Printer Friendly

Monkeyflowers hint at evolutionary leaps.

A study of the allure of monkeyflowers to pollinators challenges the longheld wisdom that evolution minces along in baby steps, according to Seattle botanists.

A small bit of the genome, possibly one gene, pumps up nectar flow enough to double hummingbird visits, report Douglas W. Schemske and H.D. Bradshaw Jr. of the University of Washington. Another small bit changes pigments so much that bee visits drop 80 percent, the researchers say in the Oct. 12 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES.

Genetic tweaks causing big changes buttress recent proposals that evolution can take giant steps, Schemske argues. "Adaptations are not simple, but they may not be nearly as complex as we previously thought," he says.

The earlier view held that a mutation causing a huge change typically proved too disruptive to last, so evolution more likely proceeded by many small genetic changes. However, researchers have rarely tested the idea, Schemske observes.

The alternative giant-step scenario would apply when a species faces catastrophe, such as destruction of its pollinator, Schemske explains. A gene causing a big enough difference to attract substitutes would indeed be a boon.

To test the impact of genetic changes, Schemske's team created two generations of hybrids, jumbling the traits of the parents: red Mimulus cardinalis, a hummingbird favorite, and pink Mimulus lewisii, which is pollinated by bees.

For a field test, researchers filled two 24-foot trucks with more than 200 plants and drove from Washington to California's Yosemite National Park. The trucks weren't air-conditioned, so the caravan traveled at night. After placing plants in a giant grid, researchers raced after pollinators and muttered into a tape recorder the ID number of each plant visited. "It was something else," sighs Schemske.

By linking pollinator interest with plant traits--pigments, nectar volume, and floral-display size--and with genetic markers, the researchers found sections of chromosomes with big effects.

The most impressive finding, says Barbara Anna Schaal of Washington University in St. Louis, is that "relatively few genetic changes are necessary to bring about reproductive isolation and, potentially, speciation."
COPYRIGHT 1999 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1999, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Milius, S.
Publication:Science News
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Oct 16, 1999
Words:339
Previous Article:Higher Primates May Have Asian Root.
Next Article:Fertilizer: Hiding a toxic pollutant?
Topics:


Related Articles
Modeling the varied avalanches of evolution.
Jump-start for the vertebrates; new clues to how our ancestors got a head.
FAITH VERSUS SCIENCE.
Meteoric wallop may have diversified life.
Christianity and evolutionary psychology: Introduction to special issue--part 1.
Gassing up: oxygen's rise may have promoted complex life.
Intelligent religion: are science and faith really incompatible?

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters