Printer Friendly

MoMA wins court appeal.

An appeals court unanimously upheld a lower court decision dismissing a lawsuit brought by neighborhood residents attempting to stop renovations undertaken by the Metropolitan Museum on Manhattan's East Side.

The New York City Parks Department had approved the plans in December 2000. The renovations mostly involved internal changes, like updating the Roman Gallery, revamping space for educational programs and building a cafeteria.

"Given the clear legal precedents, we believe the Appellate Division properly rejected the coalition's belated attempt to stop renovations at the Metropolitan Museum--most of which had already been completed," said Kristen Helmers, Senior Counsel, Appeals Division, NYC Law Department, on Metropolitan Museum Win.

However, a local neighborhood coalition--Metropolitan Museum Historic District Coalition--had claimed, among other things, that further improvements would increase the museum's visitors, thereby causing traffic congestion, pollution and safety problems. According to the neighbors, the City had permitted the plans to go forward without undertaking an analysis of these possible environmental effects, which the coalition claimed was in violation of State and City Environmental Quality Review laws.

Interestingly, virtually all of the renovations that the coalition had complained about were already in place when it filed its appeal--including all the aforementioned changes. The only remaining renovations included completing a wing called Wing K and adding gallery space in the "Arts of Africa, Oceania and the Americas" Wing.

The Appellate Division this week agreed with the lower court ruling (New York Supreme Court) and said that the lawsuit commenced by the neighborhood coalition in November 2003 was too late, because this type of action, which is known as an "Article 78 proceeding" and which is intended to provide for relatively quick review of government decision making, has a four-month statute of limitations. In other words, the coalition was required to challenge the Met's project within four months of the Parks Department's approval of the plans--or by April 2001--and, despite being aware that this approval had been obtained, the coalition waited almost another two and one-half years before filing their petition seeking judicial review.

Justice Eugene Nardelli of the Appellate Division, First Department, authored yesterday's ruling.
COPYRIGHT 2005 Hagedorn Publication
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Metropolitan Museum of Art
Publication:Real Estate Weekly
Geographic Code:1U2NY
Date:Jun 8, 2005
Words:348
Previous Article:Retailers seek some history for new locations.
Next Article:Investors make a $125m sales call to AT&T.
Topics:


Related Articles
Towards a new MoMa.
Back to school.
Open Ends.
Safe and sound: Peter Plagens on Neal Benezra. (News).
Travel brief.
MoMA to open this fall.
Destination Modern Art: an Intergalactic Journey to MoMA and P.S.1 moma.org/destination.
Red Studio: redstudio.moma.org.
Office tenants take space at new MoMA tower.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters