Printer Friendly

Miss marriage suggests.

According to the latest reports from my Weapons of Marriage Destruction inspectors, civilization as we know it is still steady as she goes. That's either the good or the bad news.

In my own on-the-ground observation, my siblings and their partners seem to be holding steady. Ditto my straight friends.

Once, I did sense on an express subway that a couple sitting across from my partner and me were in some distress, but I could not be sure if our proximity was the cause.

Although J. Lo is on her third husband, there has been no noticeable spike in polygamy. Last I checked, even the Mormon governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Mitt Full of Shit Romney, had not taken on any extra wives.

Each Sunday I scan The New York Times' Vows section and so far have not espied pictures of anyone smiling cheek to jowl with a pet. Additionally, there have been no reports of a surge in gift registration at Petco. Rice, not Kibbles 'n Bits, is still thrown.

Except for one unfortunate nuptial where an attempt was made to throw Condoleezza Rice, ceremonies have been by all accounts very well-behaved. Sigh. However, in field research on the civil effect of gay marriage, there are repeated references to extreme social discomfort--again, that mad vow disease. This is to be expected in times of what, for some, is rapid cultural change.

I would like to propose some general etiquette suggestions to smooth out the cultural unsteadiness we are all enduring. It's also a chance for me to use really stilted passive voice and that nifty etiquettish "we" that Miss Manners and others get to use.

First, it is always preferable to preface the pressure-packed "Didja get married?" with an initial "Hello" or "How are you?" or even a "How about those Red Sox?" We are amused to observe how our questions have changed--from the "Who's your daddy?" of early gay liberation to the "Who's the father?" of the baby boom; from the propositional "Do you warms?" to the proposing "Do you wanna get married?"

Second, such a well-meaning but intrusive question often provokes conversations for which we have not been prepared. In the inevitable back-and-forth that follows, we recommend that couples not use the following lines: "Let's wait until we can do it in New York State," "Let's wait until your mother dies," or "If you really loved me, you'd be down on your good knee right now."

Third, a word about hyphenates. If your last name is already hyphenated from your feminist-progressive childhood and you marry a similarly hyphenated other, for the sake of your friends and the cake decorator we encourage you to drop or combine names. But if, say, a Lyon-Bush marries a Canby-Beaton, by all means keep them all and quickly publish those vows.

Fourth, wordlessly waving your newly be-ringed hand like a flopping, desperate fish in another's face is declasse. We are so unaccustomed to admiring each other's wedding rings, the wildly flailing hand suggests not nuptials but a worrisome tremor of near-papal proportions. While we're on that topic, it's vulgar to set up that papal "wave bye-bye" pool unless it's for a fund-raiser for a very good cause [see "Fifth," below]. Especially if you ever want to receive the Eucharist in your parish again.

Fifth, while it is always lovely to receive gifts, we recommend that your wedding registry be a list of national GLBT organizations where your well-wishers can send donations in your name so those groups can continue to fight the inevitable anti-gay marriage initiatives.

Sixth, in all of the above, we encourage everyone to be a little bit more sensitive to single gay people.

Seventh, we would be remiss if we did not clarify for the questioning that if you think you are gay and don't want to get married, yon could still be gay.
COPYRIGHT 2004 Liberation Publications, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:don't get me started; same-sex marriage
Author:Clinton, Kate
Publication:The Advocate (The national gay & lesbian newsmagazine)
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jul 20, 2004
Words:644
Previous Article:For kids.
Next Article:Reining champions: two out team members take us backstage at Cavalia, the Cirque-inspired show where trainers and acrobats explore humanity's ancient...
Topics:


Related Articles
Gay rites.
Senate approves Bill C-23 (Canada).
Without his father's blessing: his lawmaker dad may be California's leading opponent of equal rights for gays, but that didn't stop David Knight from...
Call me the irreverend.
Not for lovers: banning same-sex contracts.
Enemies of the states: as part of a national right-wing get-out-the-vote effort, an unprecedented number of state-level marriage bans will go before...

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters