharge and conductive hearing loss due to the mechanical compression and/or erosion of adjacent structures by the lesion and hyperproliferative cells [9, 10]. The clinical diagnosis of cholesteatomas is supported by computed tomography (CT) scans showing bone erosion or destruction, which differentiates cholesteatoma from granulation tissue or fluid retention due to chronic otitis media. The typical CT findings of cholesteatomas are a soft-tissue mass in the middle ear cavity with varying levels of destruction [2, 3, 7, 11]. However, in clinical practice, CT may sometimes show a spontaneously evacuated, nonopacified spontaneously drained auto-evacuated secondary acquired cholesteatoma (SAC) associated with an extensive osseous wall destruction of the middle ear, which has been discussed in literature [12-16]. A drained, nonopacified SAC that is associated with marked destruction of the ossicles or bony structures, indicates a mural cholesteatoma, also known as automastoidectomy or nature's mastoidectomy. In contrast, the term auto-atticotomy or nature's atticotomy, which is less extensive and destructive than automastoidectomy, is used to describe a smaller defect where only the scutum and lower lateral attic wall are affected [1, 16].
In this study, we aimed to describe and quantify the CT findings of auto-evacuated cholesteatoma, including nondestructive and nonopacified types verified by surgery.
MATERIALS and METHODS
Study Design and Population
We retrospectively reviewed the hospital discharge records of 191 patients who were operated for cholesteatoma between May 2014 and November 2017. In all the patients, the diagnostic criteria for SAC were chronic intermittent aural discharge associated with tympanic membrane perforation or a deep attic retraction pocket. Out of the 191 patients, 98 with typical CT signs of cholesteatoma (a destructive opacified mass in the middle ear); 15 with a history of ear surgery, including ventilation tube insertion and type 1 tympanoplasty; and nine with no evidence of cholesteatoma at surgery were excluded. Finally, we included 69 patients [21 females, 48 males; mean age, 45 (range: 17-74) years)] with 75 ears with auto-evacuated SAC (six patients had bilateral SAC).
The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (No. 684; date, 06/21/2016), and the requirement for informed consent was waived due to the retrospective study design.
Classification of SAC
We classified auto-evacuated SAC into pars flaccida (attic or Prussak's space cholesteatoma), pars tensa (cholesteatoma with pars tensa perforation), consistent with the Barath classification , and a third ad hoc (undetectable) group comprising patients with auto-atticotomy or mural cholesteatoma, which is also known as automastoidectomy (Table 1).
Preoperatively, all patients underwent temporal bone CT on a 128-section multidetector CT (MDCT) scanner (Somatom Definition AS Plus 128; Siemens, Forchheim, Germany). The parameters were 320 mA tube current, 120 kV; 128-0.625 detector collimation; 0.5 s rotation time; 1 mm/rotation (pitch 0.391) table speed; 0.67 mm slice thickness; 4.9 s scan time; 96 mm field of view; and 512x512 matrix. No medication was administered in the ear for 24 h before the examinations. The preoperative images were recorded on compact discs, which were then loaded as raw data into a Philips Brilliance ICT 256 (Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands) and evaluated on an Extended Brilliance Workspace (Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands) to reconstruct them in every plane and to simultaneously access them in three orthogonal planes (axial, sagittal, and coronal), while maintaining their original resolution. In this way, the optimal anatomical detail was obtained. The anatomical reference points of both inner ears (lateral semicircular canals) could be lined symmetrically in the same plane for optimal quantitative measurements and an accurate comparison of both sides. The lateral semicircular canals were aligned to obtain complete circular images in the axial plane (Figure 1a), and assessments were made perpendicular to this alignment in the coronal plane (Figure 1b).
Postoperatively, three expert head and neck radiologists who were blinded to patients' clinical and surgical data re-evaluated these temporal MDCT images with respect to ossicular and scutum erosion, tegmen tympani defect, labyrinthine fistula, posterior wall remodeling or erosion, opening of the eustachian tube, and sinus tympani.
The MDCT images were also quantitatively analyzed by measuring the lower lateral attic recess (i.e., the distance between the long process of the incus and the lateral attic wall) and upper medial attic recess (i.e., distance between the head of malleus and the medial attic wall) in two planes. To ensure this, the incudomalleolar joint was initially found in the axial plane; then, by moving caudally, the distance between the long process of the incus and the lateral attic wall was measured perpendicular to the attic wall at the exact level of the superior margin of the external ear canal (Figure 1c). Next, by moving cranially, the distance between the head of the malleus and the medial attic wall was measured perpendicular to the attic wall just above the facial canal tympanic segment (Figure 1d). The distances between the scutum and the long process of the incus and between the head of malleus and the medial attic wall (Figure 1e and 1f, respectively) were also measured in the coronal plane. The radiologists made quantitative measurements for either the diseased or healthy ears and did not communicate while taking the measurements.
Quantitative measurements could be made for 64 of the 75 ears with auto-evacuated SAC because there was no reference bone wall in 11 patients due to scutum or incudostapedial destruction. These measurements were compared with data from the contralateral healthy ears (63 ears) of 63 patients with unilateral disease.
The Kolmogorov--Smirnov test was used to evaluate the distribution of continuous variables. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for the analysis of paired data (repeated measurements). Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Windows software version 22.0 (IBM Corp.; Armonk, NY, USA). The level of statistical significance was set at p<0.05.
The intraoperatively verified diagnoses of 69 patients (75 ears) were pars flaccida cholesteatoma for 36 ears, pars tensa cholesteatoma for 24 ears, and auto-atticotomy or automastoidectomy for 15 ears (Table 1).
Morphological Evaluation on CT
Table 2 and Figure 2 summarize the morphological evaluations made on MDCT. Scutum blunting and total ossicular destruction were detected in six ears, wherein the middle ear was completely pneumatized. Minor ossicular erosion was detected in six ears with pars flaccida type cholesteatomas and three ears with the pars tensa type (12%) and was clearly observed because of the smooth bony remodeling on the posterior tympanic wall in all of these ears. In two ears with pars flaccida cholesteatoma (3%), there was no scutum or ossicular destruction. Three patients had mastoid air cell aeration ipsilateral side. No or underpneumatization or opacification was detected in 72 (96%) of the 75 ears with cholesteatoma.
The most frequent CT finding in the partially or completely auto-evacuated SAC cases was a partially or completely empty circular or elliptical aerated cavity surrounded by granulation tissue (Figures 3 and 4). The wall structure of this circular or elliptical aerated cavity (matrix and perimatrix) of the cholesteatoma was almost never visualized because the thickness of the squamous epithelium was below the resolution limits of the device or it was obscured by the surrounding granulation tissue.
In pars flaccida cholesteatoma cases, lateral attic expansion and scutum erosion were determined in the coronal plane, whereas in pars tensa perforation cases (pars tensa cholesteatomas), medial attic expansion and posterior wall flattening (smooth remodeling) were best visualized in the axial plane. The recess expansions were confirmed by quantitative measurements.
Quantitative CT Measurements
Table 3 presents the quantitative measurements in the coronal and axial CT images of ears with auto-evacuated SAC and contralateral healthy ears. The distance of the lateral attic in ears with pars flaccida cholesteatoma in both coronal and axial planes was significantly higher than that in contralateral healthy ears (2.56[+ or -]0.76 vs. 1.20[+ or -]0.22 mm in the coronal plane, p=0.012; 3.83[+ or -]1.52 vs. 2.50[+ or -]0.51 mm in the axial plane, p=0.012). The distance of the medial attic was significantly higher in pars tensa cholesteatoma cases than in contralateral healthy ears in the axial plane (3.42[+ or -]01.00 mm vs. 2.41[+ or -]0.74 mm, p=0.001), with no difference in the coronal plane.
A cholesteatoma has three components: cystic contents comprising desquamated keratin, matrix, and perimatrix (with the last two also being known as the "shell") [2, 17, 18]. Sometimes, an acquired cholesteatoma spontaneously evacuates into the external auditory canal, leaving a cavity (shell) within the granulation tissue in the shape of the original cholesteatoma, but now filled partially or totally with air, instead of exfoliated keratin, which appears opacified. This is called an auto-evacuated (spontaneously drained) SAC. Since the healthy middle ear is already filled with air, a drained SAC is difficult to radiologically evaluate if there is no major ossicular or scutum destruction.
In this study, we presented the CT findings of auto-evacuated cholesteatomas, which form a spherical or elliptical air cavity in which the peripheral wall of the cholesteatoma wall is surrounded by the granulation tissue, wherein some of them are nondestructive and unidentified so far.
The air-filled cavity of SAC consists of the peripheral cholesteatoma wall and is composed of keratinized squamous epithelium, which is the remnant of the cholesteatoma, i.e., the matrix and perimatrix or the so-called shell [12-16, 18]. This matrix wall continues its aggressive osteolytic activity and is seen on CT as a partially opacified or completely empty air-filled cavity, depending on how much of its contents have drained and the accumulation of keratin and epithelial debris [8, 19].
The enlargement of the lateral attic recess in pars flaccida and medial attic recess in pars tensa cholesteatomas causing ossicular and/or tympanic wall destruction is well known [1, 16, 20]. In some of our patients, we observed an increase in the lateral attic distance in auto-evacuated pars flaccida cholesteatomas without the presence of scutum or lateral attic wall erosion (Figure 3). We believe that an auto-evacuated cholesteatoma can be radiologically diagnosed within the granulation tissue before it forms a massive destructive cavity, such as automastoidectomy or auto-atticotomy. As such, a nondestructive spontaneously evacuated SAC can be an early sign of auto-atticotomy or automastoidectomy.
According to our experience in patients with pars tensa cholesteatoma, a slight medial attic expansion may be easily underestimated in the coronal plane. Therefore, we recommend that the axial plane evaluation in these patients should be always made. We additionally observed smooth bony remodeling of the posterior tympanic wall in the axial plane in addition to lateral or medial attic enlargement (Figure 3-6). This finding can also support the diagnosis in more complex questionable cases.
Figure 2. Percentage of morphological findings with respect to cholesteatoma types on radiological evaluation. Pars flaccida Pars tensa Posterior wall remodeling 61% 83% Opening of eustachian tube 83% 95% Ossicular erosion 77% 83% Scutum erosion 61% 58% Tegmen tympani defect 2% 0% Round air-filled defect 20% 87% Opening of sinus tympani 61% 45% Labyrinthine fitsula 0% 0% Tympanic membrane retraction 75% 75% Autoatticotomy/mural cholestoma Posterior wall remodeling 80% Opening of eustachian tube 86% Ossicular erosion 100% Scutum erosion 100% Tegmen tympani defect 20% Round air-filled defect 73% Opening of sinus tympani 33% Labyrinthine fitsula 13% Tympanic membrane retraction 86% Note: Table made from bar graph.
The opacified appearance of a nondestructive cholesteatoma cannot be easily differentiated from the surrounding granulation tissue, fluid collection, or other benign or malign pathologies based on CT attenuation values or morphological evaluation (21-23). However, the specific CT appearance of an air-filled spontaneously evacuated SAC within the granulation tissue renders it possible to differentiate it from other pathologies. The evacuated SAC may sometimes appear as a dry middle ear in advance stages, causing complete ossicular destruction (Figure 6).
Although tympanoplasty/atticotomy is a relatively elective operation in simple central or attic perforations/dry attic retraction pockets without cholesteatoma, the existence of cholesteatoma requires mastoidectomy. However, attic perforations/dry attic retraction pockets seen on clinical examinations could also simply represent a previously evacuated cholesteatoma with the outer wall left behind. This process would be underdiagnosed by an otologist as simple central or attic perforations/dry attic retraction pockets, and this underestimation may lead to further disease progression and a more extensive surgery. Also, particularly in cases where patients are not suitable for surgery (who have contraindication for general anesthesia or not willing to undergo surgery), differentiating between a deep retraction pocket and a drained cholesteatoma may be crucial. Additionally, with the inadequacy of magnetic resonance imaging in helping detect SAC in these cases, it is thus possible to say that in some circumstances, CT becomes determinative in the decision of the indication for surgery. Membrane retraction without a cholesteatoma leading to ossicular destruction has been also reported . All of our patients were intraoperatively diagnosed with cholesteatoma. Clinically, otologists commonly decide on surgical treatment based on the patients' symptoms, e.g., discharge frequency, debris accumulation, and progressive conductive hearing loss, regardless of the presence of cholesteatoma. However, considering the potential of surgery to impair hearing, recurrence caused by residual squamous epithelium in the middle ear cavity after conservative surgery, or even worse, a combination of these two unwanted effects, the importance of the preoperative radiological evaluation of cholesteatoma becomes evident.
A cholesteatoma presenting as an aerated cavity instead of soft-tissue attenuation in the middle ear may lead to misdiagnosis in the CT follow-up investigations. In such situations, previous CTs and quantitative analyses may provide additional useful information for correct diagnosis. Since the distances evaluated were quite small, with large variation probable among patients, in our study, three different radiologists made the measurements in two separate planes at right angles. SAC of the middle ear is not histologically specific; therefore, the study depends on intraoperative observations to arrive at an appropriate diagnosis. These are the limitations of our study.
An auto-evacuated cholesteatoma should be considered when a temporal bone CT shows an expansive-looking air-filled structure within the granulation tissue, giving the impression of a cavity enclosed by a membranous wall with a smooth surface in the middle ear. Previous images showing a mass-like opacification in this location can support the diagnosis. In patients with a chronic aural discharge, evacuated cholesteatoma should be considered even if a temporal CT shows nonopacified aerated areas surrounded by granulation tissue, with or without destruction, and quantitative measurements should be made.
Enlargement of the lateral attic can suggest pars flaccida cholesteatoma
Enlargement of the medial attic can suggest pars tensa cholesteatoma
Enlargement of the lateral or medial attic can be measurable on CT
Ethics Committee Approval: Ethics committee approval was received for this study from the ethics committee of Medical Hamidiye Training and Research Hospital (No: 684, date: 06.21.2016).
Informed Consent: Written informed consent was obtained from patients who participated in this study.
Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.
Author Contributions: Concept--I.C, G.B, A.S.M, U.G.; Design - I.C, G.B.; Supervision I.C., G.B., A.S.M.; Resources - A.S.M, U.G.; Materials - G.B., A.S.M., U.G.; Data Collection and/or Processing - I.C., G.B., A.S.M.; Analysis and/or Interpretation - I.C., G.B., A.S.M., U.G.; Literature Search - I.C., G.B., U.G.; Writing Manuscript - I.C., G.B.; Critical Review - I.C., G.B.; Other - I.C., G.B., A.S.M., U.G.
Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.
[1.] Swartz JD, Hagiwara M. Temporal bone: inflammatory disease. In: Som PM., Curtis HD, eds. Head and Neck Imaging. 5th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, Elsevier; 2011: 1201-7. [CrossRef]
[2.] Ferlito A, Devaney KO, Rinaldo A, Milroy CM, Wenig BM, Iurato S, et al. Clinicopathological consultation. Ear cholesteatoma versus cholesterol granuloma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1997; 106: 79-85. [CrossRef]
[3.] Olszewska E, Wagner M, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Ebmeyer J, Dazert S, Hildmann H, et al. Etiopathogenesis of cholesteatoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2004; 261: 6-24. [CrossRef]
[4.] Du Verney JG. Traite de l'organe de l'ouie [Treatise of the hearing organ]. Paris: Bibliotheque interuniversitaire de medecine, 1683.
[5.] Cruveilhier J. Anatomie pathologique du corps humain. Paris: J. B. Bailliere, 1829.
[6.] Muller. Progress of the anatomy and physiology of the nervous system during the year 1836. Br Foreign Med Rev 1838; 5: 293-300.
[7.] Kazahaya K, Potsic WP. Congenital cholesteatoma. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 12: 398-403. [CrossRef]
[8.] Chole RA, Sudhoff HH. Chronic otitis media,Mastoiditis, and Petrositis. In: Flint PW, Haughey BH, Lund BJ, et al. editors. Cummings, Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery. 5th ed. Mosby. 2010. [CrossRef]
[9.] Martins O, Victor J, Selesnick S. The relationship between individual ossicular status and conductive hearing loss in cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 2012; 33: 387-92. [CrossRef]
[10.] Olsen JM, Ribeiro Fde A, Yasui MM, dos Santos IT. Hearing loss assessment in primary and secondary acquired cholesteatoma. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 81: 653-57 [CrossRef]
[11.] Nemzek WR, Swartz JD. Temporal bone: Inflammatory disease. Head and Neck Imaging. 5th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby. 2011.p.1190.
[12.] Gaurano JL, Joharjy IA. Middle ear cholesteatoma: characteristic CT findings in 64 patients. Ann Saudi Med 2004; 24: 442-7. [CrossRef]
[13.] Barath K, Huber AM, Stampfli P, Varga Z, Kollias S. Neuroradiology of cholesteatomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 221-9. [CrossRef]
[14.] Schwartz JD, Harnsberger HR. The Middle Ear and Mastoid. In: Schwartz JD, Harnsberger HR, eds. Imaging of the Temporal Bone. 3rd ed. New York: Thieme, 1998.p.87-107.
[15.] Lee SK, Yeo S, Park M, Byun J. Clinical analysis of 22 cases with automastoidactomy caused by cholesteatoma. Int Adv Otol 2013; 9: 232-9.
[16.] Manasawala M, Cunnane ME, Curtin HD, Moonis G. Imaging findings in auto-atticotomy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014; 35: 182-5. [CrossRef]
[17.] Soldati D, Mudry A. Knowledge about cholesteatoma, from the first description to the modern histopathology. Otol Neurotol 2001; 22: 723-30. [CrossRef]
[18.] Strunk CL. Cholesteatoma. In: Bailey BJ, Johnson JT, Newlands SD, eds. Head and neck surgery--otolaryngology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, 1993.p.2041-51.
[19.] Nardis PF, Teramo M, Giunta S, Bellelli A. Unusual cholesteatoma shell: CT findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1988; 12: 1084-85. [CrossRef]
[20.] Leighton SE, Robson AK, Anslow P, Milford CA. The role of CT imaging in the management of chronic suppurative otitis media. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1993; 18: 23-9. [CrossRef]
[21.] Borgstein J, Gerritsma TV, Bruce IA. Erosion of the incus in pediatric posterior tympanic membrane retraction pockets without cholesteatoma. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2008; 72: 1419-23. [CrossRef]
[22.] Phelps PD, Wright A. Imaging cholesteatoma. Clin Radiol 1990; 41: 156-62. [CrossRef]
[23.] Leighton SE, Robson AK, Anslow P, Milford CA. The role of CT imaging in the management of chronic suppurative otitis media. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1993; 18: 23-9. [CrossRef]
Irfan Celebi [iD], Gulpembe Bozkurt [iD], Abdullah Soydan Mahmutoglu [iD], Umman Guliyev [iD]
Department of Radiology, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (IC, UG)
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Acibadem University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (GB)
Department of Radiology, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (ASM)
Cite this article as: Celebi I, Bozkurt G, Mahmutoglu AS, Guliyev U. Multidetector Computed Tomography Findings of Auto-Evacuated Secondary Acquired Cholesteatoma: A Morphologic and Quantitative Analysis. J Int Adv Otol 2018; 14(3): 464-71.
Corresponding Address: Irfan Celebi E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Submitted: 21.11.2017 * Revision Received: 05.02.2018 * Accepted: 05.03.2018 * Available Online Date: 15.10.2018
Table 1. Intraoperatively confirmed diagnosis of 75 ears with auto-evacuated SAC (n=69 patients) according to the modified classification system of Barath et al. (2011) SAC classification Initial location of cholesteatoma Pars flaccida cholesteatoma (attic or Prussak's space) Epitympanum (lateral to ossicle) Cholesteatoma with pars tensa type perforation (sinus) Mesotympanum (medial to ossicle) Ad hoc group (mural cholesteatoma/auto-atticotomy) Undefined Total SAC classification Number of ears (%) Pars flaccida cholesteatoma (attic or Prussak's space) 36 (48.0%) Cholesteatoma with pars tensa type perforation (sinus) 24 (32.0%) Ad hoc group (mural cholesteatoma/auto-atticotomy) 15 (20.0%) Total 75 SAC, secondary acquired cholesteatoma Table 2. Morphological findings on radiological evaluation with respect to cholesteatoma types Pars flaccida (n=36) Pars tensa (n=24) Posterior wall remodeling 22 (61 %) 20 (83 %) Opening of eustachian tube 30 (83 %) 23 (95 %) Ossicular erosion 28 (77 %) 20 (83 %) Scutum erosion 22 (61 %) 14 (58 %) Tegmen tympani defect 1 (2 %) 0 (0 %) Opening of sinus tympani 22 (61 %) 11 (45 %) Labyrinthine fistula 0 (0 %) 0 (0 %) Auto-atticotomy mural cholesteatoma (n=15) Total (n=75) Posterior wall remodeling 12 (80 %) 54 (72 %) Opening of eustachian tube 13 (86 %) 66 (88 %) Ossicular erosion 15 (100 %) 63 (84 %) Scutum erosion 15 (100 %) 51 (68 %) Tegmen tympani defect 3 (20 %) 4 (5 %) Opening of sinus tympani 5 (33 %) 38 (51 %) Labyrinthine fistula 2 (13 %) 2 (3 %) Table 3. Quantitative measurements on coronal and axial CT images of ears with auto-evacuated SAC and contralateral healthy ears Ears with SAC p (*) Pars flaccida Pars tensa CT plane (n=32) (n=24) Lateral attic (mm) Coronal 2.56[+ or -]0.76 1.40[+ or -]0.86 Axial 3.83[+ or -]1.52 1.67[+ or -]0.94 Medial attic (mm) Coronal 2.36[+ or -]0.44 2.92[+ or -]0.91 Axial 2.02[+ or -]0.68 3.42[+ or -]1.00 Auto-atticotomy mural cholesteatoma Healthy ears (n=8) (n=63) Lateral attic (mm) 4.3[+ or -]1.2 1.20[+ or -]0.22 5.1[+ or -]0.7 2.50[+ or -]0.51 Medial attic (mm) 1.7[+ or -]1.1 2.52[+ or -]0.77 1.0[+ or -]0.8 2.41[+ or -]0.74 Pars flaccida vs. Pars tensa vs. healthy ears healthy ears Lateral attic (mm) <0.012 <0.012 Medial attic (mm) >0.379 <0.001 SAC: secondary acquired cholesteatoma; CT: computed tomography Data are given as mean[+ or -]standard deviation (*) Wilcoxon signed-rank test
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Original Article|
|Author:||Celebi, Irfan; Bozkurt, Gulpembe; Mahmutoglu, Abdullah Soydan; Guliyev, Umman|
|Publication:||The Journal of the International Advanced Otology|
|Date:||Dec 1, 2018|
|Previous Article:||Differences in Antibiotic Resistance of MRSA Infections in Patients with Various Types of Otitis Media.|
|Next Article:||Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Retrosigmoid Approach to the Cerebellopontine Angle Using a Novel Surgical Instrument: A Cadaveric Study.|