Printer Friendly

Montana.

Constitutional or not? In Montana the answer depends on which branch you're in, and it may be up to the third branch--the state supreme court--to decide. Governor Brian Schweitzer maintains House Bill 676, which passed in 2009 and became law without his signature, is unconstitutional because it addresses more than one subject. Not so, lawmakers argue. Schweitzer sued the Legislature over the bill in September and settlement talks between the governor and leading legislators have stalled. Schweitzer, who said he would hold the suit in abeyance until the Legislature adjourns next year to give them time to address the parts of the bill he claims are unconstitutional, now wants to take the matter straight to the Supreme Court.

COPYRIGHT 2010 National Conference of State Legislatures
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2010 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 
Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:People & Politics
Publication:State Legislatures
Article Type:Brief article
Geographic Code:1U8MT
Date:Dec 1, 2010
Words:118
Previous Article:Bail detail.
Next Article:One of the "lucky 13" Democrats who won in the 1994 GOP landslide that changed control of Congress in 1994, Karen McCarthy--a former Missouri...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters