Printer Friendly

Microdot method: used with chromogenic agar is a useful procedure for sanitary monitoring in aquaculture.

Metodo de la microgota: usado con agar cromogenico es un procedimiento util para el monitoreo sanitario en acuicultura

INTRODUCTION

In microbiology, the quantitative determination of microorganisms is performed by a traditional procedure involving 10-fold serial dilution, in a total volume of 10 mL and pours 0.1 mL of a dilution tube on a single agar plate to count around 200-1000 colonies after an incubation period. Considering also the triplicates, the method comprise many materials (plates and dilution tubes) and a laborious time to finally determine the CFU (colony forming unit) per mL of a bacteria present in the sample. With the intention of reducing samples volume, microbiological material and laborious time, several downscaling method has been reported in literature. One of them is the track dilution method which consists in performing tenfold serial dilution in a total volume of 1 mL, and then rolled along the surface of a square agar plate 10 [micro]L obtained from the dilution tube. According to the dilution, the cells are spread in this track allowing counts between 20-200 colonies (Jett et al., 1997). Other methods involve serial dilution using a 96 microplate in a total volume of 200 pL and spotted onto agar plate using a 96-spronged stamp (Tornero & Dangl, 2001). A modified version of this last method was proposed by Sieuwerts et al. (2008), where 5 [micro]L from each diluted well are spotted onto agar plate and after a period of incubation, between 1 and 200 minicolonies (200-500 pm) are counted with the help of a digital camera and a processing image software. The microdot method, proposed in this report, is the simplest downscaling method, because it is a low scale of the traditional method. The 10-fold serial dilution is performed in a total volume of 100 [micro]L and from each dilution tube triplicate dots of 10 [micro]L are deposited in a single agar plate. After a period of incubation and according to the cell dilution, among 1090 colonies are counted within the dot. This microdot method has been applied to enumerate bacteria under different experimental conditions in studies of plantbacteria relationship (Keppler & Baker, 1989), bacteriocin import mechanism (Strahsburger et al., 2005), bacterial metabolism (Chirino et al., 2013) and bacterial bioconversion (DiGioia et al., 2014). However, this method is unknown for many microbiologists and its procedure has not been explained in detail in literature. Nevertheless, due to its simplicity and reduced use of material, methodologies like this are desirable for routine laborious labor like those performed in sanitary monitoring of export fishery products.

In Chile, aquaculture is the main activity of the fishery sector and one of the most important export activities after mining. The foremost export products are trout and salmon (around 94%), followed in a minor range by bivalves, algae, osteons, abalone and oysters. These products are characterized by their high quality, good taste and safety, according to international standards. That is, due to Chilean fishery companies applying strictly national technical norms to ensure the approval of all sanitary and quality controls before its exportation to approximately 30 countries around the world. These technical norms correspond to a certification program of fishery export products (CERNT3) that include all the sanitary demands of all importer countries. The sanitary request is supported by the technical norm 2 (CER-NT2), which establishes the microbiological, physical, chemicals, sensorial and toxicological parameters involved in this sanitary certification. The technical norm 7 (LAB-NT7) indicates the microbiological methods approved for certification according to the international standards. The criteria that determine which bacterial species are included in that sanitary control program change according to the concerns of each importer country. However, three bacterial species are frequently included in sanitary monitoring; E. coli, L. monocytogenes and S. aureus. They are expected absent or low presence in diverse raw or elaborate fishery products. The microbiological methods described in CER-NT2 involve selective and differential medium according to the target bacteria. The quantification of E. coli is performed by the most probable number (MPN; CFU [mL.sup.-1]) (Feng et al., 1998). The quantification of L. monocytogenes and S. aureus is determined by counting colonies in agar plates and expressed as CFU [g.sup.-1] (Hitchins & Jinneman, 2013; Bennett & Lancette, 2001). However, for routine sanitary monitoring, the procedures are laborious and require a number of materials and large incubator space. Alternative methods are disabling for periodic sanitary monitoring programs within the fishery company, with the purpose of suggesting corrective actions in the case of finding sanitary problems. This alternative method has to be easy to perform, economic and not laborious, as well as, selective and sensitive, and does not exclude the practice of certified methods at the time of certification.

In general, the chromogenic medium is an alternative method to identify quickly the presence of pathogens or bacteria associated to sanitary problems. This cromogenic agar has the advantage of being selective and differential, because certain bacterial species are capable of growth and within them the target bacteria shows morphological and chromatic characteristic allowing their identification (Tavakoli et al., 2008; Rank, 2012). The high demands for this kind of medium have promoted broad offers of chromogenic agar by the market. Regarding its application, in a study about the sanitary state of water and sediments of an estuary in Matang Mangrove Forest Reserve in Malaysia, the chromogenic agar CHROMagar ECC allowed the determination of E. coli and coliforms in the surface water (Ghaderpour et al., 2014). In this medium, the E. coli colonies has blue colors due to the [beta]-glucoronidase activity, meanwhile coliforms colonies has mauve colors due to P-galactosidase activity (Alonso et al., 1999). In a study about the effect of high pressure procedure over the growth of resistant strain of Listeria monocytogenes in the greenshell mussel meat (Fletcher et al., 2008), the enumeration of resistant bacteria was done with CHROMagar[TM] Listeria, where L. monocytogenes has a typical turquoise blue color with a clear white halo around the colony. The blue color is due to the [beta]-D-glucosidase activity over the chromogenic substrate 5-bromo-4chloro-3-indoxl-[beta]-D-glucopyranoside. Meanwhile, the halo zone is due to the enzymatic activity of both virulence factors phosphatidylinositol-phospholipase C (PI-PLC) and phosphatidylcholin-phospholipase C (PC-PLC) over the substrate L-[alpha]-phosphatidyl-inositol (Reissbrodt, 2004). In the same way, the environmental impact of shrimp farm effluents over costal area of Mexico was evaluated measuring pathogenic and fecal origin bacteria in white clamps (Martinez-Porchas et al., 2016). Among these bacteria, the presence of S. aureus was detected by Baird Parker agar, where this bacteria looks like grey-black shiny colonies with a clear halo. The grey-black appearance is due to the reduction of tellurite; meanwhile the clear zone is due to the protease activity over the egg yolk added previously to the medium. In general, in chromogenic agar the other bacteria did not show the same chromogenic properties as target bacteria or they just did not grow.

Therefore, considering the chromogenic agar ability to identify directly a target bacteria and the microdot method that reduce the material used to determine cell concentration in a sample. We propose an alternative method that combines the advantage of microdot method with the use of chromogenic agar to identify and quantify quickly target bacteria in a water sample. Thus, this microdot chromogenic method is a reliable, fast, cheap and less laborious procedure in comparison with traditional method. Here we propose its use for sanitary monitoring of E. coli, L. monocytogenes and S. aureus in aquaculture processes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains and culture media

E. coli strain ATCC 12651, Listeria monocytogenes strain IV (Instituto de Salud Publica, Chile) and Staphylococcus aureus strain ATCC 25923 are stored in the culture collection of the Laboratorio de Biotecnologia, Facultad de Recursos Renovables, Universidad Arturo Prat, Chile. The strains were cultured in MacConkey agar (Becton & Dickinson Company, Sparks, MD), Luria-Bertani (LB) agar (Oxoid, UK), Baird Parker agar (Oxoid, UK), CHROMagar ECC[TM] (CECC) (Chromagar Microbiology, Paris, France) and CHROMagar LM[TM] (CLM) (Chromagar Microbiology, Paris, France). The medium agar was suspended in distillated water (DW) or filtered marine water (MW) following the manufacturer's instructions. The culture was incubated in aerobic conditions for 24-48 h at 37[degrees]C.

Comparison between microdot and traditional method

E. coli strain ATCC 12651 was grown in 1.5 L of LB medium prepared with DW under aerobic conditions using an orbital shaker at 150 rpm [h.sup.-1] for 24 h at 37[degrees]C. The cell concentration of this culture was determined by both traditional and microdot methods to compare both methods.

The traditional method comprised a sample of 1 mL taken directly from the E. coli culture (1.5 L) that was 10 fold serial diluted in a total volume of 10 mL using six tubes with 9 mL of physiological serum. An aliquot (0.1 mL) of each dilution tube was poured on a LB agar plate and incubated under aerobic condition for 18-24 h at 37[degrees]C. The plates containing between 200 and 1000 colonies were counted. The analysis was performed in triplicate.

The microdot method comprised an aliquot of 10 [micro]L taken directly from the E. coli culture (1.5 L) or from a sample of 1 mL taken directly from the E. coli culture (1.5 L) or from a sample of 100 mL taken directly from the surface water of a rotifers tank. That aliquot was serially diluted 10 fold in a total volume of 100 [micro]L until tube six. Triplicate aliquots of 10 [micro]L from each dilution tube were spotted on the corresponding division, previously marked at the external face of the base of the agar plate, prepared at least 24 h before in a sterile Petri dish of 180x11 mm. The plate distinguish 7 regions divided from the center of the plate and correlatively marked from 0 until 6, to indicate the dilution tube (0, correspond to the sample tube; 1, corresponding to dilution 10-1; and so on, Figure 1). The plate was open under sterile condition until all the spots were adsorbed. Then, the plate was cover with its lid and incubated under aerobic condition for 18-24 h at 37[degrees]C. The colony-forming unit per mL were determined by counting between 20-80 colonies in each spot and multiplied by the dilution factor.

Sanitary monitoring in an Artemia salina culture

The sanitary monitoring of a rotifers tank of 200 L located in the live diet room of Centro de Investigaciones Marinas de Quintay (CIMARQ), Universidad Andres Bello, Quintay, Chile, was performed. A sample of 100 mL was collected from the surface water of the rotifers tank and analyzed by the microdot chromogenic method using CECC, CLM and Baird Parker agar to detect the presence of E. coli, L. monocytogenes and S. aureus, respectively. The colonies observed, after 18 h of incubation at 37[degrees]C, were identified according to their morphology and chromogenic characteristic and confirmed by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis.

PCR and DNA sequencing

The colonies grown in Baird Parker, ECC and CLM agar plates were identified by colony PCR using 16S rRNA universal primers 27F and 1492R (Chirino et al., 2013). The PCR reaction mixture was composed of 5 [micro]L 5x buffer, 1.25 [micro]L of deoxynucleotide triphosphate 10 mM, 0.25 [micro]L of each primer 1 [micro]M, 0.25 [micro]L of Gotaq DNA polymerase 5 u [micro] [L.sup.-1] (Promega) and 18 [micro]L of nuclease-free water. PCR was performed in an Eppendorf Thermocycler (Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany). The PCR amplification protocol comprised an initial incubation at 94[degrees]C for 5 min, 30 cycles of 94[degrees]C for 1 min, 55[degrees]C for 1 min, 72[degrees]C for 1.5 min and a final extension at 72[degrees]C for 7 min. The PCR products were separated in an agarose gel electrophoresis performed at 100 V for 45 min using an agarose gel (1%) in Tris acetate buffer containing 40 mM Tris, 20 mM acetic acid, and 2 mM Na2EDTA (pH 8.1). The agarose gel were stained with ethidium bromide (5 [micro]g [mL.sup.-1]) and registered in an ultraviolet (UV) trans-illumination with Gel Doc 2000 system (Bio-Rad). Each band was extracted from gel using the PureLink Quick Gel Extraction Kit (Life Technologies, UK). The purified PCR product was sequenced (Macrogen, Seoul, Korea) and the sequence analyzed by BLAST with NCBI database for bacteria identification (Altschul et al., 1990).

RESULTS

Comparison between microdot and traditional method

In this study, the cell concentration of E. coli in a liquid culture (1.5 L) was measured by conventional and microdot methods. The conventional method registered a cell concentration of 7.93 [+ or -] 0.05 log CFU [mL.sup.-1], whereas the microdot method registered a cell concentration of 7.78 [+ or -] 0.04 log CFU [mL.sup.-1] and 7.91 [+ or -] 0.02) log CFU [mL.sup.-1], using a sample volume of 10 pL and 1 mL, respectively. Since each method showed the same cell concentration, we used only the microdot method in the next cell concentration determination.

The chromogenic agar has the advantage of identifying directly a target bacterium according to the morphology and chromogenic characteristic of its colony. In this study we evaluated these properties during cell concentration determination by the microdot method. In this sense, we compare the cell concentration results obtained by the microdot method, when diverse agar medium including chromogenic and not chromogenic agar were used. At the same time, we also evaluated if solvent used in medium suspension (distilled water or marine water) did not interfered with its chromogenic properties or its use during cell concentration determination. As showed in Table 1, for Gram-positive bacteria, and Table 2 for Gram-negative bacteria, the cell concentration of each reference strain was the same, independently of the medium used or the solvent used (distilled water or marine water) during medium agar preparation. As expected, the morphology and chromatic characteristic of each reference strain in their respective chromogenic medium was as describe by the manufacture company (Table 3). Thus, the chromogenic agar used in conjunction with the microdot method is a reliable method to use in monitoring sanitary state of an aquaculture process, identifying and quantifying target bacteria as E. coli, L. monocytogenes and S. aureus.

Application of microdot chromogenic method in sanitary monitoring of Artemia salina culture

Artemia salina was cultured as live diet for fish production in the Marine Research Center of Quintay, Andres Bello University, Chile. In Table 3 is shown that no sanitary problems related with the presence of E. coli, L. monocytogenes and S. aureus were detected by microdot method in conjunction with chromogenic agars. The colonies observed in the chromogenic agar plate were identified as Salmonella sp., Microbacterium sp., Bacillus sp. and Staphylococcus pasteuri strains according to the16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis by BLAST algorithm in NCBI database (Table 3).

DISCUSSION

In this study, we showed the usefulness of the microdot method with chromogenic agar to simultaneously detect and quantify the presence of E. coli, L. monocytogenes and S. aureus in water samples. As expected, the chromogenic agar was specific for these bacteria and did not interfere with the bacterial quantification. Thus, the microdot chromogenic method was fast, low cost and easily to perform. In addition, the method shows same quantitative results as the traditional method during quantification of an E. coli culture (1.5 L), even though sample volume between both methods was 100 fold different. This last observation means that E. coli population was in a homogenous dispersion within 1.5 L of culture, being irrelevant the sample volume used. Therefore, we propose that in tanks or ponds ([greater than or equal to]200-1000 L) of aquaculture production, the target bacteria will also be in a homogenous dispersion, being able to be detected and quantified by the microdot chromogenic method. In principle, the limit of sensitivity of this method is >100 UFC [mL.sup.-1] i.e., one colony in the dot of 10 [micro]L taken directly from the sample.

In addition, the method was used to monitor the sanitary state of a tank of culture of Artemia salina, revealing the absence of E. coli, L. monocytogenes and S. aureus in the surface water. The artificial contamination of the tank with Artemia salina by reference strains of E. coli, L. monocytogenes and S. aureus was discarded due to the hazard risk of environmental contamination or possible contamination of other cultures situated closer to this tank in the marine research center. Thus, we just monitor the bacterial presence in the surface water of the tank with Artemia salina using the chromogenic agar and the microdot method. Although other colonies appears, the chromogenic agar did not distinguish other bacteria that not correspond to the target bacteria because, for example, many other bacteria like Salmonella spp. and Hafnia alvei shows white colonies in Chromagar ECC. Therefore it was necessary to identify them by sequence analysis of 16S rRNA gene. The inclusion of other chromogenic agar like Chromagar Salmonella could be useful to specifically detect Salmonella in water sample. For example, Salmonella spp. is usually not desired in fishery products like surimi or freeze cooked mollusk (CER-NT2). In this study, against the presence of Salmonella spp. in the surface water of Artemia salina tank, corrective actions were performed. The UV lamp of the marine water filtration system was changed. Then, Salmonella spp. disappeared from the tank of Artemia salina (data not shown). Hence, our recommendation is to implement a periodic monitoring of sanitary state of water by microdot method in conjunction with chromogenic agar, to prevent the colonization on aquatic organisms by undesirable bacteria. Otherwise, it will be less effective and more expensive eradicating the undesired bacterial from the aquatic organism. Besides, this method could be done with others chromogenic agar, like those used to monitor other bacteria associated to foodborne disease (Tavakoli et al, 2008) or to monitor pathogens that damages aquatic organisms (Kriem et al., 2015).

Regarding to the colonies grown in chromogenic agar, two observations are necessary to remark. First, In CHROMagar Listeria, Microbacterium spp. showed green or white opaque colonies, in contrast to the blue colonies of L. monocytogenes. According to the litera ture, Microbacterium spp. and other species like Cellulomonas spp., Bacillus circulans, B. pumilus, Enterococcus spp., and Staphylococcus xylosus may form similar colonies like L. monocytogenes (Stessl et al., 2009), however, this was not the case although the identification of Microbacterium spp was confirmed by sequence analysis of 16SrRNA. Microbacterium is a genus that includes at least 92 species with high similarity in its 16S rRNA sequence (Laffineur et al., 2003; Hadjadj et al., 2016). Therefore, our observation could be explained because within this diversity some species could give false positive and others not for Listeria monocytogenes identification. On the other hand, in Baird Parker agar, Bacillus sp. showed dark brown colonies as expected (Baird-Parker, 1962), meanwhile S. pasteuri appeared as a round white colony. This last bacterial species has been isolated in sausage food using Baird Parker agar, but the colony description was not mentioned (Rebecchi et al., 2015). S. pasteuri is a new Staphylococcus species described 20 years ago, isolated from animals, humans, and foods (Chesnau et al., 1993), and apparently this is the first report that described its presence in aquaculture water.

Other applications of microdot chromogenic method

The potential application of this microdot chromogenic method in aquaculture could be like those studies in which E. coli, L monocytogenes or S. aureus were detected in water; in finfish aquaculture, monitoring the sanitary status of recirculating and non-recirculating water system (Pullela et al., 1998), in water of pounds of shrimp culture (Koonse et al., 2005), or in surface water and sediments of oyster ponds culture (Crassostrea virginica) (Sonier et al., 2008), among others. In the same way, it could be applied as well in combination with other chromogenic agar as CHROMagar Vibrio to distinguish several Vibrio species or CHROMagar Salmonella to perform the bacteria surveillance. Although all these studies are concerned about the sanitary state of waters, in general, those subjects do not represent a priority performed periodically in aquaculture system. However, that nonattendance could produce negative results compromising not only the final products which has a commercial value, but rather the employments of many worker associated directly or indirectly to the company, as occurred in Chilean salmon industry (Iizuka & Zanlungo, 2016). Therefore, we propose a simple method to support this issue periodically in aquaculture.

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated that the microdot method produce same results as the traditional method and its use with chromogenic agar allow, at the same time, the identification of target bacteria specie. This application is proposed to monitor is E. coli, L. monocytogenes and S. aureus in surface water of aquaculture system using the respective chromogenic agar; CHROMagar ECC, CHROMagar Listeria and Baird Parker agar. Although other colonies could appear during sanitary monitoring, their chromogenic properties are different from target bacteria, without interfering in their identification. In addition, the microdot method allows reducing material and time consuming labor during execution of the procedure, being a reproducible method to perform periodical monitoring in aquaculture systems.

DOI: 10.3856/vol44-issue4-fulltext-9

Received: 7 January 2016; Accepted: 17 June 2016

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors acknowledge financial support from Universidad Arturo Prat (VRIIP 1-14; VRIIP 0123-15, DE1549), Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria (131562, 131342 & 131109) grants and Centro de Investigaciones Marinas de Quintay, Universidad Andres Bello, Quintay, Chile. In addition authors acknowledge anonymous reviewer for helpful comments.

REFERENCES

Alonso, J.L., A. Soriano, O. Carbajo, I. Amoros & H. Garelick. 1999. Comparison and recovery of Escherichia coli and thermotolerant coliforms in water with a chromogenic medium incubated at 41 and 44.5[degrees]C. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 65: 3746-3749.

Altschul, S.F., W. Gish, W. Miller, E.W. Myers & D.J. Lipman. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol., 215: 403-410.

Baird-Parker, A.C. 1962. An improved diagnostic and selective medium for isolating coagulase positive staphylococci. J. Appl. Bacteriol., 25: 12-19.

Bennett, R.W. & G.A. Lancette. 2001. Chapter 12. Staphylococcus aureus. Bacteriological Analytical

Manual, Revision A, 1998. [http://www.fda.gov/Food/ FoodScienceResearch/Laboratory Methods/ucm071429.htm]. Reviewed: 13 January 2016.

Chesneau, O., A. Morvan, F. Grimont, H. Labischinski & N. El Solh. 1993. Staphylococcus pasteuri sp. nov., isolated from human, animal, and food specimens. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol., 43: 237-244.

Chirino, B., E. Strahsburger, L. Agullo, M. Gonzalez & M. Seeger. 2013. Genomic and functional analyses of the 2-aminophenol catabolic pathway and partial conversion of its substrate into picolinic acid in Burkholderia xenovorans LB400. PloS ONE, 8: e75746.

Di Gioia, D., E. Strahsburger, A.M. Lopez de Lacey, V. Bregola, I. Marotti, I. Aloisio & G. Dinelli. 2014. Flavonoid bioconversion in Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum B7003: a potential probiotic strain for functional food development. J. Funct. Foods, 7: 671679.

Feng, P., S.D. Weagant, A. Michael & W.B. Grant. 1998. Enumeration of Escherichia coli and the coliform bacteria. Bacteriological Analytical Manual, revision A, 1998. [http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodScienceResearch/ LaboratoryMethods/ucm064948.htm]. Reviewed: 13 January 2016.

Fletcher, G.C., J.F. Youssef & S. Gupta. 2008. Research issues in inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes associated with New Zealand Greenshell mussel meat (Perna canaliculus) using high-pressure processing. J. Aquat. Food Prod. Technol., 17: 173-194.

Ghaderpour, A., K.N.M. Nasori, L.L. Chew, V.C. Chong, K. L. Thong & L.C. Chai. 2014. Detection of multiple potentially pathogenic bacteria in Matang mangrove estuaries, Malaysia. Mar. Pollut. Bull., 83: 324-330.

Hadjadj, L., J. Rathored, M.B. Keita, C. Michelle, A. Levasseur, D. Raoult, P.-E. Fournier, J.-M. Rolain & F. Bittar. 2016. Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of Microbacterium gorillae sp. nov. Stand. Genomic Sci., 11: 32. doi. 1186/s40 793-016-0152-z.

Hitchins, A.D. & K. Jinneman. 2013. Detection and enumeration of listeria monocytogenes in foods. Bacteriological Analytical Manual, Revision A, 1998. [http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodScience Research/ LaboratoryMethods/ucm071400.htm]. Reviewed: 13 January 2016.

Jett, B.D., M.S. Gilmore, K.L. Hatter & M.M. Huycke. 1997. Simplified agar plate method for quantifying viable bacteria. Biotechniques, 23: 648-650.

Keppler, L.C. & C.J. Baker. 1989. [O.sub.2]-initiated lipid peroxidation in a bacteria-induced hypersensitive reaction in tobacco cell suspensions. Phytopathology, 79: 555-562.

Koonse, B., W. Burkhardt, S. Chirtel & G.P. Hoskin. 2005. Salmonella and the sanitary quality of aqua-cultured shrimp. J. Food Protect., 68: 2527-2532.

Kriem, M.R., B. Banni, H. El Bouchtaoui, A. Hamama, A. El Marrakchi & N. Chaouqy. 2015. Prevalence of Vibrio spp. in raw shrimps (Parapenaeus longirostris) and performance of a chromogenic medium for the isolation of Vibrio strains. Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 61: 224-230.

Laffineur, K., V. Avesani, G. Cornu, J. Charlier, M. Janssens, G. Wauters & M. Delmee. 2003. Bacteremia due to a novel Microbacterium species in a patient with leukemia and description of Microbacterium paraoxydans sp. nov. J. Clin. Microbiol., 41: 2242-2246.

Iizuka, M. & J.P. Zanlungo. 2016. Environmental collapse and institutional restructuring: the sanitary crisis in the Chilean salmon industry. In: J. Hosono, M. Iizuka & M. Katz (eds.). Chile's Salmon industry. Springer, Japan, pp. 109-135.

Martinez-Porchas, M., S.M. Scheuren-Acevedo, L.R. Martinez-Cordova & T. Gollas-Galvan. 2016. Physiological and sanitary condition of the white clam Dosinia ponderosa collected from a coastal area impacted by shrimp farm effluent. Aquacult. Int., 24: 243-256.

Pullela, S., C.F. Fernandes, G.J. Flick, G.S. Libey, S.A. Smith & C.W. Coale. 1998. Indicative and pathogenic microbiological quality of aqua cultured finfish grown in different production systems. J. Food Protect., 61: 205-210.

Rank, E.L. 2012. Chromogenic agar media in the clinical food, and environmental testing Arenas, Part I. Clin. Microbiol. Newsletter, 34: 43-47.

Rebecchi, A., V. Pisacane, F. Miragoli, J. Polka, I. Falasconi, L. Morelli & E. Puglisi. 2015. Highthroughput assessment of bacterial ecology in hog, cow and ovine casings used in sausages production. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 212: 49-59.

Reissbrodt, R. 2004. New chromogenic plating media for detection and enumeration of pathogenic Listeria spp. -an overview. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 95: 1-9.

Sieuwerts, S., F. de Bok, E. Mols, V. de Vos & J. Van Hylckama-Vlieg. 2008. A simple and fast method for determining colony forming units. Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 47: 275-278.

Sonier, R., E. Mayrand, A.D. Boghen, M. Ouellette & V. Mallet. 2008. Concentration of Escherichia coli in sediments as an indicator of the sanitary status of oyster (Crassostrea virginica) aquaculture sites. J. Appl. Ichthyol., 24: 678-684.

Stessl, B., W. Luf, M. Wagner & D. Schoder. 2009. Performance testing of six chromogenic ALOA-type media for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes. J. Appl. Microbiol., 106: 651-659.

Strahsburger, E., M. Baeza, O. Monasterio & R. Lagos. 2005. Cooperative uptake of microcin E492 by receptors FepA, Fiu, and Cir and inhibition by the siderophore enterochelin and its dimeric and trimeric hydrolysis products. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 49: 3083-3086.

Tavakoli, H., M. Bayat, A. Kousha & P. Panahi. 2008. The application of chromogenic culture media for rapid detection of food and water borne pathogen. American-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci., 4: 693698.

Tornero, P. & J.L. Dangl. 2001. A high-throughput method for quantifying growth of phytopathogenic bacteria in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J., 28: 475-481.

Erwin Strahsburger (1), Patricio Retamales (2), Juan Estrada (3) & Michael Seeger (4)

(1) Laboratorio de Biotecnologia Molecular, Facultad de Recursos Naturales Renovables Universidad Arturo, Iquique, Chile

(2) Facultad de Ciencias Biologicas, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile

(3) Centro de Investigaciones Marinas de Quintay (CIMARQ) Universidad Andres Bello, Quintay, Chile

(4) Laboratorio de Microbiologia Molecular y Biotecnologia Ambiental Centro de Nanotecnologia y Biologia de Sistemas, Centro de Biotecnologia Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria, Valparaiso, Chile

Corresponding author: Erwin Strahsburger (estrahsb@unap.cl)

Corresponding editor: Sandra Bravo

Caption: Figure 1. Distribution of 10 [micro]L dots in the agar plate. These dots were deposited in triplicate and taken directly from the sample or from the corresponding dilution tube 1 to 6. The cell concentration was calculated counting between 10 and 90 colonies within the spot and multiple by dilution factor to express as cell per mL.
Table 1. Cell concentration of Gram-positive bacteria grown in
different media. LB-MW: Luria Broth in marine water, LB-DW:
Luria Broth in distilled water, TSA-MW: Trypticase soy agar in
marine water, TSA-DW: Trypticase soy agar in distilled water,
Baird Parker-MW: Baird Parker agar in marine water, Baird Parker-DW:
Baird Parker agar in distilled water, CLM-MW: Chromagar Listeria
Monocytogenes in marine water, CLM-DW: Chromagar Listeria
Monocytogenes in distilled water.

                    Growth culture log (CFU [mL.sup.-1]) ([+ or -]SD)

Strain                  LB-MW            LB-DW            TSA-MW

S. aureus                9.40             9.36             9.34
  ATCC-25923        ([+ or -] 0.03)   ([+ or -] 0.06)   ([+ or -] 0.06)
L. monocytogenes         9.72             9.64             9.75
   IV               ([+ or -] 0.05)   ([+ or -] 0.04)   ([+ or -] 0.03)

                    Growth culture log (CFU [mL.sup.-1]) ([+ or -]SD)

Strain                  TSA-DW       Baird Parker-MW   Baird Parker-DW

S. aureus                9.29             9.36              9.45
  ATCC-25923        ([+ or -] 0.05)   ([+ or -] 0.07)    ([+ or -] 0.06)
L. monocytogenes         9.54             9.73              9.57
   IV               ([+ or -] 0.08)   ([+ or -] 0,01)    ([+ or -] 0.03)

                        Growth culture log (CFU
                        [mL.sup.-1]) ([+ or -]SD)

Strain                  CLM-MW           CLM-DW

S. aureus
  ATCC-25923              --               --
L. monocytogenes         9.84             9.63
   IV               ([+ or -] 0.02)   ([+ or -] 0.05)

Table 2. Cell concentration of Gram-negative bacterium E. coli
grown in different media. LB-MW: Luria Broth in marine
water, LB-DW: Luria Broth in distilled water, TSA-MW:
Trypticase soy agar in marine water, TSA-DW: Trypticase soy
agar in distilled water, McConkey-MW: McConkey agar in marine
water, McConkey-DW: McConkey agar in distilled water, CECC-MW:
Chromagar E. coli chromogenic media in marine water, CECC-DW:
Chromagar E. coli chromogenic media in distilled water.

               Growth culture log (CFU [mL.sup.-1]) ([+ or -] SD)

Strain             LB-MW            LB-DW            TSA-MW

E. coli             9.65             9.47             9.46
  ATCC 12651   ([+ or -] 0.01)   ([+ or -] 0.04)   ([+ or -] 0.04)

               Growth culture log (CFU [mL.sup.-1]) ([+ or -] SD)

Strain             TSA-DW        McConkey-MW      McConkey-DW

E. coli             9.20             9.49             9.48
  ATCC 12651   ([+ or -] 0.09)   ([+ or -] 0.03)   ([+ or -] 0.02)

                  Growth culture log (CFU
                 [mL.sup.-1]) ([+ or -] SD)

Strain            CECC-MW          CECC-DW

E. coli             9.48             9.48
  ATCC 12651   ([+ or -] 0.07)   ([+ or -] 0.06)

Table 3. Colony description and PCR identification by 16S rRNA gene
sequence analysis.

Strain            Culture media   Colony          16S rRNA
                                  description     identification

E. coli           CHROMagar[TM]   blue colony     E. coli
  ATCC 12651        ECC
ECC-1             CHROMagar[TM]   white opaque    Salmonella enterica
                    ECC                             subsp. enterica
ECC-2             CHROMagar[TM]   white rose      Salmonella enterica
                    ECC                             subsp. enterica
L.                CHROMagar[TM]   blue colony     L. monocytogenes
  monocytogenes     Listeria        with
  IV                                white halo
CL-1              CHROMagar[TM]   green           Microbacterium sp.
                    Listeria
CL-2              CHROMagar[TM]   white opaque    Microbacterium sp.
                    Listeria
S. aureus         Baird Parker    round black     S. aureus
  ATCC-25923                        shiny
                    Agar            colony with
                                    opaque halo
ABP-1             Baird Parker    round opaque    Bacillus sp.
                    Agar
ABP-2             Baird Parker    round white     Staphylococcus
                    Agar                            pasteuri
COPYRIGHT 2016 Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso, Escuela de Ciencias del Mar
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2016 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Strahsburger, Erwin; Retamales, Patricio; Estrada, Juan; Seeger, Michael
Publication:Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research
Article Type:Ensayo
Date:Sep 1, 2016
Words:5124
Previous Article:Biocenosis of benthic community in Guerrero Negro Lagoon, Baja California Sur, Mexico: spatio-temporal characterization.
Next Article:First sexual maturity evaluation of the Pacific red snapper (Lutjanus peru) born in captivity.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters