Microbial flora and risk factors associated with catheter associated urinary tract infections.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: I) To study microbial flora and risk factors associated in patients with catheter associated UTI's, and, II) To identify the Urinary Tract Infections in patients with indwelling urinary catheter of more than 3 days of duration with closed drainage system in different categories of patients like Surgery, Urology, AMCU, Obs & Gyn patients. III) To study the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of bacterial flora.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: THE present study was conducted with a random collection of urine samples in patients admitted in GGH, KURNOOL in different wards like General Surgery, Urology AMCU & Obs & Gyn, among post-operative patients with indwelling urinary catheters during 2013-2014. The following were included in the study: duration of catheter stay, technique of insertion and adoption of closed drainage system, were observed.
A total of 100 samples collected from these patients 76 includes test group, from General surgery and urology AMCU with more than 3 days of duration of catheter stay were included; remaining 24 includes control group with less than 3 days of duration of catheter stay, with all the patients having closed drainage system and, all in whom, aseptic precautions had been followed before insertion of catheter.
The methods of sample collection are different from the routine method of MSU collection. The samples aseptically collected by aspirating the urine through the soft rubber outlet tube of Foleys catheter tube by blocking the collecting tube with 5 ml of disposable syringe.
The samples were collected with different durations of catheter stay, they were categorized as follows in Table 1.
All samples are transported immediately to the laboratory after collection and processed by conventional methods. They are tested by direct microscopic examination by wet film and gram staining method for bacteria and pus cells. Isolation of microorganism was done by inoculating the samples in suitable culture media i.e., Mac Conkey's agar and blood agar and incubated them aerobically at 37[degrees]C overnight. For sample inoculation semi quantitative culture method followed with a nichrome loop calibrated to contain 0. 005 ml fluid was used. Organisms isolated in culture, biochemical characterization, and antibiotic susceptibility was done on Muller Hinton agar as per NCCLS guidelines and the various resistance patterns to antibiotics were observed.
RESULTS: The culture showing >[10.sup.5] CFUs was taken as significant bacteriuria. Among the total 100 samples, 41 samples showed culture positivity with a 41% culture positive rate. Biochemical characterization and antibiotic susceptibility tests were done. The samples are categorized among the patients attending the various departments as follows: General Surgery-44, Urology-28, AMCU10, Obs & Gyn-18 (ref-Table 2).
Among them the individual isolates were as follows--Pseudomonas aeruginosa-15(36. 58%), Escherichia coli-9(22%), Enterococci-5(12. 19%), Klebsiella-6(14.63%), and, Candida--6(14. 63%). (Table 2).
Among the samples collected from General Surgery patients--18/44 samples were culture positive with 40.90% of incidence of bacteriuria. Among them, the individual isolates were as follows: Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated in 5 samples with prevalence of (11.36%), Escherichia coli in 4 (9.09%); Enterococci- 3(6.82%), Klebsiella--1 (2.27%), Candida 5(11.36%) (Table3).
Among the samples collected from urology patients; 20/28 samples were culture positive with 71.42% of bacteriuria. Among them the individual isolates were as follows: Pseudomonas aeruginosa 9(32.14%) Escherichia coli 5(17. 85%); Enterococci 1 (3.57%), Klebsiella 5(17.85%) ref (Table 3).
Among AMCU out of 10 samples 2 showed culture positivity with 20% prevalence; among them 1(10%) was pseudomonas and 1 Candida sp (10%) were isolated. In Obs & Gyn--among 18 samples, all were negative for culture with 0% positive rate ref--(Table 3).
Culture positive rate versus different durations of catheter stay as follows in table 4:
Table 4: Duration of catheter stay and positivity Duration Total positive Surgery urology AMCU in days 1-2 0 (0%) 0% 0% 0% 3-4 6 (18.75%) 3 (9.37%) 3 (9.37%) - 5-10 16 (61.53%) 6 (23.07%) 9 (34.61%) 1 (3.84%) 11-20 8 (72.72%) 5 (45.45%) 2 (18.18%) 1 (9.09%) >21 days 6 (100%) - 6 (100%) -
Antibiotic Susceptibility Test: The bacterial isolates tested with [beta]-lactam drugs, [beta]-lactam inhibitors, quinolones and amino glycosides Among the GNB isolates, 90% were showing ESBL resistance with cefataxime and 10% were showing resistance to [beta]-lactam inhibitors with cefaperazone and tazobactam, 90% were showing quinolones resistance when tested with norfloxacin and levofloxacin. 50% were resistant to amikacin, and all were resistant to gentamycin. All pseudomonas are sensitive to piperacillin & tazobactam.
DISCUSSION: CAUTI is one of the most common causes of hospital associated infection; the risk factors which predisposed to CAUTI were not properly understood. (4) Risk of acquiring a urinary tract infection in patients with indwelling urinary catheters following hospital stay depends on the technique of insertion of catheter and duration of catheterization, the quality of catheter care and host susceptibility. (4,5,6) Adoption of closed method of urinary drainage has markedly reduced the risk of acquiring catheter associated infection, but the risk is still substantial. Error in maintaining sterile closed drainage were common and predisposed patients to infection. (4,5,6) Host factors which appear to increase the risk of acquiring CAUTI include, surgical operation and underlying medical illness. (5,6) A study conducted by Henry F, Alavaren et al in 1993 at Philippine general hospital medical centre, Manila showed the result as 21%--Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 18.2% Escherichia coli, 11.3% acinetobacter, 9.1% Klebsiella, 4.5% Staphylococcus saprophyticus, 2.3% Coagulase Positive staphylococci. (7) Our present study--showing 41% of bacteriuria, and microorganisms isolated are almost correlating with above study, with little higher incidence. Increased Incidence of bacteriuria occurs more than 3 days duration of catheter stay, from 25% to almost 100 % after 3 weeks of duration of catheter stay. It is certain that soon after hospitalization, patient becomes colonized with bacteremia endemic to the institution, and often gram negative aerobic and facultative bacilli carry resistance markers. These bacteria colonize the patient's skin, gastrointestinal tract, and mucous membranes including the anterior urethra. (2) With insertion of catheter, the bacteria may be pushed along the urethra into the bladder or with an indwelling catheter, may migrate along the tract between the catheter and the urethral mucosa, gaining access to the bladder. It is estimated that approximately 10% to 30% of catheterized patient will develop bacteriu. (8,9,2)
CAUTI is generally assumed to be benign. (9) Such infection in otherwise healthy patients is often asymptomatic and is likely to resolve spontaneously with the removal of the catheter. (9) Occasionally, infection persists and leads to such complications as prostatitis, epidydymitis, cystitis, pyelonephritis and gram negative bacteremia, particularly in high risk patients. The last complication is serious, since it is associated with a significant mortality but fortunately occur in less than 1% catheterized patients. (9,4) Microorganisms that inhabit the meatus or distal urethra can be introduced directly into the bladder when the catheter is inserted. (8) Generally, however, low rates of infection have been reported after single brief catheterization, suggesting that microorganism introduced by this method are usually removed from healthy individuals by voiding or by antibacterial mechanisms of bladder mucosa. (5,9) With indwelling catheters, infecting microorganism can migrate to the bladder along the outside of catheter in the periurethral mucosal sheath or along the internal lumen of the catheter after the collection bag or catheter drainage tube junction has been contaminated. (5,9) if sterile closed drainage can be maintained extra luminal migration of microorganisms in the peri urethral space becomes a relatively more important pathway of entry into bladder. (8,9)
CONCLUSION: Incidence of bacteriuria in patients with indwelling urinary catheters is 41%. Onset of bacteriuria is as early as on 3rd day of catheterization and gradually increase with duration of stay, technique of insertion and daily catheter care done. (7) Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli are common organisms isolated. Use of prophylactic antibiotics without doing culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing leads to development of drug resistant organisms. So, active surveillance of infection is the most effective method to control the CAUTI s & bacteriurias.
(1.) Ducel, J. fabry, L. Nicolle. A practical guide on prevention of hospital acquired infections, WHO/CDS/CSR/EPH/2002. 12, www. WHO. net; 2dedn. p. 5 & 38-39.
(2.) Betty A. Forbes, Daniel F. Sahm, Alice S. weissfeld et al; Bailey &Scott Diagnostic Microbiology, 2007; 12thedn p. 842-855.
(3.) E. W. Konemann, S. D. Allen, W. M. Janda, P. C. Shreekenberger, W. C. Winn et. Al color atlas and text book of diagnostic microbiology--1997; 5thedn, p. 139.
(4.) Edward S. Wong et. al; CDC guidelines for prevention of catheter related UTI, 1981 Atlanta; CDC. DHQP, CDC info@cdc. gov, p. no. 1-2.
(5.) Garibaldi RA, Burke JP, Dickman ML, Smith CB, factors predisposing to bacteriuria during indwelling urethral catheterization, N Eng J. Med1974; 291: 215-18.
(6.) Garibaldi RA et al Meatal colonization and catheter associated bacteriuria N Eng J Med 1980; 303-316.
(7.) Henry F Alavaren, jodor A limmelecia- Antonio--velmonte et al. Manila--1993--urinary tract infection in patients with indwelling catheter phil J Microbial Infect dis 1993; 22 (2): 65-74.
(8.) Daifuku R, Stature WE, association of rectal and urethral colonization with urinary tract infection in patients with indwelling catheters JAMA 1984; 252: 202-28.
(9.) Kumin CM, McCormark RC prevention of catheter induced urinary tract infection by sterile closed drainage N Engl J Med 1966; 274 (291): 215-218.
G. N. Ravi Prakash , K. Swarna Latha , A. Renuka , G. Swarna Latha 
NAME ADDRESS EMAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Dr. G. N. Ravi Prakash, F-203, Venkat Sai Enclave, New Postal Colony, Kurnool-518004, Andhra Pradesh. E-mail: email@example.com
1. G. N. Ravi Prakash
2. K. Swarna Latha
3. A. Renuka
4. G. Swarna Latha
PARTICULARS OF CONTRIBUTORS:
[1.] Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Kurnool Medical College, Kurnool.
[2.] Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Kurnool Medical College, Kurnool.
[3.] Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Kurnool Medical College, Kurnool.
[4.] Professor, Department of Microbiology, Kurnool Medical College, Kurnool.
FINANCIAL OR OTHER COMPETING INTERESTS: None
Date of Submission: 30/03/2015.
Date of Peer Review: 31/03/2015.
Date of Acceptance: 28/04/2015.
Date of Publishing: 05/05/2015.
Table 1 Duration of Surgery Urology AMCU Obs & Gyn Total catheter stay (in days) 1-2 5 3 - 24 24 3-4 20 6 6 - 32 5-10 13 10 4 - 26 11-20 6 3 - - 11 21-30 - 6 - - 6 Table 2: Positivity of samples in different categories showing bacteriurea Category of patients Total Positive rate General surgery 44 18 (40.90%) urology 28 20 (71.42%) AMCU 10 2 (20%) Obs & Gyn 18 0 (0%) Total 100 41 (41%) Table 3: Common organisms isolated Organism Total General Surg Urology AMCU Pseudomonas 15 (36.58%) 5 (11.36%) 9 (32.14%) 1 (10%) aeruginosa Escherichia coli 9 (22%) 4 (9.09%) 5 (17.85%) 0 enterococci 5 (12.19%) 3 (6.82%) 1 (3.57%) - Klebsiella 6 (14.63%) 1 (2.27%) 5 (17.85%) - Candida 6 (14.63%) 5 (11.36%) - 1 (10%)
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||ORIGINAL ARTICLE|
|Author:||Prakash, G.N. Ravi; Latha, K. Swarna; Renuka, A.; Latha, G. Swarna|
|Publication:||Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences|
|Date:||May 7, 2015|
|Previous Article:||A clinical case report on restoration and rehabilitation of gross anatomic limb defects.|
|Next Article:||Estimation of Thymic size in preterm and term Neonates by ultrasonography in tertiary health centre of western Maharastra.|