Printer Friendly

Most NSPS transitions expected by September.

The transition of Defense Department civilian employees from the National Security Personnel System is proceeding, with 75 percent of the work force expected to be transferred into the General Schedule classification and pay system by late September, the defense official overseeing the effort told Congress June 9.

More than 53,000 defense civilian employees who had been enrolled in the NSPS system have been shifted to the GS system, John H. James Jr., director of the Pentagon's NSPS Transition Office, told a subcommittee of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.

About 170,000 remaining NSPS employees will transition to the GS or other pay and personnel systems by Jan. 1, 2012, the congressionally mandated deadline, Mr. James said.

In the 2010 Defense Appropriations Act, Congress directed a repeal of the NSPS system and set the timeline for its completion.

Congress also mandated that no employee lose pay due to the transition.

As of the date of his meeting with the subcommittee, 71 percent of the employees who had transitioned from NSPS had actually received pay increases averaging almost $1,400, Mr. James said. That's because their NSPS pay levels put them between steps on the GS pay scale, which qualified them for the higher step.

Eight percent of employees maintained the same pay level because their NSPS salary matched a step within their new GS grade, Mr. James said.

The other 21 percent of employees earned salaries under NSPS that exceeded the Step 10 pay level for their GS grade.

They, too, retained their full pay level as they converted to the GS system, Mr. James said. However, they will receive only one-half of any future pay raises until their pay reaches parity with the high end of their GS pay level.

The military services and Defense Department components have launched information and education campaigns to ensure their workers understand how the NSPS transition will affect them, Mr. James said. In addition, the NSPS website is updated regularly to provide employees the most up-to-date reference materials and training modules on the GS system and performance management basics.

Mr. James noted the challenges associated with transferring employees between two fundamentally different classification and pay systems.

NSPS is based on pay bands that encompass a broad range of duties and responsibilities, and allows employees to advance within a single pay band based on performance.

In contrast, the GS system tightly defines duties and responsibilities in discrete pay grades based on a position's difficulty, responsibility and qualification requirements.

While overseeing the NSPS transition, Mr. James' office is also charged with forming a plan for an enterprise-wide performance management system that provides hiring flexibilities and a work force incentive fund.

He assured the committee the Defense Department will make the process as open, transparent and inclusive as possible.

"We have a strong desire to build an effective relationship and fully participative process with labor organizations in developing these new authorities," he said.

The Defense Department, he said, is "committed to open, ongoing communication about NSPS transition, and development of the DOD-unique performance management and hiring authorities" provided in the 2010 National Defense Appropriations Act. (Donna Miles, American Forces Press Service)
COPYRIGHT 2010 Air Force Reserves
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2010 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Round the Reserve; National Security Personnel System
Publication:Citizen Airman
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Aug 1, 2010
Words:528
Previous Article:908th AW offers realistic water survival training.
Next Article:ESGR expands Patriot Award to include spouses.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters