Printer Friendly

Microphytoplankton composition, chlorophyll-a concentration and environmental variables of the Maranhao Continental Shelf, Northern Brazil.

Composicion de microfitoplancton, concentracion de clorofila-a y variables ambientales en la plataforma continental de Maranhao, norte de Brasil


The continental shelf of Maranhao has a quite varied coastline: in the west the coast is indented by numerous "false rivers" named "Reentrancias Maranhenses": in the east the coast is linear, formed by dune fields, and these two coastal physiographies are divided by the Maranhense Gulf, with a wide opening (100 km) to the Atlantic Ocean (Pontes & El-Robrini, 2008). The coastal zone of the Amazonian states of Amapa, Para, and Maranhao encompasses more than a third of the 7,400 km long coastline of Brazil (Isaac & Barthem, 1995). This region is characterized by complex hydrodynamic processes resulting from the action of winds and currents (Nittrouer & DeMaster, 1996) and the discharge of freshwater, with solutes and suspended particulate material from the Amazon, Tocantins (Smith & Demaster, 1996) and Maranhao rivers.

As primary producers of the ocean, phytoplankton play significant roles in regulating the marine ecosystem and global carbon cycle by photosynthesis and thus providing energy for other organisms (Falkowski & Woodhead, 1992). Due to the strong interaction between land and ocean, the physical and chemical environment of continental shelves tends to be highly variable both spatially and temporally, which greatly contributes to the complexity of phytoplankton communities in these areas (Zhu et al., 2009).

In tropical marine waters, the phytoplankton communities consist of autotrophic, heterotrophic and mixotrophic organisms of variable size. While diatoms dominate in terms of the species diversity in coastal and shelf regions, their relative importance is gradually reduced toward the open ocean, where the contribution of dinoflagellates increases significantly (Fernandes & Brandini, 2004). On continental shelves, the contribution of nanoplanktonic haptophytes is also important (Simon et al., 2009). In open seas, picoplankton (primarily consisting of cyanobacteria and small eukaryotes) dominate both the photosynthetic biomass and production (Vaulot et al., 2008).

Despite the potential economic importance of the phytoplankton community, and its unique hydrodynamic characteristics, few data are available for the distribution of phytoplankton in the continental shelf in northern Brazil and incipient in the state of Maranhao. The present study aimed to evaluate the spatial and temporal distribution in the structure (microphy-toplankton composition, occurrence frequency and biomass) of the phytoplankton community, the environmental parameters and the seasonality of the region in a coastal gradient located in the pelagic area of the Maranhao continental shelf.


Description of the area

The Maranhao continental shelf is located between 01[degrees]01'-02[degrees]36'S and 41[degrees]48'-48[degrees]40'W, extending from the mouth of the Gurupi River (Para State) to the mouth of the Parnaiba River (Piaui State) (Pontes & El-Robrini, 2008). The pelagic productivity of the northern shelf Brazil is low compared to the other Brazilian shelf areas. The availability of nutrients for the maintenance of the plankton community in its coastal region is due to the continental drainage, benthic regeneration (Yoneda, 1999), and the influence of estuaries that maintain direct contact with the coastal zone (Day et al., 1989).

The study area is located on the west bank of the Equatorial Atlantic region, where occurs great part of the transport of heat and mass between the hemispheres (Stramma et al., 2003, 2005). This equatorial Atlantic region is under the influence of the spatial and temporal variability of the Intertropical Convergence Zone, ITCZ (Silva et al., 2007). Thus, rain is observed more often during the months from January to June, a period in which the ITCZ is found in a position further south, reaching the coastal and oceanic area. On the other hand, the months from September to November are marked by lower rainfall rates.

Samples were taken every two months between November 2013 and September 2014, during the dry season (November 2013, July 2014, September 2014) and rainy (January 2014, March 2014, May 2014) at fixed stations: (MA1, MA2, MA3, MA4, MA5, MA6 and MA7) with distance from the coast as follows: 0.5, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 nautical miles, following a profile towards the break of the continental shelf (Fig. 1).

Sampling Field work

The subsurface water samples were obtained with Van Dorn bottles (2 L) for nutrient analysis and determination of chlorophyll-a. Estimates of water transparency in situ were obtained using the Secchi disk. At each sampling station a profiling was carried out of the subsurface water column with a Castway CTD (conductivity, temperature and depth), in order to obtain depth data, temperature, salinity and conductivity. The pH value was determined in situ at the subsurface water column with the aid of a multi-parameter probe Hanna HI 9828, with accuracy of [+ or -]0.02.

For the qualitative analysis of microphytoplankton horizontal hauls were taken in the subsurface by plankton net with mesh size of 20 [micro]m. Samples were transferred to plastic bottles and on board immediately fixed in formaldehyde (4%), buffered with sodium tetraborate.

Phytoplankton was analyzed in terms of chlorophyll-a by collecting 2 L of water in the subsurface. The samples were placed on frosted flasks and were immediately filtered through Whatman GF/C glass fibre filters (particulate retention efficiency of 1.2 [micro]m and 47 mm of diameter). For each collection station, replicas were made using a volume of 150 mL. To obtain the fractional values of chlorophyll-a, water sub-samples were passed through a PVC tube with a 20 [micro]m mesh, to separate different fractions of the phytoplankton community (>20 [micro]m microphytoplankton and <20 pm nano/picophytoplankton) and then filtered. After drying, the filters were kept in a freezer at -18[degrees]C until analysis.

Laboratory analysis

The dissolved oxygen was determined by the chemical method of Winkler according to Strickland & Parsons (1972). The turbidity was determined through Tecnopon TB-1000 turbidimeter, previously calibrated, presenting the range 0-1100 NTU with an accuracy of [+ or -]2% or 0.05 to readings below 100 NTU. The concentrations of nitrite, phosphate and silicate were determined by the method of Grasshoff et al. (1999). The suspended particulate matter (SPM) was analyzed according to APHA (2012). Qualitative phytoplankton analyses were performed from the preparation of semi- permanent and permanent blades according to the Muller-Melchers & Ferrando (1956) method for taxonomic identification with an optical microscope. The taxonomic identification, in optical microscope, was realized with a specialized bibliography (Anagnostidis & Komarek, 1988; Komarek & Anagnostidis, 1989; Licea et al., 1995; Moreno et al., 1996). The taxonomic classification of diatoms was made according to Round et al. (1992), the classification of dinoflagellates according to Tomas (1997), and of cyanobacteria according to Anagnostidis & Komarek (1988).

Filters were placed in test tubes to extract chlorophyll pigments, adding 10 mL of 90% acetone to each tube. After a rest of 24 h the material was centrifuged and the supernatant placed in glass cuvettes with 10 mm optical path. The determination of the chlorophyll-a was performed using a fluorometer TD-700 (Turner Designs), calibrated with pure chlorophyll (Sigma[R] C-6144). The estimated detection limit (EDL) was 0.04 mg [m.sup.-3]. The equation presented by Arar & Collins (1997) was applied for chlorophyll estimations (mg [m.sup.-3]).

Statistical analysis of the data

The analysis of the frequency of occurrence (%) was calculated using the formula: Fo = (Ta x 100)/tA (Fo: frequency of occurrence; Ta: number of samples in which taxon occurs; TA: total number of samples). To estimate the frequency of occurrence of each taxon the scale Neumann-Leitao (1994) was used, considering occurrences >70% very frequent; 70-40% frequent; 40-10% low frequency; <10% sporadic.

After standardizing all data, the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed in order to verify the correlation between physical, chemical and biological parameters, using the software Statistica 7.0. The data of rainfall were granted by the National Institute of Meteorology (INMET).


Environment variables

The amounts of precipitation showed a clear seasonal cycle. The rainy season (January/June) showed mean values of 445.13 [+ or -] 343.81 mm and the dry period (July/December) showed mean values of 30.87 [+ or -] 39.84mm.

Physical and chemical variables

A growing profile toward the ocean was observed in all campaigns for the water transparency, with overall mean of 5.64 [+ or -] 1.88 m in the rainy season, while in the dry season was 4.91 [+ or -] 1.75 m The average depths in each station were: 11m/MA1, 17m/MA2, 27m/MA3, 43m/MA4, 34.4m/MA5, 25m/MA6 and 47m/MA7, respectively (Table 1).

Dissolved oxygen levels showed overall mean values of 4.26 [+ or -] 0.31 mg [L.sup.-1] in the rainy season, while in the dry season showed 4.41 [+ or -] 0.22 mg [L.sup.-1]. The highest values were observed during the dry season while the lowest values were observed in the rainy season. The turbidity of the water showed a decreasing profile toward the ocean, with overall mean values of 15.51 [+ or -] 10.45 NTU in the rainy season, while in the dry season was 12.97 [+ or -] 11.99 NTU (Table 1).

The pH maintained alkaline during all the study period and showed overall mean values of 8.01 [+ or -] 0.23 in the rainy season, and in the dry season of 8.03 [+ or -] 0.28. The values of SPM showed a decreasing profile toward the ocean, with overall mean values of 23.37 [+ or -] 14.93 mg [L.sup.-1] in the rainy season, while in the dry season of 35.94 [+ or -] 32.61 mg [L.sup.-1]. The temperature of the water remained stable throughout the study with overall mean values in the rainy season of 29.01 [+ or -] 0.47[degrees]C, while in the dry season 28.24 [+ or -] 0.43[degrees]C (Table 1).

The electrical conductivity overall mean values of the Maranhao continental shelf were 53.53 [+ or -] 5.51 [micro]S [cm.sup.-1] in the rainy season, and 52.68 [+ or -] 2.85 [micro]S [cm.sup.-1] in the dry season. Overall mean values of salinity were 35.04 [+ or -] 2.58 in the rainy season, and 34.16 [+ or -] 1.60 in the dry season (Table 1). There was an increase in electrical conductivity in direction of the ocean, the same pattern was observed for salinity.


Overall mean concentrations of nitrite of the Maranhao continental shelf showed results of 0.06 [+ or -] 0.05 [micro]mol [L.sup.-1] in the rainy season, while in the dry season showed 0.15 [+ or -] 0.19 [micro]mol [L.sup.-1] (Table 2). Their major contri-butions were in the dry season, and their highest values towards the coast. Conversely, the lowest values were recorded towards the ocean mostly in the rainy season. Phosphate overall mean values were 0.23 [+ or -] 0.27 [micro]mol [L.sup.-1] in the rainy season, and 0.35 [+ or -] 0.21 [micro]mol [L.sup.-1] in the dry season (Table 2). The highest phosphate values were observed in the first stations during the dry season, while in the rainy season the lowest values were observed in the first stations. The silicate overall mean values were 4.75 [+ or -] 1.82 [micro]mol [L.sup.-1] in the rainy season, and 3.73 [+ or -] 1.66 [micro]mol [L.sup.-1] in the dry season (Table 2). The silicate concentrations also showed a decreasing profile toward the ocean in both dry and rainy season.

Microphytoplankton composition

The microphytoplankton community was represented by 128 generic and infrageneric taxa, distributed in three divisions, five classes, twenty-four orders, thirty-six families, forty-seven genera and two varieties. The division showing the highest percentage of species was Bacillariophyta, representing 86.7%, followed by Dinophyta with 12.5% and Cyanophyta with 0.8%. The Table 3 shows the predominant species in this study. Of the 128 identified species, the highest percentage (fifty-six species, 43%) was classified as sporadic, distributed among the Bacillariophyta divisions (50 species), Dinophyta (4 species), and Cyanophyta (2 species). For the category of low frequency 38 species (30%) have been found, belonging to the Bacilla- riophyta division (33 species) and the Dinophyta division (5 species). The category frequent was represented by 20 species (15%), followed by very frequent with 13 species (12%). The diatoms species occurring in all stations were Bacteriastrum delicatulum Cleve, Bacteriastrum furcatum Shadbolt, Bellerochea malleus (Brightwell) Van Heurck, Chaetoceros affinis Lauder, Chaetoceros compressus Lauder, Chaetoceros peruvianus Brightwell, Coscinodiscus granii L. F. Gough, Coscinodiscus jonesianus (Greville) Ostenfeld, Coscinodiscus radiatus Ehrenberg, Coscinodiscus rothii (Ehrenberg) Grunow, Paralia sulcata (Ehrenberg) Cleve, Odontella mobiliensis (J. W. Bailey), Odontella regia (Schultze) and Thalassiosira nitzschioides (Grunow) Mereschkowsky. The microphytoplankton composition in transect of the Maranhao continental shelf showed the highest representation during the dry season and a lower one in the rainy period. This may be explained by the nutrient input arriving from the continent, which is observed in the study area.

Chlorophyll-A concentration

The chlorophyll-a (chl-a) concentration showed a clear seasonal cycle. The total chl-a presented the lowest values during the rainy season and the highest in the dry one, with overall mean values of 0.008 [+ or -] 0.007 mg [m.sup.-3] in the rainy period, and in the dry period of 0.014 [+ or -] 0.018 mg [m.sup.-3] (Table 4). The total chl-a also showed a decreasing profile toward the ocean in both dry and rainy season. For fractional chl-a, the predominance of nano/picophytoplankton was noted in the dry season too, with overall mean values of 0.005 [+ or -] 0.004 mg [m.sup.-3], while in the rainy season of 0.005 [+ or -] 0.005 mg [m.sup.-3]. The same was noted in the microphytoplankton, which presented their highest values in the dry season, with overall mean of 0.005 [+ or -] 0.006 mg [m.sup.-3], and in the rainy season of 0.004 [+ or -] 0.003 mg [m.sup.-3]; these concentrations also showed a decreasing profile toward the ocean (Table 4).

Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) with all parameters, obtained in the seven stations during the dry season, explained 36.40% of total variance in the dry season, presenting a negative correlation of the parameters transparency (-0.69), pH (-0.39) and DO (-0.31) with temperature (0.44), rainfall (12.18), turbidity (0.63), SPM (0.83), nitrite (0.38) and silicate (0.82). The second component explains about 20% of the total variance and has as main elements: chlorophyll-a (0.68) nano/picophytoplankton (0.71), microphyto-plankton (0.60) and phosphate (0.50), which were directly associated with: salinity (0.19), conductivity (0.10) and depth (0.02) (Fig. 2).

The PCA explained 40.41% of the total variance. It can be interpreted as a contrast, appearing on one side the SPM (-0.90), nitrite (-0.72) and silicate (-0.85), which are correlating negatively with pH (0.42), DO (0.60), phosphate (0.29), transparency (0.76), depth (0.77) and rainfall (0.18). The second component explains 21.7% of the total variance. It presents as main elements: chlorophyll-a (0.32), salinity (0.80), conductivity (0.79) and turbidity (0.03) correlating negatively with the temperature (-0.43) (Fig. 3).


Weather conditions have a considerable effect on hydrological variables, and thus on biological characteristics of pelagic and benthic organisms (Costa et al., 2011). In tropical and subtropical regions the rainfall seems to be the major factor controlling the distribution and abundance of phytoplankton organisms (Lacerda et al., 2004), since it modifies the availability of nutrients and the optical qualities of water (Bastos et al., 2005).

In the Maranhense region of the continental platform rainfall occurred within the expected pattern. According to Azevedo et al. (2008), the Maranhao coast presents a defined seasonal cycle, with a rainy season from January to June, with maximum rainfall in May, and a dry season from July to December. Similar values of the water temperature in the Maranhao continental shelf observed in this study were registered in previous studies by Pontes & El-Robrini (2008). These authors identified a pattern with higher temperature near the coast and lower values toward the ocean.

The transparency, conductivity, and salinity of the water had showed clearly a growing profile toward the ocean in all campaigns, in the dry and rainy season, with the lowest values in the first stations and the highest in the last ones. Intense carrying of nutrients and suspended materials in the coastal area of the continental shelf maranhense directly influences the levels of these data in this region. The turbidity of the continental shelf of Maranhao showed a decreasing profile toward the ocean. These highest values in the first stations also can be explained by the nutrients coming from the estuaries, the influence of estuaries reduces along the ocean, causing the turbidity values decrease. Dissolved oxygen remained stable during the entire study, according to Sen-Gupta & Machaincastillo (1993) in marine waters the dissolved oxygen concentrations may vary between 0 and 8 mL [L.sup.-1], with a more common variation between 1 and 6 mL [L.sup.-1], which is consistent with the study area.

Silva et al. (2007) comment that the inner continental shelf of the Maranhao is affected by the continental supply of fresh water and suspended material that was evident by the high regional rainfall observed in their sample data. The same was found in the first sample stations of this study. According to Flores-Montes (2003) the typical features of tropical oceanic regions are high temperatures and salinity and a small thermal oscillation. Also according to this author, the pH remains always alkaline and its highest values coincide with the largest concentrations of dissolved oxygen. In station MA3 (May/2014) the observed results were of accord to those described by this author.

The phosphate in the continental shelf of the Maranhao showed a clear seasonal cycle in this study, with the highest values observed in the first stations during the dry season, while in the rainy season the lowest values were observed in the first stations, thus presenting a defined seasonal variation. The nitrite and silicate values were higher towards the coast and lower towards the ocean, in dry and rainy season. The same distribution pattern was observed by Eca et al. (2014) in studies of the eastern continental shelf of Brazil. The higher nutrient concentrations in the Maranhao continental shelf were normally associated with the rainy season, the very direct precipitation or by a higher contribution of inputs by the rivers. The contribution of primary production by the entry of nutrients regenerated in the marine aquatic environment should also be considered. Although this region has a low primary production, it manages to maintain a more constant small production throughout the year.

These inorganic nutrients are some of the principal needs required for growth and reproduction of phyto-plankton. Diatoms, for example, require large amounts of silicate for their development. The studies focusing on the relationship between phytoplankton and nutrients are important, especially considering that in general the nutrients occur in low concentrations in seawater. The oceans of the earth can be considered as true deserts because they are low in nutrients compared to the continents, as observed in this study. Thus, in most natural conditions, the nutrients are limiting factors to productivity of phytoplankton (Pereira & Soares-Gomes, 2009).

According to Phlips et al. (2002) the structure of phytoplankton populations is directly related to the physical and chemical characteristics of water along with other environmental factors. These characteristics and environmental factors, acting together or separately, are conditioning the establishment of populations adapted to environmental changes. The phytoplankton composition of the Maranhao continental shelf was represented by the divisions of Bacillariophyta, Dinophyta and Cyanophyta. The same pattern was observed by Costa et al. (2011) in studies in the region of the Amazon continental shelf.

Microplanktonic diatoms are associated with conditions of high turbulence and nutrient availability (Falkowski, 1980). Many diatom species can be considered R-strategists (disturbance tolerant, or ruderal), presenting a high surface/volume ratio that affords them the ability to harvest light energy under strong mixing conditions, but with high nutrient concentrations (Reynolds, 2006; Alves-de-Souza et al., 2008). The generally high maximum uptake rates observed in diatoms may be advantageous under conditions of high or fluctuating nutrient availability (Grover, 1991; Litchman et al., 2007).

In this study a clear seasonal cycle was observed for the chlorophyll-a concentrations, with the lowest values during the rainy season and the highest in the dry one. The biggest determinant for the concentrations of chlorophyll-a is the rain, because it can both contribute to the enrichment of nutrient salts, which can lead to an increase of biomass, but can also increase the amount of suspended material. This limits the photic layer and may affect the development of the phytoplankton and decrease the biomass concentrations (Losada, 2000). A decreasing profile toward the ocean was also observed in this study, showing the influence of the large contribution of sediments coming from estuarine waters in the first stations.

The chlorophyll-a concentrations in the study area remained low compared to other studies carried out in Para State, northern Brazil (Sousa et al., 2009; Costa et al., 2011; Matos et al., 2011, 2012). This region has a coast populated by mangroves and is under the strong influence of continental discharge of the Amazon River as it is also observed in the Maranhense Gulf (Azevedo et al., 2008) where eutrophic characteristics are very common (rich in nutrients). However, the low chloro-phyll concentrations identified in the Maranhense continental shelf are characteristic of oligotrophic regions (poor in nutrients).

The values of total and fractional chlorophyll-a presented analogous results to those obtained by Armbrecht et al. (2014) on the continental shelf east of Australia, which is also a tropical region. Although low, the chlorophyll-a concentrations in tropical waters are quite variable, but always with concentrations less than those of coastal waters regardless of the season. This overall pattern commonly results from the low nutrient concentrations typical of oligotrophic waters transported by Brazil current (Brandini, 1990; Braga & Niencheski, 2006; Castro et al., 2006).


The scenario observed in this study showed a clear seasonal cycle, with the highest contribution of the phytoplankton in the dry period; also it was possible to observe the predominance of the Bacillariophyta division over the other identified divisions found, based on the obtained qualitative data. Regarding quantitative data (chlorophyll-a), nano/picophytoplankton and microphytoplankton had greater representation also in the dry season. The intense carrying of nutrients and suspended materials in the coastal area of the continental shelf maranhense directly influenced the abiotic variables in this region such as the transparency, the turbidity, conductivity and salinity. Due to the lack of data from the Maranhense continental shelf it is impossible to draw comparisons with greater precision in relation to the data surveyed in this study.


Received: 21 July 2015; Accepted: 15 February 2016


The authors would like to thank the Phycology Laboratory (LABFIC) and the Laboratory of Biological Cycles of Chemical Constituents of Water (LAB CICLOS) of the Federal University of Maranhao (UFMA) by granting their participation in the project INCT AMBTROPIC-CNPq, Sao Luis-MA, and for providing logistics and infrastructure to carry out campaigns and analysis of the material.


Alves-de-Souza, C., M.T. Gonzalez & J.L. Iriarte. 2008. Functional groups in marine phytoplankton assemblages dominated by diatoms in fjords of southern Chile. J. Plankton Res., 30: 1233-1243.

American Public Health Association (APHA). 2012. Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater. APHA, Washington, 1360 pp.

Anagnostidis, K. & J. Komarek. 1988. Modern approach to the classification system of Cyanophytes. 3. Oscillatoriales. Algolog. Stud., 50-53: 327-472.

Arar, E.J. & G.B. Collins. 1997. In vitro determination of chlorophyll-a and pheophytin a in marine and freshwater algae by fluorescence. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, 22 pp.

Armbrecht, L.H., M. Roughan, V. Rossi, A. Schaeffer, P.L. Davies, A.M. Waite & L.K. Armand. 2014. Phytoplankton composition under contrasting oceano-graphic conditions: upwelling and downwelling (Eastern Australia). Cont. Shelf Res., 75: 54-67.

Azevedo, A.C.G., F.A.N. Feitosa & M.L. Koening. 2008. Distribuicao espacial e temporal da biomassa fito-planctonica e variaveis ambientais no Golfao Maranhense, Brasil. Sao Luis, MA, Brasil. Acta Bot. Bras., 22: 870-877.

Bastos, R.B, F.A.N. Feitosa & K. Muniz. 2005. Variabilidade espaco-temporal da biomassa fitoplanctonica e hidrologia no estuario do rio Una (Pernambuco-Brasil). Trop. Oceanogr., 33: 1-18.

Braga, E.S. & L.F.H. Niencheski. 2006. Composicao de massa de agua e seus potenciais produtivos na regiao entre Sao Tome (RJ) e o Chui (RS). In: C.L.D.B. Rossi-Wongtschowski & L.S.-P. Madureira (eds.). O ambiente oceanografico da plataforma continental e do talude na regiao sudeste sul do Brasil. EdUSP, Sao Paulo, pp. 161-218.

Brandini, F.P. 1990. Hydrography and characteristics of the phytoplankton in the shelf and oceanic waters of southern Brazil during winter (July/August 1982) and summer (February/March 1984). Hydrobiology, 196: 111-146.

Castro, B.M., J.A. Lorenzetti, I.C.A. Silveira & L.B. Miranda. 2006. Estrutura termohalina e circulacao na regiao entre Sao Tome (RJ) e o Chui (RS). In: C.L.D. B. Rossi-Wongtschowski & L.S.-P. Madureira (eds.). O ambiente oceanografico da plataforma continental e do talude na regiao sudeste sul do Brasil. EdUSP, Sao Paulo, pp. 11-120.

Costa, V.D., E.D. Sousa, S.C.C. Pinheiro, L.C.C. Pereira & R.M.D. Costa. 2011. Effects of a high energy coastal environment on the structure and dynamics of phyto-plankton communities (Brazilian Amazon Littoral). J. Coast. Res. SI, 64: 354-358.

Day, J.W., C.A.S. Hall, W.M. Kemp & A. Yanez-Arancibia. 1989. Estuarine ecology. J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 558 pp.

Eca, G.F., J. B.B.S. Lopes, M.F.L. Souza & A.L. Belem. 2014. Dissolved inorganic nutrients and chlorophyll on the narrow continental shelf of Eastern Brazil. Braz. J. Oceanogr., 62: 11-21.

Falkowski, P.G. 1980. Light-shade adaptation in marine phytoplankton. In: P.G. Falkowski (ed.). Primary productivity in the sea. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 19-99.

Falkowski, P.G & A.D. Woodhead. 1992. Primary productivity and biogeochemical cycles in the sea. Plenum Press, New York, 43 pp.

Fernandes, L.F. & F.P. Brandini. 2004. Diatom associations in shelf waters of Parana State, Southern Brazil: annual variation in relation to environmental factors. Braz. J. Oceanogr., 52: 19-34.

Flores-Montes, M.J. 2003. Fatores que influenciam na produtividade dos oceanos: a importancia do fluxo de difusao dos nutrientes para a biomassa do fitoplancton na regiao oceanica do nordeste brasileiro. Tese de Doutorado, Universidade Federal de Recife, Recife, 179 pp.

Grasshoff, K., K. Kremling & M. Ehrhardt. 1999. Methods of seawater analysis. 3. Completely revised and extended edition. Wiley New York, Wiley, New York, 600 pp.

Grover, J. 1991. Dynamics of competition among microalgae in variable environments: experimenttal Ests of alternative model. Oikos, 62: 231-243.

Isaac, V.J. & R.B. Barthem. 1995. Os recursos pesqueiros da Amazonia Brasileira. Editora do Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Belem, 339 pp.

Komarek, J. & K. Anagnostidis. 1989. Modern approach to the classification system of cyanophytes. 4. Nostocales. Algol. Stud., 56: 247-345.

Lacerda, S.R. M.L Koening, S. Neuman-Leitao & M.J. Flores-Montes. 2004. Phytoplankton nyctemeral variation at a tropical river estuary (Itamaraca-Pernambuco -Brazil). Braz. J. Biol., 64: 81-94.

Licea, L., J.L. Moreno, H. Santoyo & G. Figueroa. 1995. Dinoflagelados del Golfo de California. Universidad Autonoma de Baja California Sur, B.C.S., 165 pp.

Litchman, E., C. Klausmeier, O.M. Schofield & P.G. Falkowski. 2007. The role of functional traits and trade-offs in structuring phytoplankton communities: scaling from cellular to ecosystem level. Ecol. Lett., 10: 1170-1181.

Losada, A.P.M. 2000. Biomassa fitoplanctonica relacionada com parametros abioticos nos estuarios dos Rios Ilhetas e Mamucaba e na Baia de Tamandare (Pernambuco-Brasil). Dissertacao Mestrado em Oceanografia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Pernambuco, 88 pp.

Matos, J.B., D.K.L. Sodre, K.G. Costa, L.C.C. Pereira & R.M. Da. Costa. 2011. Spatial and temporal variation in the composition and biomass of phytoplankton in an Amazonian estuary. J. Coast. Res. SI, 64: 1525-1529.

Matos, J.B., N.I.S. Silva, L.C.C. Pereira & R.M. Costa. 2012. Caracterizacao quali-quantitativa do fitoplancton da zona de arrebentacao de uma praia amazonica. Acta Bot. Bras., 26(4): 979-990.

Moreno, J.L, S. Licea & H. Santoyo. 1996. Diatomeas del golfo de California. Universidad Autonoma de Baja California Sur, B.C.S., 273 pp.

Muller-Melchers, F.C. & H.J. Ferrando. 1956. Tecnica para el estudio de las diatomeas. Bol. Inst. Oceanogr., 7(1-2): 151-160.

Neumann-Leitao, S. 1994. Impactos antropicos na comunidade zooplanctonica estuarina. Porto de Suape-PE-Brasil. Tese de Doutorado, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, 273 pp.

Nittrouer, C.A. & D.J. DeMaster. 1996. The Amazon shelf setting tropical, energetic, and influenced by a large river. Cont. Shelf Res., 16: 553-574.

Pereira, R.C. & A. Soares-Gomes. 2009. Biologia marinha. Interciencia, Rio Janeiro, 631 pp.

Phlips, J.E., S. Badylak & T. Grosskopf. 2002. Factors affecting the abundance of phytoplankton in a restricted subtropical lagoon, the Indian River Lagoon. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 55: 385-402.

Pontes, P.H.P. & M. El-Robrini. 2008. Massa d'agua da plataforma continental do Maranhao, durante o periodo seco (Novembro, 1997). Bolm. Lab. Hidrobiol., 8(21): 17-24.

Reynolds, C.S. 2006. The ecology of phytoplankton. Cambridge University, Cambridge, 552 pp.

Round, F.E., R.M. Crawford & D.G. Mann. 1992. The diatoms: biology and morphology of the genera. Cambridge University Press, New York, 747 pp.

Sen-Gupta, B.K. & M.L. Machain-Castillo. 1993. Benthic foraminifera in oxygen poor habitats. Mar. Micropaleontol., 20: 183-201.

Silva, A.C., M. Araujo & L.S. Pinheiro. 2007. Caracterizacao hidrografica da plataforma continental do Maranhao a partir de dados oceanograficos medidos, remotos e modelados. Rev. Bras. Geofis., 25(3): 281-294.

Simon, N., A.L. Cras, E. Foulo & R. Lemee. 2009. Diversity and evolution of marine phytoplankton. C.R. Biol., 332: 159-170.

Smith, W.O. Jr. & D.J. DeMaster. 1996. Phytoplankton and biomass productivity in the Amazon River plume: correlation with seasonal river discharge. Cont. Shelf Res., 16: 291-317.

Sousa, E.B., V.B. Costa, L.C.C. Pereira & R.M. Costa. 2009. Variacao temporal do fitoplancton e dos parametros hidrologicos da zona de arrebentacao da

Ilha Canela (Braganca-Para-Brasil). Acta Bot. Bras., 23(4): 1084-1095.

Stramma, L., J. Fischer, P. Brandt & F. Schott. 2003. Circulation, variability and near-equatorial meridional flow in the central tropical Atlantic. In: G.J. Goni & P. Malanotte-Rizzoli (eds.). Interhemispheric water exchange in the Atlantic Ocean. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 1-22.

Stramma, L., M. Rhein, P. Brandt, M. Dengler, C. Boning & M. Walter. 2005. Upper ocean circulation in the western tropical Atlantic in boreal fall 2000. Deep-Sea Res. I, 52: 221-240.

Strickland, J.D. & T.R. Parsons. 1972. A practical handbook of seawater analysis. Bull. Fish. Res. Bd. Can., 167: 310 pp.

Tomas, C.R. 1997. Identifying marine phytoplankton, Academic Press, San Diego, 858 pp.

Vaulot, D., W. Eikrem, M. Viprey & H. Moreau. 2008. The diversity of eukaryotic marine picophytoplankton. FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 32: 795-820.

Yoneda, N.T. 1999. Plancton. Centro de Estudos do Mar, Universidade Federal do Parana. Pontal do Parana, 29 pp.

Zhu, Z.Y., W.M. Ng, S.M. Liu, J. Zhang, J.C. Chen & Y. Wu. 2009. Estuarine phytoplankton dynamics and shift of limiting factors: a study in the Changjiang (Yangtze River) Estuary and adjacent area. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 84: 393-401.

Ronnessa C.Q. Carvalho (1), Marco V.J. Cutrim (1), Samara A. Eschrique (1), Andrea C.G. Azevedo-Cutrim (2) Evaldeni G. Moreira (3), Paula C.A. Silveira (1) & Juliana M. Coelho (1)

(1) Federal University of Maranhao-UFMA, CEP. 65080-805, Sao Luis, MA, Brasil

(2) State University of Maranhao-UEMA, CEP. 65055-000, Sao Luis, MA, Brasil

(3) Federal Institute of Maranhao-IFMA, CEP. 65010-500, Sao Luis, MA, Brasil

Corresponding author: Ronnessa C.Q. Carvalho (

Paper presented in the 5th Brazilian Congress of Marine Biology, 17-21 May 2015, Porto de Galinhas, Brazil.

Caption: Figure 1. Study area of the Maranhao continental shelf, Sao Luis-MA. Source: INCT AMBTROPIC-CNPq.

Caption: Figure 2. Two-dimensional projection of the PCA of the hydrogenionic potential (pH), salinity (Sal), dissolved oxygen(DO), temperature of water ([degrees]C), transparency-Secchi (Sec), depth-profundity (Prof), turbidity (Turb), suspended particulate matter (SPM), conductivity (Cond), nitrite (N[O.sub.2]), phosphate (P[O.sub.4]), silicate (Si[O.sub.2]), chlorophyll-a concentrations (Chl-a), Nano/picophytoplankton (Nano), microphytoplankton (Micro), rainfall-pluviosity (Plu) in transect of the continental shelf, dry season. Sao Luis-MA, Brazil.

Caption: Figure 3. Two-dimensional projection of the PCA of the hydrogenionic potential (pH), salinity (Sal), dissolved oxygen(DO), temperature of water ([degrees]C), transparency-Secchi (Sec), depth-profundity (Prof), turbidity (Turb), suspended particulate matter (SPM), conductivity (Cond), nitrite (N[O.sub.2]), phosphate (P[O.sub.4]), silicate (Si[O.sub.2]), chlorophyll-a concentrations (Chl-a), Nano/picophytoplankton (Nano), microphytoplankton (Micro), rainfall-pluviosity (Plu) in transect of the continental shelf, rainy season. Sao Luis-MA, Brazil.
Table 1. Mean values, standard deviation and overall mean (OM)
of abiotic data from transect of the continental shelf in
the seven sampling stations during the rainy (January to May/
2014) and dry season (November 2013 to July and September
2014). Sao Luis-MA, Brazil. SPM: suspended particulate matter.

                             Rainy period

Stations        Transparency (m)     DO (mg [L.sup.-1])

MA1            0.27 [+ or -] 0.14    4.25 [+ or -] 0.10
MA2            0.74 [+ or -] 0.55    4.20 [+ or -] 0.26
MA3             4.66 [+ or -]1.73    4.41 [+ or -] 0.43
MA4            5.83 [+ or -] 1.54    4.49 [+ or -] 0.44
MA5            7.90 [+ or -] 2.75    4.26 [+ or -] 0.30
MA6            8.63 [+ or -] 3.11    4.06 [+ or -] 0.24
MA7            11.28 [+ or -] 3.62   4.15 [+ or -] 0.41
O M            5.64 [+ or -] 1.88    4.26 [+ or -] 0.31

                             Dry period

Stations        Transparency (m)     DO (mg.[L.sup.-1])

MA1            0.72 [+ or -] 0.94    4.49 [+ or -] 0.45
MA2            1.20 [+ or -] 1.03    4.47 [+ or -] 0.26
MA3                3.06 + 1.03       4.42 [+ or -] 0.06
MA4            5.46 [+ or -] 0.24    4.22 [+ or -] 0.51
MA5            7.07 [+ or -] 2.76    4.34 [+ or -] 0.02
MA6            8.83 [+ or -] 2.51    4.42 [+ or -] 0.15
MA7            10.78 [+ or -] 1.07   4.53 [+ or -] 0.08
O M            4.91 [+ or -] 1.75    4.41 [+ or -] 0.22

                              Rainy period

Stations         Turbidity (NTU)              pH

MA1            53.00 [+ or -] 19.75   7.80 [+ or -] 0.20
MA2            36.53 [+ or -] 37.74   7.97 [+ or -] 0.12
MA3             5.30 [+ or -] 3.40    8.09 [+ or -] 0.33
MA4             3.83 [+ or -] 2.99    7.92 [+ or -] 0.19
MA5             3.25 [+ or -] 3.11    8.06 [+ or -] 0.26
MA6             3.06 [+ or -] 2.96    8.09 [+ or -]0.26
MA7             3.59 [+ or -] 3.23    8.12 [+ or -] 0.23
O M            15.51 [+ or -] 10.45   8.01 [+ or -] 0.23

                              Dry period

Stations         Turbidity (NTU)              pH

MA1            37.20 [+ or -] 28.65   7.96 [+ or -] 0.12
MA2            21.40 [+ or -] 17.42   8.08 [+ or -] 0.22
MA3             5.63 [+ or -] 2.95    7.98 [+ or -] 0.28
MA4             2.74 [+ or -] 3.49    8.07 [+ or -] 0.36
MA5             2.76 [+ or -] 3.65    8.06 [+ or -] 0.35
MA6             4.17 [+ or -] 3.50    8.02 [+ or -] 0.30
MA7            16.89 [+ or -] 24.25   8.02 [+ or -] 0.33
O M            12.97 [+ or -] 11.99   8.03 [+ or -] 0.28

                              Rainy period

Stations       SPM (mg [L.sup.-1])        Temperature

MA1            118.0 [+ or -] 39.23   29.34 [+ or -] 0.66
MA2            61.73 [+ or -] 36.64   28.69 [+ or -] 0.84
MA3            30.93 [+ or -] 36.75   28.90 [+ or -] 0.59
MA4            26.60 [+ or -] 32.48   29.26 [+ or -] 0.63
MA5             0.67 [+ or -] 1.15    29.30 [+ or -] 0.63
MA6            23.20 [+ or -] 35.04   29.11 [+ or -] 0.21
MA7            8.93 [+ or -] 11.15    28.54 [+ or -] 0.46
O M            23.37 [+ or -] 14.93   29.01 [+ or -] 0.47

                               Dry period

Stations        SPM (mg[L.sup.-1])        Temperature

MA1            85.03 [+ or -] 68.27   28.63 [+ or -] 0.37
MA2            62.34 [+ or -] 48.17   28.32 [+ or -] 0.07
MA3            38.10 [+ or -] 31.59   28.91 [+ or -] 1.24
MA4            26.17 [+ or -] 31.85   28.41 [+ or -] 0.59
MA5             2.67 [+ or -] 4.62    28.16 [+ or -] 0.38
MA6            25.95 [+ or -] 32.87   27.81 [+ or -] 0.18
MA7            11.35 [+ or -] 10.93   27.46 [+ or -] 0.16
O M            35.94 [+ or -] 32.61   28.24 [+ or -] 0.43

                               Rainy period

Stations       Conductivity ([micro]S        Salinity

MA1             49.05 [+ or -] 8.80     31.54 [+ or -] 4.46
MA2             50.05 [+ or -] 8.44     32.96 [+ or -] 3.09
MA3             54.39 [+ or -] 4.66     34.91 [+ or -] 2.65
MA4             54.94 [+ or -] 5.42     35.39 [+ or -] 3.09
MA5             56.37 [+ or -] 3.70     36.40 [+ or -] 1.64
MA6             57.00 [+ or -] 3.00     37.01 [+ or -] 1.27
MA7             52.88 [+ or -] 4.58     36.82 [+ or -] 1.31
O M             53.53 [+ or -] 5.51     35.04 [+ or -] 2.58

                                Dry period

Stations       Conductivity ([micro]S        Salinity

MA1             48.83 [+ or -] 5.26     31.51 [+ or -] 3.31
MA2             50.22 [+ or -] 4.99     32.47 [+ or -] 2.96
MA3             53.44 [+ or -] 2.39     34.78 [+ or -] 1.06
MA4             54.02 [+ or -] 1.25     35.48 [+ or -] 0.43
MA5             54.02 [+ or -] 1.75     35.20 [+ or -] 0.74
MA6             54.03 [+ or -] 1.95     35.23 [+ or -] 1.04
MA7             54.22 [+ or -] 2.34     35.12 [+ or -] 1.12
O M             52.68 [+ or -] 2.85     34.16 [+ or -] 1.60

Table 2. Mean values, standard deviation and overall
mean (OM) of nutrients data from transect of the
continental shelf in the seven sampling stations during the
rainy (January to May/2014) and dry season (November
/2013 to July and September /2014). Sao Luis-MA, Brazil.

                      Rainy period

Station        Nitrite             Phosphate
             ([micro]mol          ([micro]mol
             [L.sup.-1])          [L.sup.-1])

MA1       0.18 [+ or -] 0.12   0.13 [+ or -] 0.03
MA2       0.08 [+ or -] 0.25   0.10 [+ or -] 0.04
MA3       0.04 [+ or -] 0.04   0.29 [+ or -] 0.36
MA4       0.01 [+ or -] 0.02   0.29 [+ or -] 0.41
MA5       0.03 [+ or -] 0.02   0.27 [+ or -] 0.34
MA6       0.05 [+ or -] 0.09   0.24 [+ or -] 0.31
MA7       0.02 [+ or -] 0.03   0.28 [+ or -] 0.39
O M       0.06 [+ or -] 0.05   0.23 [+ or -] 0.27

                       Dry period

Station        Nitrite             Phosphate
             ([micro]mol          ([micro]mol
             [L.sup.-1])          [L.sup.-1])

MA1       0.31 [+ or -] 0.29   0.63 [+ or -]0.26
MA2       0.28 [+ or -] 0.25   0.55 [+ or -] 0.37
MA3       0.11[+ or -] 0.20    0.24 [+ or -] 0.21
MA4       0.09 [+ or -] 0.12   0.19 [+ or -] 0.18
MA5       0.02 [+ or -] 0.03   0.23 [+ or -] 0.13
MA6       0.15 [+ or -] 0.25   0.33 [+ or -] 0.24
MA7       0.10 [+ or -] 0.18   0.29 [+ or -] 0.12
O M       0.15 [+ or -] 0.19   0.35 [+ or -] 0.21

             Rainy period

Station        Silicate

MA1       12.87 [+ or -] 0.11
MA2       6.07 [+ or -] 3.92
MA3       3.50 [+ or -] 2.18
MA4       3.14 [+ or -] 2.56
MA5       2.47 [+ or -] 1.42
MA6       1.54 [+ or -] 0.61
MA7       3.64 [+ or -] 1.95
O M       4.75 [+ or -] 1.82

              Dry period

Station        Silicate

MA1       9.84 [+ or -] 2.07
MA2       7.67 [+ or -] 2.49
MA3       1.85 [+ or -] 0.54
MA4       1.45 [+ or -] 0.35
MA5       1.89 [+ or -] 2.20
MA6       2.01 [+ or -] 2.27
MA7       1.42 [+ or -] 1.71
O M       3.73 [+ or -] 1.66

Table 3. Predominant species along transect of the continental shelf
during the rainy and dry season, Sao Luis-MA, Brazil.

Bacillariophyta             Dinophyta                 Cyanophyta

Actinoptychus annulatus     Ceratium carriense        Genus
  (G.C. Wallich) Grunow       Gourret                   Geitlerinema
A. aster J.J. Brun          C. closterium Perty       Genus
A. minutus Greville         C. contrarium (Gourret)     Oscillatoria
A. parvus A. Mann           C. declinatum (Karsten)
A. splendens (Shadbolt)     C. deflexum (Kofoid)
  Ralfs                       E.G. Jorgensen
A. vulgaris Schumann        C. furca (Ehrenberg)
                              Claparede & Lachmann
Coscinodiscus centralis     C. fusus (Ehrenberg)
  Ehrenberg                   Dujardin
C. gigas Ehrenberg          C. horridum (Cleve)
C. granii L.F. Gough        C. longirostrum Gourret
C. jonesianus (Greville)    C. macroceros
  Ostenfeld                   (Ehrenberg) Vanhoffen
C. oculus-iridis            C. pentagonum Gourret
  (Ehrenberg) Ehrenberg
C. radiatus Ehrenberg       C. tripos (O.F. Muller)
C. rothii (Ehrenberg)       Podolampas palmipes
  Grunow                      Stein

Gyrosigma balticum          Protoperidinium sp.
  (Ehrenberg) Rabenhorst
G. fasciola (Ehrenberg)
  J.W. Griffith & Henfrey
G. hippocampus Hassall,
  nom. illeg.
G. tenuissima (Stromfelt)
Odontella aurita
  (Lyngbye) Agardh
O. dubia (Brightwell)
O. longicruris (Greville)
  M.A. Hoban
O. mobiliensis (J.W.
  Bailey) Grunow
O. regia (Schultze)
O. sinensis (Greville)

Thalassiosira eccentrica
  (Ehrenberg) Cleve
T. leptopus (Grunow ex
  Van Heurck) Hasle &
  G. Fryxell
T. lineata Jouse
T. oestrupii (Ostenfeld)
T. plicata H. J. Schrader
T. simonsenii Hasle & G.
T. subtilis (Ostenfeld)

Table 4. Mean values, standard deviation and overall
mean (OM) of total chlorophyll-a, nano/picophyto-plankton
(nano) and microphytoplankton (micro) concen-trations
along transect of the continental shelf during the
rainy and dry season. Sao Luis-MA, Brazil.

                         Rainy period

Station   Total Chlorophyll-a            Nano
            (mg [m.sup.-3])        (mg [m.sup.-3])

MA1       0.022 [+ or -] 0.017   0.002 [+ or -] 0.002
MA2       0.013 [+ or -] 0.016   0.011 [+ or -] 0.013
MA3       0.005 [+ or -] 0.005   0.010 [+ or -]0.012
MA4       0.004 [+ or -] 0.003   0.003 [+ or -]0.002
MA5       0.005 [+ or -] 0.002   0.003 [+ or -]0.002
MA6       0.004 [+ or -] 0.002   0.002 [+ or -] 0.002
MA7       0.005 [+ or -] 0.003   0.002 [+ or -] 0.001
O M       0.008 [+ or -] 0.007   0.005 [+ or -] 0.005

                          Dry period

Station   Total Chlorophyll-a            Nano
            (mg [m.sup.-3])        (mg [m.sup.-3])

MA1       0.026 [+ or -] 0.035   0.010 [+ or -] 0.009
MA2       0.046 [+ or -] 0.067   0.006 [+ or -] 0.003
MA3       0.006 [+ or -] 0.006   0.004 [+ or -] 0.005
MA4       0.006 [+ or -] 0.006   0.003 [+ or -] 0.002
MA5       0.005 [+ or -] 0.004   0.005 [+ or -] 0.003
MA6       0.007 [+ or -] 0.006   0.005 [+ or -] 0.002
MA7       0.005 [+ or -] 0.002   0.004 [+ or -] 0.002
O M       0.014 [+ or -] 0.018   0.005 [+ or -] 0.004

              Rainy period

Station          Micro
            (mg [m.sup.-3])

MA1       0.011 [+ or -] 0.011
MA2       0.002 [+ or -] 0.001
MA3       0.005 [+ or -] 0.003
MA4       0.001 [+ or -] 0.001
MA5       0.002 [+ or -] 0.001
MA6       0.002 [+ or -] 0.001
MA7       0.003 [+ or -] 0.002
O M       0.004 [+ or -] 0.003

               Dry period

Station          Micro
            (mg [m.sup.-3])

MA1       0.016 [+ or -] 0.027
MA2       0.006 [+ or -] 0.002
MA3       0.001 [+ or -] 0.001
MA4       0.008 [+ or -] 0.006
MA5       0.000 [+ or -] 0.000
MA6       0.002 [+ or -] 0.003
MA7       0.000 [+ or -] 0.001
O M       0.005 [+ or -] 0.006
COPYRIGHT 2016 Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso, Escuela de Ciencias del Mar
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2016 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Carvalho, Ronnessa C.Q.; Cutrim, Marco V.J.; Eschrique, Samara A.; Azevedo-Cutrim, Andrea C.G.; More
Publication:Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research
Article Type:Ensayo
Date:May 1, 2016
Previous Article:Micro- and mesozooplankton communities in the surf zone of a tropical sandy beach (Equatorial Southwestern Atlantic).
Next Article:Total mercury (T-Hg) in Anomalocardia brasiliana (Mollusca) under different biological and environmental conditions.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters