Printer Friendly

Molecular diagnostics of infectious diseases.

Over the past century microbiologists have searched for more rapid and efficient means of microbial identification. The identification and differentiation of microorganisms has principally relied on microbial morphology and growth variables. Advances in molecular biology over the past 10 years have opened new avenues for microbial identification and characterization [1-5].

The traditional methods of microbial identification rely solely on the phenotypic characteristics of the organism. Bacterial fermentation, fungal conidiogenesis, parasitic morphology, and viral cytopathic effects are a few phenotypic characteristics commonly used. Some phenotypic characteristics are sensitive enough for strain characterization; these include isoenzyme profiles, antibiotic susceptibility profiles, and chromatographic analysis of cellular fatty acids [6-13]. However, most phenotypic variables commonly observed in the microbiology laboratory are not sensitive enough for strain differentiation. When methods for microbial genome analysis became available, a new frontier in microbial identification and characterization was opened.

Early DNA hybridization studies were used to demonstrate relatedness amongst bacteria. This understanding of nucleic acid hybridization chemistry made possible nucleic acid probe technology [14-25]. Advances in plasmid and bacteriophage recovery and analysis have made possible plasmid profiling and bacteriophage typing, respectively [26-31]. Both have proven to be powerful tools for the epidemiologist investigating the source and mode of transmission of infectious diseases [26, 28, 30, 32-40]. These technologies, however, like the determinations of phenotypic variables, are limited by microbial recovery and growth.

Nucleic acid amplification technology has opened new avenues of microbial detection and characterization [1, 5, 41], such that growth is no longer required for microbial identification [42-52]. In this respect, molecular methods have surpassed traditional methods of detection for many fastidious organisms. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and other recently developed amplification techniques have simplified and accelerated the in vitro process of nucleic acid amplification. The amplified products, known as amplicons, may be characterized by various methods, including nucleic acid probe hybridization, analysis of fragments after restriction endonuclease digestion, or direct sequence analysis. Rapid techniques of nucleic acid amplification and characterization have significantly broadened the microbiologists' diagnostic arsenal.

Traditional Microbial Typing

BIOTYPING

Traditional microbial identification methods typically rely on phenotypes, such as morphologic features, growth variables, and biochemical utilization of organic substrates. The biological profile of an organism is termed a biogram. The determination of relatedness of different organisms on the basis of their biograms is termed biotyping. Investigators must determine which profile variables have the greatest differentiating capabilities for a given organism [53, 54]. For example, gram stain characteristics, indole positivity, and the ability to grow on MacConkey medium do not aid in the differentiation of nonenterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli from E. coli O157: H7. However, sorbitol fermentation has proven to be an extremely useful characteristic of the biochemical profile used to differentiate these strains.

Biograms that are identical have been used to infer relatedness between strains in epidemiological investigations [32, 55, 56]. The biograms of organisms are not entirely stable, and several isotypes may exist from a single isolate [12]. Biograms may be influenced by genetic regulation, technical manipulation, and the gain or loss of plasmids. In many instances, biotyping is used in conjunction with other methods to more accurately profile microorganisms [32].

ANTIBIOGRAMS, RESISTOGRAMS, AND BACTERIOCIN TYPING

The susceptibility or resistance of an organism to a possibly toxic agent forms the basis of the following typing techniques. The antibiogram is the susceptibility profile of an organism to a variety of antimicrobial agents, whereas the resistogram is the susceptibility profile to dyes and heavy metals [26]. Bacteriocin typing is the susceptibility of the isolate to various bacteriocins, i.e., toxins that are produced by a collected set of producer strains. These three techniques are limited by the number of agents tested per organism.

By far, the antibiogram is the most commonly used susceptibility/resistance typing technique, most probably because the data required for antibiogram analysis are available routinely from the antimicrobial susceptibility testing laboratory. Although antibiograms have been used successfully to demonstrate relatedness, this technology is limited [6, 10, 55]. And although organisms with similar antibiograms may be related, such is not necessarily the case. The antibiogram of an organism is not always constant [57]. Selective pressure from antimicrobial therapy may alter an organism's antimicrobial susceptibility profile [58], such that related organisms show different resistance profiles. These alterations may result from chromosomal point mutations or from the gain or loss of extrachromosomal DNA such as plasmids or transposons [26, 57, 59].

PROTEIN ANALYSIS

Commercially available antibodies are routinely used to specifically identify antigenic proteins from a wide variety of organisms. In some instances, the test may be used only to identify the genus and species of an organism. Examples of this include the cryptococcal antigen agglutination assay and the exoantigen assay for Histoplasma capsulatum. Other immunoassays are designed to subtype microbes [60]. Monoclonal antibodies directed against the major subtypes of the influenza virus, as well as the various serotypes of Salmonella, are commonly used in speciation. Specific antigenic proteins may be detected by antibodies directed against these proteins in immunoblot methods [12, 61].

Electrophoretic typing techniques have been used to examine outer membrane proteins, whole-cell lysates, and particular enzymes [6, 55]. Several electrophoretic methods are available to examine the protein profile of an organism. Generally, outer membrane proteins and proteins from cell lysates are examined by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. This technique denatures the proteins and separates them on the basis of molecular mass. The protein profile may be used to compare strains [8, 55, 62].

Nondenaturing conditions are used for the electrophoretic separation of active enzymes. Multilocus enzyme electrophoresis is the typing technique based on the electrophoretic pattern of several constitutive enzymes [63]. Differences in electrophoretic migration of functionally similar enzymes (e.g., lactate dehydrogenase isoenzymes) represent different alleles. These differences or similarities, especially when numerous enzymes are examined, may be used to exclude or infer relatedness [6, 8, 10].

The results of these studies may be difficult to interpret, however. The absence of a particular protein may simply reflect downregulation of that particular gene product, rather than the loss of that particular gene. Additionally, the electrophoretic migration of proteins is dependent on molecular mass, net protein charge, or both. Mutations that do not alter these characteristics will not be detected.

PHAGE ANALYSIS

Bacteriophages, viruses that infect and lyse bacteria, are often specific for strains within a species. A collection of bacteriophages, many of which often infect similar bacteria, is termed a panel. When a bacterial isolate is exposed to a panel of bacteriophages, a profile is generated--a listing of which bacteriophages are capable of infecting and lysing the bacteria. The bacteriophage profile may be used to type bacterial strains within a given species [31, 62]. The more closely related the bacterial strains, the greater the similarity of the bacteriophage profiles. Bacteriophage profiles have been used successfully to type various organisms associated with epidemic outbreaks [64, 65]. However, this typing method is labor-intensive and requires the maintenance of bacteriophage panels for a wide variety of bacteria. Additionally, bacteriophage profiles may fail to identify isolates, are often difficult to interpret, and may give poor reproducibility [62].

CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS

Chromatographic analysis of short-chain fatty acid production is a routine method used to aid in the identification of anaerobic bacteria. Computer-aided gas-liquid chromatography is commercially available and is a means of microbial identification. This identification system utilizes the type and amount of cellular fatty acids present in the lysate of an organism. Many species have unique cellular fatty acid chromatographic profiles [9, 13]. Relationships between strains of a particular species may be inferred from highly similar cellular fatty acid profiles [7]. Chromatographic analysis is reliable when organisms are grown under identical conditions and the cellular fatty acids are extracted without technical variation. These constraints, however, limit the accuracy of this technology with respect to strain and in some instances even species-level identification.

Nucleic Acid-Based Typing Systems

PLASMID ANALYSIS

Plasmids are small, self-replicating circular DNA found in many bacteria. These often encode genes related to antibiotic resistance and certain virulence factors. In epidemiological studies, relatedness of isolated pathogenic bacterial strains can be determined from the number and size of plasmids the bacteria carry. Plasmid profile analysis was among the earliest nucleic acid-based techniques applied to the diagnosis of infectious diseases and has proven useful in numerous investigations [26-30, 60]. This method has also been widely utilized for tracking antimicrobial resistance during nosocomial outbreaks [26, 66, 67]. In studies of the epidemiology of plasmids, analysis of restriction fragments has proved valuable. This technique is widely used to monitor the spread of resistance-encoding plasmids between organisms and between hospitals, communities, or even countries [37-40]. The weakness of the analysis is inherent in the fact that plasmids are mobile, extrachromosomal elements, not part of the chromosomal genotype. Because plasmids can be spontaneously lost from or readily acquired by a host stain, epidemiologically related isolates can exhibit different plasmid profiles [68].

RESTRICTION ENZYME PATTERN

Restriction endonucleases recognize specific nucleotide sequences in DNA and produce double-stranded cleavages that break the DNA into small fragments. The number and sizes of the restriction fragments, called restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) (1), generated by digesting microbial DNA are influenced by both the recognition sequence of the enzyme and the composition of the DNA. In conventional restriction endonuclease analysis, chromosomal or plasmid DNA is extracted from microbial specimens and then digested with endonucleases into small fragments. These fragments are then separated by size with use of agarose gel electrophoresis. The nucleic acid electrophoretic pattern can then be visualized by ethidium bromide staining and examination under UV light.

Restriction endonuclease analysis has the advantage of being highly reproducible, very accurate in determining the relatedness of microbial strains, and well within the technical capabilities of experienced laboratory technologists. However, the major limitation of this technique, especially for chromosomal DNA, is the difficulty of comparing the complex profiles generated, which consist of hundreds of fragments. To address this problem, pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) has been developed [69] to enable the separation of large DNA fragments. PFGE provides a chromosomal restriction profile typically composed of 5 to 20 distinct, well-resolved fragments ranging from ~10-800 kilobases (kb) [58]. The relative simplicity of the RFLP profiles generated by PFGE facilitates application of the procedure in identification and epidemiological survey of bacterial pathogens [12, 70-80]. Fingerprinting, which combines PFGE with Southern transfer and hybridization, has been widely used in studying the tuberculosis nosocomial outbreak in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive populations [81-83].

RIBOTYPING

Restriction patterns can be obtained by hybridizing Southern-transferred DNA fragments with labeled bacterial ribosomal operon(s), which encode for 16S and (or) 23S rRNA. This method, called ribotyping, has been shown to have both taxonomic and epidemiological value [84, 85]. All bacteria carry these operons, which are highly conserved and therefore typeable. Particular rRNA sequences that are species-or group-specific have been also exploited in construction of oligonucleotides that have been used as probes for in situ detection of bacteria.

Ribotyping assays have been used to differentiate bacterial strains in different serotypes and to determine the serotype(s) most frequently involved in outbreaks [12, 29, 73, 79, 86-89]. This technique is especially useful in epidemiological studies for organisms with multiple ribosomal operons, such as members of the family of Enterobacteriaceae. Ribotyping simplifies the microrestriction patterns by rendering visible only the DNA fragments containing part or all of the ribosomal genes. The technique is less helpful when the bacterial species under investigation contains only one or a few ribosomal operons. In these instances, ribotyping typically detects only one or two bands, which limits its utility for epidemiological studies [70]. Most studies have indicated that PFGE is superior to ribotyping for analysis of common nosocomial pathogens.

RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA (RAPD)

RAPD typing, originally developed by Welsh and McClelland in 1990, involves the use of a short (usually 10 to 15 mers), arbitrarily chosen primer to amplify nearly homologous sequences of the genomic DNA under low-stringency conditions [90]. RAPD has been used to differentiate strains of various species, various serotypes within species, and various subtypes within a serotype [91-95]. It is, therefore, useful for determining whether two isolates of same species are epidemiologically related. RAPD has been used to evaluate outbreaks of infection of drugresistant bacteria [96-98]. For potentially dangerous drugresistant organisms such as the mycobacteria, RAPD may be a better choice than PFGE because the technique requires fewer open manipulations and the organisms are kept viable for a shorter period. RAPD is probably the simplest DNA-based subtyping method to date if a temperature-cycling instrument is available, although the usefulness for epidemiological investigations remains to be determined, particularly with regard to reproducibility concerns.

Nucleic Acid Analysis Without Amplification

NUCLEIC ACID PROBES

Nucleic acid probes are capable of identifying organisms at, above, and below the species level. The quantity of target detectable by the method depends on the size and homology of the probe chosen and the nature of the original specimen; identification of organisms in pure cultures or from isolated colonies is usually easier than detection of organism in a direct specimen. DNA probes facilitate the identification of infectious agents that do not grow rapidly. Additionally, this technique allows for the diagnosis of infections in which the organisms are not easily cultured or cannot be cultured at all. Detection of DNA with direct or culture-amplified gene probe technology has been applied to several organisms, including bacteria [14-16], viruses [17-19], mycobacteria [20-22], fungi [23, 24], and even certain parasites [25]. The technique has been also used to monitor growth as an indicator of drug resistance [99, 100] or to directly detect genes associated with antibiotic resistance [101, 102].

Gen-Probe, MicroProbe, and Digene Diagnostics are currently manufacturing several direct detection and culture identification nucleic probes that have been cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration. The procedures for the use of DNA probes are now well standardized, and the advent of synthetic short oligonucleotide DNA probes has shortened the time required for probe assay. However, direct probe techniques appear to be of limited utility owing to poor sensitivity. Nucleic acid amplification methods, described in detail below, have been explored to address this problem.

BRANCHED DNA SIGNAL AMPLIFICATION

Developed and manufactured by Chiron Corp., branched DNA (bDNA) probes are an example of signal amplification. Multiple probes as well as multiple reporter molecules are used to increase the signal in proportion to amount of target in the reaction [103, 104]. In this process, multiple specific synthetic oligonucleotides hybridize to the target and capture the target onto a solid surface. Synthetic bDNA amplifier molecules, which are enzyme-conjugated, branched oligonucleotide probes, are added. Hybridization proceeds between the amplifiers and the immobilized hybrids. After addition of a chemiluminescent substrate, light emission is measured and may be quantified [103].

In bDNA assays, all hybridization reactions occur simultaneously and the observed signal is proportional to the amount of target DNA. DNA quantification can thus be determined from a calibration curve. Because the target molecules themselves are not amplified during the process, this procedure is less likely to have contamination problems, which may be encountered with nucleic acid amplification methods. bDNA is also highly reproducible, and thus represents an excellent technological platform for monitoring therapeutic response and quantifying nucleic acids [105-109]. A separate section below deals with this particularly important issue. One of the disadvantages, however, is that the bDNA assay is generally less sensitive than enzymatic amplification techniques and usually can detect no fewer than [10.sup.3] to [10.sup.5] nucleic acid targets. As with many techniques, moreover, test specificities decline as greater sensitivity is sought.

Polymerase Chain Reaction

As mentioned above, for direct application to the diagnosis of infections, nucleic acid analysis without amplification often has the disadvantage of low sensitivity (high detection limits). Nucleic acid amplification techniques increase sensitivity dramatically while still retaining a high specificity. Invented by Cetus scientist Kary Mullis in 1983 [1, 2], PCR is the best-developed and most widely used method of nucleic acid amplification. An ingenious procedure, PCR is based on the ability of DNA polymerase to copy a strand of DNA by elongation of complementary strands initiated from a pair of closely spaced chemically synthesized oligonucleotide primers.

The basic technique of PCR includes repeated cycles of amplifying selected nucleic acid sequences [1, 2]. Each cycle consists of three steps: (a) a DNA denaturation step, in which the double strands of the target DNA are separated; (b) a primer annealing step, performed at a lower temperature, in which primers anneal to their complementary target sequences; and (c) an extension reaction step, in which DNA polymerase extends the sequences between the primers. At the end of each cycle (each consisting of the above three steps), the quantities of PCR products are theoretically doubled. The whole procedure is carried out in a programable thermal cycler. Generally, performance of 30 to 50 thermal cycles results in an exponential increase in the total number of DNA copies synthesized [110, 111]. Commercial systems for PCR detection of DNA targets of Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis are manufactured by Roche Molecular Systems [112].

REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE (RT)-PCR

Numerous modifications of the standard PCR procedure have been developed since its inception [4, 5, 41]. Some of these modifications effectively expand the diagnostic capabilities of PCR and have increased its utility in the clinical laboratory. RT-PCR was developed to amplify RNA targets. In this process, RNA targets are first converted to complementary DNA (cDNA) by RT, and then amplified by PCR. RT-PCR has played an important role in diagnosing RNA-containing virus infections, detecting viable Mycobacteria species, and monitoring the effectiveness of antimicrobial therapy [113-115]. The conventional reverse transcription reactions are fastidious: The enzymes cannot tolerate higher temperatures, which limits wide application of the method in clinical diagnosis. The thermostable DNA polymerase (Tth pol) and its thermostable cousins derived from other organisms have efficient reverse transcription activity and therefore can be used in detection of RNA targets without the need for a separate RT step [116, 117]. The higher reaction temperature increases stringency of primer hybridization and avoids the possible RNA secondary structure, so that the reaction is more specific and efficient than previous protocols that used avian myeloblastosis virus RT. Commercial kits for detection of HIV are now available that use this single enzyme technology.

NESTED PCR

Nested PCR, designed mainly to increase sensitivity (detect smaller quantities of target), uses two sets of amplification primers [4, 118]. One set of primers is used for the first round of amplification, which consists of 15 to 30 cycles. The amplification products of the first reaction are then subjected to a second round of amplification with another set of primers that are specific for an internal sequence that was amplified by the first primer pair [118-120]. Nested PCR has extremely high sensitivity because of the dual amplification process. The DNA product from the first round of amplification contains the hybridization sites for the second primer pair. The amplification by the second primer set, therefore, verifies the specificity of the first-round product. The major disadvantage of the nested-amplification protocol is the high probability of contamination during transfer of the firstround amplification products to a second reaction tube. This can be avoided either by physically separating the two amplification mixtures with a layer of wax or oil, or by designing the primer sets to utilize substantially different annealing temperatures [4].

MULTIPLEX PCR

Multiplex PCR is an amplification reaction in which two or more sets of primer pairs specific for different targets are introduced in the same tube. Thus, more than one unique target DNA sequence in a specimen can be amplified at the same time [121]. Primers used in multiplex reactions must be carefully designed to have similar annealing temperatures, which often requires extensive empirical testing. This coamplification of multiple targets can be used for various purposes. For diagnostic uses, multiplex PCR can be set up to detect internal controls or to detect multiple pathogens from a single specimen [115, 120, 122, 123]. Quantitative competitive PCR, a variation of multiplex PCR, can be used to quantify the amount of target DNA or RNA in a specimen [124, 125].

BROAD-RANGE PCR

Another important technical modification is the development of broad-range PCR, in which conserved sequences within phylogenetically informative genetic targets are used to diagnose microbial infection. A broad-range PCR approach has identified several novel, fastidious, or uncultivated bacterial pathogens directly from infected human tissue or blood [126-131]. A universal primer set designed to target herpesvirus DNA polymerases might be widely useful for diagnosing herpesvirus infection [132]. Broad-range rRNA PCR techniques offer the possibility of rapid bacterial identification through use of a single pair of primers targeting bacterial small-subunit (16S) rRNA or DNA [133-136]. The major obstacles to implementation of rapid, automated rDNA-based bacterial identification systems are background contamination and, needless to say, cost. Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems is developing a commercial system for broad-range bacterial amplification and sequencing.

Other Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques

TRANSCRIPTION-BASED AMPLIFICATION SYSTEM (TAS). Described in 1989 by Kwoh et al., TAS includes synthesis of a DNA molecule complementary to the target nucleic acid (usually RNA) and in vitro transcription with the newly synthesized cDNA as a template [137]. Variations on this process are referred to as self-sustaining sequence replication ("3SR"), nucleic acid sequence-based amplification ("NASBA"), or transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) [138-139]. Three enzymes, RT, RNase H, and T7 DNA-dependent RNA polymerase are used in the reaction. Amplification steps involve the formation of cDNAs from the target RNA by using primers containing a RNA polymerase-binding site. The RNase H then degrades the initial strand of target RNA in the RNA-DNA hybrid after it has served as the template for the first primer. The second primer binds to the newly formed cDNA and is extended, resulting in the formation of double-strand cDNAs in which one or both strands are capable of serving as transcription templates for RNA polymerase. Although technically less robust and less sensitive than PCR, TMA has various merits that make it an attractive option: It works at isothermal conditions in a single tube to help minimize contamination risks [138]. Amplification of RNA not only makes it possible to detect RNA-containing viruses, but also lowers the detection limit for certain bacterial and fungal pathogens by using high-copy-number rRNA targets [139]. A commercial system for detection of M. tuberculosis by TMA is now available from Gen-Probe.

LIGASE CHAIN REACTION (LCR)

Also called ligase amplification reaction, LCR is a probe amplification technique first described in 1989 by Wu and Wallace [141]. Successful ligation relies on the contiguous positioning and correct base-pairing of the 39 and 59 ends of oligonucleotide probes on a target DNA molecule. In the process, oligonucleotide probes are annealed to template molecules in a head-to-tail fashion, with the 39 end of one probe abutting the 59 end of the second. DNA ligase then joins the adjacent 39 and 59 ends to form a duplicate of one strand of the target. A second primer set, complementary to the first, then uses this duplicated strand (as well as the original target) as a template for ligation. Repeating the process results in a logarithmic accumulation of ligation products, which can be detected by means of the functional groups attached to the oligonucleotides [142]. The recently developed thermostable DNA ligase greatly simplifies this technique and has increased the specificity by helping avoid problems of blunt-end ligation at low annealing temperature [143]. When used after a target amplification method, such as PCR, this technique can be sensitive and is useful for the detection of point mutations. Although convenient and readily automated, one potential drawback of LCR is the difficult inactivation of the postamplification products. The nature of the technique does not allow the most widely used contamination control methods to be applied. The inclusion of a detection system within the same reaction tube would greatly decrease the possibility of contamination, which is associated with the opening of reaction tubes. A combination LCR kit for detection of both Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhea is now commercially available from Abbott Labs. [144].

STRAND DISPLACEMENT AMPLIFICATION (SDA)

SDA is another non-PCR nucleic acid amplification technique, developed in 1991 [145, 146]. In this system, DNA polymerase initiates DNA syntheses at a single-stranded nick and displaces the nicked strand during DNA synthesis. The displaced single-stranded molecule then serves as a substrate for additional simultaneous nicking and displacement reactions [145]. This isothermal DNA amplification procedure uses specific primers, a DNA polymerase, and a restriction endonuclease to achieve exponential amplification of target. The key technology behind SDA is the generation of site-specific nicks by the restriction endonuclease. Although complicated, SDA has two important advantages. Except for the initial denaturation step, SDA is isothermal and requires no specialized thermocycler [146]. In addition, SDA can be applied to either single- or double-stranded DNA.

Q[beta] REPLICASE SYSTEM

Initially described in 1988 [147], the Q[beta] replicase system is based on the incorporation of a single-stranded oligonucleotide probe into an RNA molecule that can be exponentially amplified after target hybridization by the enzyme Q[beta] replicase [148]. The assay is technically straightforward. The enzyme specifically recognizes the secondary structure of the RNA from the Q[beta] genome, which is hybridized to the specific target. After a given probe anneals to a target, the nonhybridized material can be removed by the enzyme RNase III and subsequent wash steps. The hybridized probe is then enzymatically replicated by Q[beta] replicase to detectable quantities [147, 149]. The potential advantages associated with the Q[beta] replicase procedure include its remarkable speed (<30 min) and isothermal reaction conditions. The main drawback is that unbound reporter probes or nonspecifically bound reporter probes serve as templates for amplification, resulting in false-positive results. This formidable problem has been largely overcome by the use of target capture methods.

Practical information about current commercially available and Mayo Clinic-developed amplification techniques for detection of microbial pathogens are summarized in Table 1.

Analysis of Amplification Products

After target amplification, the simple or conventional version of product detection is use of agarose gel electrophoresis after ethidium bromide staining. Several other techniques have been developed not only to "visualize" the products, but to enhance both the sensitivity and specificity of amplification techniques as well. A probe-based DNA detection system has the advantage of providing sequence specificity and decreased detection limits. After routine agarose gel electrophoresis, the DNA is transferred to a solid phase, e.g., nitrocellulose or nylon membrane, and probed by a specific probe. Radiolabeled probed membranes are directly exposed to x-ray film, 2026 Tang et al.: Molecular diagnostics of infectious diseases whereas enzyme-labeled probed membrane may be visualized through either light or color production.

HYBRIDIZATION PROTECTION ASSAY (HPA)

HPA is a homogeneous format. The probe and the product are incubated together in a single test tube, and the binding of probe to the target is measured without further manipulation [150]. A probe labeled with an acridinium ester is added to a sample containing PCR products for identification. In a positive sample, the bound probe is protected from alkaline hydrolysis and, upon addition of peroxides, emits detectable light. The HPA does not require the binding of amplified DNA to a solid support by DNA capture or other means, can be performed in a few hours, and does not need to have excess unbound DNA probe removed [151, 152].

DNA ENZYME IMMUNOASSAY (DEIA)

DEIA is another newly developed system for detecting nucleic acid previously amplified by means of PCR [153]. An anti-dsDNA antibody exclusively recognizes the hybridization product resulting from the reaction between target DNA and a DNA probe. The final product is revealed by means of a colorimetric reaction [153]. The DEIA increases the sensitivity of a previous PCR by including enzymatic reactions. The hybridization between specific probe and PCR-amplified target DNA, as well as the formation of target DNA/probe hybrids and antidsDNA antibody complex, also enhances the specificity. The system is now manufactured by Sorin Biomedica Diagnostics in Europe and Incstar in the US. Variations on DEIA capture techniques have been explored recently [112, 144].

AUTOMATED DNA SEQUENCING TECHNOLOGY

Direct sequencing offers direct, rapid, and accurate analysis of amplification products. As described earlier, broad-range PCR amplifies conserved regions of a wide range of organisms [128, 133]. The amplicon sequence is first determined, then a DNA sequence-based phylogenetic analysis is performed and used to specifically identify the pathogen [154]. Current sequencing technologies include one of two approaches: electrophoretic separation, based on polyacrylamide slab gels or glass capillaries, and solid-phase sequencing, determined by matrix hybridization [128, 133].

SINGLE-STRAND CONFORMATIONAL POLYMORPHISMS (SSCP)

SSCP was first described by Orita et al. [155]. DNA is subjected to PCR with primers to a region of suspected polymorphism. The PCR products, which usually incorporate a detector marker, are examined after gel electrophoresis. Physical conformational changes in single-stranded DNA are based on the physiochemical properties of the nucleotide sequence. Variations in the physical conformation are reflected in differential gel migration. This technique is sensitive enough to detect single nucleotide substitutions. One area in which SSCP may prove to be of value is in the detection of mutations related to resistance mechanisms. SSCP, and variations on the technique, have been successfully used to examine the genes contributing to the multidrug resistance of M. tuberculosis [156, 157].

RFLP ANALYSIS

In postamplification RFLP analysis, the amplified DNA fragments are cut by a restriction endonuclease, separated by gel electrophoresis, and then transferred to a nitrocellulose or nylon membrane. The fragment(s) containing specific sequences may then be detected by using a labeled homologous oligonucleotide as a probe. Variations in the number and sizes of the fragments detected are referred to as RFLPs and reflect variations in both the number of loci that are homologous to the probe and the location of restriction sites within or flanking those loci [158]. An epidemiological application of RFLPs is discussed in more detail later.

Current Application of Molecular Diagnostics

CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY

Traditionally, the clinical medical microbiology laboratory has functioned to identify the etiologic agents of infectious diseases through the direct examination and culture of clinical specimens. Direct examination is limited by the number of organisms present and by the ability of the laboratorian to successfully recognize the pathogen. Similarly, the culture of the etiologic agent depends on the ability of the microbe to propagate on artificial media and the laboratorian's choice of appropriate media for the culture. When a sample of limited volume is submitted, it is often not possible to culture for all pathogens. In such instances, close clinical correlation is essential for the judicious use of the specimen available.

Some microorganisms are either unculturable at present, extremely fastidious, or hazardous to laboratory personnel. In these instances, the diagnosis often depends on the serologic detection of a humoral response or culture in an expensive biosafety level II-IV facility. In community medical microbiology laboratories, these facilities may not be available, or it may not be economically feasible to maintain the special media required for culture of all of the rarely encountered pathogens. Thus, cultures are often sent to referral laboratories. During transit, fragile microbes may lose viability or become overgrown by contaminating organisms or competing normal flora.

The addition of molecular detection methods to the microbiology laboratory has resolved many of these problems. The exquisite sensitivity and specificity of many molecular methods allow the accurate detection of very small numbers of organisms. The direct detection of M. tuberculosis nucleic acid from the sputa of smear-negative patients with tuberculosis clearly illustrates this point [159-161]. The technology allows for the rapid and accurate identification of the etiologic agent in a time substantially shorter than traditional methods. This allows for earlier initiation of a focused antimicrobial regimen and decreases the likelihood of disease progression.

In selected situations, the limitations imposed by the ability of an organism to be cultured and the selection of appropriate media and culture conditions may be replaced by the use of molecular microbiology. Microbial DNA/RNA extracted from a clinical specimen may be analyzed for the presence of various organism-specific nucleic acid sequences regardless of the physiological requirements or viability of the organism [136, 162-165]. For example, the inability to culture and analyze the principal etiologic agent of non-A, non-B hepatitis limited medical advances in this area. Using various molecular methods, however, investigators have been able to isolate hepatitis C virus (HCV) nucleic acid [166]. Analysis and cloning of the HCV genome has provided the viral antigens necessary for the development of specific serologic tests [167-169]. Currently, RT-PCR allows for the identification, quantification, and sequence analysis of the HCV genome in infected individuals [117, 170, 171].

Another unculturable microbe that has been specifically detected by PCR and probe analysis is Tropheryma whippelii, the causative agent of Whipple disease [128, 172, 173]. Because of the inability of this organism to grow on conventional media and the lack of a serologic test, diagnosis of Whipple disease is usually based on clinical and specific biopsy findings. Patients with Whipple disease often have gastrointestinal manifestations and undergo endoscopy. Small bowel biopsies reveal foamy histiocytes filling the lamina propria. The definitive diagnosis is made with the identification of non-acid-fast, periodic acid-shift-positive, diastase-resistant bacillary forms within the histiocytes. Extraintestinal Whipple disease, principally seen as arthritis and central nervous system involvement, may be missed entirely unless the clinician and pathologist have a high index of suspicion. Even so, the diagnosis in such instances may prove difficult. Advances in the molecular detection of T. whippelii have resolved this dilemma [128, 172, 173]. On the basis of bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, an emerging pathogen, Bordetella holmesii, has been successfully identified in the immunocompromised hosts [130, 131]. Additionally, the DNA from a single clinical specimen, such as a knee fluid aspirate, may be tested for several etiologic agents in a differential diagnosis. In such instances, the specimen may also be analyzed for other fastidious and difficult-to-culture agents of infectious arthritis, such as N. gonorrhea or Borrelia burgdorferi [14, 15, 60, 103, 125, 174].

As alluded to earlier, molecular methods may also be useful in instances of limited specimen volume [175, 176]. Even in low-volume specimens, enough DNA/RNA can often be extracted to allow performance of numerous molecular assays. However, though molecular methods are very sensitive, we emphasize that, like culture and direct examination, clinically relevant results are ultimately reliant on the submission of quality specimens [177-178].

Some organisms, although not difficult to culture, are encountered infrequently and require special media for isolation. In these instances, culturing may not be costeffective for smaller laboratories because the reagents may expire before usage; these samples may also be sent to reference laboratories for culturing, for the sake of economy. Again, fragile organisms may die in transit or become overgrown by contaminating bacteria, thereby making the subsequent culture useless. If molecular microbiology facilities are not available in community laboratories, nucleic acids extracted by the use of commercially available kits may be sent frozen to molecular reference facilities. Alternatively, if molecular facilities are available, PCR primers and probes for relatively rare microorganisms may be maintained frozen at -70 [degrees]C for extended periods and used when needed. This may eliminate the need for special culture media and circumvent problems related to specimen transit. As molecular techniques become more widely available, the spectrum of rapid and cost-effective clinical microbiology testing available to smaller laboratories can be extended.

Molecular methods of detection may also play a role in laboratory safety. Organisms such as Coxiella burnetti, M. tuberculosis, Coccidioides immitis, and several viruses causing severe hemorrhagic fevers are laboratory hazards [179-182]. These organisms are easily cultured, but may infect laboratory personnel and cause serious illness or death. The handling of these organisms requires specially trained personnel, special equipment, and expensive ventilated facilities--all of which increase laboratory costs. Molecular methods may be used to detect such organisms directly from clinical specimens, without exposing laboratory personnel to biologically amplified organisms. After the initial extraction procedure, only noninfectious materials are handled.

The molecular detection of microbes with a known susceptibility profile is an effective replacement of the traditional culture. An excellent example is the molecular detection of Bordetella pertussis [176]. This organism is a relatively slow grower, requires specially supplemented and more costly media, and has a known susceptibility profile. The molecular detection of Bordetella pertussis can save time, lower laboratory costs with regard to special media, and allow for the more rapid initiation of effective therapy [176]. If variable antimicrobial susceptibility profiles exist, culture for susceptibility testing is still necessary. Molecular methods for the detection of antimicrobial-resistant strains are in development and in the future may replace traditional susceptibility testing (see below). Until then, molecular screening may be used to determine which patients should be cultured for subsequent susceptibility testing.

In recent years, the demand for quantification of nucleic acid targets has been growing [183, 184]. By use of molecular methods, the microbial load of an infecting pathogen may be determined and its genotype may also be evaluated. Viral load data are used to monitor therapeutic responsiveness and may yield prognostic information regarding the progression of disease. Until recently, however, the task of quantitative nucleic acid amplification has been very difficult to accomplish. Because the amplification techniques yielded products in an exponential manner until a plateau was reached, any factor interfering with the exponential nature of the amplification process would therefore affect the result of the quantitative assay. In practice, many factors can affect the efficiency of the PCR reaction throughout the amplification procedures and result in the differences between theoretical and actual yields of the reaction. Now, however, kit-based technologies make it possible for many laboratories to carry out quantitative determinations.

Viral load determinations are currently used for evaluating HIV and HCV disease by the use of PCR and bDNA technology [185-187]. When used with other surrogate markers such as CD4 cell count, determination of plasma HIV viral load is an early and accurate marker of disease progression [188-191]. This may result in better predictors of disease progression and outcome, as well as criteria for initiation and modification of antiviral therapy.

CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION CONTROL

The investigation and control of nosocomial infections is a complex issue that involves clinical, infection-control, and laboratory personnel. The efforts of both the microbiologist and the hospital epidemiologist are facilitated greatly by the availability of the newer molecular epidemiological typing techniques. Molecular diagnostic techniques have been successfully used in the investigation and control of classical and emerging nosocomial pathogens, such as the enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, enterococci, Candida albicans, M. tuberculosis, and Chlamydia pneumoniae [79, 192-194]. Application of DNA probe-based assays allows the diagnosis of other nosocomial infections caused by respiratory syncytial virus [195], varicellazoster virus, herpes simplex virus [196], and legionella [197] to be made in only a few hours. The molecular techniques have played an important role in the detection, identification, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of many nosocomial pathogens [83, 96, 97, 198]. A good example is the use of PCR-RFLP analysis in combination with Southern transfer and hybridization (fingerprinting) to study the multiple drug-resistant M. tuberculosis nosocomial outbreak in HIV-positive groups in Miami [81] and New York [82, 83].

The ability to rapidly and unambiguously characterize organisms suspected of causing a disease outbreak is critical to public health and hospital infection-control endeavors. Recent contributions to clinical and hospital epidemiology have depended on PCR. Several putative outbreaks of infections have been investigated by molecular techniques. Such examples include investigation of several temporally clustered cases of Streptococcus pyogenes invasive disease in Air Force recruits [199], a case cluster of lymphogranuloma venereum caused by Chlamydia trachomatis serovar L1 in homosexual men [200], and an outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 infection from contaminated deer jerky [80].

Significantly, a PCR analysis was recently successfully used to identify the hantavirus agent responsible for an outbreak of fatal infections in the US Southwest. In May 1993, a mysterious respiratory illness outbreak was reported in the Four Corners region, which includes New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado, and Utah. Patients were defined as having unexplained adult respiratory distress syndrome or acute bilateral pulmonary interstitial infiltrates. Mortality in confirmed patients was >75%. Preliminary serologic studies found antibodies in patients' sera in patterns suggesting cross-reactivity (but not identity) with previously known hantaviruses [180]. By comparing genome sequences of available hantavirus strains, precise regions of sequence conservation within the G2 protein coding region of the M segment of the hantavirus genome were identified [201, 202]. Deoxyoligonucleotide primers were designed for detection of small amounts of hantavirus genome by a nested RT-PCR assay. The genetic detection assay amplified hantavirus-specific DNA fragments from RNA extracted from the tissues of patients and deer mice caught at or near patients' residences, revealing the associated virus to be a new hantavirus and providing a direct genetic link between infection in patients and rodents [203].

Molecular techniques are being used increasingly in epidemiological and clinical investigations. Among viral infections, the human papillomavirus (HPV) is a common cause of dysplasia, intraepithelial neoplasia, and carcinoma in the female genital tract. Certain types, such as types 16 and 18, have been regarded as high-risk cancer-associated HPVs, whereas types 6 and 11 are regarded as low-risk HPVs [204, 205]. Use of DNA hybridization assays in cervical swabs or fresh cervical biopsy specimens to determine HPV infection and viral types has provided helpful information for clinical assessment and treatment of patients [206, 207]. In HCV infections, different genotypes have been reported to alter disease severity, change treatment response, and influence virus-host interactions [208]. A specific primer set to the 59-untranslated region has been designed to allow detection of HCV nucleic acids of different genotypes [209]. By using PCR followed by automated direct sequencing, several studies have revealed that the most common genotypes of HCV in the US and Western Europe are 1a and 1b; other genotypes, including 2a, 2b, 3, 4, 5, and 6, have their own distinct global distributions [210, 211]. A new PCR-based HCV genotyping system has been recently developed to identify HCV genotypes 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3a, 3b, 4, 5a, and 6a; it may be useful for a large-scale determination of HCV genotypes in clinical studies [212].

Molecular techniques have been used to directly detect resistance genes or mutations that result in resistance in organisms. The mecA gene that codes for resistance to methicillin in Staphylococci has been detected by PCR, multiplex PCR, and bDNA assays [123, 213, 214]. Defining the mutations responsible for resistance to microbial agents has led to new methods for monitoring efficacy of antimicrobial therapy. Successful investigations have been carried out on both bacterial and viral resistance mechanisms. A PCR assay has been used to detect mutations in the rpoB locus associated with rifampin resistance in M. tuberculosis [157, 159, 215]. The previously discussed TMA technique has been described for detection of the point mutations resulting in zidovudine resistance in stains of HIV [140]. Determination of the structural basis of resistance of HIV to viral polymerase inhibitors has been described in detail elsewhere [106, 216, 217]. Another example is the finding that certain point mutations in the herpes simplex virus-encoded thymidine kinase gene are responsible for the occurrence of acyclovir resistance [218]. Determining acyclovir resistance by detecting these point mutations is extremely important in patients undergoing long-term therapy and in patients with AIDS or other immunosuppressed states [156, 219, 220].

Future Applications

Molecular screening of particular at-risk populations for a group of possible pathogens is an exciting area of development in molecular microbiology. For example, numerous etiologic agents cause debilitating gastroenteritis in immunosuppressed patient populations, including mycobacteria (i.e., M. avium complex and M. genevense), parasites (i.e., Cryptosporidum, Microsporidum), viruses (i.e., rotovirus, Norwalk agent), and typical bacterial pathogens (E. coli variants, Salmonella, Shigella, and Campylobacter). Traditionally, different methods of detection are used for each group of intestinal pathogens. This requires special media, equipment, and expensive facilities for the culture of mycobacteria; expertise in the identification of parasites in ova and parasite stool preparations; virology facilities; and special media for the workup of bacterial enteric pathogens. Although these tests may be relatively inexpensive individually, an adequate workup for enteric pathogens can be quite costly.

Molecular techniques exist and are being developed that may be used to screen individuals within a particular patient population for the most probable etiologic agents of disease. Nucleic acids extracted from the stool of patients with gastroenteritis may be examined with organism--or group-specific nucleic acid primers and probes. In this manner, one single test may be used to single out the etiologic agent of disease among numerous possibilities.

The techniques being used for molecular screening include the newer nucleic acid "chip" technologies, multiplex PCR, and the use of broad-range PCR primers and subsequent nucleic acid sequence analysis. "DNA chips," developed and manufactured by several companies, are basically the product of bonding or direct synthesis of numerous specific DNA probes on a stationary, often silicon-based support [221-225]. Within the particular well, hybridization reactions occur if the appropriate sequence or probe "feature" is present in the DNA or RNA analyte. Because numerous features are present on a single chip, several microbial pathogens or targets may be detected in one test. The chip may be tailored to particular disease processes. This technology is easily performed and readily automated.

Similarly, multiplex PCR utilizes numerous primers within a single reaction tube so as to amplify nucleic acid fragments from different targets. Specific nucleic acid amplification should occur if the appropriate target DNA is present in the sample tested [115, 120, 122, 123]. Detection may then be accomplished by traditional Southern transfer and subsequent nucleic acid probe, by enzyme immunoassay methods, or by "gene-chip" analysis. This technology is limited by the number of primers that can be included in a single reaction, primer-primer interference, and nonspecific nucleic acid amplification.

Finally, several pathogens within taxonomically related groups may be screened with broad-range PCR primers and detected by nucleic acid sequence or probe analysis [126-128, 226]. Primers are chosen on the basis of nucleic acid sequence comparisons to include pathogenic agents and, if possible, to exclude possible environmental contaminants. For example, the use of broad-range PCR primers and sequence analysis has successfully detected diseases caused by members of the Rickettsiaceae; in particular, the agents of ehrlichiosis have been identified and speciated [154]. This technique is quite useful in instances in which the differential diagnosis can be limited to a particular group of organisms.

Future applications in the field of molecular microbiology include the rapid detection of microbial resistance and, we hope, with the development of more userfriendly systems, the expansion of these technologies to smaller institutions and hospitals. The use of these biochemical methods and reactions in the specific identification of infectious agents at the nucleic acid level truly represents a synthesis of the clinical chemistry and clinical microbiology laboratories.

Received June 10, 1997; revision accepted July 18, 1997.

References

[1.] Mullis KB, Faloona FA. Specific synthesis of DNA in vitro via a polymerase-catalyzed reaction. Methods Enzymol 1987;155: 335-50.

[2.] Mullis KB. The unusual origin of the polymerase chain reaction. Sci Am 1990;262:56-65.

[3.] Saiki RK, Gelfand DH, Stoffel S, Scharf SJ, Higuchi R, Horn GT, et al. Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science 1988;239:487-91.

[4.] Erlich HA, Gelfand D, Sninsky JJ. Recent advances in the polymerase chain reaction [Review]. Science 1991;252:1643-51.

[5.] Persing DH. Polymerase chain reaction: trenches to benches [Review]. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:1281-5.

[6.] Thurm V, Gericke B. Identification of infant food as a vehicle in a nosocomial outbreak of Citrobacter freundii: epidemiological subtyping by allozyme, whole-cell protein, and antibiotic resistance. J Appl Bacteriol 1994;76:553-8.

[7.] Pierson CL, Friedman BA. Comparison of susceptibility to beta-lactam antimicrobial agents among bacteria isolated from intensive care units. Diag Microbiol Infect Dis 1992;15:19S-30S.

[8.] Lin D, Lehmann PF, Hamory BH, Padhye AA, Durry E, Pinner RW, Lasker BA. Comparison of three typing methods for clinical and environmental isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:1596-601.

[9.] Stoakes L, John MA, Lannigan R, Schieven BC, Ramos M, Harley D, Hussain Z. Gas-liquid chromatography of cellular fatty acids for identification of staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32: 1908-10.

[10.] Blanc DS, Lugeon C, Wenger A, Siegrist HH, Francioli P. Quantitative antibiogram typing using inhibition zone diameters compared with ribotyping for epidemiological typing of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32: 2505-9.

[11.] Bernstein JM, Sagahtaheri-Altaie S, Dryja DM, Wactawski-Wende J. Bacterial interference in nasopharyngeal bacterial flora of otitis-prone and non-otitis-prone children. Acta Oto-Rhino-Laryn Belg 1994;48:1-9.

[12.] Tenover FC, Arbeit R, Archer G, Biddle J, Byrne S, Goering R, et al. Comparison of traditional and molecular methods of typing isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32: 407-15.

[13.] Asai S, Noda M, Yamamura M, Hozumi Y, Takase I, Nitta H, et al. Comparative study of the cellular fatty acids of methicillin-resistant and susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. APMIS 1993; 101:753-61.

[14.] Granato PA, Franz MR. Use of the Gen-Probe PACE system for the detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urogenital samples. Diag Microbiol Infect Dis 1990;3:217-21.

[15.] Lewis JS, Fakile 0, Foss E, Legarza G, Leskys A, Lowe K, Powning D. Direct DNA probe assay for Neisseria gonorrhoeae in pharyngeal and rectal specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:2783-5.

[16.] Daly JA, Clifton NL, Seskin KC, Gooch WM III. Use of rapid, nonradioactive DNA probes in culture confirmation tests to detect Streptococcus agalactiae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Enterococcus spp. from pediatric patients with significant infections. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:80-2.

[17.] Clarke LM, Sierra MF, Daidone BJ, Lopez N, Covino JM, McCormack WM. Comparison of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay and Gen-Probe PACE 2 with cell culture for diagnosis of cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a high-prevalence female population. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:968-71.

[18.] Denniston KJ, Hoyer BH, Smedile A, Wells FV, Nelson J, Gerin JL. Cloned fragment of the hepatitis delta virus RNA genome: sequence and diagnostic application. Science 1986;232: 873-5.

[19.] Kiviat NB, Koutsky LA, Critchlow CW, Galloway DA, Vernon DA, Peterson ML, et al. Comparison of Southern transfer hybridization and dot filter hybridization for detection of cervical human papillomavirus infection with types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, and 35. Am J Clin Pathol 1990;94:561-5.

[20.] Drake TA, HindlerJA, Berlin OG, Bruckner DA. Rapid identification of Mycobacterium avium complex in culture using DNA probes. J Clin Microbiol 1987;25:1442-5.

[21.] Gonzalez R, Hanna BA. Evaluation of Gen-Probe DNA hybridization systems for the identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare. Diag Microbiol Infect Dis 1987;8:69-77.

[22.] Musial CE, Tice LS, Stockman L, Roberts GD. Identification of mycobacteria from culture by using the Gen-Probe rapid diagnostic system for Mycobacterium avium complex and Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. J Clin Microbiol 1988;26:2120-3.

[23.] Hall GS, Pratt-Rippin K, Washington JA. Evaluation of a chemiluminescent probe assay for identification of Histoplasma capsulatum isolates. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30:3003-4.

[24.] Huffnagle KE, Gander RM. Evaluation of Gen-Probe's Histoplasma capsulatum and Cryptococcus neoformans Accu-Probes. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:419-21.

[25.] Romero JL, Descoteaux S, Reed S, Orozco E, Santos J, Samuelson J. Use of polymerase chain reaction and nonradioactive DNA probes to diagnose Entamoeba histolytica in clinical samples. Arch Med Res 1992;23:277-9.

[26.] Mayer LW. Use of plasmid profiles in epidemiologic surveillance of disease outbreaks and in tracing the transmission of antibiotic resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 1988;1:228-43.

[27.] Wachsmuth K. Genotypic approaches to the diagnosis of bacterial infections: plasmid analyses and gene probes. Infect Control 1985;6:100-9.

[28.] Sabria-Leal M, Morthland VH, Pedro-Botet ML, Sopena N, Gimenez-Perez M, Branchini ML, Pfaller MA. Molecular epidemiology for local outbreaks of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus au reus (MRSA). The need for several methods. Eur J Epidemiol 1994;10:325-30.

[29.] Grattard F, Pozzetto B, Berthelot P, Rayet I, Ros A, Lauras B, Gaudin OG. Arbitrarily primed PCR, ribotyping, and plasmid pattern analysis applied to investigation of a nosocomial out break due to Enterobacter cloacae in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:596-602.

[30.] Wu SX, Liu YX. Molecular epidemiologic study of burn wound infection caused by Staphylococcus aureus in children. Chin Med J 1994;107:570-3.

[31.] Pitt TL, Gaston MA. Bacteriophage typing. Methods Mol Biol 1995;46:15-26.

[32.] Martin de Nicolas MM, Vindel A, Offez-Nieto JA. Epidemiological typing of clinically significant strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Hosp Infect 1995;29:35-43.

[33.] Usera MA, Popovic T, Bopp CA, Strockbine NA. Molecular subtyping of Salmonella enteritidis phage type 8 strains from the United States. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:194-8.

[34.] Sader HS, Hollis RJ, Pfaller MA. The use of molecular techniques in the epidemiology and control of infectious diseases [Review]. Clin Lab Med 1995;15:407-31.

[35.] Choi YJ, Hu Y, Mahmood A. Clinical significance of a polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Am J Clin Pathol 1996;105:200-4.

[36.] Catry MA, Borrego MJ, Cardoso J, Azevedo J, Santo I. Comparison of the Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis test and cell culture for the detection of urogenital chlamydial infections. Genitourin Med 1995;71:247-50.

[37.] Cherubin CE. Antibiotic resistance of Salmonella in Europe and the United States. Rev Infect Dis 1981;3:1105-26.

[38.] Cohen ML, Tauxe RV. Drug-resistant Salmonella in the United States: an epidemiologic perspective. Science 1986;234: 964-9.

[39.] Sahm DF, O'Brien TF. Detection and surveillance of antimicrobial resistance [Review]. Trends Microbiol 1994;2:366-71.

[40.] Livornese LL Jr, Dias S, Samel C, Romanowski B, Taylor S, May P, et al. Hospital-acquired infection with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium transmitted by electronic thermometers. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:112-6.

[41.] Wagar EA. Direct hybridization and amplification applications for the diagnosis of infectious diseases [Review]. J Clin Lab Anal 1996;10:312-25.

[42.] Cormican MG, Glennon M, Riain UN, Smith T, Flynn J, Gannon F. Evaluation of a PCR assay for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens. Diag Microbiol Infect Dis 1995;22:357-60.

[43.] Beavis KG, Lichty MB, Jungkind DL, Giger 0. Evaluation of Amplicor PCR for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from sputum specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:2582-6.

[44.] Enroth H, Engstrand L. Immunomagnetic separation and PCR for detection of Helicobacter pylori in water and stool specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:2162-5.

[45.] Mathis A, Deplazes P. PCR and in vitro cultivation for detection of Leishmania spp. in diagnostic samples from humans and dogs. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:1145-9.

[46.] Lin JJ, Ham HJ, Hsu YD, Tsao WL, Lee HS, Lee WH. Rapid diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis by polymerase chain reaction assay of cerebrospinal fluid. J Neurol 1995;242:147-52.

[47.] Williams WJ, Radulovic S, Dasch GA, Lindstrom J, Kelly DJ, Oster CN, Walker DH. Identification of Rickettsia conorii infection by polymerase reaction in a soldier returning from Somalia. Clin Infect Dis 1994;19:93-9.

[48.] Elvin K. Laboratory diagnosis and occurrence of Pneumocystis carinii. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl 1994;94:1-34.

[49.] Yamashita Y, Kohno S, Koga H, Tomono K, Kaku M. Detection of Bacteroides fragilis in clinical specimens by PCR. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:679-83.

[50.] Miller N, Hernandez SG, Cleary TJ. Evaluation of Gen-Probe amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test and PCR for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:393-7.

[51.] Busch MP, Wilber JC, Johnson P, Tobler L, Evans CS. Impact of specimen handling and storage on detection of hepatitis C virus RNA. Transfusion 1992;32:420-5.

[52.] Greer CE, Peterson SL, Kiviat NB, Manos MM. PCR amplification from paraffin-embedded tissues, effects of fixative and fixation time. Am J Clin Pathol 1991;95:117-24.

[53.] Kilian M, Sorensen I, Frederiksen W. Biochemical characteristics of 130 recent isolates from Haemophilus influenzae meningitis. J Clin Microbiol 1979;9:409-12.

[54.] Maslow JN, Brecher SM, Adams KS, Durbin A, Loring S, Arbeit RD. Relationship between indole production and differentiation of Klebsiella species: indole-positive and -negative isolates of Klebsiella determined to be clonal. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31: 2000-3.

[55.] Dijkshoorn L, Aucken H, Gerner-Smidt P, Janssen P, Kaufmann ME, Garaizar J, et al. Comparison of outbreak and nonoutbreak Acinetobacter baumannii strains by genotypic and phenotypic methods. J Clin Microbiol 1996;34:1519-25.

[56.] Maki DG, Rhame FS, Mackel DC, Bennett JV. Nationwide epidemic of septicemia caused by contaminated intravenous products. I. Epidemiologic and clinical features. Am J Med 1976;60: 471-85.

[57.] Tenover FC, McGowan JE Jr. Reasons for the emergence of antibiotic resistance [Review]. Am J Med Sci 1996;311:9-16.

[58.] Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV, Mickelsen PA, Murray BE, Persing DH, et al. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:2233-9.

[59.] Goswitz JJ, Willard KE, Fasching CE, Peterson LR. Detection of gyrA gene mutations associated with ciprofloxacin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: analysis by polymer ase chain reaction and automated direct DNA sequencing. Antimicrobiol Agents Chemother 1992;36:1166-9.

[60.] Ng LK, Carballo M, Dillon JA. Differentiation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates requiring proline, citrulline, and uracil by plasmid content, serotyping, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:1039-41.

[61.] Mulligan ME, Kwok RY, Citron DM, John JF Jr, Smith PB. Immunoblots, antimicrobial resistance, and bacteriophage typing of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 1988;26:2395-401.

[62.] Bannerman TL, Hancock GA, Tenover FC, Miller JM. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis as a replacement for bacteriophage typing of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:551-5.

[63.] Selander RK, Caugant DA, Ochman H, Musser JM, Gilmour MN, Whittam TS. Methods of multilocus enzyme electrophoresis for bacterial population genetics and systematics [Review]. Appl Environ Microbiol 1986;51:873-84.

[64.] Blair JE, Williams RE. Phagetyping of staphylococci [Review]. Bull WHO 1961;24:771-84.

[65.] Hickman-Brenner FW, Stubbs AD, Farmer JJ III. Phage typing of Salmonella enteritidis in the United States. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:2817-23.

[66.] Morosini MI, Canton R, Martinez-Beltran J, Negri MC, Perez-Diaz JC, Baquero F, Blazquez J. New extended-spectrum TEM-type beta-lactamase from Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica iso lated in a nosocomial outbreak. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995;39:458-61.

[67.] Anderson JR, Smith MD, Kibbler CC, Holton J, Scott GM. A nosocomial outbreak due to non-encapsulated Haemophilus influenzae: analysis of plasmids coding for antibiotic resistance. J Hosp Infect 1994;27:17-27.

[68.] Mickelsen PA, Plorde JJ, Gordon KP, Hargiss C, McClure J, Schoenknecht FD, et al. Instability of antibiotic resistance in a strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from an outbreak of prosthetic valve endocarditis. J Infect Dis 1985;152:50-8.

[69.] Schwartz DC, Cantor CR. Separation of yeast chromosome-sized DNAs by pulsed field gradient gel electrophoresis. Cell 1984;37: 67-75.

[70.] Arbeit RD, Slutsky A, Barber TW, Maslow JN, Niemczyk S, Falkinham JO, et al. Genetic diversity among strains of Mycobacterium avium causing monoclonal and polyclonal bacteremia in patients with AIDS. J Infect Dis 1993;167:1384-90.

[71.] Murray BE, Singh KV, Heath JD, Sharma BR, Weinstock GM. Comparison of genomic DNAs of different enterococcal isolates using restriction endonucleases with infrequent recognition sites. J Clin Microbiol 1991;28:2059-63.

[72.] Prevost G, Jaulhac B, Piemont Y. DNA fingerprinting by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis is more effective than ribotyping in distinguishing among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30:967-73.

[73.] Kristjansson M, Samore MH, Gerding DN, DeGirolami PC, Bettin KM, Karchmer AW, Arbeit RD. Comparison of restriction endonuclease analysis, ribotyping, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for molecular differentiation of Clostridium difficile strains. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:1963-9.

[74.] Back NA, Linnemann CC Jr, Pfaller MA, Staneck JL, Morthland V. Recurrent epidemics caused by a single strain of erythromycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The importance of molecular epidemiology. JAMA 1993;270:1329-33.

[75.] Brosch R, Buchrieser C, Rocourt J. Subtyping of Listeria monocytogenes serovar 4b by use of low-frequency-cleavage restriction endonucleases and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Res Microbiol 1991;142:667-75.

[76.] Samore MH, Venkataraman L, DeGirolami PC, Arbeit RD, Karchmer AW. Clinical and molecular epidemiology of sporadic and clustered cases of nosocomial Clostridium difficile diarrhea. Am J Med 1996;100:32-40.

[77.] Banatvala N, Magnano AR, Cartter ML, Barrett TJ, Bibb WF, Vasile LL, et al. Meat grinders and molecular epidemiology: two supermarket outbreaks of Escherichia coli 0157:H7 infection. J Infect Dis 1996;173:480-3.

[78.] Layton MC, Hierholzer WJ Jr, Patterson JE. The evolving epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at a university hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1995;16:12-7.

[79.] Van Belkum A, Van Leeuwen W, Verkooyen R, Can Sacilick S, Cokmus C, Verbrugh H. Dissemination of a single clone of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among Turkish hospitals. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:978-81.

[80.] Keene WE, Sazie E, Kok J, Rice DH, Hancock DD, Balan VK, et al. An outbreak of Escherichia coli 0157:H7 infections traced to jerky made from deer meat. JAMA 1997;277:1229-31.

[81.] Beck-Sague C, Dooley SW, Hutton MD, Otten J, Breeden A, Crawford JT, et al. Hospital outbreak of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections: factors in transmission to staff and HIV-infected patients. JAMA 1992;268:1280-6.

[82.] Dooley SM, Jarvis WR, Marione WJ, Snider DE. Multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Ann Intern Med 1992;117: 257-9.

[83.] Pearson ML, Jereb JA, Frieden TR, Crawford JT, Davis BJ, Dooley SW, Farvis WR. Nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:191-6.

[84.] Grimont F, Grimont PA. Ribosomal ribonucleic acid gene restriction patterns as potential taxonomic tools. Ann Inst Past Microbiol 1986;37B:165-75.

[85.] Altwegg M, Mayer LW. Bacterial molecular epidemiology based on a nonradioactive probe complementary to ribosomal RNA [Review]. Res Microbiol 1989;140:325-33.

[86.] Moyer NP, Luccini GM, Holcomb LA, Hall NH, Altwegg M. Application of ribotyping for differentiating aeromonads isolated from clinical and environmental sources. Appl Environ Microbiol 1992; 58:1940-4.

[87.] Baloga A0, Harlander SK. Comparison of methods for discrimination between strains of Listeria monocytogenes from epidemiological surveys. Appl Environ Microbiol 1991;57:2324-31.

[88.] Arthur M, Arbeit RD, Kim C, Beltran P, Crowe H, Steinbach S, et al. Restriction fragment length polymorphisms among uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates: pap-related sequences compared with rrn operons. Infect Immun 1990;58:471-9.

[89.] Okwumabua 0, Staats J, Chengappa MM. Detection of genomic heterogeneity in Streptococcus suis isolates by DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms of rRNA genes (ribotyping). J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:968-72.

[90.] Welsh J, McClelland M. Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucleic Acids Res 1990;18:7213-8.

[91.] Mazurier S, van de Giessen A, Heuvelman K, Wernars K. RAPID analysis of Campylobacter isolates: DNA fingerprinting without the need to purify DNA. Lett Appl Microbiol 1992;14:260-2.

[92.] McMillin DE, Muldrow LL. Typing of toxic strains of Clostridium difficile using DNA fingerprints generated with arbitrary polymerase chain reaction primers. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1992;71:5-9.

[93.] MacGowan AP, O'Donaghue K, Nicholls S, McLauchlin J, Bennett PM, Reeves DS. Typing of Listeria spp. by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPID) analysis. J Clin Microbiol 1993;38: 322-7.

[94.] Goyal M, Young D, Zhang Y, Jenkins PA, Shaw RJ. PCR amplification of variable sequence upstream of katG gene to subdivide strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:3070-1.

[95.] Sandery M, Coble J, McKersie-Donnolley S. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPID) profiling of Legionella pneumophila. Lett Appl Microbiol 1994;19:184-7.

[96.] Elaichouni A, Verschraegen G, Claeys G, Devleeschouwer M, Godard C, Van Eechoutte M. Pseudomonas aeruginosa serotype 012 outbreak studied by arbitrary primer PCR. J Clin Microbiol 1994:32:666-71.

[97.] Kerr JR, Moore JE, Curran MD, Graham R, Webb CH, Lowry KG, et al. Investigation of a nosocomial outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia in an intensive care unit by random amplification of polymorphic DNA assay. J Hosp Infect 1995;30: 125-31.

[98.] van Belkum A, Kluytmans J, van Leeuwen W, Bax R, Quint W, Peters E, et al. Multicenter evaluation of arbitrarily primed PCR for typing of Staphylococcus aureus strains. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:1537-47.

[99.] Reznicek M, Bale M, Pfaller M. Application of DNA probes to antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Legionella pneumophila. Diag Microbiol Infect Dis 1991;14:7-10.

[100.] Youmans GR, Davis TE, Fuller DD. Use of chemiluminescent DNA probes in the rapid detection of oxacillin resistance in clinically isolated strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Diag Microbiol Infect Dis 1993;16:99-104.

[101.] Ferretti JJ, Gilmore KS, Courvalin P. Nucleotide sequence analysis of the gene specifying the bifunctional 6'-aminoglycoside acetyltransferase 2"-aminoglycoside phosphotransferase en zyme in Streptococcus faecalis and identification and cloning of gene regions specifying the two activities. J Bacteriol 1986;167: 631-8.

[102.] Rood JI, Jefferson S, Bannam TL, Wilkie JM, Mullany P, Wren BW. Hybridization analysis of three chloramphenicol resistance determinants from Clostridium perfringens and Clostridium difficile. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1989;33:1569-74.

[103.] Sanchez-Pescador R, Stempien MS, Urdea MS. Rapid chemiluminescent nucleic acid assays for detection of TEM-1 beta-lactamase-mediated penicillin resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae and other bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 1988;26:1934-8.

[104.] Urdea MS, Horn T, Fultz TJ, Anderson M, Running JA, Hamren S, et al. Branched DNA amplification multimers for the sensitive, direct detection of human hepatitis viruses. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 1991;24:197-200.

[105.] Arens M. Use of probes and amplification techniques for the diagnosis and prognosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) infections. Diag Microbiol Infect Dis 1993;16:165-72.

[106.] D'Aquila RT. HIV-1 drug resistance. Molecular pathogenesis and laboratory monitoring. Clin Lab Med 1994;14:393-422.

[107.] Duvoux C, Pawlotsky JM, Cherqui D, Tran van Nhieu J, Metreau JM, Fagniez PL, et al. Serial quantitative determination of hepatitis C virus RNA levels after liver transplantation. A useful test for diagnosis of hepatitis C virus reinfection. Transplantation 1995;60:457-61.

[108.] Holodniy M, Katzenstein D, Winters M, Montoya J, Shafer R, Kozal M, et al. Measurement of HIV virus load and genotypic resistance by gene amplification in asymptomatic subjects treated with combination therapy. J AIDS 1993;6:366-9.

[109.] Luque F, Caruz A, Pineda JA, Torres Y, Larder B, Leal M. Provirus load changes in untreated and zidovudine-treated human immu- nodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients. J Infect Dis 1994; 169:267-73.

[110.] Eisenstein BI The polymerase chain reaction: a new method of using molecular genetics for medical diagnosis [Review]. N Engl J Med 1990;322:178-83.

[111.] White TJ, Madej R, Persing DH. The polymerase chain reaction: clinical applications [Review]. Adv Clin Chem 1992;29:161-96.

[112.] Loeffelholz MJ, Lewinski CA, Silver SR, Purohit AP, Herman SA, Buonagurio DA, Dragon EA. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin M icrobiol 1992;30:2847-51.

[113.] Boddinghaus B, Rogall T, Flohr T, Blocker H, Bottger EC. Detection and identification of mycobacteria by amplification of rRNA. J Clin Microbiol 1990;28:1751-9.

[114.] Salomon RN. Introduction to quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Diag Mol Pathol 1995;4:82-4.

[115.] Jou NT, Yoshimori RB, Mason GR, Louie JS, Liebling MR. Single-tube, nested, reverse transcriptase PCR for detection of viable Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35: 1161-5.

[116.] Myers TW, Gelfand DH. Reverse transcription and DNA amplification by a Thermus thermophilus DNA polymerase. Biochem 1991;30:7661-6.

[117.] Young KK, Resnick RM, Meyers TW. Detection of hepatitis C virus by a combined reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:882-6.

[118.] Haqqi TM, Sarkar G, David CS, Sommer SS. Specific amplification of a refractory segment of genomic DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 1988;16:11844.

[119.] Feray C, Sammuel D, Thiers V, Gigou M, Pichon F, Bismuth A, et al. Reinfection of liver graft by hepatitis C after liver transplantation. J Clin Invest 1992;89:1361-5.

[120.] Roberts TC, Storch GA. Multiple PCR for diagnosis of AIDS-related central nervous system lymphoma and toxoplasmosis. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:268-9.

[121.] Chamberlain JS, Gibbs RA, Rainier JE, Nguyen PN, Caskey CT. Detection screening of Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus via multiplex DNA amplification. Nucleic Acids Res 1988;16: 11141-56.

[122.] Bej AK, Mahbubani MH, Miller R, Dicesare JL, Haff L, Atlas RM. Multiples PCR amplification and immobilized capture probes for detection of bacterial pathogens and indicators in water. Mol Cell Probes 1990;4:353-65.

[123.] Geha DJ, Uhl JR, Gustaferro CA, Persing DH. Multiplex PCR for identification of methicillin-resistant staphylococci in the clinical laboratory. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:1768-72.

[124.] Piatak M, Luk KC, Williams B, Lifson JD. Quantitative competitive polymerase chain reaction for accurate quantitation of HIV DNA and RNA species. BioTechniques 1993;14:70-81.

[125.] Yang L, Weis JH, Eichwald E, Kolbert CP, Persing DH, Weis JJ. Heritable susceptibility to Borrelia burgdorferi-induced arthritis is dominant and is associated with persistence of high numbers of spirochetes in tissues. Infect Immun 1994;62:492-500.

[126.] Coyle MB, Carlson LC, Wallis CK, Leonard RB, Raisys VA, Kilburn J0, et al. Laboratory aspects of "Mycobacterium genavense," a proposed species isolated from AIDS patients. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30:3206-12.

[127.] Relman DA, Loutit JS, Schmidt TM, Falkow S, Tompkins LS. The agent of bacillary aniomatosis: an approach to the identification of uncultured pathogens. N Engl J Med 1990;323:1573-80.

[128.] Relman DA, Schmidt TM, MacDermott RP, Falkow S. Identification of the uncultured bacillus of Whipple's disease. N Engl J Med 1992;327:293-301.

[129.] Relman DA, Schmidt TM, Gajadhar A, Sogin M, Cross J, Yoder K, et al. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the human intestinal pathogen, Cyclospora, suggests that it is closely related to Eimentia. J Infect Dis 1996;173:440-5.

[130.] Weyant RS, Hollis DG, Weaver RE, Amin MF, Steigerwalt AG, O'Connor, et al. Bordetella holmesii sp. nov, a new gram-negative species associated with septicemia. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:1-7.

[131.] Tang YW, Hopkins MK, Kolbert CP, Hartley PA, Severance PJ, Persing DH. Bordetella holmesii-like organisms associated with septicemia, endocarditis, and respiratory failure [Abstract]. Con ference on Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics. Washington, DC: American Society of Microbiology, 1997.

[132.] Van Devanter DR, Warrener P, Bennett LY, Schultz ER, Coulter S, Garber RL, Rose TM. detection and analysis of diverse herpes-viral species by consensus primer PCR. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34:1666-71.

[133.] Kirschner P, Springer B, Vogel U, Meier A, Wrede A, Kiekenbeck M, et al. Genotypic identification of mycobacteria by nucleic acid sequence determination: report of a 2-year experience in a clinical laboratory. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:2882-9.

[134.] Neefs JM, Van de Peer Y, De Rijk P, Chapelle S, Wachter R. Compilation of small ribosomal subunit RNA structures. Nucleic Acids Res 1993;21:3025-49.

[135.] Persing DH, Herwaldt BL, Glaser C, Lane RS, Thomford JW, Mathiesen D, et al. Infection with a babesia-like organism in northern California. N Engl J Med 1995;332:298-303.

[136.] Monstein HJ, Kihlstrom E, Tiveljung A. Detection and identification of bacteria using in-house broad range 16S rDNA PCR amplification and genus-specific DNA hybridization probes, located within variable regions of 16S rRNA genes. APMIS 1996; 104:451-8.

[137.] Kwoh DY, Davis GR, Whitefield KM, Chappelle HL, DiMichele U, Gingerase TR. Transcription-based amplification systems and detection of amplified human immunodeficiency virus type 1 with a bead-based sandwich hybridization format. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989;86:1173-7.

[138.] Guatelli JC, Whitfield KM, Kwoh DY, Barringer KJ, Richman DD, Gingeras TR. Isothermal in vitro amplification of nucleic acids by multienzyme reaction modeled after retroviral replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990;87:1874-8.

[139.] Compton J. Nucleic acid sequence-based amplification. Nature 1991;350:91-2.

[140.] Gingeras TR, Prodanovich P, Latimer T, Guatelli JC, Richman DD, Barringer KJ. Use of self-sustained sequence replication amplification reaction to analyze and detect mutations in zidovudine resistant human immunodeficiency virus. J Infect Dis 1991;164: 1066-74.

[141.] Wu DY, Wallace RB. The ligation amplification reaction (LAR)-amplification of specific DNA sequences using sequential rounds of template dependent ligation. Genomics 1989;4:560-9.

[142.] Schachter J, Stamm WE, Quinn TC, Andrews WW, Burczak JD, Lee HH. Ligase chain reaction to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the cervix. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:2540-3.

[143.] Barany F. Genetic disease detection and DNA amplification using cloned thermostable ligase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991;88: 189-93.

[144.] Chernesky MA, Lee H, Schachter J, Burczak JD, Stamm WE, McCormack WM, Quinn TC. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis urethral infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic men by testing first-void urine in a ligase chain reaction assay. J Infect Dis 1994;170:1308-11.

[145.] Walker GT, Fraiser ML, Schram JL, Little MC, Nadeau JG, Malinowski DP. Strand displacement amplification-an isothermal, in vitro DNA amplification technique. Nucleic Acids Res 1992;20:1691-6.

[146.] Walker GT, Little MC, Nadeau JG, Shank DD. Isothermal, in vitro amplification of DNA by a restriction enzyme/DNA polymerase system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89:392-6.

[147.] Lizardi PM, Guerra C, Lomeli H, Tussie-Luna I, Kramer FR. Exponential amplification of recombinant-RNA hybridization probes. Biotechnology 1988;6:1197-202.

[148.] Kramer FR, Lizardi PM. Replicatable RNA reporters. Nature 1989;339:401-2.

[149.] Prichard CG, Stefano JE. Amplified detection of viral nucleic acid at subattomole levels using Q beta replicase. Ann Biol Chem 1990;48:492-7.

[150.] Arnold U, Hammond PW, Wiese WA, Nelson NC. Assay formats involving acridinium-ester-labeled DNA probes. Clin Chem 1989; 35:1588-94.

[151.] Nelson NC, Kacian DL. Chemiluminescent DNA probes. A comparison of the acridinium ester and dioxetane detection systems and their use in clinical diagnostic assay. Clin Chim Acta 1990;194:73-90.

[152.] Pollard-Knight D, Read CA, Downes MJ, Howard LA, Leadbetter MR, Pheby SA, et al. Nonradioactive nucleic acid detection by enhanced chemiluminescence using probes directly labeled with horseradish peroxidase. Anal Biochem 1990;34:84-9.

[153.] Mantero G, Zonaro A, Albertini A, Bertolo P, Primi D. DNA enzyme immunoassay: general method for detecting products of polymerase chain reaction. Clin Chem 1991;37:422-9.

[154.] Dumler JS, Asanovich KM, Bakken JS, Richter P, Kimsey R, Madigan JE. Serologic cross-reactions among Ehrlichia equi, Ehrlichia phagocytophila, and human granulocytic Ehrlichia. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:1098-103.

[155.] Orita M, Hiroyki I, Kanazawa H, Hayashi K, Sekiya T. Detection of polymorphisms of human DNA by gel electrophoresis as single-strand conformation polymorphisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989;86:2766-70.

[156.] Heym G, Honore N, Truffot-Pernot C, Banerjee A, Schurra C, Jacobs WR, et al. Implications of multidrug resistance for the future of short-course therapy of tuberculosis: a molecular study. Lancet 1994;344:293-8.

[157.] Felmlee TA, Liu Q, Whelen AC, Williams D, Sommer SS, Persing DH. Genotypic detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis rifampin resistance: comparison of single-strand conformation polymor phism and dideoxy fingerprinting. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33: 1617-23.

[158.] Van Embden JD, Cave MD, Crawford JT, Dale JW, Eisenach KID, Gicquel B, et al. Strain identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA finger-printing: recommendations for a standardized methodology. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:406-9.

[159.] Whelen AC, Felmlee TA, Hunt JM, Williams DL, Roberts GD, Stockman L, Persing DH. Direct genotypic detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis rifampin resistance in clinical specimens by using single-tube heminested PCR. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33: 556-61.

[160.] Jackson KM, Edwards RM, Bowden DS, Leslie DE. Evaluation of the Roche Amplicor polymerase chain reaction system for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in specimens. Pathology 1996;28:65-7.

[161.] Ichiyama S, linuma Y, Tawada Y, Yamori S, Hasegawa Y, et al. Evaluation of Gen-Probe amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test and Roche PCR-microwell plate hybridization method (Amplicor Mycobacterium) for direct detection of mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol 1996;34:130-3.

[162.] Schwab KJ, De Leon R, Sobsey MD. Immunoaffinity concentration and purification of waterborne enteric viruses for detection by reverse transcriptase PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 1996;62: 2086-94.

[163.] Sandhu GS, Kline BC, Stockman L, Roberts GD. Molecular probes for diagnosis of fungal infections. J Clin Microbiol 1995; 33:2913-9.

[164.] Fedorko DP, Nelson NA, Cartwright CP. Identification of microsporidia in stool specimens by using PCR and restriction endonucleases. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:1739-41.

[165.] Tang YW, Espy MJ, Persing DH, Smith TF. Molecular evidence and clinical significance of herpesvirus infection in the central nervous system. J Clin Microbiol (in press).

[166.] Choo QL, Kuo G, Weiner AJ, Overby LR, Bradley DW, Houghton M. Isolation of a cDNA clone derived from a blood-borne non-A, non-B viral hepatitis genome. Science 1989;244:359-62.

[167.] Kuo G, Choo QL, Alter HJ, Gitnick GL, Redeker AG, Purcell RH, et al. An assay for circulating antibodies to a major etiologic virus of human non-A, non-B hepatitis. Science 1989;244:362-4.

[168.] Alter HJ, Purcell RH, Shih JW, Melpolder JC, Houghton M, Choo QL, Kuo G. Detection of antibody to hepatitis C virus in prospectively followed transfusion recipients with acute and chronic non-A, non-B hepatitis. N Engl J Med 1989;321:1494-500.

[169.] Aach RD, Stevens CE, Hollinger FB, Mosley JW, Peterson DA, Taylor PE, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection in post-transfusion hepatitis. An analysis with first- and second-generation assays. N Engl J Med 1991;325:1325-9.

[170.] Nakagiri I, Ichihara K, Ohmoto K, Hirokawa M, Matsuda N. Analysis of discordant test results among five second-generation assays for anti-hepatitis C virus antibodies also tested by polymerase chain reaction-RNA assay and other laboratory and clinical tests for hepatitis. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:2974-80.

[171.] Hammerle T, Falkner FG, Demer F. A sensitive PCR assay system for the quantitation of viral genome equivalents: hepatitis C virus (HCV). Arch Virol 1996;141:2103-14.

[172.] von Herbay A, Ditton HJ, Maiwald M. Diagnostic application of a polymerase chain reaction assay for the Whipple's disease bacterium to intestinal biopsies. Gastroenterology 1996;110: 1735-43.

[173.] Ramzan NN, Loftus EL, Burgart U, Rooney M, Batts KP, Wiesner RH, et al. Diagnosis and monitoring of Whipple disease by polymerase chain reaction. Ann Intern Med 1997;126:520-7.

[174.] Nocton JJ, Dressier F, Rutledge BJ, Rys PN, Persing DH, Steere AC. Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi DNA by polymerase chain reaction in synovial fluid from patients with Lyme arthritis. N Engl J Med 1994;330:229-34.

[175.] Comeau AM, Pitt J, Hillyer GV, Landesman S, Bremer J, Chang BH, et al. Early detection of human immunodeficiency virus on dried blood spot specimens: sensitivity across serial specimens. J Pediatr 1996;129:111-8.

[176.] Buck GE. Detection of Bordetella pertussis by rapid-cycle PCR and colorimetric microwell hybridization. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34:1355-8.

[177.] Kellogg JA, Seiple JW, Klinedinst JL, Stroll ES, Cavanaugh SH. Improved PCR detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by using an altered method of specimen transport and high-quality endocervical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:2765-7.

[178.] Rota S, Yildiz A, Kustimur S, Akbas E, Gunay A, Guner H. Sample adequacy in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1995;51:225-8.

[179.] Coccidioidomycosis-United States, 1991-1992. MMWR 1993; 42:21-4.

[180.] Update. Outbreak of hantavirus infection-Southwestern United States [News]. MMWR 1993;42:477-9.

[181.] Peerbooms PG, van Doornum GJ, van Deutekom H, Coutinho RA, van Soolingen D. Laboratory-acquired tuberculosis [Letter]. Lancet 1995;345:1311-2.

[182.] Gruner E, Bernasconi E, Galeazzi RL, Buhl D, Heinzle R, Nadal D. Brucellosis: an occupational hazard for medical laboratory personnel. Report of five cases. Infection 1994;22:33-6.

[183.] Crotty PL, Staggs RA, Porter PT, Killeen AA, McGlennen RC. Quantitative analysis in molecular diagnostics [Review]. Hum Pathol 1994;25:572-9.

[184.] Reischl U, Kochanowski B. Quantitative PCR. A survey of the present technology [Review]. Mol Biotechnol 1995;3:55-71.

[185.] Detmer J, Lagier R, Flynn J, Zayati C, Kolberg J, Collins M, et al. Accurate quantification of HCV RNA from all HCV genotypes using branched DNA (bDNA) technology. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34:901-7.

[186.] Pachl C, Todd JA, Kern DG, Sheridan PJ, Fong SJ, Stempien M, et al. Rapid and precise quantification of HIV-1 RNA in plasma using a branched DNA signal amplification assay. J AIDS 1995;8:446-54.

[187.] Revets H, Marissens D, de Wit S, Lacor P, Clumeck N, Lauwers S, Zissis G. Comparative evaluation of NASBA HIV-1 RNA QT, Amplicor-HIV monitor, and Quantiplex HIV RNA assay, three methods for quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA in plasma. J Clin Microbiol 1996;34:1058-64.

[188.] Saksela K, Stevens CE, Rubinstein P, Taylor PE, Baltimore D. HIV-1 messenger RNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells as an early marker of risk for progression to AIDS. Ann Intern Med 1995;123:641-8.

[189.] O'Brien TR, Blattner WA, Waters D, Eyster ME, Hilgartner MW, Cohen AR, et al. Serum HIV-1 RNA levels and time to development of AIDS in the multicenter hemophilia cohort study. JAMA 1996;276:105-10.

[190.] Mellors JW, Kingsley LA, Rinaldo CR, Todd JA, Hoo BS, Kokka RP, Gupta P. Quantitation of HIV-1 RNA in plasma predicts outcome after seroconversion. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:573-9.

[191.] Mellors JM, Rinaldo CR Jr, Gupta P, White RM, Todd JA, Kingsley LA. Prognosis in HIV-1 infection predicted by the quantity of virus in plasma. Science 1996;272:1167-70.

[192.] Banerjee SN, Emori TG, Culver DH, Gaynes RP, Jarvis WR, Horan T, et al. Secular trends in nosocomial primary bloodstream infections in the United States, 1980-1989. Am J Med 1991; 91:86S-89S.

[193.] Pfaller MA, Wenzel RP. Impact of the changing epidemiology of fungal infections in the 1990s. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1992;11:287-9.

[194.] Troy CJ, Peeling RW, Ellis AG, Hockin JC, Bennett DA, Murphy MR, Spika JS. Chlamydia pneumoniae as a new source of infectious outbreaks in nursing homes. JAMA 1997;277: 1214-8.

[195.] Ahluwalia G, Embree J, McNicol P, Law B, Hammond GW. Comparison of nasopharyngeal aspirate and nasopharyngeal swab specimens for respiratory syncytial virus diagnosis by cell culture, indirect immunofluorescence assay, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Clin Microbiol 1987;25:763-7.

[196.] Schmidt NJ, Gallo D, Devlin V, Woodie JD, Emmons RW. Direct immunofluorescence staining for detection of herpes simplex and varicella-zoster virus antigens in vesicular lesions and certain tissue specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1980;12:651-5.

[197.] Doebbeling BN, Bale MJ, Koontz FP, Helms CM, Wenzel RP, Pfaller MA. Prospective evaluation of the Gen-Probe assay for detection of legionellae in respiratory specimens. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1988;7:748-52.

[198.] Rodrigues JN, Amaral JL, Leme IL, Pignatari A, Wey S, Hollis R, et al. Molecular epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Testing of quinolone-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated in Brazil. Diag Microbiol Infect Dis 1993;16:9-16.

[199.] Musser JM, Kapur V, Peters JE, Hendrix CW, Drehner D, Gackstetter GD, et al. Real-time molecular epidemiologic analysis of an outbreak of Streptococcus pyogenes invasive disease in US Air Force trainees. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1994;118:128-33.

[200.] Bauwens JE, Lampe MF, Suchland RJ, Wong K, Stamm WE. Infection with Chlamydia trachomatis lymphogranuloma venereum serovar L1 in homosexual men with proctitis: molecular analysis of an unusual case cluster. Clin Infect Dis 1995;20: 576-81.

[201.] Arikawa J, Lapenotiere HF, Iacono-Connors L, Wang ML, Schmaljohn CS. Coding properties of the S and the M genome segments of Sapporo rat virus: comparison to other causative agents of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. Virology 1990;176: 114-25.

[202.] Tang YW, Ruo SL, Xu X, Sanchez A, Fisher-Hoch SP, McCormick JB, Xu ZY. Hantavirus strains isolated from rodentia and insectivora in rural China differentiated by polymerase chain reaction assay. Arch Virol 1990;115:37-46.

[203.] Nichol ST, Spiropoulou CF, Morzunov S, Rollin PE, Ksiazek TG, Feldmann H, et al. Genetic identification of a hantavirus associated with an outbreak of acute respiratory illness. Science 1993;262:914-7.

[204.] Reid R, Greenberg M, Jenson AB, Husain M, Willett J, Daoud Y, et al. Sexually transmitted papillomaviral infections. I. The anatomic distribution and pathologic grade of neoplastic lesions associated with different viral types. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;156:212-22.

[205.] Fuchs PG, Girardi G, Pfister H. Human papillomavirus DNA in normal, metaplastic, preneoplastic and neoplastic epithelia of the cervix uteri. Int J Cancer 1988;41:41-5.

[206.] Lorincz AT, Schiffman MH, Jaffurs WJ, Marlow K, Quinn AP, Temple GF. Temporal associations of human papillomavirus infection with cervical cytologic abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:645-51.

[207.] Morrison EA, Ho GY, Vermund SH, Goldberg GL, Kadish AS, Kelley KF, Burk RD. Human papillomavirus infection and other risk factors for cervical neoplasia: a case-control study. Int J Cancer 1991;49:6-13.

[208.] Choo QL, Richman KH, Han JH, Berger K, Lee C, Dong C, et al. Genetic organization and diversity of the hepatitis C virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991;88:2451-5.

[209.] McOmish F, Yap PL, Dow BC, Follett EA, Seed C, Keller AJ, et al. Geographical distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes in blood donors: an international collaborative survey. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:884-92.

[210.] Yoshioka K, Kakumu S, Wakita T, Ishikawa T, Itoh Y, Takayanagi M, et al. Detection of hepatitis C virus by polymerase chain reaction and response to interferon-alpha therapy: relationship to genotypes of hepatitis C virus. Hepatology 1992;16:293-9.

[211.] Zein NN, Rakela J, Krawitt EL, Reddy KR, Tominaga T, Persing DH. Hepatitis C virus genotypes in the United States: epidemiology, pathogenicity, and response to interferon therapy. Ann Intern Med 1996;125:634-9.

[212.] Ohno 0, Mizokami M, Wu RR, Saleh MG, Ohba K, Orito E, et al. New hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping system that allows for identification of HCV genotypes 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3a, 3b, 4, 5a, and 6a. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:201-7.

[213.] Ubukata K, Nakagami S, Nitta A, Yamane A, Kawakami S, Sugiura M, Konno M. Rapid detection of the mecA gene in methicillin-resistant staphylococci by enzymatic detection of polymerase chain reaction products. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30: 1728-33.

[214.] Zheng X, Kolbert CP, Delmore P, Arruda J, Lewis M, Kolberg J, et al. Direct mecA detection from blood culture bottles by branched DNA (bDNA) signal amplification [Abstract]. 37th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, DC: American Society of Microbiology, 1997.

[215.] Telenti A, Imboden P, Marchesi F, Schmidheini T, Bodmer T. Direct, automated detection of rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis by polymerase chain reaction and single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993;37:2054-8.

[216.] Frost SD, McLean AR. Quasispecies dynamics and the emergence of drug resistance during zidovudine therapy of HIV infection. AIDS 1994;8:323-32.

[217.] Larder BA, Kohli A, Kellam P, Kemp SD, Kronick M, Henfrey RD. Quantitative detection of HIV-1 drug resistance mutations by automated DNA sequencing. Nature 1993;365:671-3.

[218.] Palu G, Gerna G, Bevilacqua F, Marcello A. A point mutation in the thymidine kinase gene is responsible for acyclovir-resistance in herpes simplex virus type 2 sequential isolates. Virus Res 1992;25:133-44.

[219.] Pease AC, Solas D, Sullivan EJ, Cronin MT, Holmes CP, Fodor SP. Light-generated oligonucleotide arrays for rapid DNA sequence analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993;91:5022-6.

[220.] Field AK, Viron KK. "The end of innocence" revisited: resistance of herpesviruses to antiviral drugs. Clin Microbiol Rev 1994;7: 1-13.

[221.] Gibbs WW. New chip off the old block. Can DNA microprobes do for genetics what microprocessors did for computing? [News]. Sci Am 1996;275:42-4.

[222.] Ross DW. DNA on a chip [Review]. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1996;120:604-5.

[223.] Cheng J, Shoffner MA, Hvichia GE, Kricka U, Wilding P. Chip PCR. II. Investigation of different PCR amplification systems in microfabricated silicon-glass chips. Nucleic Acids Res 1996;24: 380-5.

[224.] Woolley AT, Mathies RA. Ultra-high-speed DNA sequencing using capillary electrophoresis chips [Review]. Anal Chem 1995;67: 3676-80.

[225.] Lamture JB, Beattie KL, Burke BE, Eggers MD, Ehrlich DJ, Fowler R, et al. Direct detection of nucleic acid hybridization on the surface of a charge coupled device. Nucleic Acids Res 1994;22: 2121-5.

[226.] Maurin M, Roux V, Stein A, Ferrier F, Viraben R, Raoult D. Isolation and characterization by immunofluorescence, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, Western blot, restriction fragment length polymorphism-PCR, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of Rochalimaea quintana from a patient with bacillary angiomatosis. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:1166-71.

(1) Nonstandard abbreviations: RFLP, restriction fragment length polymorphism; PFGE, pulse-field gel electrophoresis; RAPD, random amplified polymorphic DNA; bDNA, branched DNA; RT, reverse transcriptase; TAS, transcription-based amplification system; TMA, transcription-mediated amplification; LCR, ligase chain reaction; SDA, strand displacement amplification; HPA, the hybridization protection assay; DEIA, DNA enzyme immunoassay; SSCP, single-strand conformational polymorphisms; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HPV, human papillomavirus. Clinical Chemistry 43, No. 11, 1997 2023

YI-WEI TANG, * GARY W. PROCOP, and DAVID H. PERSING *

Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hilton Bldg. 470, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St., SW, Rochester, MN 55905.

* Authors for correspondence. Fax 507 284-4272; e-mail tang.yi-wei@mayo.edu or persing.david@mayo.edu.
Table 1. Commercially available and Mayo-developed amplification
techniques for detection of microbial pathogens.

 Basic
Organism Manufacturer/ technique Trade mark/ Detection
detected Institute adopted name system

HIV-1 Roche PCR Amplicor [R] EIA

 Roche Quant. Monitor [TM] EIA
 PCR
 Chiron Quant. Quantiplex [TM] EIA
 bDNA
 Organon NASBA HIV-1 QL ECL
 Teknika

 Organon Quant. HIV-1 QT ECL
 Teknika NASBA

HCV Roche PCR Amplicor [R] EIA

 Roche Quant. Monitor [TM] EIA
 PCR

 Chiron Quant. Quantiplex [TM] EIA
 bDNA

 Mayo RT-PCR WB-ECL

Mycobacterium Roche PCR Amplicor [R] EIA
tuberculosis

 Gen-Probe TMA MTD HPA-ECL

Chlamydia Roche PCR Amplicor [R] EIA
trachomatis

 Abbott LCR LCX [R] EIA

 Gen-Probe TMA AMP HPA-ECL

Neisseria Roche PCR Amplicor [R] EIA
gonorrhoeae

 Abbott LCR LCX [R] EIA

Hepatitis B Chiron Quant. Quantiplex [TM] EIA
virus bDNA

CMV Roche PCR Amplicor [R] EIA

 Roche Quant. Monitor [TM] EIA
 PCR

 Mayo PCR WB-ECL

HTLV-1/11 Roche PCR Amplicor [R] EIA

Enterovirus Roche PCR Amplicor [R] EIA

Borrelia Mayo PCR WB-ECL
burgdorferi

HSV Mayo PCR WB-ECL

Bordetella Mayo PCR WB-ECL
pertussis

JC virus Mayo PCR WB-ECL

Babesia Mayo PCR WB-ECL
microti

HGE Mayo PCR WB-ECL

Tropheryma Mayo PCR WB-ECL
whippehi

Epstein-Barr Mayo PCR WB-ECL
virus

Varicella- Mayo PCR WB-ECL
zoster virus

 Analytical sen- Clinical Clinical
 Contami- sitivity (lower sensiti- specifi-
Organism nation detection limit) vity city
detected potential or testing range %

HIV-1 Low to <100 copies/mL >99 (a) No claims
 moderate (a)

 Low to 400-750 000 NA (c) No claims
 moderate copies/ mL (b)

 Low 500-800 000 NA (c) 95 (b)
 copies /mL (b)
 Moderate 80 copies/mL (b) >99 (b) >99 (b)

 Moderate 200-[10.sup.6] NA (c) >99 (b)
 copies/mL (a)

HCV Low to <200 copies/mL 98% (a) No claims
 moderate (a)

 Low to 200-[10.sup.7] NA (c) No claims
 moderate copies/mL (a)

 Low 200 000-120 x NA (c) 98 (b)
 [10.sup.6]
 copies/mL (b)
 Moderate <20 copies/rxn >99 (a) >99 (a)
 (a)

Mycobacterium Low to [greater than or 88.9-100 100 (b)
tuberculosis moderate equal to] 20 or- (b)
 ganisms/rxn (b)

 Moderate Unknown 95.5 (b) 100 (b)

Chlamydia Low to 10-20 elementary 93.2 (b) 98.4 (b)
trachomatis moderate bodies/rxn (b)

 Moderate Unknown >95 (a) >99 (a)
 to high

 Moderate Unknown 86.7-99.2 >99 (b)
 (b)

Neisseria Low to No claims No claims No claims
gonorrhoeae moderate

 Moderate Unknown >95 (a) >99 (a)
 to high

Hepatitis B Low 0.7-5000 x NA (c) 98 (b)
virus [10.sup.6]
 copies/mL

CMV Low to No claims No claims No claims
 moderate

 Low to No claims NA (c) No claims
 moderate

 Moderate <100 CMV genome 70-90 (a) >95 (a)
 copies/rxn

HTLV-1/11 Low to No claims No claims No claims
 moderate

Enterovirus Low to No claims No claims No claims
 moderate

Borrelia Moderate <10 organisms Variable >99 (a)
burgdorferi (d)

HSV Moderate <100 copies/mL 70-90 (a) >99 (a)

Bordetella Moderate <100 organisms/ >95 (a) 95 (a)
pertussis mL

JC virus Moderate <100 copies/mL 75 (a) >95 (a)

Babesia Moderate <100 copies/mL >95 (a) >99 (a)
microti

HGE Moderate <100 copies/mL >95 (a) >99 (a)

Tropheryma Moderate <100 copies/mL >95 (a) >99 (a)
whippehi

Epstein-Barr Moderate <100 copies/mL Unknown (e) >95 (a)
virus

Varicella- Moderate <100 copies/mL Unknown (e) >95 (a)
zoster virus

Organism Additional comments/
detected Primary application Information

HIV-1 Confirmatory testing Customer service: 1-800-
 526-1247
 Quantitation during FDA-cleared
 therapy

 Quantitation during Customer service: 1-800-
 therapy 653-1353

 Confirmatory testing Customer service: 1-800-
 682-2666

 Quantitation during
 therapy

HCV Confirmatory testing

 Quantitation during
 therapy

 Quantitation during
 therapy

 Monitoring and Contact: 1-507-284-1441
 confirmation

Mycobacterium Smear-positive and FDA-cleared. Has been
tuberculosis untreated patients used on BACTEC broth
 only culture

 Smear-positive and FDA-cleared. Customer
 untreated patients service: 1-800-523-
 only 5001

Chlamydia Monitoring and FDA-cleared
trachomatis confirmation

 Monitoring and FDA-cleared. Customer
 confirmation service: 1-800-527-
 1869
 Monitoring and Sensitivity varies in
 confirmation sexes and specimen
 source. FDA-cleared.

Neisseria Monitoring and
gonorrhoeae confirmation

 Monitoring and FDA-cleared
 confirmation

Hepatitis B Quantitation and
virus monitoring

CMV Confirmatory testing

 Quantitation and
 monitoring
 Monitoring and
 confirmation

HTLV-1/11 Monitoring and
 confirmation

Enterovirus Monitoring and
 confirmation

Borrelia Monitoring and
burgdorferi confirmation

HSV Monitoring and
 confirmation

Bordetella Monitoring and
pertussis confirmation

JC virus Monitoring and
 confirmation

Babesia Monitoring and
microti confirmation

HGE Monitoring and
 confirmation

Tropheryma Monitoring and More sensitive than
whippehi confirmation histology for diagnosis

Epstein-Barr Monitoring and
virus confirmation

Varicella- Monitoring and
zoster virus confirmation

NASBA, nucleic acid sequence-based amplification; WB, Western blot;
EIA, enzyme immunoassay; ECL, electrochemiluminescence; HTLV, human
T cell lymphotropic virus; CMV, cytomegalovirus; HGE, human
granulocytic ehrlichiosis; NA, not applicable; rxn, reaction.

(a) Based on Mayo's experience.

(b) Based on manufacturer's claim.

(c) For testing of seropositive patients only.

(d) 95% on synovial fluid specimens, 30% on cerebrospinal
fluid and blood specimens from acute cases.

(e) Too few cases to evaluate sensitivity.
COPYRIGHT 1997 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1997 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Tang, Yi-Wei; Procop, Gary W.; Persing, David H.
Publication:Clinical Chemistry
Date:Nov 1, 1997
Words:15494
Previous Article:The cloning debates and progress in biotechnology.
Next Article:Graphical interpretation of analytical data from comparison of a field method with a reference method by use of difference plots.
Topics:

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters