Printer Friendly

Montez Estate of Hearlson v. U.S.

U.S. Appeals Court

PRISONER ON PRISONER ASSAULT

Montez Estate of Hearlson v. U.S., 359 F.3d 392 (6th Cir. 2004). The administratrix of the estate of a murdered federal inmate brought a negligence claim against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). The district court dismissed the case and the administratrix appealed. The appeals court affirmed. The appeals court that the allegations in the complaint were insufficient to rebut the presumption that prison officials' decisions regarding the inmate's safety at the time of his death were of the type that could be said to be grounded in Bureau of Prisons (BOP) policy, and thus the FTCA's discretionary function exception shielded the United States from liability for the inmate's death. The court noted that applicable statutes and regulations gave the BOP discretion in deciding how to accomplish its stated objectives and to decide when disciplinary action is necessary. (Federal Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 
Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:cases of negligence
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U6KY
Date:Nov 1, 2004
Words:157
Previous Article:Kelley v. County of Wayne.
Next Article:Riccardo v. Rausch.
Topics:


Related Articles
Economic negligence actions: a remedy for third parties.
Virginia high court upholds medical malpractice cap.
How to protect damages in federal tort cases: safeguard your clients' awards by knowing the pitfalls of Federal Tort Claims Act litigation.
High Court limits punitive damages in an appeal of State Farm decision. (Briefing).
Supreme Court wades into ERISA's 'Serbonian bog' again.
Iowa justices allow Title VII claim for fatal punch.
An introduction to liability, negligence, and all things in between: Part I.
Montez Estate of Hearlson v. U.S.
Immunities and defenses for allegedly negligent inspections.
Torres v. Corrections Corp. of America.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters