Morphological and genetic evidence for the synonymy of Reticulitermes species: Reticulitermes dichrous and Reticulitermes guangzhouensis (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae).
The taxonomy of Reticulitermes Holmgren (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in China is problematic and in need of revision. Most Chinese Reticulitermes species were described in the 1980s and 1990s, and have never been studied since then. In this study, morphological characteristics including coloration, pilosity, shape, and morphometric characteristics of Reticulitermes dichrous Ping and Reticulitermes guangzhouensis Ping were compared. In addition, a portion of the ribosomal RNA large subunit 16S (16S rRNA) and the mitochondrial DNA cytochrome oxidase subunit II (COII) genes from different populations of the 2 species were sequenced and analyzed. Morphological comparisons revealed the similarities between the 2 species in both discrete and morphometric characteristics. In the molecular phylogenetic trees inferred from COII and 16S rRNA genes, all of the examined populations of the 2 species clustered into a common clade with a high bootstrap value. Based on the morphological comparisons and the molecular analyses, it is proposed that R. dichrous is a junior synonym of R. guangzhouensis.
Key Words: morphometric characteristic; 16S rRNA; COII
La taxonomia del genero Reticulitermes Holmgren (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) en China es problematica y necesita revision. La mayoria de las especies chinas de Reticulitermes fueron descritas en los anos ochenta y noventa, y nunca se han estudiado desde entonces. En este estudio se compararon las caracteristicas morfologicas incluyendo coloracion, pilosidad, forma y caracteristicas morfometricas de Reticulitermes dichrous Ping y Reticulitermes guangzhouensis Ping. Ademas, se secuencio y analizo una parte de la subunidad 16S (16S rRNA) del ARN ribosomico y los genes de la subunidad II de la citocromo oxidasa (COII) del ADN mitocondrial de diferentes poblaciones de las 2 especies. Las comparaciones morfologicas revelaron las similitudes entre las 2 especies tanto en caracteristicas discretas como morfometricas. En los arboles filogeneticos moleculares inferidos de los genes COII y 16S rRNA, todas las poblaciones examinadas de las 2 especies se agruparon en un clado comun con un alto valor de bootstrap. Basandose en las comparaciones morfologicas y en los analisis moleculares, se propone que R. dichrous es un sinonimo menor de R. guangzhouensis.
Palabras Clave: caracteristica morfometrica; 16S rRNA; COII
Subterranean termites of the genus Reticulitermes Holmgren (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) are economically important termites, and taxonomic research on the genus is necessary. However, Reticulitermes species identification by morphology alone has been complicated due to interspecific overlap and intraspecific geographic variations in size (Ye et al. 2004; Austin et al. 2007; Lim & Forschler 2012). A combination of molecular and morphological taxonomy has solved some problems in termite identification, such as revealing synonymous relationships between Reticulitermes flavipes (Kollar) and Reticulitermes santonensis Feytaud (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) (Austin et al. 2005b), between Nasutitermes corniger (Motschulsky) and Nasutitermes costalis (Holmgren) (Isoptera: Termitidae) (Scheffrahn et al. 2005); as well as between Coptotermes gestroi (Wasmann) and Coptotermes vastator Light (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) (Yeap et al. 2007). Termites of the genus Reticulitermes are very diverse in China, where 111 species have been reported (Huang et al. 2000). In just a decade (1980-1989), 72 new Reticulitermes species were described based on morphological characters of the soldier and the alates. According to Krishna et al. (2013), 138 species of Reticulitermes have been described in subtropical and temperate regions worldwide. Therefore, the number of Chinese species seems to be out of proportion and some species may be proven to be invalid. Reticulitermes species from China are in need of careful monographic revisions (Eggleton 1999; Vargo & Husseneder 2009).
Reticulitermes dichrous Ping (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) and Reticulitermes guangzhouensis Ping (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) are indigenous to Guangdong Province, China, and many morphological character dimensions of both species overlap, suggesting that they may be conspecific. In this paper, the genetic relationship between R. dichrous and R. guangzhouensis was investigated based on 2 mitochondrial genes (COII and 16S rRNA). The coloration, pilosity, shape, and 11 morphometric measurements were compared between the 2 species. Our results show that R. dichrous is a junior synonym of R. guangzhouensis.
Materials and Methods
Eight populations of R. dichrous and 12 populations of R. guangzhouensis were collected from 5 localities of Zhaoqing (23.1655833-23.1737778[degrees]N, 112.5394917[degrees]-112.5573944[degrees]E), Guangdong Province and 4 localities of Huizhou (23.2487639[degrees]-23.3840917[degrees]N, 114.0220361[degrees]-114.4395194[degrees]E), Guangdong Province, China, from 2011 to 2015 and were used in the morphological examinations. Some of the samples were chosen for molecular analyses according to the availability of worker termites and the success of DNA sequencing. A population of R. tricholabralis Ping and Li (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) collected from Wuhan (30.4795806[degrees]N, 114.3495361[degrees]E), Hubei Province, in Aug 2013 also was included in the molecular analysis. The specimens were preserved in 70% ethanol for morphological studies and in 100% ethanol for molecular analysis. Voucher specimens were deposited in Guangdong Institute of Applied Biological Resources, Guangzhou, China.
Specimens were identified applying keys by Huang et al. (2000). The head and the pronotum of both species were photographed under a stereomicroscope (SMZ1000, Nikon, Chiyoda-ku, Japan) connected to a computer-assisted imaging camera. Forty soldiers from the 8 populations of R. dichrous and from the 12 populations of R. guangzhouensis were examined with the stereomicroscope. The following 11 morphological characteristics were measured: head length to upper base of condyle of mandibles (HL), head maximum width (HW), left mandible length (upper base of condyle to tip, LML), labrum length (LL), labrum maximum width (LW), postmentum medium length (POL), postmentum maximum width (POW), postmentum waist width (PWW), pronotum maximum length (PRL), pronotum maximum width (PRW), and hind tibia length (HTL). These measurement data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the significance of the differences was compared by the Duncan Multiple Range Test at the level of 5% probability using SAS[R] software Version 9.0 (SAS 2002). The cluster dendrogram was constructed by using the minimum-variance method of Ward.
DNA EXTRACTION, AMPLIFICATION, AND SEQUENCING
Total genomic DNA of 3 worker termites from populations of R. guangzhouensis and R. dichrous was extracted (Table 1). To avoid contamination with gut contents, including polysaccharides, which act as PCR inhibitors (Schrader et al. 2012), the abdomen was removed from specimens before extraction, and just the head and thorax were extracted. The DNA extraction was performed by TIANamp Genomic DNA Kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Two mitochondrial genes, COII and 16S rRNA, were amplified by polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) with primers TL2J3037 (alias AtLeu) (5'-ATGGCAGATTAGTGCAATGG-3') (Liu & Beckenbach 1992) and TKN3785 (alias BtLys) (5'-GTTTAAGAGACCAGTACTTG-3') (Simon et al. 1994) for COII, and with LR-J-13007 (5'-TTACGCTGTTATCCCTAA-3') (Kambhampati & Smith 1995) and LR-N-13398 (5'-CGCCTGTTTATCAAAAACAT-3') (Simon et al. 1994) for 16S rRNA. PCR amplification was performed in a 50 [micro]L reaction mixture containing 2 [micro]L DNA, 21 [micro]L d[H.sub.2]O, 25 [micro]L Premix Taq[TM] (Ex Taq version, TaKaRa, Tokyo, Japan), 1 [micro]L forward primer at 10 [micro]M, and 1 [micro]L reverse primer at 10 [micro]M. Thermal cycling was conducted for 40 of the following cycles: predenaturation at 94 [degrees]C for 4 min, denaturation at 94 [degrees]C for 30 s, annealing at 54 [degrees]C for 30 s, extension at 72 [degrees]C for 40 s; followed by a final extension of 72 [degrees]C for 5 min after the cycles. Amplified products were checked on a 1% agarose gel, and sent to Generay Biotech Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China) for direct sequencing in both directions. GenBank accession numbers for termite DNA sequenced in this study are provided in Table 1, along with the accession numbers of some other species and populations.
MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS
Molecular phylogenetic analyses were carried out on a dataset comprising COII gene sequences of 4 populations of R. dichrous and 3 populations of R. guangzhouensis, as well as 16S rRNA gene sequences of 4 populations of both species. DNA sequences of R. tricholabralis from this study and 10 other Reticulitermes species obtained from GenBank were included in the phylogenetic comparisons. Two species of Coptotermes, C. formosanus Shiraki (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae), and C. gestroi were used as outgroup taxa.
Sequences were aligned with Clustal X (Larkin et al. 2007). Base compositional analyses were conducted with the computer program MEGA version 6.0 (Tamura et al. 2013). The distance estimation of MEGA 6.0 was used to calculate genetic distances according to the p-distance model. Molecular phylogenetic trees were constructed by the maximum likelihood method in MEGA 6.0. Consensus trees were determined using CONSENSE in the PHYLIP 3.6 software package (University of Washington, Seattle, Washington) with the majority rule (extended) model. Poisson model and 1,000 bootstrap repetitions were applied for the analyses.
Observations of R. dichrous and R. guangzhouensis soldiers from different populations indicated that the 2 species were similar in morphology. The head capsule of both species was elongated, broadly rounded at posterior margin, with a prominent hump at the front. In both species, the labrum was sharpened at the apex, the mandibles were stout with the tips slightly to moderately curved, the pronotum was covered by approximately 30 setae, and the anterior margin was concave with a shallow incised notch at the middle (Fig. 1). The morphological differences between the species mainly showed in the color of the head capsule and in the number of antennal segments. The head capsule color of R. dichrous was light brown, a little darker than that of R. guangzhouensis (Fig. 1A, F); the number of antennal segments of R. dichrous and R. guangzhouensis was 15 and 14 to 16, respectively. Furthermore, the maximum and minimum width of R. dichrous postmentum were generally narrower than those of R. guangzhouensis (Fig. 1B, G; Table 2), but the ratio of PWW to POW was similar in the 2 species. From the measurement data, large variations in significant differences in many characteristics were found among conspecific populations of both R. dichrous and R. guangzhouensi, but the differences were not significant between some populations of different species (Table 2). The cluster dendrogram constructed with the measurement data of the 2 species also showed that some populations of different species, instead of absolutely conspecific populations, clustered into 1 branch (Fig. 2).
MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS
The average sizes of PCR products of COII and 16S rRNA genes for the 2 species examined were 763 and 432 base pairs (bp), respectively. For the COII gene, the multiple sequence alignment (including out-groups) resulted in 687 characters, of which 482 were constant and 148 were parsimony-informative. For the 16S rRNA gene, the multiple sequence alignment (including outgroups) resulted in 432 characters, of which 356 were constant and 56 were parsimony-informative. Average nucleotide composition among ingroup taxa was as follows: A = 39.3%, T = 23.5%, G = 13.9%, and C = 23.3% in the COII gene; A = 23.1%, T = 40.8%, G = 22.7%, and C = 13.4% in the 16S rRNA gene. Both mitochondrial genes were A and T rich.
The intraspecific genetic variations of R. dichrous ranged from 0.15 to 0.31% in the COII gene, with no variation in the 16S rRNA gene. The intraspecific genetic variations of R. guangzhouensis ranged from 0.00 to 2.31% in the COII gene, with no variation in the 16S rRNA gene. The genetic divergences between the 2 species ranged from 0.00 to 2.62% for COII and no variation was observed in the 16S rRNA gene. This was slightly higher than, or equal to, the intraspecific genetic variations of R. guangzhouensis. By comparison, the ranges between R. dichrous and R. guangzhouensis, and other analyzed Reticulitermes species were 5.08 to 8.94% in the COII gene and 2.24 to 4.47% in the 16S rRNA gene, which was higher than between R. dichrous and R. guangzhouensis.
The molecular phylogenetic trees generated from the COII and 16S rRNA genes by the maximum likelihood method revealed similar phylogenetic relationships between R. dichrous and R. guangzhouensis (Figs. 3 and 4). In the tree inferred from the COII gene, all the populations of R. dichrous and R. guangzhouensis formed a clade with strong bootstrap support (99%). The clade comprised 2 subclades: 1 with R. dichrous and 2 populations of R. guangzhouensis from Xiangtou Mountain, and the other was R. guangzhouensis from Luofu Mountain. In the tree inferred from the 16S rRNA gene, populations of R. dichrous and R. guangzhouensis from this study and a population of R guangzhouensis from GenBank also formed a common clade with a bootstrap value of 99%.
According to the morphological comparison between R. dichrous and R. guangzhouensis in this study, they were alike in both discrete and morphometric characteristics. It was difficult to differentiate them by the shape and the pilosity of head capsule, labrum, mandibles, and pronotum. Although the head capsule coloration of the 2 species was a little different in the examined specimens, it was not reliable enough for species identification. Coloration can be influenced by the age and state of the colony or by environmental and storage conditions (Scheffrahn et al. 2005). For the morphometric characteristics, it was found that most measurements of the 11 characters of R. dichrous either fell within the range of those of R. guangzhouensis or overlapped extensively with them, as was observed in the original descriptions for type specimens of the 2 species. It was only in the length range of the left mandible that the inclusion or overlap did not occur (0.88-0.90 mm in R. dichrous; and 0.92-1.04 mm in R. guangzhouensis), based on the original descriptions (Ping 1985). In the samples of this study, however, the measurements of left mandible length of R. dichrous also fell within the range of R. guangzhouensis (Table 2). In addition, the populations of R. dichrous are collected only in Dinghu Mountain, Zhaoqing, Guangdong Province. The distribution of R. guangzhouensis in Guangdong Province, by contrast, is much wider. It is likely that the samples of R. dichrous are actually the populations of R. guangzhouensis that are distributed in Dinghu Mountain.
The comparison of genetic divergences between different populations provided the evidence for clarifying the relationship between R. dichrous and R. guangzhouensis. There were no genetic divergences between analyzed populations of R. dichrous and R. guangzhouensis in 16S rRNA. By contrast, R. arenincola Goellner (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) and R. flavipes, which were supposed to be conspecific, have a genetic divergence in 16S rRNA of 0.0 to 1.9% (Ye et al. 2004). Likewise, N. costalis has a genetic divergence of 0 to 1.8% in 16S rRNA with N. corniger, which is its junior synonym (Scheffrahn et al. 2005). The COII genetic divergence between R. dichrous and R. guangzhouensis (0.00-2.62%) was also lower than that between R. arenincola and R. flavipes (0-4%) (Ye et al. 2004), and was evidently lower than the least genetic divergence between R. dichrous and R. guangzhouensis, and other Reticulitermes species included in the study (5.08%). As the COII gene is faster evolved and larger in size than the 16S rRNA gene (Ye et al. 2004), the value of 2.62% was considered relatively low and should be regarded as intraspecific variation.
The high bootstrap values of the clade R. dichrous + R. guangzhouensis in the 16S rRNA and COII trees also showed that R. dichrous and R. guangzhouensis are closely related, although the population Rg01-HZ in the COII tree had a relatively distant relationship compared with other populations in the clade. The separation of Rg01-HZ from the subclade composed of other populations could be due to variations at the population level. Solving the relationship among the population Rg01-HZ and the other populations in the clade would require collecting more populations from the distribution localities and analyzing more molecular markers.
The morphological comparisons and the molecular phylogenetic analyses with mitochondrial COII and 16S rRNA genes suggested that R. dichrous and R. guangzhouensis are conspecific. It is proposed that R. dichrous is a junior synonym of R. guangzhouensis.
Reticulitermes guangzhouensis Ping, 1985
Reticulitermes guangzhouensis Ping, 1985, Entomotaxonomia, 7: 321.
Reticulitermes dichrous Ping, 1985, Entomotaxonomia, 7: 324. syn. nov.
We are grateful to Jixing Guo (College of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University) for photographing the specimens used in this study. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31172140, 31172163) and Funds for Environment Construction and Capacity Building of GDAS' Research Platform (2016GDASPT-0107).
Austin JW, Szalanski AL, Scheffrahn RH, Messenger MT. 2005a. Genetic variation of Reticulitermes flavipes (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in North America applying the mitochondrial rRNA 16S gene. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 98: 980-988.
Austin JW, Szalanski AL, Scheffrahn RH, Messenger MT, Dronnet S, Bagneres A-G. 2005b. Genetic evidence for the synonymy of two Reticulitermes species: Reticulitermes flavipes and Reticulitermes santonensis. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 98: 395-401.
Austin JW, Szalanski AL, Ghayourfar R, Kence A, Gold RE. 2006. Phylogeny and genetic variation of Reticulitermes (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) from the eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. Sociobiology 47: 873-890.
Austin JW, Bagneres AG, Szalanski AL, Scheffrahn RH, Heintschel BP, Messenger MT, Clement JL, Gold RE. 2007. Reticulitermes malletei (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae): a valid Nearctic subterranean termite from eastern North America. Zootaxa 1554: 1-26.
Eggleton P. 1999. Termite species description rates and the state of termite taxonomy. Insectes Sociaux 46: 1-5.
Ghesini S, Marini M. 2012. New data on Reticulitermes urbis and Reticulitermes lucifugus in Italy: Are they both native species? Bulletin of Insectology 65: 301-310.
Huang FS, Zhu SM, Ping ZM, He XS, Li GX, Gao DR [eds.]. 2000. Fauna Sinica, Insecta, Volume 17: Isoptera. Science Press, Beijing, China.
Huang Z, Chen X, Shi Y, Shen Z, Peng J, Yang H. 2011. Molecular analysis of some Chinese termites (Isoptera) based on the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase (CoII) gene. Sociobiology 58: 107-117.
Kambhampati S, Smith PT. 1995. PCR primers for the amplification of four insect mitochondrial gene fragments. Insect Molecular Biology 4: 233-236.
King SW, Austin JW, Szalanski AL. 2007. Use of soldier pronotal width and mitochondrial DNA sequencing to distinguish the subterranean termites, Reticulitermes flavipes (Kollar) and R. virginicus (Banks) (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae), on the Delmarva Peninsula: Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia, U.S.A. Entomological News 118: 41-48.
Krishna K, Grimaldi DA, Krishna V, Engel MS. 2013. Termite evolution: diversity, distributions, phylogeny, fossil record, pp. 147-182 In Treatise on the Isoptera of the World, Volume 1, Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 377. American Museum of Natural History-Scientific Publications, New York, New York.
Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23: 2947-2948.
Li H-F, Ye W, Su N-Y, Kanzaki N. 2009. Phylogeography of Coptotermes gestroi and Coptotermes formosanus (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in Taiwan. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 102: 684-693.
Lim SY, Forschler BT. 2012. Reticulitermes nelsonae, a new species of subterranean termite (Rhinotermitidae) from the southeastern United States. Insects 3: 62-90.
Liu H, Beckenbach AT. 1992. Evolution of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II gene among 10 orders of insects. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 1: 41-52.
Long YH, Xiang H, Xie L, Yan X, Fan M, Wang Q. 2009. Intra- and interspecific analysis of genetic diversity and phylogeny of termites (Isoptera) in East China detected by ISSR and COII markers. Sociobiology 53: 411-430.
Luchetti A, Trenta M, Mantovani B, Marini M. 2004. Taxonomy and phylogeny of north Mediterranean Reticulitermes termites (Isoptera, Rhinotermitidae): a new insight. Insectes Sociaux 51: 117-122.
Ping ZM. 1985. Eight new species of the genus Coptotermes and Reticulitermes from Guangdong Province, China (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Entomotaxonomia 7: 317-326.
SAS (SAS Institute Inc.). 2002. SAS[R] software Version 9.0. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.
Scheffrahn RH, Krecek J, Szalanski AL, Austin JW. 2005. Synonymy of Neotropical arboreal termites Nasutitermes corniger and N. costalis (Isoptera: Termitidae: Nasutitermitinae), with evidence from morphology, genetics, and biogeography. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 98: 273-281.
Schrader C, Schielke A, Ellerbroek L, Johne R. 2012. PCR inhibitors--occurrence, properties and removal. Journal of Applied Microbiology 113: 1014-1026.
Simon C, Frati F, Beckenbach A, Crespi B, Liu H, Flook P. 1994. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87: 651-701.
Su N-Y, Ye W, Ripa R, Scheffrahn RH, Giblin-Davis RM. 2006. Identification of Chilean Reticulitermes (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) inferred from three mitochondrial gene DNA sequences and soldier morphology. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 99: 352-363.
Szalanski AL, Austin JW, Owens CB. 2003. Identification of Reticulitermes spp. (Isoptera: Reticulitermatidae) from south central United States by PCR-RFLP. Journal of Economic Entomology 96: 1514-1519.
Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 2725-2729.
Tripodi AD, Austin JW, Szalanski AL, McKern J, Carroll MK, Saran RK, Messenger MT. 2006. Phylogeography of Reticulitermes termites (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in California inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 99: 697-706.
Vargo EL, Husseneder C. 2009. Biology of subterranean termites: insights from molecular studies of Reticulitermes and Coptotermes. Annual Review of Entomology 54: 379-403. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.54.110807.090443
Yashiro T, Matsuura K. 2007. Distribution and phylogenetic analysis of termite egg-mimicking fungi "termite balls" in Reticulitermes termites. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 100: 532-538.
Ye WM, Lee CY, Scheffrahn RH, Aleong JM, Su NY, Bennett GW, Scharfa ME. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships of Nearctic Reticulitermes species (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) with particular reference to Reticulitermes arenincola Goellner. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30: 815-822.
Yeap BK, Othman AS, Lee VS, Lee CY. 2007. Genetic relationship between Coptotermes gestroi and Coptotermes vastator (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 100: 467-474.
Yunling Ke (1,2,3), Wenjing Wu (1,2,3), Shijun Zhang (1,2,3), and Zhiqiang Li (1,2,3,*)
(1) Guangdong Institute of Applied Biological Resources, Guangzhou, 510260, China; E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org (Y. K.), email@example.com (W. W.), firstname.lastname@example.org (S. Z.), email@example.com (Z. L.)
(2) Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Guangzhou, 510260, China
(3) Guangdong Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management in Agriculture, Guangzhou, 510260, China
(*) Corresponding author; E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org (Z. L.)
Caption: Fig. 1. Photomicrographs of dorsal (A, D, E, F, I, and J), ventral (B and G), and lateral (C and H) views of Reticulitermes dichrous (A to E) and Reticulitermes guangzhouensis (F to J) soldier heads and pronotums.
Caption: Fig. 2. Cluster dendrogram of 12 populations of Reticulitermes guangzhouensis and 8 populations of Reticulitermes dichrous.
Caption: Fig. 3. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of Reticulitermes guangzhouensis and Reticulitermes dichrous relative to other Reticulitermes species based on the COII gene. Bootstrap values are indicated at the nodes and represent 1,000 pseudoreplicates.
Caption: Fig. 4. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of Reticulitermes guangzhouensis and Reticulitermes dichrous relative to other Reticulitermes species based on the 16S rRNA gene. Bootstrap values are indicated at the nodes and represent 1,000 pseudoreplicates.
Table 1. Termite species and populations included in the present study. Species Collecting sites Reticulitermes guangzhouensis Luofu Mountain, Huizhou, China R. guangzhouensis Xiangtou Mountain, Huizhou, China R. guangzhouensis Xiangtou Mountain, Huizhou, China R. guangzhouensis Guangzhou, China Reticulitermes dichrous Dinghu Mountain, Zhaoqing, China R. dichrous Dinghu Mountain, Zhaoqing, China R. dichrous Dinghu Mountain, Zhaoqing, China R. dichrous Dinghu Mountain, Zhaoqing, China R. dichrous Dinghu Mountain, Zhaoqing, China Reticulitermes tricholabralis Wuhan, Hubei, China Reticulitermes chinensis Beijing, China R. chinensis China Reticulitermes flaviceps Zhejiang, China Reticulitermes speratus Japan R. speratus China R. speratus China Reticulitermes flavipes Georgia, USA R. flavipes Florida, USA R. flavipes Jalisco, Mexico R. flavipes Hamburg, Germany R. flavipes Toronto, Canada Reticulitermes labralis Beijing, China Reticulitermes balkanensis NeaArtaki, Greece R. balkanensis Areopolis, Greece R. balkanensis Dionissos, Greece Reticulitermes lucifugus Policoro, Italy R. lucifugus Komotini, Greece R. lucifugus Ankara, Turkey R. lucifugus Kharman Maras, Turkey Reticulitermes malletei Georgia, USA R. malletei Georgia, USA R. malletei USA R. malletei USA Reticulitermes hageni North Carolina, USA R. hageni Georgia, USA Reticulitermes hesperus Oregon, USA Reticulitermes hesperus California, USA Coptotermes formosanus East China C. formosanus Hainan, China Coptotermes gestroi China C. gestroi Taiwan, China GenBank accession no. Species 16S rRNA COII Reticulitermes guangzhouensis KX374680 KX374676 R. guangzhouensis KX374681 KX374678 R. guangzhouensis KX374683 KX374675 R. guangzhouensis KM245673 NS Reticulitermes dichrous KX374687 KX374673 R. dichrous KX374684 KX374674 R. dichrous KX374686 NA R. dichrous KX374685 KX374671 R. dichrous NA KX374672 Reticulitermes tricholabralis NA KX374679 Reticulitermes chinensis NS JX142147 R. chinensis NS HQ012033 Reticulitermes flaviceps GU116564 NS Reticulitermes speratus NS AB005463 R. speratus NS KU061246 R. speratus NS KU061240 Reticulitermes flavipes NS EU689005 R. flavipes NS AY808085 R. flavipes DQ001967 NS R. flavipes AY257226 NS R. flavipes AY257229 NS Reticulitermes labralis NS JX142151 Reticulitermes balkanensis NS AY954667 R. balkanensis NS AY267867 R. balkanensis DQ431060 NS Reticulitermes lucifugus NS JQ231195 R. lucifugus NS AY954665 R. lucifugus DQ431052 NS R. lucifugus DQ431057 NS Reticulitermes malletei NS JF796227 R. malletei NS GU550074 R. malletei DQ422137 NS R. malletei DQ422138 NS Reticulitermes hageni NS DQ493729 R. hageni NS JF796225 Reticulitermes hesperus DQ004948 NS Reticulitermes hesperus DQ389194 NS Coptotermes formosanus NS FJ423459 C. formosanus EU805742 NS Coptotermes gestroi NS KC515412 C. gestroi EU805727 NS Species References Sequence codes Reticulitermes guangzhouensis This study Rg01-HZ R. guangzhouensis This study Rg04-HZ R. guangzhouensis This study Rg08-HZ R. guangzhouensis Unpublished Rg13-GZ Reticulitermes dichrous This study Rd01-ZQ R. dichrous This study Rd04-ZQ R. dichrous This study Rd05-ZQ R. dichrous This study Rd07-ZQ R. dichrous This study Rd08-ZQ Reticulitermes tricholabralis This study Rt01-China Reticulitermes chinensis Unpublished Rc01-China R. chinensis Huang et al. (2011) Rc02-China Reticulitermes flaviceps Unpublished Rfc01-China Reticulitermes speratus Unpublished Rs01-Japan R. speratus Unpublished Rs02-China R. speratus Unpublished Rs03-China Reticulitermes flavipes Unpublished Rf01-USA R. flavipes Su et al. (2006) Rf02-USA R. flavipes Austin et al. (2005a) Rfp01-Mexico R. flavipes Szalanski et al. (2003) Rfp02-Germany R. flavipes Szalanski et al. (2003) Rfp03-Canada Reticulitermes labralis Unpublished Rla01-China Reticulitermes balkanensis Unpublished Rb01-Greece R. balkanensis Luchetti et al. (2004) Rb02-Greece R. balkanensis Austin et al. (2006) Rb03-Greece Reticulitermes lucifugus Ghesini & Marini (2012) Rlu01-Italy R. lucifugus Unpublished Rlu02-Greece R. lucifugus Austin et al. (2006) Rl01-Turkey R. lucifugus Austin et al. (2006) Rl02-Turkey Reticulitermes malletei Lim & Forschler (2012) Rm01-USA R. malletei Unpublished Rm02-USA R. malletei King et al. (2007) Rm03-USA R. malletei King et al. (2007) Rm04-USA Reticulitermes hageni Yashiro & Matsuura (2007 Rh01-USA R. hageni Lim & Forschler (2012) Rh02-USA Reticulitermes hesperus Austin et al. (2005a) Rh01-USA Reticulitermes hesperus Tripodi et al. (2006) Rh02-USA Coptotermes formosanus Long et al. (2009) Cf01-China C. formosanus Li et al. (2009) Cf02-China Coptotermes gestroi Unpublished Cg01-China C. gestroi Li et al. (2009) Cg02-China NA, not available; NS, not submitted. Table 2. Morphometric data (mm) of the soldier termites in different populations of Reticulitermes guangzhouensis and Reticulitermes dichrous. Population Measurements (a) (mean [+ or -] SE) HL HW Reticulitermes guangzhouensis Rg01 1.600 [+ or -] 0.029e-i 0.995 [+ or -] 0.010c Rg02 1.767 [+ or -] 0.050ab 1.117 [+ or -] 0.009a Rg03 1.800 [+ or -] 0.059a 1.120 [+ or -] 0.012a Rg04 1.748 [+ or -] 0.020a-c 0.990 [+ or -] 0.008cd Rg05 1.710 [+ or -] 0.070a-d 1.043 [+ or -] 0.037b Rg06 1.678 [+ or -] 0.019b-e 0.960 [+ or -] 0.015c-f Rg07 1.645 [+ or -] 0.005d-g 0.990 [+ or -] 0.008cd Rg08 1.567 [+ or -] 0.007f-i 0.993 [+ or -] 0.043c Rg09 1.657 [+ or -] 0.007c-f 0.957 [+ or -] 0.007c-f Rg10 1.750 [+ or -] 0.032a-c 0.977 [+ or -] 0.007cd Rg11 1.657 [+ or -] 0.018c-f 0.997 [+ or -] 0.007c Rg12 1.587 [+ or -] 0.007e-i 0.947 [+ or -] 0.015c-f Reticulitermes dichrous Rd01 1.530 [+ or -] 0.015hi 0.914 [+ or -] 0.010f Rd02 1.550 [+ or -] 0.045g-i 0.926 [+ or -] 0.017ef Rd03 1.608 [+ or -] 0.021d-h 0.924 [+ or -] 0.004ef Rd04 1.610 [+ or -] 0.030d-h 0.918 [+ or -] 0.018ef Rd05 1.500 [+ or -] 0.027i 0.920 [+ or -] 0.010ef Rd06 1.660 [+ or -] 0.029c-f 0.942 [+ or -] 0.010d-f Rd07 1.578 [+ or -] 0.019e-i 0.965 [+ or -] 0.005c-e Rd08 1.600 [+ or -] 0.012e-i 0.950 [+ or -] 0.018c-f LML LL Reticulitermes guangzhouensis Rg01 1.005 [+ or -] 0.013b 0.395 [+ or -] 0.013d-g Rg02 0.963 [+ or -] 0.018bc 0.410 [+ or -] 0.025b-e Rg03 1.070 [+ or -] 0.021a 0.357 [+ or -] 0.007hi Rg04 0.943 [+ or -] 0.008c-e 0.440 [+ or -] 0.008ab Rg05 0.923 [+ or -] 0.026c-f 0.397 [+ or -] 0.023d-g Rg06 0.920 [+ or -] 0.021c-g 0.403 [+ or -] 0.006d-f Rg07 0.928 [+ or -] 0.008c-f 0.420 [+ or -] 0.000b-d Rg08 0.930 [+ or -] 0.021c-f 0.373 [+ or -] 0.023f-h Rg09 0.940 [+ or -] 0.021c-e 0.413 [+ or -] 0.007b-e Rg10 0.913 [+ or -] 0.007c-h 0.337 [+ or -] 0.007i Rg11 0.957 [+ or -] 0.007cd 0.370 [+ or -] 0.000gh Rg12 0.733 [+ or -] 0.017j 0.357 [+ or -] 0.007hi Reticulitermes dichrous Rd01 0.872 [+ or -] 0.012g-i 0.402 [+ or -] 0.009d-f Rd02 0.868 [+ or -] 0.023hi 0.406 [+ or -] 0.009c-e Rd03 0.910 [+ or -] 0.008d-h 0.436 [+ or -] 0.002a-c Rd04 0.900 [+ or -] 0.000e-i 0.440 [+ or -] 0.000ab Rd05 0.856 [+ or -] 0.016i 0.394 [+ or -] 0.007d-g Rd06 0.857 [+ or -] 0.009i 0.387 [+ or -] 0.003e-h Rd07 0.880 [+ or -] 0.000f-i 0.460 [+ or -] 0.000a Rd08 0.925 [+ or -] 0.017c-f 0.440 [+ or -] 0.008ab LW POL Reticulitermes guangzhouensis Rg01 0.303 [+ or -] 0.003c-e 1.015 [+ or -] 0.036ef Rg02 0.347 [+ or -] 0.007a 1.120 [+ or -] 0.050cd Rg03 0.343 [+ or -] 0.007a 1.230 [+ or -] 0.012b Rg04 0.325 [+ or -] 0.005a-c 1.235 [+ or -] 0.005b Rg05 0.317 [+ or -] 0.013b-e 1.343 [+ or -] 0.033a Rg06 0.330 [+ or -] 0.000ab 1.217 [+ or -] 0.007b Rg07 0.335 [+ or -] 0.005ab 1.210 [+ or -] 0.000b Rg08 0.317 [+ or -] 0.007b-e 1.113 [+ or -] 0.013cd Rg09 0.323 [+ or -] 0.007a-d 1.113 [+ or -] 0.007cd Rg10 0.330 [+ or -] 0.012ab 1.407 [+ or -] 0.026a Rg11 0.303 [+ or -] 0.007c-e 0.990 [+ or -] 0.000f Rg12 0.330 [+ or -] 0.012ab 1.097 [+ or -] 0.026c-e Reticulitermes dichrous Rd01 0.302 [+ or -] 0.005c-e 1.054 [+ or -] 0.043d-f Rd02 0.296 [+ or -] 0.004ef 0.998 [+ or -] 0.043f Rd03 0.298 [+ or -] 0.005d-f 1.070 [+ or -] 0.015d-f Rd04 0.335 [+ or -] 0.005ab 1.165 [+ or -] 0.032bc Rd05 0.277 [+ or -] 0.006f 1.056 [+ or -] 0.021def Rd06 0.310 [+ or -] 0.007b-e 1.100 [+ or -] 0.025c-e Rd07 0.310 [+ or -] 0.000b-e 1.115 [+ or -] 0.010cd Rd08 0.313 [+ or -] 0.019b-e 1.065 [+ or -] 0.016d-f Population Measurements (a) (mean [+ or -] SE) POW PWW Reticulitermes guangzhouensis Rg01 0.435 [+ or -] 0.010a-c 0.170 [+ or -] 0.006a-d Rg02 0.450 [+ or -] 0.012a 0.160 [+ or -] 0.000b-d Rg03 0.427 [+ or -] 0.007a-f 0.170 [+ or -] 0.010a-d Rg04 0.430 [+ or -] 0.010a-e 0.158 [+ or -] 0.008b-d Rg05 0.400 [+ or -] 0.010gh 0.167 [+ or -] 0.007a-d Rg06 0.410 [+ or -] 0.021d-h 0.153 [+ or -] 0.003cd Rg07 0.420 [+ or -] 0.000b-g 0.180 [+ or -] 0.000ab Rg08 0.420 [+ or -] 0.000b-g 0.160 [+ or -] 0.010b-d Rg09 0.427 [+ or -] 0.007a-f 0.173 [+ or -] 0.023a-d Rg10 0.440 [+ or -] 0.000ab 0.170 [+ or -] 0.010a-d Rg11 0.433 [+ or -] 0.007a-d 0.170 [+ or -] 0.010a-d Rg12 0.407 [+ or -] 0.007e-h 0.187 [+ or -] 0.007a Reticulitermes dichrous Rd01 0.412 [+ or -] 0.005c-g 0.150 [+ or -] 0.000d Rd02 0.408 [+ or -] 0.005e-h 0.154 [+ or -] 0.009cd Rd03 0.422 [+ or -] 0.002b-g 0.174 [+ or -] 0.004a-c Rd04 0.440 [+ or -] 0.000ab 0.180 [+ or -] 0.000ab Rd05 0.387 [+ or -] 0.006h 0.167 [+ or -] 0.005a-d Rd06 0.413 [+ or -] 0.005c-g 0.157 [+ or -] 0.004b-d Rd07 0.405 [+ or -] 0.005f-h 0.180 [+ or -] 0.000ab Rd08 0.420 [+ or -] 0.008b-g 0.180 [+ or -] 0.000ab Population Measurements (a) (mean [+ or -] SE) PRL PRW Reticulitermes guangzhouensis Rg01 0.488 [+ or -] 0.011c-f 0.763 [+ or -] 0.010a-d Rg02 0.507 [+ or -] 0.012a-e 0.770 [+ or -] 0.029a-c Rg03 0.513 [+ or -] 0.020a-d 0.800 [+ or -] 0.032a Rg04 0.540 [+ or -] 0.006a 0.765 [+ or -] 0.005a-d Rg05 0.487 [+ or -] 0.015d-f 0.750 [+ or -] 0.030a-e Rg06 0.500 [+ or -] 0.014b-e 0.723 [+ or -] 0.028b-g Rg07 0.510 [+ or -] 0.000a-e 0.745 [+ or -] 0.005a-f Rg08 0.490 [+ or -] 0.021c-f 0.717 [+ or -] 0.017c-g Rg09 0.497 [+ or -] 0.017b-e 0.743 [+ or -] 0.013b-f Rg10 0.523 [+ or -] 0.007a-c 0.777 [+ or -] 0.007ab Rg11 0.440 [+ or -] 0.000h 0.700 [+ or -] 0.000e-h Rg12 0.530 [+ or -] 0.012ab 0.760 [+ or -] 0.032a-d Reticulitermes dichrous Rd01 0.440 [+ or -] 0.011h 0.660 [+ or -] 0.000h Rd02 0.456 [+ or -] 0.010f-h 0.712 [+ or -] 0.018d-h Rd03 0.460 [+ or -] 0.009f-h 0.690 [+ or -] 0.009f-h Rd04 0.475 [+ or -] 0.005e-h 0.735 [+ or -] 0.005b-f Rd05 0.443 [+ or -] 0.005gh 0.700 [+ or -] 0.017e-h Rd06 0.485 [+ or -] 0.011d-f 0.725 [+ or -] 0.014b-g Rd07 0.400 [+ or -] 0.000i 0.660 [+ or -] 0.000h Rd08 0.478 [+ or -] 0.014d-g 0.675 [+ or -] 0.005gh Population Measurements (a) (mean [+ or -] SE) HTL Reticulitermes guangzhouensis Rg01 0.820 [+ or -] 0.029a-c Rg02 0.820 [+ or -] 0.015a-c Rg03 0.863 [+ or -] 0.053ab Rg04 0.833 [+ or -] 0.008a-c Rg05 0.740 [+ or -] 0.071de Rg06 0.798 [+ or -] 0.005b-d Rg07 0.880 [+ or -] 0.000a Rg08 0.835 [+ or -] 0.045a-c Rg09 0.770 [+ or -] 0.000cd Rg10 0.797 [+ or -] 0.013b-d Rg11 0.687 [+ or -] 0.013ef Rg12 0.740 [+ or -] 0.021de Reticulitermes dichrous Rd01 0.660 [+ or -] 0.000f Rd02 0.734 [+ or -] 0.021de Rd03 0.742 [+ or -] 0.020de Rd04 0.770 [+ or -] 0.000cd Rd05 0.766 [+ or -] 0.017cd Rd06 0.765 [+ or -] 0.013cd Rd07 0.780 [+ or -] 0.006cd Rd08 0.760 [+ or -] 0.006cd (a) Means followed by different lowercase letters within the same column are significantly different by the Duncan multiple range test (P [less than or equal to] 0.05).
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Ke, Yunling; Wu, Wenjing; Zhang, Shijun; Li, Zhiqiang|
|Date:||Mar 1, 2017|
|Previous Article:||Actual and potential distribution of five regulated avocado pests across Mexico, using the maximum entropy algorithm.|
|Next Article:||Bioacoustics of Acanthoscelides obtectus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae) on phaseolus vulgaris (Fabaceae).|