Printer Friendly

Mites (Acari: Mesostigmata, Sarcoptiformes and Trombidiformes) associated to soybean in Brazil, including new records from the cerrado areas.

Soybean Glycine max (L.) Merril (Fabaceae) is one of the most important agricultural crops, and Brazil is ranked as one of the top producers with approximately 75 million tonnes during the 2010/2011 harvest (Conab 2011). In addition, soybean is grown in most states, and is economically significant in the Brazilian economy (Correa-Ferreira et al. 2000). The soybean crop is especially important in the Cerrado region, which provides the largest portion of domestic production (Embrapa 2000). The Cerrado occupies almost onefourth of Brazilian territory, or about 200 million ha (Rezende et al. 2005). However, this biome has been severely degraded by agricultural practices, and agriculture, especially soybean production, is responsible for much of the fragmentation (Durigan et al. 2007).

Many pests associated with soybean in Brazil (Embrapa 2008), but arthropods are responsible for most of the yield loss. In recent years, population outbreaks of phytophagous mites have been observed in soybean (Guedes et al. 2007) and some authors believe that such outbreaks result from the improper use of pesticides (Correa-Ferreira et al. 2010; Salvadori et al. 2007). In any case, mites (especially phytophagous species) have become important soybean pests because of the lack of basic knowledge about them. There is a need to know the mite species associated with soybean, in order to appropriately manage their populations on this crop. Thus, in this work we have attempted to gather the already published data on mites found in soybean cultivated in Brazil, and, also to include new records from cultivated and spontaneous soybean plants from the central region of the Brazilian Cerrado.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Records of mites associated with soybean in Brazil were obtained from reports in the literature (Guedes et al. 2007; Leite et al. 2003; Navia & Flech tmann 2004; Neto et al. 2008; Oliveira et al. 2007; Roggia et al. 2008, 2009; Oliveira 2010; Vivan et al. 2011 (Fig. 1, Table 1), and also by new samplings carried out in the Cerrado region (Fig. 1, Table 2). The new records were obtained by 2 samplings carried out in 10 fields during part of the rainy season in Brazil (Nov and Dec/2009, and Jan/2010). In these areas, the surrounding landscape consisted of a Cerrado fragment and others soybean fields. Also, samplings dates coincided with the inflorescence (sampling #1-40 d after sowing) and ended at the pod formation (sampling #2-80 d later) (Table 3). One additional sampling was made in June/2010 (during the dry season), along highway margins in 3 other areas of spontaneous soybean.

The mites were extracted in the field by washing the soybean leaves with 30% ethyl alcohol. The washing was done in plastic buckets with 5 L of the same alcohol. The collected leaves were immersed and stirred for some seconds to dislodge the mites. The washed leaves were withdrawn from the bucket and the alcohol was filtered through nylon micro-sieves with 25 ]am porosity. Subsequently, both sides of the mesh were sprayed with 67% ethyl alcohol to dislodge the retained material. Such material was transferred into flasks each containing 80 mL of the same alcohol for temporary preservation and transportation.

In the laboratory, the preserved material was examined under stereoscopic microscopes. The mites were assembled on microscopic slides, using Hoyer's medium (Moraes & Flechtmann 2008). Subsequently, the slide borders were sealed with transparent nail polish. Identification of the specimens was done under an optical microscope with phase contrast in accordance with Lindquist et al. (2009a).

In the species listing, the following data have been presented for the new records: collection site, date of collection (month in Roman numerals, and year in Arabic numerals) and the number of individuals in parentheses. In case of former records, the presented data are: collection site and reference.

The voucher material of the samplings is deposited with the Acari collection (DZSJRP) http://www.splink.cria.org.br, of the Zoology and Botany Department, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo.

RESULTS

The samplings yielded 2,732 mites, belonging to 29 species. Phytoseiidae and Tarsonemidae presented the largest species richness (8 species each). The tetranychid, Mononychellus planki (McGregor), was the species most frequently collected in all sampled areas (Table 3). Such data, added to the prior records, result into 44 species found in soybean in Brazil, according to the list subsequently presented.

ORDER MESOSTIGMATA

Ascidae

Asca sp. 1

Origin: Goias: Cristalina: XII-09 (1); Minas Gerais: Tupaciguara: XII-09 (8), I-10 (1). Diet: Mites of this genus are known as predators (Krantz 2009), but they might also be saprophages (Moutia 1958; De Leon 1967). Asca sp. 2

Origin: Goias: Chapadao do Ceu: I-10 (1), Cristalina: XII-09 (1), Jatai (area 1): I-10 (1). Diet: Same as Asca sp. 1.

Blattisociidae

Lasioseius sp.

Origin: Mato Grosso do Sul: Chapadao do Sul: I-10 (2); Goias: Jatai (2): XI-09 (1), XII-09 (2), Rio Verde (1): XII-09 (3). Diet: Individuals of this family are known to be predators (Lindquist et al. 2009b), but no information is available specifically about the diet of Lasioseius sp.

Incertae sedis

Africoseius sp.

Origin: Goias: Jatai (1): I-10 (1). Diet: Unknown.

Melicharidae

Proctolaelaps sp.

Origin: Goias: Rio Verde (1): XII-09 (1). Diet: Basically they are predators, but they may be facultatively pollenophagous or saprophagous (Krantz 2009).

Phytoseiidae

Euseius alatus De Leon, 1966

Origin: Minas Gerais: Arapora: VI-10 (21). Diet: Generalist predator that also feeds on pollen (McMurtry & Croft 1997).

Galendromus (Galendromus) annectens (De Leon, 1958)

Origin: Minas Gerais: Arapora: VI-10 (1). Previous records in Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul: Santa Maria (Roggia et al. 2009). Diet: Selective predator of tetranychid mites (Luh & Croft 2001; McMurtry & Croft 1997).

Iphiseiodes zuluagai Denmark & Muma, 1973.

Origin: Minas Gerais: Tupaciguara: XII-09 (1). Diet: Predator, but also feeds on pollen (Reis & Alves 1997).

Neoseiulus anonymus Chant & Baker, 1965

Previous records in Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul: Nonoai (Roggia et al. 2009). Diet: Selective predator of tetranychid mites (Ferla & Moraes 2003; McMurtry & Croft 1997).

Neoseiulus benjamini (Schicha, 1981)

Origin: Minas Gerais: Tupaciguara (1): XII-09 (1). Diet: Unknown for the species. Mites of this genus are considered selective or generalist predators (McMurtry & Croft 1997).

Neoseiulus californicus McGregor, 1954

Previous records in Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul: Cruz Alta, Nonoai, Santa Maria, Victor Graeff (Roggia et al. 2009). Diet: Predator used in several control managements of pest mites (McMurtry & Croft 1997).

Neoseiulus idaeus Denmark & Muma, 1973

Origin: Goias: Jatai (2): XI-09 (1). Diet: Predator used in the management of the cassava green mite Mononychellus tanajoa (McMurtry & Croft 1997).

Neoseiulus tunus (De Leon, 1967)

Origin: Goias: Edealina: XII-09 (1), I-10 (1). Diet: As N. benjamini.

Phytoseiulus fragariae Denmark & Schicha, 1983

Previous records in Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul: Cangucu (Guedes et al. 2007); Cruz Alta, Santa Maria, Nonoai, Victor Graeff (Roggia et al. 2009). Diet: Predator and promising control agent of Tetranychus urticae (Vasconcelos et al. 2008).

Phytoseiulus macropilis Banks, 1905

Previous records in Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul: Victor Graeff (Roggia et al. 2009). Diet: It is considered to be a specialized predator of Tetranychus species (McMurtry & Croft 1997).

Proprioseiopsis cannaensis Muma, 1962

Previous records in Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul: Santa Maria (Roggia et al. 2009). Diet: This species has been observed feeding on pollen and Tetranychidae, Tenuipalpidae and Eriophyidae mites. However, the data obtained didn't allow asserting that P. cannaensis utilizes these items as principal sources of food in nature (Bellini et al. 2010).

Proprioseiopsis ovatus (Garman, 1958)

Origin: Minas Gerais: Unai: I-10 (1). Diet: Same as P. cannaensis.

Typhlodromalus aripo De Leon, 1967

Origin: Goias: Rio Verde (2): VI-10 (1). Previous records in Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul: Cangucu (Guedes et al. 2007). Diet: This species can feed on a variety of food items, including mites, pollen, fungal spores and tetranychid mites (Gnanvossou et al. 2003).

ORDER SARCOPTIFORMES

Acaridae

Tyrophagus putrescentiae (Schrank, 1781)

Previous records in Brazil: Minas Gerais: Unai (Oliveira et al. 2007). Diet: Species of this genus are considered to be basically fungivorous or graminivorous. But T. putrescentiae has also been found feeding on eggs of the southern corn rootworm Diabrotica undecimpunctata howardi Barber (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) (Krantz 2009).

Galumnidae

Galumna glabra Perez-Inigo & Baggio, 1991

Previous records in Brazil: Mato Grosso (Oliveira 2010). Diet: Unknown, but commonly mites of this family are mycophagous and saprophagous (Norton & Behan-Pelletier 2009). Galumna sp.

Previous records in Brazil: Mato Grosso (Oliveira 2010). Diet: Same as G. glabra.

Oribatulidae

Zygoribatula bonairensis (Willmann, 1936)

Previous records in Brazil: Maranhao (Oliveira 2010). Diet: Same as G. glabra.

Zygoribatula translineata (Mahunka, 1985)

Previous records in Brazil: Mato Grosso: Claudia, Sorriso (Vivan et al. 2011). Diet: Same as G. glabra.

Scheloribatidae

Scheloribates praeincisus (Berlese, 1910)

Previous records in Brazil: Mato Grosso (Oliveira 2010). Diet: Same as G. glabra.

Winterschmidtiidae

Czenspinskia sp.

Origin: Goias: Jatai (1): XII-09 (4). Diet: This genus is considered to be fungivorous (Krantz 2009).

ORDER TROMBIDIFORMES

Cunaxidae

Neocunaxoides sp.

Origin: Goias: Jatai (2): XI-09 (2); Minas Gerais: Tupaciguara (1): XII-09 (2). Diet: Cunaxidae is comprised of predatory species (Walter et al. 2009).

Diptilomiopidae

Catarhinus tricholaenae Keifer, 1959

Origin: Goias: Cristalina: I-10 (1); Minas Gerais: Tupaciguara (1): XII-09 (2), Unai: I-10 (3).

Diet: All species included in Diptilomiopidae are considered phytophagous (Walter et al. 2009).

Iolinidae

Metapronematus sp.

Origin: Goias: Jatai (2): XII-09 (2). Diet: This genus consists of fungivores and predators of eriophyoid and tetranychid mites (O'Dowd & Wilson 1997).

Pronematus sp.

Origin: Mato Grosso do Sul: Chapadao do Sul: I-10 (1); Goias: Edealina: I-10 (1), Rio Verde (1): XII-09 (4); Minas Gerais: Unai: I-10 (1). Diet: One species of this genus (Pronematus ubiquitus (McGregor)) is omnivorous, feeding on honeydew, fungi and eriophyoid mites (Walter et al. 2009).

Tarsonemidae

aff. Tarsonemus sp.

Origin: Goias: Cristalina: I-10 (1).

Neotarsonemoides sp.

Origin: Minas Gerais: Unai: I-10 (2). Diet: Unknown.

Polyphagotarsonemus latus Banks, 1904

Origin: Goias: Cristalina: I-10 (17); Minas Gerais: Unai: I-10 (4). Previous records in Brazil: Minas Gerais: Montes Claros (Leite et al. 2003); Rio Grande do Sul: Santa Maria (Guedes et al. 2007), Itaara (Roggia et al. 2009). Diet: Phytophagous, and it has great economic importance in agriculture (Lindquist 1986).

Tarsonemus bilobatus Suski, 1965

Origin: Goias: Chapadao do Ceu: XII-09 (1), Cristalina: I-10 (5), Edealina: I-10 (9), Jatai (2): XII-09 (3); Minas Gerais: Unai: I-10 (1). Diet: According to Lindquist (1986), this genus consists of fungivorous species.

Tarsonemus confusus Ewing, 1939

Origin: Goias: Edealina: I-10 (3), Jatai (1): I-10 (1), Rio Verde (1): XII-09 (1); Minas Gerais: Unai: I-10 (4). Diet: Same as T. bilobatus.

Tarsonemus sp.

Origin: Distrito Federal: Brasilia: XII-09 (1). Diet: Same as T. bilobatus.

Tarsonemus waitei Banks, 1912

Origin: Minas Gerais: Tupaciguara (1): I-10 (1). Diet: Same as T. bilobatus.

Xenotarsonemus sp.

Origin: Goias: Rio Verde (1): XII-09 (1); Minas Gerais: Unai: I-10 (1). Diet: Possibly members of this genus feed on green plant matter (Lindquist 1986).

Tetranychidae

Mononychellus planki (McGregor, 1950)

Origin: Distrito Federal: Brasilia: I-10 (47); Goias: Chapadao do Ceu: I-10 (43), Cristalina: XII-09 (3), I-10 (38); Edealina: XII-09 (2), I-10 (113), Jatai (1): XII-09 (6), I-10 (972), Jatai (2): XII-09 (13), Rio Verde (1): XII-09 (32), I-10 (165),

Rio Verde (2): VI-10 (18); Mato Grosso do Sul: Cha padao do Sul: XII-09 (75), I-10 (721); Minas Gerais: Arapora: VI-10 (32), Tupaciguara (1): XII-09 (32), I-10 (242), Tupaciguara (2): VI-10 (14), Unai: XII-09 (5), I-10 (3). Previous records in Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul: Faxinal do Soturno, Manuel Viana, Nova Palma, Santa Maria, Sao Pedro do Sul (Guedes et al. 2007), Barra Funda, Cacequi, Cachoeira do Sul, Caicara, Candelaria, Condor, Cruz Alta, Espumoso, Formigueiro, Itaara, Jari, Julio de Castilhos, Nonoai, Panambi, Restinga Seca, Rosario do Sul, Santa Maria, Sao Pedro do Sul, Silveira Martins, Victor Graeff, Vila Nova do Sul (Roggia et al. 2008). Diet: All Tetranychidae species are phytophagous. Mononychellus planki causes considerable economic damage to some crops (Moraes & Flechtmann 2008).

Tetranychus desertorum Banks, 1900

Previous records in Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul: Cangucu, Manuel Viana, Santa Maria (Guedes et al. 2007); Cacapava do Sul, Caicara, Campos Borges, Cruz Alta, Formigueiro, Jari, Nonoai, Santa Maria, Sao Pedro do Sul, Sao Sepe, Silveira Martins, Vila Nova do Sul (Roggia et al. 2008). Diet: Same as M. planki.

Tetranychus gigas Pritchard & Baker, 1955

Previous records in Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul: Cangucu, Santa Maria (Navia & Flechtmann 2004, Guedes et al. 2007), Alegrete, Nonoai, Santa Maria, Sao Pedro do Sul, Victor Graeff (Roggia et al. 2008). Diet: Same as M. planki.

Tetranychus ludeni Zacher, 1913

Previous records in Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul: Alegrete, Rosario do Sul, Santa Maria (Roggia et al. 2008). Diet: As M. planki.

Tetranychus sp.

Previous records in Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul: Itaara, Palmeira das Missoes, Piratini, Restinga Seca, Sao Pedro do Sul (Guedes et al. 2007). Diet: Phytophagous (Moraes & Flechtmann 2008).

Tetranychus urticae Koch, 1836

Previous records in Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul: Barra Funda, Cacequi, Cachoeira do Sul, Campos Borges, Cruz Alta, Espumoso, Julio de Castilhos, Nao-me-Toque, Nonoai, Santa Maria, Sao Sepe, Selbach, Silveira Martins, Victor Graeff (Roggia et al. 2008). Diet: Phytophagous and pest on several crops (Moraes & Flechtmann 2008).

Tydeidae

Lorryia formosa Cooreman, 1958

Origin: Goias: Chapadao do Ceu: I-10 (2); Minas Gerais: Tupaciguara (1): XII-09 (1). Diet: Lorryia formosa can be found on some cultivated plants, e.g., rubber trees. However, they were not seen causing evident damage (Hernandes & Feres 2006). Therefore, its feeding habit remains unclear.

DISCUSSION

Of the 31 species found in this study, only Galendromus (G.) annectens, M. planki, P. latus and T. aripo had been reported in previous studies. The other collected species are new records of the fauna found in soybean, in Brazil. Furthermore, the 4 above-mentioned species are the only ones, until the present date, commonly registered in the soybean crops of Rio Grande do Sul and in the country's central region.

The prior data from Montes Claros (Leite et al. 2003) and Unai (Oliveira et al. 2007), when added to the species recorded in the samplings carried out in this work, show that the species richness of mites associated with soybean in the Cerrado region (31 species) is much higher than observed in the surveys carried out in Rio Grande do Sul (14 species). Twenty seven species of mites have been found exclusively on soybean plants in the Cerrado biome. The lower number of species found thus far in Rio Grande do Sul probably results from the close proximity of the fields analyzed in that state, compared with the samplings carried out more widely in the Cerrado biome. It is known that increased distances between certain sites results in increased p diversity, i.e., the sum of the various species observed in the respective areas (Nekola & White 1999).

Besides the surveys made in Rio Grande do Sul and Minas Gerais, other studies showed that oribatid mites have been found on soybean (G. glabra, Galumna sp., S. praenincisus, Z. bonairensis e Z. translineata) in Maranhao and Mato Grosso states (Oliveira 2010; Vivan et al. 2011). There is a suspicion that these species would be related to a recent plant disorder observed in crops in these states and commonly known as "crazy soybean II", which is marked by malformation of flowers and pods, resulting in significant reductions of production, in some cases. Up to now, there are records of this disease only in Brazil (Saraiva et al. 2010). None of the studies conducted have confirmed a connection between this disorder and these mites. It is known that most of oribatid species exhibit mycophagous and saprophagous feeding, i.e., they can ingest dead plant material, spores or fungal fragments (Schneider et al. 2005; Norton & Behan-Pelletier 2009; Oliveira 2010). This characteristic, at least, suggests that a direct connection between oribatid mites and the new disorder would be improbable. Although there are some references to oribatid mites feeding on cultivated plants, these reports are isolated and rare. Thus, no oribatid species has reached pest status (A. R. Oliveira, Departamento de Ciencias Biologicas, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, personal communication).

Considering only the data attained from the samplings under this study, Phytoseiidae and Tarsonemidae presented the largest richness. However, almost 50 % of the Phytoseiidae were found exclusively in spontaneous soybean. According to the farmers' statements, their crops were treated with several pesticides. Some chemical defensives can suppress populations of nontarget species present in the field, i.e., predatory mites (Degrande et al. 2002; Guedes et al. 2007). So, it is possible that the lower diversity of Phytoseiidae, recorded in cultivated soybean, might be related to pesticide application. Anyway, the occurrence of certain phytoseiid species in the field, i.e. E. alatus, G. annectens, I. zuluagai, N. anonymus, P. fragariae and T. aripo must be highlighted because these mites can contribute effectively to the pest mite control (De Vis et al. 2006; Gerson et al 2003; Ferla & Moraes 2003; McMurtry & Croft 1997; Melo et al. 2009; Reis et al. 2003; Vasconcelos et al. 2003). As for the Tarsonemidae, in contrast to the results of Phytoseiidae, all the species have been recorded exclusively in cultivated soybean. Most of them belong to Tarsonemus genus, which is comprised of fungivorous species (Lindquist 1986).

The results attained from several surveys carried out indicate that M. planki was the mite species most frequently found on soybean in Brazil, until the present date, considering the numbers of crops on which it has been recorded. Bolland et al. (1998) mentioned that M. planki is broadly distributed, extended throughout the American continent. In addition, this mite has been recorded on 64 other host plants species (Migeon & Dorkeld 2011). Some works report populations of M. planki as harmful to several crops in Brazil, e.g., cotton, peanut, beans and okra (Flechtmann 1981; Moraes & Flechtmann 2008). Thus, there is no doubt that this mite has relevance for Brazil's national agriculture. Therefore studies about control and biological aspects of M. planki are needed in Brazil.

Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Tarsonemidae) can be considered as another species with potential of being a pest for soybean production in Brazil. This mite species was recorded both in the Cerrado areas and in the surveys carried out by Guedes et al. (2007) and Leite et al. (2003). It is known that this species is present on a large number of host crops (Lindquist 1986). Other potential pests species included in the presented list are mites of the Tetranychus genus. It should be highlighted that none of these species were recorded in the samplings carried out in crops from the country's central region, and that they have been found only in prior surveys carried out in Rio Grande do Sul. According to Moraes & Flechtmann (2008), all such species are seen as pest mites in certain crops. Guedes et al. (2007) asserted that some of these species were recorded in localized infestations in Rio Grande do Sul state. Furthermore, T. urticae is cited as an important pest mite in soybean in several parts of the world (Abraham 2000; Carlson 1969; Hoda et al. 1986; Shabalta et al. 1992; Singh 1988). Such facts certainly add to the importance of T. urticae as an agricultural pest.

Finally, although the mite densities observed in the samplings did not indicate risks of economic damage, it is necessary to take into account the potential these species to cause economic damage. Hence, the mere occurrence of their populations should be periodically monitored so that infestation of those mites can be properly handled in the future, without great losses in the soybean production chain.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

To Fapesp (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo) (Procs. n[degrees] 06/57868-9 e n[degrees] 08/07835-2) and Capes (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior) for financial support. To the farmers who kindly made this work possible by allowing their crops to be used in the study. To Prof. Dr. Anibal R. Oliveira (UESC), who elucidated the doubts about the relation between oribatid mites and the soybean disease "crazy soybean II". To Dr. Edson Hirose (Embrapa Soja), Dr. Marcio F. Peixoto (IFET - Rio Verde-GO) and Dr. Luis Adriano Maia Cordeiro (Embrapa Sede), for helping on the selection of the studied areas. To the colleagues Barbara M. Oliveira, Fabio de S. Tavares, Fernanda M. Silva, Felipe M. Nuvoloni, Jose Cesar de Souza, Perola M. Paulon, Peterson R. Demite and Tarciso V. Martins for helping on the samplings and the examination of the sampled material.

REFERENCES CITED

ABRAHAM, R. 2000. Mite and thrips populations of soybean varieties of different ripening groups. Nove nyvedelem 36: 583-589.

BELLINI, M. R., ARAUJO, R. V. DE, SILVA, E. S., MORAES, G. J. DE, AND BERTI FILHO, E. 2010. Ciclo de Vida de Proprioseiopsis cannaensis (Muma) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) com Diferentes Tipos de Alimentos. Neotropical Entomology 39: 360-364.

BOLLAND, H. H., GUTIERREZ, J., AND FLECHTMANN, C. W. H. 1998. World catalogue of spider mite family (Acari: Tetranychidae). Brill Academic Publishers, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands. 392 pp.

CARLSON, E. C. 1969. Spider mites on soybeans: injury and control. California Agric. 23: 16-18.

CONAB. 2010. Series historicas das safras 1976/77 a 2009/2010 de area plantada e produtividade. www.conab.gov.br/conteudos.php?a=1252&t=&Pagina_objcmsconteudos=3#A_objcmsconteu dos/ accessed 10th October, 2010.

CORREA-FERREIRA, B. S., DOMIT, L. A., MORALES, L., AND Guimaraes, R. C. 2000. Integrated soybean pest management in micro river basins in Brazil. Integ. Pest Manag. Rev. 5: 75-80.

CORREA-FERREIRA, B. S., ALEXANDRE, T. M., PELLIZZARRO, E. C., MOSCARDI, F., AND FREITAS BUENO, A. 2010. Circular Tecnica 78: Praticas do manejo de pragas usado em soja e seus impactos na agricultura. Embrapa Soja, Londrina, Parana, Brazil.

DEGRANDE, P. E., REIS, P. R., CARVALHO, G. A., AND BELARMINO, L. E. 2002. Metodologia para avaliar o impacto de pesticidas sobre inimigos naturais, pp. 71-93 In J. P. R. Parra, P. S. M. Botelho, B. S. C. Ferreira and J. M. S. Bento [eds.], Controle biologico no Brasil: parasitoides e predadores. Editora Manole, Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

DE LEON, D. 1967. Some Mites of the Caribbean Area. Part I. Acarina on Plants in Trinidad, West Indies. Allen Press Inc., Lawrence, Kansas, USA. 66 pp.

DE VIS, R. M. J., MORAES, G. J. DE, AND BELLINI, M. R. 2006. Initial screening of little known predatory mites in Brazil as potential pest control agents. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 39: 115-125.

DURIGAN, G., SIQUEIRA, M. F. DE, AND FRANCO, G. A. D. C. 2007. Threats to the Cerrado remnants of the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Sci. Agric. 64: 355-363.

EMBRAPA. 2000. Recomendacoes tecnicas para lavouras de soja no estado do Parana 2000/2001. Embrapa Soja, Londrina, Parana, Brazil. 225 pp.

EMBRAPA. 2008. Tecnologias da producao de soja: regiao central do Brasil 2009 e 2010. Embrapa Soja, Londrina, Parana, Brazil. 263 pp.

FERLA, N. J., and Moraes, G. J. de 2003. Oviposition rates of the predatory mites Agistemus floridanus Gonzalez, Euseius concordis (Chant) and Neoseiulus anonymus (Chant & Baker) (Acari) with different types of food. Rev. Brasileira de Zool. 20: 153-155.

FLECHTMANN, C. H. W. 1981. Acaros de importancia agricola. Editora Nobel, Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. 189 pp.

GERSON, U., SMILEY, R. L., AND OCHOA, R. 2003. Mites (Acari) for pest control. Blackwell Publishing Company, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK. 539 pp.

GNANVOSSOU, D., YANINEK, J. S., HANNA, R., AND DICKE, M. 2003. Effects of prey mite species on life history of the phytoseiid predators Typhlodromalus manihoti and Typhlodromalus aripo. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 30: 265-278.

GUEDES, J. V. C., NAVIA, D., LOFEGO, A. C., AND DEQUECH, S. T. B. 2007. Mites associated to soybean crops in Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Neotrop. Entomol. 36: 288-293.

HODA, F. M., HASSAN, A. A., SAWIRES, Z. R., TAHA, H. A., AND IBRAHIM, G. A. 1986. Effect of some acaricides on the number of spider mites infesting soybean plants in lower and upper Egypt. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Egypt, Econ. Series 15: 253-262.

KRANTZ, G.W. 2009 HABITS AND HABITATS, PP. 64-82 IN G. W. KRANTZ AND D. E. WALTER [eds.], A manual of Acarology. 3rd edition. Texas Tech Univ. Press, Lubbock, Texas, USA.

LEITE, G. L. D., ALMEIDA, C. I. M., ROCHA, S. L., COSTA., C. A., and veloso, R. v. S. 2003. Insects, mites and spiders associated to soybean vegetable, in four spacings between plants, in Montes Claros-MG. Unimontes Cientifica 5: 1-5.

LINDQUIST, E. E. 1986. The world genera of Tarsonemidae (Acari: Heterostigmata): A morphological, phylogenetic and systematic revision, with reclassification of family group taxa in Heterostigmata. Mem. Entomol. Soc. Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 517 pp.

LINDQUIST, E. E., Krantz, G. W., and Walter, D. E. 2009a. Classification, pp. 97-103 In G. W Krantz and D. E. Walter [eds.], A Manual of Acarology. 3 ed. Texas Tech Univ. Press, Lubbock, Texas, USA.

LINDQUIST, E. E., Krantz, G. W., and Walter, D. E. 2009b. pp. 124-232. Order Mesostigmata. In G. W Krantz and D. E. Walter [eds.], A manual of Acarology. 3 ed. Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock, Texas, USA.

LUH, H.-K. , and Croft, B. A. 2001. Quantitative classification of life-style types in predaceous phytoseiidmites. Exp. & Appl. Acarol. 25: 403-424.

MCMURTRY, J. A., AND CROFT, B. A. 1997. Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 42: 291-321.

MELO, J. W. DA S., DOMINGOS, C. A., GONDIM JR., M. G. C., AND MORAES, G. J. de 2009. Can Euseius alatus De Leon (Acari: Phytoseiidae) preys Aceria guerreronis Keifer (Acari: Eriophyidae) in coconut trees? Neotrop. Entomol. 38: 139-143.

MIGEON, A., AND DORKELD, F. 2011. Spider mites web: a comprehensive database for the Tetranychidae. http://www1.montpellier.inra.fr/CBGP/spmweb. Accessed 26 Oct 2011.

MORAES, G. J. DE, AND FLECHTMANN, C. H. W. 2008. Manual de Acarologia: Acarologia basica de acaros em plantas cultivadas no Brasil. Holos Editora, Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil. 288 pp.

MOUTIA, L. A. 1958. Contribution to the study of some phytophagous acarina and their predators in Mauritius. Bull. Entomol. Res. 49: 59-75.

MUMA, M. H. 1962. New Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata) from Florida. Florida Entomol. 45: 1-10.

NAVIA, D., AND FLECHTMANN, C. H. W. 2004. Rediscovery and redescription of Tetranychus gigas (Acari, Prostigmata, Tetranychidae). Zootaxa 547: 1-8.

NORTON, R. A., AND BEHAN-PELLETIER, V. M. 2008. Suborder Oribatida, pp. 430-564 In G. W. Krantz and D. E. Walter [eds.], A Manual of Acarology. 3 ed. Texas Tech Univ. Press, Lubbock, Texas, USA.

O'DOWD, D. J., AND WILSON, M. F. 1997. Leaf domatia and the distribution and abundance of foliar mites in broadleaf deciduous forest in Wisconsin. Am. Mi dl. Nat. 137: 337-348.

OLIVEIRA, C. M. DE, NAVIA, D., AND FRIZZAS, M. R. 2007. First record of Tyrophagus putrescentiae (Schrank) (Acari: Acaridae) in soybean plants under no tillage in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Ciencia Rural 37: 876-877.

Oliveira, A. R. 2010. Oribatid mites X soja louca II, p. 64-70 In O. F.Saraiva, R. M. V. B. de C. Leite and R. M. Soares [eds.], Documentos 324: Ata da XXXI reuniao de pesquisa de soja da regiao central do Brasil. 1 ed. Embrapa Soja, Londrina, Parana, Brazil. 321 pp.

REIS, P. R., AND ALVES, E. B. 1997. Criacao do acaro predador Iphiseiodes zuluagai Denmark & Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae) em laboratorio. An. Soc. Entomol. Brasil 26: 565-568.

REIS, P. R., SOUSA, E. O., TEODORO, A. V., AND NETO, M. P. 2003. Effect of prey density on the functional and numerical responses of 2 species of predaceous mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Neotrop. Entomol. 32: 461-467.

REZENDE, A. V., SANQUETTA, C. R., AND FIGUEIREDO FILHO, A. 2005. Efeito do desmatamento no estabelecimento de especies lenhosas em um cerrado sensu stricto. Floresta. 35: 69-88.

ROGGIA, S., GUEDES, J. V. C., KUSS, R. C. R., ARNEMANN, J. A., AND NAVIA, D. 2008. Spider mites associated to soybean in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 43: 295-301.

ROGGIA, S., GUEDES, J. V. C., KUSS-ROGGIA, R. C. R., VASCONCELOS, G. J. N. DE, NAVIA, D., AND DELALIBERA Jr, I. 2009. Acaros predadores e o fungo Neozygites floridana associados a tetraniquideos em soja no Rio Grande do Sul. Pesqui. Agropecu. Brasileira. 44: 107-110.

SALVADORI, J. R., PEREIRA, P. R. V. S., AND CORREA-FERREIRA, B. S. 2007. Documentos 91: Pragas ocasionais de lavouras de soja no estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Embrapa Trigo, Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. 19 pp.

SARAIVA, O. F., LEITE, R. M. V. B. DE C., AND SOARES, R. M. 2010. Documentos 324: Ata da XXXI Reuniao de Pesquisa de Soja da Regiao Central do Brasil. Embrapa Soja, Londrina, Parana, Brazil. 325 pp.

SCHNEIDER, K., RENKER, K., SCHEU, S., AND MARAUN, M. 2005. Feeding biology of oribatid mites: a minire view. Phytophaga 14: 247-256.

SHABALTA, O. M., NGUEN, T. M., AND SHYRINIAN, O. M. 1992. Injuriosness of spider mites to soybean in relation to the mineral nutrition of plants. Agrokhimiya 8: 125-126.

SINGH, O. P. 1988. Assessment of losses to soybean by red spider mite in Madhya Pradesh. Agric. Sci. Dig. 8: 129-130.

VASCONCELOS, G. J. N. DE, MORAES, G. J. DE, DELALIBERA JR., I, AND KNAPP, M. 2008. Life history of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus fragariae on Tetranychus evansi and Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Phyto seiidae, Tetranychidae) at five temperatures. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 44: 27-36.

VIVAN, L, FRANCISCO, E. A. B., MAGRI, J., AND OLIVEIRA, A. R. 2011. Searching for answers. Revista Cultivar 13: 20-21.

WALTER, D. E., LINDQUIST, E. E., SMITH, I. M., COOK, D. R., AND KRANTZ, G. W. 2009. Order Trombidiformes, pp. 233-420 In Krantz, G. W. and D. E. Walter [eds.], A manual of Acarology. 3rd edition. Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock, Texas, USA.

JOSE MARCOS REZENDE (1) *, ANTONIO CARLOS LOFEGO (2), DENISE NAVIA (3) AND SAMUEL ROGGIA (4)

(1) UNESP--Programa de Pos-Graduacao em Biologia Animal, Rua Cristovao Colombo, 2265, Jardim Nazareth, 15054-000, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil

(2) UNESP--Departamento de Zoologia e Botanica--Rua Cristovao Colombo, 2265- Jardim Nazareth-15054-000--Sao Jose do Rio Preto, SP-Brazil

(3) Embrapa, Recursos Geneticos e Biotecnologia--Parque Estacao Biologica, final W5 Norte, Cx. Postal 02372-70.770-900-Brasilia, DF--Brazil

(4) Embrapa, Soja--Rodovia Carlos Joao Strass, Cx. Postal 231-86001-970- Londrina, PR--Brazil

* Corresponding author; E-mail: jmrezende@live.com

TABLE 1. LOCATIONS SAMPLED FOR MITES ON SOYBEAN, AS REPORTED
IN PUBLICATIONS BEFORE THE CURRENT STUDY.

STATE                    MUNICIPALITY

Maranhao (7)                 --
Mato Grosso               Claudia(8)
Mato Grosso               Sorriso(8)
Minas Gerais           Montes Claros(1)
Minas Gerais                Unai(2)
Rio Grande do Sul         Alegrete(3)
Rio Grande do Sul       Barra Funda(3)
Rio Grande do Sul     Cacapava do Sul(3)
Rio Grande do Sul         Cacequi(3)
Rio Grande do Sul     Cachoeira do Sul(3)
Rio Grande do Sul         Caicara(3)
Rio Grande do Sul      Campos Borges(3)
Rio Grande do Sul        Candelaria(3)
Rio Grande do Sul        Cangucu(4,5)
Rio Grande do Sul          Condor(3)
Rio Grande do Sul       Cruz Alta(3,6)
Rio Grande do Sul         Espumoso(3)
Rio Grande do Sul    Faxinal do Soturno(4)
Rio Grande do Sul       Formigueiro(3)
Rio Grande do Sul         Itaara(3,4)
Rio Grande do Sul           Jari(3)
Rio Grande do Sul    Julio de Castilhos(3)
Rio Grande do Sul       Manuel Viana(4)
Rio Grande do Sul       Nao-me-Toque(3)
Rio Grande do Sul         Nonoai(3,6)
Rio Grande do Sul        Nova Palma(4)
Rio Grande do Sul   Palmeira das Missoes(4)
Rio Grande do Sul         Panambi(3)
Rio Grande do Sul         Piratini(4)
Rio Grande do Sul     Restinga Seca(3,4)
Rio Grande do Sul      Rosario do Sul(3)
Rio Grande do Sul      Santa Maria(4,6)
Rio Grande do Sul    Sao Pedro do Sul(3,4)
Rio Grande do Sul         Sao Sepe(3)
Rio Grande do Sul         Selbach(3)
Rio Grande do Sul     Silveira Martins(3)
Rio Grande do Sul     Victor Graeff(3,6)
Rio Grande do Sul     Vila Nova do Sul(3)

STATE                           COORDINATES

Maranhao (7)                          --
Mato Grosso         11[degrees] 30' S 54[degrees] 52' W
Mato Grosso         12[degrees] 33' S 55[degrees] 42' W
Minas Gerais        16[degrees] 44' S 43[degrees] 51' W
Minas Gerais        16[degrees] 21' S 46[degrees] 54' W
Rio Grande do Sul   29[degrees] 47' S 55[degrees] 46' W
Rio Grande do Sul   27[degrees] 55' S 53[degrees] 02' W
Rio Grande do Sul   30[degrees] 30' S 53[degrees] 29' W
Rio Grande do Sul   29[degrees] 52' S 54[degrees] 49' W
Rio Grande do Sul   30[degrees] 01' S 52[degrees] 55' W
Rio Grande do Sul   27[degrees] 19' S 53[degrees] 25' W
Rio Grande do Sul   28[degrees] 53' S 53[degrees] 00' W
Rio Grande do Sul   29[degrees] 40' S 52[degrees] 47' W
Rio Grande do Sul   31[degrees] 24' S 52[degrees] 40' W
Rio Grande do Sul   28[degrees] 12' S 53[degrees] 29' W
Rio Grande do Sul   28[degrees] 38' S 53[degrees] 36' W
Rio Grande do Sul   28[degrees] 43' S 52[degrees] 50' W
Rio Grande do Sul   29[degrees] 34 'S 53[degrees] 26' W
Rio Grande do Sul   29[degrees] 59' S 53[degrees] 29' W
Rio Grande do Sul   29[degrees] 36' S 53[degrees] 45' W
Rio Grande do Sul   29[degrees] 17' S 54[degrees] 13' W
Rio Grande do Sul   29[degrees] 13' S 53[degrees] 41' W
Rio Grande do Sul   29[degrees] 35' S 55[degrees] 28' W
Rio Grande do Sul   28[degrees] 28' S 52[degrees] 48' W
Rio Grande do Sul   27[degrees] 21' S 52[degrees] 46' W
Rio Grande do Sul   29[degrees] 28' S 53[degrees] 28' W
Rio Grande do Sul   27[degrees] 53' S 18[degrees] 24' W
Rio Grande do Sul   28[degrees] 17' S 53[degrees] 29' W
Rio Grande do Sul   31[degrees] 26' S 06[degrees] 18' W
Rio Grande do Sul   28[degrees] 13' S 54[degrees] 20' W
Rio Grande do Sul   30[degrees] 14' S 54[degrees] 55' W
Rio Grande do Sul   29[degrees] 41' S 53[degrees] 48' W
Rio Grande do Sul   29[degrees] 38' S 54[degrees] 11' W
Rio Grande do Sul   30[degrees] 10' S 54[degrees] 34' W
Rio Grande do Sul   28[degrees] 37' S 52[degrees] 57' W
Rio Grande do Sul   29[degrees] 38' S 53[degrees] 34' W
Rio Grande do Sul   28[degrees] 33' S 52[degrees] 44' W
Rio Grande do Sul   30[degrees] 20' S 53[degrees] 52' W

STATE                   CULTIVAR

Maranhao (7)                --
Mato Grosso                 --
Mato Grosso                 --
Minas Gerais          'BRM 94-52273'
Minas Gerais          'Monsoy 8001'
Rio Grande do Sul           --
Rio Grande do Sul           --
Rio Grande do Sul           --
Rio Grande do Sul           --
Rio Grande do Sul           --
Rio Grande do Sul           --
Rio Grande do Sul           --
Rio Grande do Sul           --
Rio Grande do Sul      'A 7001 RG'
Rio Grande do Sul           --
Rio Grande do Sul           --
Rio Grande do Sul           --
Rio Grande do Sul      'A 6001 RG'
Rio Grande do Sul           --
Rio Grande do Sul      'A 7001 RG'
Rio Grande do Sul           --
Rio Grande do Sul           --
Rio Grande do Sul      'A 8100 RG'
Rio Grande do Sul           --
Rio Grande do Sul           --
Rio Grande do Sul      'A 8100 RG'
Rio Grande do Sul      'ANTA 82 *'
Rio Grande do Sul           --
Rio Grande do Sul      'A 8100 RG'
Rio Grande do Sul      'A 8100 RG'
Rio Grande do Sul           --
Rio Grande do Sul      'A 8100 RG'
Rio Grande do Sul      'A 8100 RG'
Rio Grande do Sul           --
Rio Grande do Sul           --
Rio Grande do Sul           --
Rio Grande do Sul           --
Rio Grande do Sul           --

(1) Leite et al. (2003), (2) Oliveira et al. (2007),  (3) Roggia
et al. (2008),(4) Guedes et al. (2007), (5) Navia & Flechtmann
(2004), (6) Roggia et al. (2009), (7) Oliveira (2010), (8) Vivan
et al. (2011).

TABLE 2. LOCATIONS SAMPLED FOR MITE FAUNA ON SOYBEAN, IN
THE CENTRAL AREA OF THE CERRADO.

CODE         STATE             MUNICIPALITY

A      Distrito Federal         Brasilia
B      Goias                Chapadao do Ceu
C      Goias                Cristalina
D      Goias                Edealina
E      Goias                Jatai (1)(1)
F      Goias                Jatai (2)(1)
G      Goias                Rio Verde (1)(1)
H      Goias                Rio Verde (2)(1)
I      Mato Grosso do Sul   Chapadao do Sul
J      Minas Gerais         Arapora
K      Minas Gerais         Tupaciguara (1)(1)
L      Minas Gerais         Tupaciguara (2)(1)
M      Minas Gerais         Unai

CODE        STATE                   COORDINATES

A     Distrito Federal     15[degrees] 38' S 47[degrees] 44' W
B     Goias                18[degrees] 15' S 52[degrees] 44' W
C     Goias                16[degrees] 17' S 47[degrees] 27' W
D     Goias                17[degrees] 24' S 49[degrees] 45' W
E     Goias                17[degrees] 51' S 51[degrees] 45' W
F     Goias                17[degrees] 49' S 51[degrees] 41' W
G     Goias                17[degrees] 40' S 51[degrees] 02' W
H     Goias                17[degrees] 40' S 51[degrees] 02' W
I     Mato Grosso do Sul   18[degrees] 51' S 52[degrees] 35' W
J     Minas Gerais         18[degrees] 26' S 49[degrees] 11' W
K     Minas Gerais         18[degrees] 31' S 48[degrees] 54' W
L     Minas Gerais         18[degrees] 31' S 48[degrees] 54' W
M     Minas Gerais         15[degrees] 59' S 46[degrees] 41' W

CODE        STATE              CULTIVAR

A     Distrito Federal     'BRS Baliza RR'
B     Goias                  'M-Soy 8001'
C     Goias                   'AN 8843'
D     Goias                  'M-Soy 8200'
E     Goias                   'ANTA 82*'
F     Goias                   'P 98Y11*'
G     Goias                  'M-Soy 6101'
H     Goias                      -- (2)
I     Mato Grosso do Sul      'ANTA 82*'
J     Minas Gerais               -- (2)
K     Minas Gerais         'BRS Valiosa RR'
L     Minas Gerais               _(2)
M     Minas Gerais         'BRS Valiosa RR'

(1) Areas 1 and 2 are in different localities of the municipality.

(2) Spontaneous soybean.

TABLE 3. MITE SPECIES FOUND ON SOYBEAN CROPS LOCATED IN THE CERRADO
REGION. THE NUMBERS REFER TO THE DATE OF SAMPLING (1: SAMPLING 40
DAYS AFTER SOWING; 2: SAMPLING 80 DAYS LATER; AND 3: SAMPLING ON
SPONTANEOUS SOYBEAN). AREA CODES ARE DEFINED IN TABLE 2.

                                          Area

Mite Species         A  B   C     D     E     F     G    H     I     J

Asca sp. 1           -  -   1     -     -     -     -    -     -     -
Asca sp. 2           -  2   1     -     2     -     -    -     -     -
Africoseius sp.      -  -   -     -     2     -     -    -     -     -
Proctolaelaps sp.    -  -   -     -     -     -     1    -     -     -
E. alatus            -  -   -     -     -     -     -    -     -     3
G. annectens         -  -   -     -     -     -     -    -     -     3
I. zuluagai          -  -   -     -     -     -     -    -     -     -
N. benjamini         -  -   -     -     -     -     -    -     -     -
N. idaeus            -  -   -     -     -     1     -    -     -     -
N. tunus             -  -   -    1, 2   -     -     -    -     -     -
P. ovatus            -  -   -     -     -     -     -    -     -     -
T. aripo             -  -   -     -     -     -     -    3     -     -
Czenspinskia sp.     -  -   -     -     1     -     -    -     -     -
Neocunaxoides sp.    -  -   -     -     -     1     -    -     -     -
C. tricholaenae      -  -   2     -     -     -     -    -     -     -
Metapronematus sp.   -  -   -     -     -     2     -    -     -     -
Pronematus sp.       -  -   -     2     -     -     1    -     2     -
aff. Tarsonemus sp.  -  -   2     -     -     -     -    -     -     -
Neotarsonemoides sp.
P. latus             -  -   2     -     -     -     -    -     -     -
T. bilobatus         -  1   2     2     -     2     -    -     -     -
T. confusus          -  -   -     2     2     -     1    -     -     -
Tarsonemus sp.       1  -   -     -     -     -     -    -     -     -
Tarsonemus waitei    -  -   -     -     -     -     -    -     -     -
Xenotarsonemus sp.   -  -   -     -     -     -     1    -     -     -
M. planki            2  2  1, 2  1, 2  1, 2   2   1, 2   3   1, 2    3
L. formosa           -  2   -     -     -     -     -    -     -     -

                           Area

Mite Species          K     L      M

Asca sp. 1           1, 2   -      -
Asca sp. 2            -     -      -
Africoseius sp.       -     -      -
Proctolaelaps sp.     -     -      -
E. alatus             -     -      -
G. annectens          -     -      -
I. zuluagai           1     -      -
N. benjamini          1     -      -
N. idaeus             -     -      -
N. tunus              -     -      -
P. ovatus             2     -      -
T. aripo              -     -      -
Czenspinskia sp.      -     -      -
Neocunaxoides sp.     1     -      -
C. tricholaenae       1     -      2
Metapronematus sp.    -     -      -
Pronematus sp.        -     -      2
aff. Tarsonemus sp.   -     -      -
Neotarsonemoides sp.               2
P. latus              -     -      2
T. bilobatus          -     -      2
T. confusus           -     -      2
Tarsonemus sp.        -     -      -
Tarsonemus waitei     2     -      -
Xenotarsonemus sp.    -     -      2
M. planki            1, 2   3    1, 2
L. formosa            1     -      -


----------

Please note: Illustration(s) are not available due to copyright restrictions.
COPYRIGHT 2012 Florida Entomological Society
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2012 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Rezende, Jose Marcos; Lofego, Antonio Carlos; Navia, Denise; Roggia, Samuel
Publication:Florida Entomologist
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:3BRAZ
Date:Sep 1, 2012
Words:6449
Previous Article:Development of species-specific markers and molecular differences in mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences of Aphis gossypii and Myzus persicae...
Next Article:Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae) species, their hosts and parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in five municipalities of the state of Amapa, Brazil.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters