Printer Friendly

Movements and habitat use of subadult alligator snapping turtles (Macroclemys temminckii) in Louisiana.


Alligator snapping turtles (Macroclemys temminckii) are secretive, highly aquatic and difficult to study. This species is listed as a threatened, protected or restricted species in most states because of overharvest, dredging, pollution and depletion of its wetland habitat (Pritchard, 1989). Sloan and Taylor (1987) found that movements of adult M. temminckii varied and that bald cypress (Taxodium distichum) forest, vegetation mats, and buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis) were used extensively. Shipman (1993) reported similar results from one adult female in Kansas. The turtle had "core sites" containing much cover and debris in which she would remain inactive for at least 1 h. She also moved upstream 6.5 km in 11.5 mo.

There has been no research on subadult Macroclemys temminckii. Subadults are an important size class to study, as they represent potential breeders. Subadults may have different movement patterns or varied habitat use because of habitat partitioning, size, sexual immaturity, juvenile dispersal (Diemer, 1992) or diet. Information concerning movements and habitat use is vital for better understanding of the ecology of North America's largest fresh-water turtle. The objective of this study was to determine the movements and habitat use of subadult M. temminckii in a Louisiana bayou.


Approximately 9.7 km of the northern portion of Bayou Desiard, located ca. 10 km N of Monroe, Louisiana, served as the study area. Bayou Desiard is a slow-flowing, winding bayou that partially drains Lake Bartholomew through culverts to the N and empties into the larger Ouachita River to the S. The central and southern portion of the bayou are partitioned by several control structures with underwater culverts allowing control of water flow. An open channel, almost devoid of emergent vegetation, runs through the center of the bayou. Between the open channel and the bayou shoreline is a baldcypress forest. Numerous small breaks exist in the baldcypress forest consisting of either open water, thickets of buttonbush or floating mats of herbaceous vegetation (Ludwigia glandulosa, L. peploides, Hydrocotyle ranunculoides, Myriophyllum brasiliense, Eichornia crassipes, Azolla caroliniana and Lemna spp.). The underwater habitat varies from open (bare sand, mud bottom or leaf debris) to dense areas of logs, stumps, branches or submergent vegetation composed primarily of Cabomba caroliniana, Ceratophyllum demersum, Uricularia spp. and Najas guadalupensis. Sixty circular (4 m radius = 50 [m.sup.2]) sampling plots were used to determine tree/shrub/sapling ([greater than]1.37 m all) density and size (DBH). The plots were located at 30 points, 315 m apart (upstream/downstream) in the study area in the midpoint of the baldcypress forest on either side of the stream channel. The baldcypress forest had a mean density of 4.3 trees/shrubs/saplings per sample plot (876 per ha) and a mean DBH of 26.8 cm per individual. The water depth of the open channel and baldcypress forest and the width of open channel, baldcypress forest and total bayou were measured at 75 points. The points were located an equal distance apart (upstream/downstream) in the study area. The mean water depth of the open channel was 193.7 cm and in the baldcypress forest was 121.9 cm. The mean bayou width was 81.6 m, the baldcypress forest width was 56.4 m, and width of the open channel was 25.2 m.


Size criteria and capture. - Macroclemys temminckii can be divided into three ontogenetic classes: adults, subadults and hatchlings. Dobie (1971) considered turtles to be sexually mature based on the following criteria: for males, skull length = 11.5 cm and carapace length = 37.0 cm; for females, skull length = 11.2 cm and carapace length = 33.0 cm. Subadult turtles were classified by a skull length of 8.0-11.0 cm and a carapace length of 18.0-32.0 cm.

We trapped from 16 March-2 June 1992 for a total of 38 trapping days. Seventeen black, three-hoop, 91.4-cm hoop nets were used to capture turtles. Captured turtles were removed immediately from nets; those that did not meet the size criteria were measured, marked and released. Subadults were placed in a plastic container, weighed on a Hanson (860) scale, and then strapped to a board for further measurement and transmitter attachment. Measurements taken with calipers included carapace length and width, plastron length and width, precloacal length and head length. Environmental data such as water depth, temperature and habitat type were also recorded at the time of capture. The capture per unit effort (CPUE) was 0.042 per day and was calculated by dividing the number of turtles (27 = 14 subadults and 13 adults) by the number of trapping days (38) multiplied by the number of traps (17) (Bagenal, 1978; Neilson and Johnson, 1983).

Transmitter placement and telemetry equipment. - Advanced Telemetry Systems (ATS, Isanti, Minn.) transmitters were attached to the posterior marginal scute of the carapace of 12 subadult turtles by two, 1.6-mm self-locking nuts and bolts. Transmitters were 48 mm x 29 mm x 19 mm, weighed 66 g, had a pulse rate of 57-62 ppm, a pulse width of 17-19 msec, and were hermetically sealed in 3M Scotchcase electrical resin. A 45.7-cm transmitter antenna trailed behind the turtle. A TR-2 receiver (TELONICS, Mesa, Ariz.) and a Yagi 2-element "H" antenna were used to monitor the turtles (Kenward, 1987). Following attachment of the transmitter, each turtle was photographed and assigned a color corresponding to plastic flagging ribbon, which was used to mark fix locations (for example, 151.560 MHz = RED).

Monitoring and data collection. - The 12 turtles (nine females, three males) had the following mean measurements at the time of recapture: weight 4.10 kg (SD 0.62); carapace length 26.48 cm (SD 1.42); carapace width 22.50 cm (SD 1.30); plastron length 19.81 cm (SD 0.94); plastron width 19.02 cm (SD 1.13); precloacal length 6.04 cm (SD 0.87); and head length 9.03 cm (SD 0.56). Of the 15 turtles that were caught but not used, 10 were adult females, three were adult males, and two were too small for sex determination.

All turtles were released at the exact spot of capture within 2 h after capture. The release site was marked by colored ribbons. A turtle's capture location was the reference point for measuring up and down stream movement. Telemetry fixes were made on each turtle irregularly during the study. Fixes were from a boat, which made it possible to get directly above each turtle in order to determine its exact location and eliminated the need for triangulation. Fix locations were marked with colored ribbons (Reinert, 1992). The date and time of the fix were recorded on the colored ribbon.

Each time a fix was taken, the following data were recorded: date, time, air temperature, weather condition, water depth, water temperature, water color (secchi disk), location up or down stream from previous fix, up or down stream from capture site, distance traveled from previous fix, distance from capture site, distance from shoreline, azimuth from capture site, azimuth from last fix, macrohabitat and microhabitat type, and same or opposite side of bayou (Reinert and Kodrich, 1982; Slip and Shine, 1988; Brown et al., 1990; Secor, 1992). Distances were measured in feet with a hand-held Ranging 600 range finder which has a margin of error of [+ or -]6[inches] at 100[feet], [+ or -]5[feet] at 300[feet], and [+ or -]20[feet] at 600[feet]. Feet were later converted to meters. Water depth was recorded in cm and all temperature measurements were in degrees Celsius.

Habitats, recapture and data processing. - The study area included two macrohabitats: baldcypress forest and open channel. The baldcypress forest could be subdivided into forest, open water, floating aquatic vegetation mat, or dense buttonbush thicket habitats. Microhabitat was the area within 2 [m.sup.2] of a fix location and was divided into three major categories: structures, open water and undetermined. Structures included logs, stumps, branches, cypress tree roots, debris (leaf and other natural litter), vegetation mat, buttonbush, submerged vegetation or man-made structures (duckblinds). Undetermined microhabitats occurred at fix sites with high water turbidity.

Each turtle was recaptured by hand collection or by gill webbing approximately 1 yr (mean = 370.9 days) from the date of initial capture. Each turtle was remeasured, and its sex was determined surgically (Owens et al., 1978; Wood et al., 1983; Rostal et al., 1990; Mahmoud and Cyrus, 1992). The transmitters were removed and a Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries tag was attached. The turtles were taken to their last known location and released.

An unpaired student's t-test was used to compare fix distance, percent of movement fixes, water depth and distance from shoreline between males and females. Home range length of males and females was compared using a Mann-Whitney U-test. Pearson Correlation (r) was used to correlate size and percent of movement fixes, fix distance, home range, distance from shoreline, and water depth. This test was also used to correlate water temperature and percent of movement fixes, fix distance, distance from shoreline and water depth. Goodness [TABULAR DATA FOR TABLE 1 OMITTED] of fit (chi-square) with Yates correction for continuity was used to compare observed use of macrohabitat to available macrohabitat (Ludwig and Reynolds, 1988; White and Garrott, 1990).


Movements. - The total number of fixes was 1327, a mean of 110.6 per turtle. The mean time between fixes was 3.3 days the percent of fixes in which turtles had moved since the last fix (movement fixes) was significantly greater in males than females (Table 1) (t = 2.506, P = 0.031). The mean distance between movement fixes was longer for males than females (Table 1) (t = 3.718, P = 0.004). Males were in shallower water than females (Table 1) (t = 4.278, P = 0.001). There was no significant difference between males and females in distance from shoreline (Table 1) (t = 0.731, P = 0.465).

Home-range length was calculated by adding the farthest upstream movement distance to the farthest downstream movement distance (Pluto and Bellis, 1988; Rowe and Moll, 1991). The bayou is nearly the same width throughout the study area and no overland movements were recorded, so home range length was used rather than area. Mean home range length for male turtles was longer than that of females (Table 1) (U = 27.000, P = 0.014). Nine of the 12 home ranges overlapped.

The mean percentage of fixes in which turtles moved upstream from the previous fix was 22.8; downstream from the previous fix was also 22.8, and the percent of lateral movements from the previous fix was 2.5. The percentage of fixes in which the turtle moved upstream from the capture site was 18.5 and downstream from the capture site was 29.2.

Water temperature was highly correlated with percentage of movement fixes (r = 0.955) and fix distance (r = 0.937), but less correlated to distance from shoreline (r = 0.749) and [TABULAR DATA FOR TABLE 2 OMITTED] water depth (r = 0.634). There was little correlation of size to any variable: distance to shoreline (r = 0.507), home range (r = 0.495), fix distance (r = 0.437), water depth (r = 0.274) and percentage of movement fixes (r = 0.133). The smallest percent of movement fixes (4.6) and shortest mean fix distance (11.1 m) for all turtles occurred in February (Table 2). The largest percent of movement fixes was in July (82.4) and the month with the longest mean fix distance was June (312.3 m). Only 82 (6.2%) of the fixes represented a turtle crossing the bayou. All the turtles stayed within the bayou except for one female which ventured over 800 m up a small adjoining creek. The turtle overwintered there and then returned to within 36.0 m of its capture site the following spring. Two other turtles (a male and a female) moved over 1850 m within the bayou and overwintered at a new location. The male returned close to its capture site after winter was over but the female did not.

Habitat use. - Macrohabitats available to the turtles in the study area included 30.9% open channel and 69.1% baldcypress forest. Almost all of the fixes (males = 99.7%, females = 98.9%, total = 99.1%) were in the baldcypress forest. The observed macrohabitat preference is significantly different from the expected (sample chi-square = 41.13, sample g-statistic = 63.7, P [less than] 0.001).

The microhabitat occupied by subadults in 73.8% of the fixes was a structure. The most often used structures were log/logs (39.5% of the fixes), buttonbush (9.2%), stump/stumps (8.8%) and branches (8.0%). For all subadult turtles, the lowest percentage of fixes with a structure occurred in spring (63.0) and summer (70.5). Males were found in open water microhabitat more often than females (t = 4.694, P = 0.003), especially during the spring. There were no substantial differences in overwintering microhabitats.

Turtles returned to within 1.5 m of a previously occupied site on 135 occasions, 97 of them to a microstructure of log/logs. One area of logs was visited by five turtles during the year. At six different fixes two turtles were present, and at two fixes three turtles were present. Forty-six fixes were made at a site where a different turtle had been before. Thirty-three of the 46 fixes were male/female combinations and the other 13 were male/male. No female/female combinations were observed. There was no mortality during the study.


Movements. - Gibbons (1990) listed four reasons for turtle movements: (1) basking; (2) reproduction; (3) feeding and (4) favorable hiding places (cover). Macroclemys temminckii seldom if ever bask (Pritchard, 1989) and we observed no basking. Turtles used in this study were nonreproductive subadults and no reproductive behavior was observed. However, there were 33 fixes where a male moved into a microsite where a female had been. We observed no feeding activity during the study, but fixes were made near large bream beds (Lepomis spp.). Cover was a major factor for turtle movements in our study; 99.1% of fixes were in baldcypress forest and 73.8% were associated with a structure.

In addition to cover, water temperature also affected turtle movement. The water temperature was about the same in November (mean = 13.3 C) and March (mean = 13.8 C); however, the distance between fixes was longer in March (mean = 136.1 m) than in November (mean = 88.7 m) (Table 2). Perhaps photoperiod as well as temperature affect movement. Movement began to increase drastically in April for all turtles, particularly for males [ILLUSTRATION FOR FIGURE 1 OMITTED]. There was a sharp decline in movement by males in August (mean fix distance July = 453.8 m, August = 208.4 m, September = 328.2 m), a trend that has also been noted in other turtle species (Meeks and Ultsch, 1990; Lovich et al., 1992; Brown and Brooks, 1993). The maximum mean water temperature during our study was 29.1 C in July, however, our turtles did not move to the deeper cooler waters of the open channel during the hot summer months. This could be because of a lack of structures in the open channel.

Habitat. - The baldcypress forest occupies 69.1% of the bayou and the open channel occupies 30.9%. The preference (99.1% of the fixes) for the baldcypress forest habitat shows the importance of forested wetlands to this species. The high preference for structure was similar to common snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina) (Froese, 1978). Obbard (1977) stated that common snapping turtles preferred areas with cover because they were "ambush predators"; this is also the case with Macroclemys temminckii.

On numerous occasions we could see and photograph the turtles that were often not only under logs but inside them. Additional observations were made of the turtles in shallow depressions at the base of cypress trees or stumps. These depressions apparently were constructed by the turtles. In some instances, the turtles were covered by loose leaf litter with only their head and a small portion of their carapace exposed. Galbraith et al. (1987) observed similar activity in chelydra serpentina. Burrowing in the bottom was especially evident during winter months. In addition to cover, the structures also may be used as climbing aids in obtaining air since these turtles are bottom-walkers and are relatively poor swimmers compared to other aquatic turtles.

There were limited observations of aggregation or interaction by the turtles. However, during recapture efforts, a small Macrolemys temminckii without a transmitter that we had captured the year before was recaptured within 30 cm of the targeted transmittered turtle. Also, after the turtles were returned to their recapture location, we placed traps (hoop nets) in locations that were "highly preferred" and additional M. temminckii (subadults and adults) were captured. Two nights of trapping with a single trap in one particular "highly preferred area" yielded three additional adult M. temminckii weighing 12.7, 26.4 and 32.7 kg.

Our results show similarities to adult Macrolemys temminckii in their frequent use of cypress forest and in their tendency to return to the same microsite or core areas (Sloan and Taylor, 1987; Shipman, 1993). Since the baldcypress forest and structured microhabitats within this forest are very important to the subadult M. temminckii, this should add impetus to the efforts to protect these wetlands, especially from dredging.

Acknowledgments. - This study was made possible by the Fur and Refuge Division of the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries. We also thank Tony Trishel, Toby Trishel, Steven George, David Ruid, Steve Jensen, Brent Johnson, Anthony Newman and Edwin Ritter for their assistance in the field. Neil H. Douglas provided superb holding accommodations at the NLU Turtle Research Facility. We thank Arthur Liles, M.D., for his help with surgical techniques, and Chris Holt for his help in sex determination of the turtles. Also, appreciation goes to William Gutzke for his suggestions. We thank Jeffrey Lovich for his contribution to the literature review and Ernest Maples for his help with statistics. We thank Sherry Harrel, Anne-Marie Murphy, Jessica Ruff and Mark Farr for their assistance in reviewing the manuscript. Special thanks go to Keith Cascio who was a tremendous help throughout this study.


BAGENAL, T. 1978. Methods for assessment of fish production in fresh waters. Blackwell Scientific Publications Ltd., Victoria, Australia. 365 p.

BROWN, G. P. AND R. J. BROOKS. 1993. Sexual and seasonal differences in activity in a northern population of snapping turtles, Chelydra serpentina. Herpetologica, 49:311-318.

-----, ----- AND J. A. LAYFIELD. 1990. Radio telemetry of free-ranging snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina) during summer. Can. J. Zool., 69:1659-1663.

DIEMER, J. E. 1992. Home range and movements of the tortoise Gopherus polyphemus in northern Florida. J. Herpetol., 26:158-165.

DOBIE, J. L. 1971. Reproduction and growth in the alligator snapping turtle, Macroclemys temminckii (Troost). Copeia, 1971:645-658.

FROESE, A. D. 1978. Habitat preferences of the common snapping turtle, Chelydra serpentina (Reptilia, Testudines, Chelydridae). J. Herpetol., 12:53-58.

GALBRAITH, D. A., M. W. CHANDLER AND R. J. BROOKS. 1987. The fine structure of home ranges of male Chelydra serpentina are snapping turtles territorial? Can. J. Zool., 65:2623-2629.

GIBBONS, J. 1990. Life history and ecology of the slider turtle. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. 368 p.

KENWARD, R. 1987. Wildlife radio tagging; equipment, field techniques, and data analysis. Academic Press, San Diego, California. 222 p.

LOVICH, J. E., D. W. HERMAN AND K. M. FAHEY. 1992. Seasonal activity and movements of bog turtles (Clemmys muhlenbergii) in North Carolina. Copeia, 1992:1107-1111.

LUDWIG, J. A. AND J. F. REYNOLDS. 1988. Statistical ecology: a primer on methods and computing. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. 337 p.

MAHMOUD, I. Y. AND R. V. CYRUS. 1992. The testicular cycle of the common snapping turtle, Chelydra serpentina, in Wisconsin. Herpetologica, 48:193-201.

MEEKS, R. L. AND G. R. ULTSCH. 1990. Overwintering behavior of snapping turtles. Copeia, 1990:880-884.

NEILSON, L. A. AND D. L. JOHNSON. 1983. Fisheries techniques. Southern Printing Co., Blacksburg, Virginia. 468 p.

OBBARD, M. E. 1977. A radio-telemetry and mark-recapture study of activity in the common snapping turtle, Chelydra serpentina. Unpubl. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario. 76 p.

OWENS, D. W., J. R. HENDRICKSON, V. LANCE AND I. P. CALLARD. 1978. A technique for determining sex of immature Chelonia mydas using a radioimmunoassay. Herpetologica, 34:270-273.

PLUTO, T. G. AND E. D. BELLIS. 1988. Seasonal and annual movements of riverine map turtles, Graptemys geographica. J. Herpetol., 22:152-158.

PRITCHARD, P. C. H. 1989. The alligator snapping turtle; biology and conservation. Milwaukee Public Museum, Wisconsin. 104 p.

REINERT, H. R. 1992. Radiotelemetric field studies of pit vipers: data acquisition and analysis, p. 185-197. In: J. A. Campbell and E. D. Brodie, Jr. (eds.). Biology of the pit vipers. Selva, Tyler, Texas.

----- AND W. R. KODRICH. 1982. Movements and habitat utilization by the massasaunga, Sistrurus catenatus catenatus. J. Herpetol., 16:162-171.

ROSTAL, D. C., T. R. ROBECK, D. W. OWENS AND D. C. KRAEMER. 1990. Ultrasound imaging of ovaries and eggs in Kemp's ridley sea turtles (Lepidochelys kempi). J. Zoo and Wildl. Med., 21:27-35.

ROWE, J. W. AND E. O. MOLL. 1991. A radiotelemetric study of activity and movements of the Blanding's turtle (Emydoidea blandingi) in northeastern Illinois. J. Herpetol., 25:178-185.

SECOR, S. M. 1992. A preliminary analysis of the movement and home range size of the sidewinder, Crotalus cerastes, p. 389-393. In: J. A. Campbell and E. D. Brodie, Jr. (eds.). Biology of the pit vipers. Selva, Tyler, Texas.

SHIPMAN, P. A. 1993. Natural history of the alligator snapping turtle (Macroclemys temminckii) in Kansas. Kans. Herpetol. Soc. Newsl. 93:14-17.

SLIP, D. J. AND R. SHINE. 1988. Habitat use, movements and activity patterns of free-ranging diamond pythons, Morelia spilota spilota (Serpentes: Boidae): a radio telemetric study. Aust. Wildl. Res., 15:515-531.

SLOAN, K. N. AND D. TAYLOR. 1987. Habitats and movements of adult alligator snapping turtles in Louisiana. Proc. Annu. Conf. Southeast Assoc. Fish and Wildl. Agencies, 41:343-348.

WHITE, G. C. AND R. A. GARROTT. 1990. Analysis of radio tracking data. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif. 383 p.

WOOD, J. R., F. E. WOOD, K. H. CRITCHLEY, D. E. WILDT AND M. BUSH. 1983. Laparoscopy of the green turtle, Chelonia mydas. Br. J. Herpetol., 6:323-327.
COPYRIGHT 1996 University of Notre Dame, Department of Biological Sciences
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1996 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Harrel, J. Brent; Allen, Charles M.; Hebert, Steve J.
Publication:The American Midland Naturalist
Date:Jan 1, 1996
Previous Article:Are road kills valid indicators of armadillo population structure?
Next Article:Habitat use and fidelity in the striped plateau lizard Sceloporus virgatus.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |