Printer Friendly

Minnesota students just say no to abstinence.

After taking an abstinence-only sex education course, 12% of students in three Minnesota junior high schools said that they were sexually active--twice the proportion who gave this response before taking the course. (1) A similar pattern is apparent statewide. Furthermore, despite the state's policy to teach that abstaining from intercourse is the only way to avoid pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease, 77% of parents surveyed said that they want their children to be taught about both abstinence and contraception. While supporters of abstinence only education fault the program for teaching that young people should refrain from having intercourse only until adulthood, rather than until marriage, opponents label such thinking "naive." The director of a group that advocates comprehensive sex education comments that "just telling kids to abstain doesn't meet their needs."

(1.) Pierre RE, Abstinence lessons going unheeded, five-year study finds, Washington Post, Jan. 11, 2004, p. A2.

FYI is compiled and written by Dore Hollander, executive editor of Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health.
COPYRIGHT 2004 The Alan Guttmacher Institute
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:FYI
Author:Hollander, Dore
Publication:Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Mar 1, 2004
Words:165
Previous Article:What women need to know.
Next Article:When is a test a red flag?
Topics:


Related Articles
Programs help prevent teen pregnancy.
House committee just say yes to abstinence-only education. (FYI).
Fight for your right...to sex ed: what you don't know can hurt you--and here's what five high school girls did about it... (Hot Topic).
Number of controversies decline as schools adopt conservative policies. (Analysis of 2001-2002 School Year).
A controversial decade: 10 years of tracking debates around sexuality education.
Factors associated with the content of sex education in U.S. public secondary schools.
Public support for comprehensive sexuality education.
Misuse of taxpayer dollars to fund religion.
Who's for comprehensive sex education?

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters