Printer Friendly

Moho reflections from strong near quarry blasts: an example for the central Ore Mountains, Czech Republic.

1. INTRODUCTION

The Eger Rift (ER) in the northwestern part of the Bohemian Massif belongs to the European Cenozoic rift system. The ER tends generally NE-SW along SE margin of the Ore Mountains in the Czech-German border region. The rift attracts attention of many investigators due to several extraordinary geological phenomena on a relatively small area (Plomerova et al., 2007; Babuska et al., 2007). Among them, one should mention contacts of several geological units in the basement, deep faults, granitic massifs, extensive Tertiary sedimentary basins with lignite deposits, Tertiary and Quaternary volcanism, mineral and thermal springs, dry gas vents (mofettes), contrast gravity anomalies, and earthquake swarms in the western part of the rift (Horalek et al., 2000). These remarkable phenomena call for detailed studies of the crustal and upper mantle structure of the region.

The first deep seismic soundings (DSS) in the Bohemian Massif, carried out in the 1960s and 1970s, revealed a relatively thin Earth's crust in the Ore Mts. block (Beranek, 1971; Beranek et al., 1975). Subsequent areal mapping of the Moho discontinuity depth using seismic waves generated by industrial explosions confirmed the unusually thin crust of the Ore Mts. block (Mayerova et al., 1994). Similar results have recently been obtained using the receiver function technique by Heuer (2006) in the scope of the BOHEMA project and by Wilde-Piorko et al. (2005) for permanent stations. The present paper supplements these studies by detailed measurements at a locality in the central part of the Ore Mts. region.

The seismic reflection measurement is a basic, widely used method in exploration geophysics (e.g. Shearer, 1999). The main idea of the presented method is to find Moho reflections on quarry blast seismograms at near epicentral distances. These reflections are very weak and they cannot be identified by standard readings of seismogram. Therefore, we apply filtering and stacking to amplify them.

In the present study, we have used a series of industrial quarry blasts at the quarry Tusimice recorded at the nearby seismic station Prisecnice (PRI) at an epicentral distance of about 16 km. We attempted to find reflections from the Moho discontinuity. The main motivation for this study was the fact that seismograms from quarry blasts are recorded at short epicentral distances at many stations in the Czech Republic, where a dense network of quarries exists (Malek and Zanda, 2004). The records can be used for mapping the Moho if the reflections are extracted from them. This method of Moho mapping does not require special blasts, which are necessary in the conventional seismic reflection experiments.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

The raypath between Tusimice and Prisecnice crosses two main geological units: Chomutov sedimentary basin and Ore Mts. Crystalline unit (Fig. 2). These units are separated by the Ore Mts. fault. Igneous rocks and sediments, which fell into large depths during the Proterozoic till Palaeozoic, are generally denoted as the Crystalline unit. They were metamorphosed by high pressure and temperature, and also younger granite rocks leaked into them.

2. EXPERIMENTAL SETTINGS

The Tusimice quarry is a large open-pit coal mine in the NW of the Czech Republic. The geological sketch is shown in Fig. 2 (after Zoubek, 1998). In the last years, the shots were performed several times a week to disintegrate the roof stone. For this study we selected twelve blasts from January 2003 to June 2003, which can be divided into three clusters, denoted as A, B and C. Clusters A and B were situated at an altitude of 280 m, while cluster C was situated at the lower layer at an altitude of 260 m (Table 1). The charges of the selected blasts ranged from 3600 to 6350 kg of explosive, divided into several tens of boreholes. The boreholes were blasted in several steps with time delay of 23 ms. The accurate shot time was not measured regularly, but only for one shot, which we call master blast. The times for other shots were extrapolated from Pg-wave onsets at PRI (Fig. 5) considering the differences in epicentral distances, see Section 4.1.

All seismograms come from the seismic station PRI (operated by the Institute of Rock Structure and Mechanics), which was established during the BOHEMA experiment (Plomerova et al., 2003). This station is situated inside a concrete water dam. The station is equipped with the seismic sensor GURALP CMG 40T, which has a flat velocity response in the frequency range from 0.03 to 40 Hz. The continuous acquisition system RUP2000 with GPS time synchronization is used. The sampling frequency is 100 Hz.

3. MODEL OF THE CRUSTAL STRUCTURE

Refraction measurements along the Tusimice-Prisecnice profile have not been performed yet. Consequently, for our purposes we have adopted the velocity model for the Ore Mts. block along the nearby DSS profile VI. This P-wave velocity model was proposed by Beranek (1971) and Beranek et al. (1975) as a piecewise linear function of depth. Later, Novotny and Urban (1988) approximated this model by a simpler model composed of homogeneous layers. The velocities and thicknesses of the first two layers were as follows: 5.3 km/s and 1.5 km in the first layer, 5.5 km/s and 1.0 km in the second layer. However, the Pg wave observed at PRI (see below) requires a higher superficial velocity of about 5.5 km/s. Consequently, we have increased the velocity of the first layer from 5.3 km/s to 5.5 km/s and joined the first two layers. The parameters of the resulting model are given in Table 2 and Fig. 3.

[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]

4. METHOD OF AMPLIFYING THE MOHO REFLECTIONS

A typical seismogram used in this study is shown in Fig. 4. The first onset, which is formed by the Pg wave, is quite clear with pronounced signal-to-noise ratio. The Sg wave can also be easily identified especially on the transversal component T. The seismogram is characterized by intensive surface waves, which arrive at the same travel times as the Moho reflection, but with much lower frequencies. The Moho reflection cannot be identified directly from the single seismogram. The goal of our analysis is to amplify the Moho reflection using frequency and polarization filters and stacking the groups of seismograms. We proceeded in several steps, the descriptions of which follow.

4.1. DATA PREPARATION

The Moho reflections of the longitudinal waves, PmP, are polarized nearly at the vertical direction, while the reflections of shear waves, SmS, are polarized nearly in the horizontal plane. To amplify these reflections in the seismograms we performed four preparatory steps. First, we rotated the horizontal components to obtain the radial and transverse components. After that we computed Pg onsets. We shifted seismograms relatively to obtain the best correlation as shown in Fig. 5. To obtain high correlation, it is necessary to select blasts with similar source function, which determine the shape of the Pg pulse (that is the reason, why we selected just four blasts in each group from 95 registered blasts). Finally, we determined the origin times for all blasts. Since only one origin time was measured (for "master blast"), the remained origin times were calculated using this master event with corrections computed from the differences of epicentral distances. The apparent Pg-wave velocity of 5.5 km/s was used for this purpose.

[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]

4.2. TIME-FREQUENCY ANALYSIS

The time-frequency analysis (Fig. 6) showed that in the frequency band of about 8-22 Hz, the seismic signal continues more than 10 s after the explosion. This signal represents the reflections from the Moho depths which are hidden in the seismic coda. Consequently, a cosine shaped band-pass filter with flat response between 8 and 22 Hz was applied.

4.3. ENVELOPES

For further amplification of the reflections a directional filter was applied. First, the envelopes of all components (vertical Z, radial R and transverse T) were computed. We used the Hilbert transformation for that. To obtain the filtered signals of P- and S- reflections we applied the formulae:

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (1)

where Env denotes the envelop of the signal. We proposed these formulae in order to amplify the waves impinging from the directions close to the vertical. In our model the incidence angle at the surface is about 12 degree.

4.4. LINEAR SUMMATION

Finally, to amplify the reflections, all seismograms in the individual groups A, B, C were summed together, considering time delays between seismograms according to travel time curves of reflected waves (Fig. 7). The reflections in Fig. 8 are amplified by constructive interference, while the other phases are reduced. After this procedure amplified reflections have become comparable with the direct Pg wave. The amplification could be successful only if the wave form of the Pg wave was similar for all blasts in the group and therefore, it was necessary to select just only seismograms with similar focal mechanisms.

[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 7 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 8 OMITTED]

5. MEASURED TRAVEL TIMES

We have found three PmP reflections for group A and two PmP reflections for groups B and C. Moreover, we found two SmS reflections for all groups (Table 3).

6. MOHO DEPTH DETERMINATION

The depths of the interfaces corresponding to times in Table 3 were computed using the homogeneous model and the layered model whose parameters are given in Table 2. Let us mention briefly the basic formulae for the forward problem.

Consider a medium composed of homogeneous layers, and assume the source and receiver to be placed at the surface. Introduce a fictitious interface in the model coinciding with the assumed Moho discontinuity, and consider only the medium above this interface. Denote by n the sequential number of the layer where this Moho interface is situated. Further, denote by [v.sub.m] and [d.sub.m] the velocity (the corresponding P- or S-wave velocity) and thickness of the m-th layer, respectively, where m=1,2,...,n. Note that [d.sub.n] is the thickness of the fictitious upper part of the n-th layer only, i.e. the part above the assumed Moho.

In the m-th layer, let us denote by [[alpha].sub.m] the incidence angle, p = (sin [[alpha].sub.m])/[v.sub.m] the ray parameter (identical in all layers),

[s.sub.m] = [d.sub.m] / cos[[alpha].sub.m] = [d.sub.m] / [square root of 1 - [p.sup.2][v.sup.2.sub.m]] (2)

the length of the ray in the layer,

[[xi].sub.m] = [s.sub.m] sin [[alpha].sub.m] = [s.sub.m][pv.sub.m] (3)

the increment of the epicentral distance, and by

[[tau].sub.m] = [s.sub.m] / [v.sub.m] (4)

the increment of the travel time. The arrival time, t, at a given epicentral distance r cannot be expressed analytically (if n>1), but only in a parametric form:

r = 2 [n.summation over (m=1)] [[xi].sub.m], (5)

t = 2 [n.summation over (m=1)] [[tau].sub.m]. (6)

The ray tracing represents a numerical solution of Eq. (5) to determine the implicit function p = p(r, [v.sub.m], [d.sub.m]). If the ray parameter p is found, the arrival time t can be determined from Eqs. (2), (4) and (6).

In solving the inverse problem to determine the Moho depth, we applied the method of conjugate gradients where the required partial derivative of the travel time with respect to the Moho depth was calculated analytically (Novotny, 1980; Novotny et al., 2007).

7. RESULTS

The error of the determination of the travel times is estimated to be better than 0.05 s (5 samples) in all cases. The depths of the interfaces were computed using a homogeneous crustal model (Table 4) and the slightly modified layered velocity model (Table 5) derived by Beranek (1971) for the Ore Mountains block.

All reflections come from depths between 29.5 and 31.5 km (Fig. 9). This agrees well with the position of the Moho discontinuity in the previous studies of the Ore Mts. region (30-31 km) from DSS (Beranek, 1971) and from receiver functions technique (Wilde-Piorko, 2005; Heuer, 2006).

8. CONCLUSIONS

A method of amplifying the Moho (or low crust) reflections has been developed. The method can be applied to seismograms from cluster of quarry blasts recorded at single seismic station at short epicentral distances of about 10 to 20 km. According to our results at distance of 16 km, the signal-to-noise ratio is sufficient to obtain reliable results. The reflections from the Moho could be distinguished from other waves at frequencies of about 20 Hz. The advantage of this method is that measurement of only one shot time is necessary. The summation of the seismograms and the application of a directional filter improve the results considerably. The application of this method to blasts at open-pit coal mine Tusimice confirmed that the Moho in the central Ore Mts. region is relatively shallow. Since we found the reflections of both P and S waves we calculated directly the mean crustal value of [v.sub.P]/[v.sub.S] = 1.78. The crust-mantle boundary is not probably formed by a single interface. Four reflections from depths between 29.5 and 31.5 km were detected. This agrees well with the position of the Moho discontinuity in the previous studies of the Ore Mts. region (30-31 km) from DSS and from the receiver functions technique.

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 9 OMITTED]

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We acknowledge financial support of the Grant Agency of the Academy of Science of the Czech Republic, Grant Nos. A300460602 and A300460705. Finally we are much obliged to all three anonymous reviewers who have helped us to improve the manuscript.

(Received May 2007, accepted August 2007)

REFERENCES

Babuska, V., Plomerova, J. and Fischer, T.: 2007, Intraplate seismicity in the western Bohemian Massif (central Europe): A possible correlation with a paleoplate junction. J. Geodyn., in press, doi:10.1016/j.jog.2007.02.004.

Beranek, B.: 1971, Study of the velocity conditions in Earth's crust in the regions of the Bohemian Massif and Carpathian System along International Profiles VI and VII. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 15, 316-330.

Beranek, B., Dudek, A. and Zounkova, M.: 1975, Velocity models of the crustal structure in the Bohemian Massif and West Carpathians. Journal of Geological Sciences, Applied Geophysics, 13, 7-20, (in Czech).

Heuer, B., Geissler, W.H., Kind, R. and Kampf, H.: 2006, Seismic evidence for asthenospheric updoming beneath the western Bohemian

Massif, Central Europe. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L05311, doi:10.1029/2005GL025158.

Horalek, J., Fischer, T., Bouskova, A.and Jedlicka, P.: 2000, Western Bohemia/Vogtlang region in the light of the WEBNET network. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 44, 107-125.

Malek, J. and Zanda, L.: 2004, Seismic effects of the quarry blasts on the territory of Bohemia. Acta Geodyn. Geomater. 1, No.2 (134), 291-302.

Mayerova, M., Nakladalova, M., Ibrmajer, I. and Fejfar, M.: 1994, Construction of the Moho Discontinuity Map. In: Crustal Structure of the Bohemian Massif and the West Carpathians, edited by Bucha, V. and Blizkovsky, M. Academia, Praha, 20-21.

Novotny, O.:1980, Partial derivatives of travel-time curves of reflected waves in a layered medium. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 24, 355-364.

Novotny, O., and Urban, L.: 1988, Seismic models of the Bohemian Massif and of some adjacent regions derived from deep seismic soundings and surface waves investigations: A review. In Induced Seismicity and Associated Phenomena, edited by Prochazkova, D. Geophysical Institute, Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Praha, 227-249.

Novotny, O., Jansky, J., Plicka, V. and Lyon-Caen, H.: 2007, A vertically inhomogeneous model of the upper crust in the Aigion region of Greece, inferred from arrival times of the 2001 earthquake swarm. Stud. Geophys. Geod., (submitted).

Plomerova, J., Achauer, U., Babuska, V. and Vecsey, L.: 2007, Upper mantle beneath the Eger Rift (Central Europe): plume or asthenosphere upwelling? Geoph. J. Int., 169, No.2, 675-682, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03361.x.

Plomerova, J., Achauer, U., Babuska, V., Granet, M. and BOHEMA working group: 2003, BOHEMA 2001-2003: Passive Seismic experiment to study Litosphere-Astenosphere System in the western part of the Bohemian Massif. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 47, 691-701.

Shearer, P.M.: 1999, Introduction to Seismology. Cambridge University Press.

Strunc, J. and Broz, M.: 2006, RUP2004--High definition apparatus for standalone, network and micro-array applications, Seismic, Transactions of the VSB. Technical University of Ostrava, Civil Engineering Series, 6, No. 2, 1213-1962.

Wilde-Piorko, M., Saul, J. and Grad, M.: 2005, Differences in the crustal and uppermost mantle structure of the Bohemian Massif from teleseismic receiver functions. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 49, 85-107.

Zoubek, J. et al.: 1998, Digital atlas of the Czech Republic--GeoCR 500. Czech Geological Survey, CD-ROM.

Hana Kampfova (1),*, Jiri Malek (1) and Oldfich Novotny (2)

(1) 1nstitute ofRock Structure and Mechanics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i., V Holesovickach 41, 182 09 Prague 8, Czech Republic (2) Department of Geophysics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University in Prague, V Holesovickach 2, 180 00 Prague 8, Czech Republic

* Corresponding author's e-mail: kampfova@irsm.cas.cz
Table 1 Coordinates of the blasts and station PRI (with
respect to the WGS-84 reference ellipsoid).

Name    Latitude      Longitude    Altitude    Distance
       [[degrees]]   [[degrees]]     [m]      to PRI [m]

A1       13.3441       50.4297       280        16 263
A2       13.3440       50.4299       280        16 249
A3       13.3420       50.4306       280        16 090
A4       13.3395       50.4308       280        15 914
B1       13.3391       50.4275       280        16 045
B2       13.3371       50.4279       280        15 898
B3       13.3276       50.4282       280        15 275
B4       13.3419       50.4275       280        16 227
C1       13.3481       50.4269       260        16 648
C2       13.3461       50.4275       260        16 491
C3       13.3490       50.4270       260        16 705
C4       13.3446       50.4276       260        16 394
PRI      13.1355       50.4903       718

Table 2 Modified DSS model for the Ore Mts. block
composed of homogeneous layers: m is the
sequential number of the layer, [z.sub.m] is the
depth of the top of the m-th layer in
kilometres, [v.sub.m] is the P-wave velocity in
km/s, and [d.sub.m] is the thickness in kilometres.

m     [z.sub.m]   [v.sub.m]   [d.sub.m]

1     0.0         5.5         2.5
2     2.5         5.7         1.0
3     3.5         5.9         0.5
4     4.0         6.1         1.0
5     5.0         6.3         9.5
6     14.5        6.5         3.5
7     18.0        6.7         11.0
8     29.0        6.9         2.0
9     31.0        7.1         1.0
10    32.0        8.2

Table 3 Travel times of seismic waves: r is the epicentral
distance in kilometres, the other columns contain the
travel times of the individual waves in seconds (for notations,
see the text).

Group     r      Pg    Pm[P.    Sm[S.    Pm[P.    Sm[S.    Pm[P.
                       sup.1]   sup.1]   sup.2]   sup.2]   sup.3]

A       16.09   2.93    9.82    17.34    10.04    17.48    10.16
B       16.23   2.95    9.63    17.22     9.94    17.50      -
C       16.71   3.03    9.73    17.39    10.11    17.68      -

Table 4 Moho depths determined from travel times of
the reflected waves given in Table 3. A homogeneous
crustal model with [v.sub.P] = 6.3 km/s and
[v.sub.P]/[v.sub.S] = 1.78 km/s is considered. The
Moho depths are given in kilometres. The last row
contains mean values

Group   Pm[P.    Sm[S.    Pm[P.    Sm[S.    Pm[P.
        sub.1]   sub.1]   sub.2]   sub.2]   sub.3]

A       29.9     29.6     30.6     29.9     31.0
B       29.2     29.4     30.2     29.9     -
C       29.5     29.6     30.7     30.2     -
Mean    29.53    29.53    30.50    30.00    31.00

Table 5 Moho depths for the layered crustal model of
Ore Mts. block, given in Table 2. The Moho depths are
given in kilometres. The last row contains mean values.

Group   Pm[P.    Sm[S.    Pm[P.    Sm[S.    Pm[P.
        sub.1]   sub.1]   sub.2]   sub.2]   sub.3]

A        30.2     29.9     31.0     30.2     31.5
B        29.5     29.7     30.6     30.3      -
C        29.8     30.0     31.2     30.5      -
Mean    29.83    29.87    30.93    30.33    31.50
COPYRIGHT 2007 Akademie Ved Ceske Republiky, Ustav Struktury a Mechaniky Hornin
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Kampfova, Hana; Malek, Jiri; Novotny, Oldfich
Publication:Acta Geodynamica et Geromaterialia
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:4EXCZ
Date:Jul 1, 2007
Words:3388
Previous Article:Generalized Average of Signals (GAS)--a new method for detection of very weak waves in seismograms.
Next Article:Mineralogy of the clay gouge on Prague fault.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters