Printer Friendly

MetLife Solely Responsible For Asbestos-Related Claims.

Connecticut's highest court ruled that Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. and other insurers are not obligated to help pay asbestos-related claims against Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

The state Supreme Court rejected a MetLife appeal of a lower court decision that ruled MetLife's insurers are not liable for payments of about 200,000 asbestos-related claims against the NewYork-based MetLife.

The legal question for MetLife in the case was whether the separate claims involving asbestos constituted a single occurrence or multiple occurrences. If, as MetLife claimed, the cases constituted a single occurrence, MetLife's insurers would be liable to cover damages beyond a threshold of $25 million. If the claims are defined as multiple occurrences, the threshold would apply to each claim separately.

MetLife argued that all the asbestos-related claims against it constituted a single occurrence because all the cases resulted from MetLife's "failure to warn" its policyholders of the dangers of asbestos exposure. The Supreme Court rejected this argument, noting that the asbestos claims originated from more than one work site and from exposures over a period of 60 years, both of which invalidate the "single occurrence" guideline.
COPYRIGHT 2001 A.M. Best Company, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2001, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Comment:MetLife Solely Responsible For Asbestos-Related Claims.
Publication:Best's Review
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Mar 1, 2001
Words:185
Previous Article:Viatical Settlement Firm Closes.
Next Article:Anthem Plans to Go Public.
Topics:


Related Articles
Asbestos companies try to eliminate their liability.
Asbestos legislation: Could it be the end?
Asbestos: A Moving Target.
When the dust settles: it may be years before insurers see the last of the disability claims related to Sept. 11. (Life/Health).
Taking aim at smaller prey: companies that used products containing asbestos are the newest targets of litigation. (Briefing).
Dust storm: a sudden rise in silicosis claims is reminiscent of asbestos litigation, but this time insurers are blocking the turbulence.
Facing the past.
White-collar workers more likely to file psychiatric disability claims.
Insurers gain some limits in asbestos claims.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters