Printer Friendly

Mental health, mother-child interaction and development at the end of the first year of life/Saude mental, interacao mae-crianca e desenvolvimento ao final do primeiro ano de vida/Salud mental, interaccion madre-hijo y desarrollo al final del primer ano de vida.

One of the priorities of the current Brazilian health model is the surveillance of child development, in order to detect problems in the evolutive process, aiming to alleviate and neutralize the effects of both biological and psychosocial adversity (Amorim et al., 2009; Ribeiro, Silva, & Puccini, 2010; Santa Maria-Mengel & Linhares, 2007). The behavior of the caregiver (mother) has a decisive role in the protection and development of children exposed to risk in the family context, such as low socioeconomic status, low levels of education, chronic illnesses, death, conflict, violence, and mental health problems of the caregiver (Engle, 2009, Parsons, Young, Rochat, Kringelbachach, & Stein, 2012). Good parent-child communication and the quality of early interactions, especially maternal sensitivity, have been identified as variables that play a protective role in the development of the child (Pinheiro, 2004; Shin, Park, Ryu, & Seonum, 2008) especially with regard to socioemotional, language and cognition development (Field, 2010; L. Murray, Halligan, & Cooper, 2010; Stein, Malmberg, Sylva, Barnes, & Leach, 2008).

According to Feldman and Klein (2003), to assess the quality of the interaction, the majority of studies use recordings of episodes of free interaction between the mother and the child, analyzed by two types of codes. The first, microanalytical, includes the recording, over short intervals of time, of a series of discrete behaviors, such as what the child looks at, vocalizes, touches, and facial expressions, which allows a quantitative description of the categories selected for the analysis of the episode. Alternatively, following the tradition of Ainsworth, researchers have used global assessment scales when evaluating interactive characteristics in the episode as a whole, the responsiveness, intrusiveness and reciprocity, from psychometric Likert type scales.

Studies has shown that, among the factors associated with the quality of the interaction, maternal mental health, particularly chronic depression (Frizzo & Piccinini, 2007; Lovejoy, Graczyk, O'Hare, & Neuman, 2000; L. Murray et al., 2010) or extreme anxiety (Glasheen, Richardson, & Fabio, 2010), may adversely affect the mother-child interaction and child development, and that its effects can be maintained for a long period. The risks increase when it comes to depressed mothers who live in vulnerable environments, with unfavorable economic conditions, and little social support (Parsons et al., 2012; Stein et al., 2008).

It is hypothesized that mothers, especially those who are depressed, who are not emotionally available for the child have a more apathetic style of interacting, tend to be less responsive, and offer few facilitating behaviors for the exploration of objects, which may lead to psychosocial deprivation and adverse development conditions (L. Murray et al., 2010; Tran et al., 2014). According to Lovejoy et al. (2000) in a review article, these difficulties are not specific to mothers diagnosed with depression, but may appear in mothers with subclinical levels of depression or even accompany other psychiatric disorders.

There are studies associating the quality of the interaction and child development with the depressive or anxious symptoms of the mother, however, very little is known about the role of the so-called common mental disorders (CMDs) in the quality of the mother-child interaction. These conditions are of high prevalence in the adult population, especially among women with low socioeconomic status (Lima et al, 2008; Maragno, Goldbaum, Gianini, Novaes, & Cesar, 2006), and are characterized by multiple symptoms, such as nonspecific somatic complaints, irritability, insomnia, nervousness, headaches, fatigue, forgetfulness, and lack of concentration, as well as various events that, while not necessarily meeting all the diagnostic criteria for mental illness according to the ratings of the DSM-V and ICD-10, could be characterized as depressive, anxious or somatoform symptoms.

Another aspect rarely mentioned in the literature is related to the role of the child in the interaction. Although the interaction is characterized as a reciprocal and bidirectional action and there is strong evidence that, from the start of development, it is not only determined by the actions of the mother (Klein & Linhares, 2006; Lopes et al., 2012; Seidlde-Moura et al., 2008), studies of the interaction of mothers with very young children are focused on the maternal behaviors, and on the ways the adult alters her behavior and the surrounding physical environment to accommodate the demands and limitations of the child (Lordelo, Fonseca, & Araujo, 2000; Lyra, Silva & Silva, 2012). According to Lordelo et al. (2000), in a phase in which the child still has a limited motor repertoire and little communicative ability, it is necessary to delegate more responsibility to the adult and consider that the maternal role is a critical variable in the interactive process, which does not absolve the researcher from observing the role of child in the interaction or from acknowledging the possible participation of the child.

Based on the above, this study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the mother-child interaction and the neuropsychomotor development of children at one year of age, taking into consideration the maternal mental health. The intention was, therefore, to identify the role that maternal mental health plays in the interaction, especially regarding the common mental disorders, as well as the role of the child in the interaction. The following hypotheses were constructed: (a) in the dyadic interaction, mothers without common mental disorders emit more qualitatively positive behaviors (sensitivity, cognitive stimulation, positive affectivity) and less qualitatively negative behaviors (disengagement, coercion, and negative affectivity) than mothers that score positive for CMDs; (b) certain behaviors of the child are associated with certain behaviors of the mother; and (c) disengagement, intrusiveness, insensitivity, and poor maternal cognitive stimulation, as well as less involvement of the child in the interaction, would be configured as risk factors for the neuro-psychomotor development of the child.

Method

Cross-sectional study, conducted with children and their mothers, living in the catchment area of two family health strategy (FHS) units located in the peripheral areas of a medium-sized city in the state of Sao Paulo.

Participants

The dyads were selected from consulting the worksheets of the Community Health Agents (CHAs) of the Family Health Unit. All who met the following inclusion criterion were invited to take part in the study: child's age from 11 months and 20 days to 12 months and 20 days. Children with a biological risk mentioned by the mother in the interview, such as mental, motor, or sensory retardation, prematurity, severe neonatal complications, or a long period of hospitalization after birth were excluded. Of 129 dyads who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 20.9% moved to a different catchment area, and 29.4% refused to participate. The final sample consisted of 65 dyads, users of two FHS units.

Instruments

The Dyadic Interaction Assessment Protocol (Piccinini, Frizzo, & Marin, 2007) was prepared by the Nucleo de Infancia e Familia of GIDEP/UFRGS (Nudif), based on previous instruments by Cox and Ainsworth (Piccinini et al., 2007). The dyad is asked to play, as they do in everyday life. They are offered toys appropriate for the age and the aim is to evaluate the behavior of the child aged one year and its mother, in a moment of interaction of approximately seven minutes, as suggested by the evaluation instrument.

To evaluate the behavior of the caregiver six categories are used: sensitivity, cognitive stimulation, positive affectivity, negative affectivity, disengagement and intrusiveness. The following four categories are used to evaluate the behavior of the child: involvement, interaction, positive affectivity, negative affectivity. Each category has an average five subcategories.

To evaluate the degree to which the behaviors listed in the instrument were characteristic of the interaction observed in each episode, a model similar to a Likert scale was used, with five measurement points with weightings varying from 1 point for behaviors uncharacteristic of the interaction, up to 5 points for behaviors very characteristic of the interaction. The scores of all the subcategories of each category are added, providing a final score per category that can vary according to the number of subcategories.

Denver Developmental Screening Test II (Frankenburg & Dodds, 1967, translated and adapted by Pedromonico, Bragatto, & Strobiluis, 1999). Consists of a screening test for the monitoring of risk and evaluates the development of children, from one month to six years of age, in four general functions: Personal-Social, Language, Fine motor skills and Gross motor skills. The items are evaluated by the applier directly with the child and, in some cases, maternal information is requested.

For the final evaluation, an item is interpreted as "Caution" when the child fails or refuses to perform a task in which between 75-90% of the comparison sample present such behavior (indicated in the register) and "delayed" when the child fails or refuses to perform a task in which more than 90% of the children of the same age already present such behavior. The final interpretation of the test presents the indicators: Normal, when there is no "delay" items and, at the most, one "caution" item; Risk when there are two or more "caution" items and/or one or more "delay" items. The Denver II test has good validity and reliability (.99 interobserver and .90 test-retest). It is an easy to perform test and can be applied by various healthcare professionals (Silva et al., 2011).

Self Report Questionnaire-20--SRQ-20. Developed by Harding et al. (1980) and validated in Brazil by Mari and Williams (1986). This is a questionnaire to screen for psychiatric disorders at the primary health care level. It is composed of 20 questions with dichotomous responses (yes or no), classified in groups of physical symptoms and psycho-emotional disorders (decreased energy, depressed mood and depressive thinking), for the detection of neurotic based common mental disorders. To determine the possibility of a common mental disorder, the cutoff score is eight. Its psychometric qualities are considered adequate: sensitivity between 63% and 90% and specificity between 44% and 95%, with it having been validated in Brazil. The internal consistency index, in the Brazilian version, was 0.86 (Goncalves, Stein, & Kapczinski, 2008).

Interview for the Identification of Risk and Biopsychosocial Resources in the Life History of the Child. The script, based on the work of Santa Maria-Mengel and Linhares (2007), was used to characterize the sample in relation to socioeconomic level, environmental/social conditions, pregnancy and child birth conditions, and childcare.

Procedure

Data collection. After selection of the dyads, the mothers were invited to participate and, if they accepted, they signed the Terms of Free Prior and Informed Consent. In a room that offered them privacy, within the unit itself, the researcher individually applied the Self Report Questionnaire-20 and the Interview Script for the Identification of Risk and Biopsychosocial Resources in the Life History of the Child with the child present. In the same place, in a second step, the neuro-psychomotor development of the child was evaluated by the researcher, using the Denver II test.

In a third step, the dyad was sent to a room of the health unit, containing a table, two chairs and a free space so that the mother and child could move about, and the recording of the episode for free play was initiated. Each interactive episode lasted for approximately seven minutes. The evaluation of the dyadic interaction was videotaped. All the instruments were applied in a single session lasting approximately 60 minutes.

Data analysis. The Denver Screening Test and Self Report Questionnaire-20 were scored and analyzed according to their respective standards. The interactive episodes of the dyad were analyzed as a whole, according to the proposal of the authors, by two independent observers. Of the total observations, 20% were drawn and evaluated using the Kendall index (SPSS, 1997) for each category of parental and child behavior. As the index was greater than. 80 for the majority of the categories, except positive affectivity of the child and disengagement of the mother, it was considered that there was good concordance between the observers. After establishing all the indices of concordance, the principal researcher analyzed the other videos, in full, attributing the final score.

At first, a descriptive analysis was carried out based on the calculation of frequency, percentage or median, according to the nature of the data. For the analysis of the interactive character between the behaviors of the mother and the behaviors of the child the Spearman correlation test was used. Next, inferential statistical analysis was performed: the Mann-Whitney test was used to compare differences between two independent groups and the Kruskal-Wallis test to compare differences between more than two independent groups. The interactive behaviors of the mother and child that presented statistically significant differences between children with normal overall development and those with developmental risk were included in multivariate logistic regression model, aiming to identify the best predictive model for child development. The results were discussed at the 5% level of significance.

Ethical Considerations

The study received approval from the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu--UNESP (Protocol No. 2709/08), as well as from the Municipal Health Secretariat of the municipality and from those responsible for the respective Family Health units. The mothers with mental health problems were referred for care in the health unit itself, and the children referred to the child development outpatient clinic of the Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu--UNESP.

Results

Of the 65 children studied, 50.7% were female. All were born full term, with 80.0% being via normal birth. A total of 89.2% were breastfed and the median duration of weaning was 8.5 months. According to the maternal reports, the majority of the children slept normally and feed well, however, 66.1% were described as "nervous", "agitated" or "obstinate". A third of the mothers reported difficulties in caring for their children, mainly due to being occupied with the household chores. Despite this, the majority (86%) of the mothers reported that had support in caring for the child.

The majority of the parents were young adults, aged between 20 and 30 years, and more than half had eight or more years of study. The majority of the mothers were housewives (80.0%) and 95.3% of the fathers were employed, of which 36.9% had skilled occupations. A total of 87.0% of the families lived in consensual unions. The median family income in minimum wages was 1.64 (Min. = 0.21; Max. = 4.3 minimum wages).

In relation to the evaluation of the development, 43.1% of the children presented overall developmental risk, with the language (24.6%) and fine motor skills (20.0%) areas the most affected. A small percentage of the children (6.1%) presented delay in the personal-social domain, while the gross motor skills area showed 100% normality. Regarding mental health, 44.6% of the mothers presented scores indicative of common mental disorders.

Considering the interactive behaviors, there were high scores in sensitivity (Mdn = 24; Max = 35; and Min = 06), cognitive stimulation (Mdn = 17; Max = 35; and Min = 7), maternal positive affectivity (Mdn = 15; Max=29; and Min = 8) and involvement of the child (Mdn = 16; Max=20; and Min = 5). The indices of negative affectivity, maternal disengagement and intrusiveness, and child negative affectivity were low with medians ranging between 5.0 and 7.0.

No statistically significant differences were observed with respect to the behaviors of mother and child in the interaction of dyads whose mothers scored for common mental disorder and those who did not. As indicated in Table 1, there were statistically significant correlations between the behaviors of the mother and of the child in the interactive situation. The sensitivity, cognitive stimulation and maternal positive affectivity categories were positively correlated with involvement, interaction and positive affectivity and inversely correlated with negative affectivity of the child. Maternal disengagement was negatively correlated with involvement, interaction and positive affectivity of the child and positively with negative affectivity of the child. The negative affectivity and maternal intrusiveness also showed significant correlations with negative affectivity of the child.

Comparing the medians of the interactive behaviors of the children that presented normal development and those at risk, it was found that the mothers whose children had developmental risk presented higher medians in the disengagement and intrusiveness variables. Conversely, the mothers of children with normal development presented a higher median in the cognitive stimulation variable that the mothers of children at risk. The children with normal development also presented a higher median in the involvement variable than the children at risk (Table 2).

Statistically significant differences in maternal behaviors were observed between the different groups regarding the risk in two subareas of the development: language, and fine motor skills. The group of mothers whose children presented delay or caution profiles in language development presented a lower median in cognitive stimulation and a higher median in disengagement. With respect to the fine motor skills subarea, the mothers whose children presented delay or caution in this had lower medians in sensitivity and cognitive stimulation and higher medians in disengagement and intrusiveness, when compared to the mothers of children with normal development (Table 3).

The interactive behaviors that presented significant differences between the children with normal overall development and those at risk, i.e., involvement, cognitive stimulation, disengagement and intrusiveness, as described in Table 2, were included in the multivariate logistic regression model. Only cognitive stimulation remained as a risk factor for overall development (OR = 3.83; 95% CI = .82 to .98) that is, children who had mothers that provided less cognitive stimulation were 3.83 times more likely to have a developmental delay.

Discussion

Qualitatively positive interactive behaviors (Klein & Linhares, 2006) predominated in the episodes, such as sensitivity, cognitive stimulation, positive affectivity, with low intrusiveness and disengagement on behalf of the mother and little negative affectivity on behalf of both. Confirming the initial hypothesis, positive correlations were observed between the behaviors of the mother and child, suggesting reciprocal relationships of mutuality present in the early social development (Klein & Linhares, 2006; Seidl-de-Moura et al., 2008). The children more involved in the interaction, who demonstrated affectivity in a positive way, with smiles, enthusiasm, physical demonstrations of affectivity and few episodes of negative affectivity had mothers who were more sensitive, stimulating and positively affective. In contrast, the mothers that were more unengaged had children that interacted less and were less involved and that presented fewer positive and more negative affective behaviors.

The prevalence of symptomatology for common mental disorders, in this sample, was higher than in other Brazilian studies (Lima et al., 2008; Maragno et al., 2006), possibly because the sample was composed exclusively by women, living in poor areas. Lima et al. (2008) and Maragno et al. (2006) found a significant association between CMDs and social disadvantage and the female gender. Having young children who are beginning to become independent has also been implicated as a risk factor for mental disorders due to creating additional challenges for the parents, requiring protection and demanding care (Araujo, Pinho, & Almeida, 2005; Lovejoy et al., 2000).

Although the literature associates maternal mental health problems, especially chronic maternal depression (Lovejoy et al., 2000; L. Murray et al., 2010; Parsons et al., 2012), with impairments in the mother-child interaction, contrary to the initial hypothesis, the CMD was not associated with significant impairments in the interaction. Some hypotheses may explain these results. Firstly, the common mental disorder was investigated using a screening instrument, being a less severe condition than depression. Chabrol, Bron and Le Camus (1996) also found that moderately depressed mothers presented positive interactions with their children. Furthermore, the SRQ-20 assesses not only depressive symptoms, but a variety of anxiety and somatoform symptoms, of which associations with the interaction and child development have been little investigated (Correia & Linhares, 2007).

Consideration must be given to the fact that the majority of the mothers, despite living in poor neighborhoods, had more than eight years of study, a steady partner with employment, and a social support network. Education and social support are factors that are strongly associated with the degree of maternal sensitivity in the interaction (Shin et al., 2008). Fonseca, Silva and Otta (2010) found that when the mother had social support and emotional availability, the depressive symptoms did not interfere in the quality of the mother-infant interaction. Frizzo and Piccinini (2007), observing triadic interactions in families with and without maternal depression, found that they were not dysfunctional, possibly because the father was present and because the mothers concerned about a possible negative impact of their depression on their children, struggled to not impair the interaction, despite the suffering associated with depression.

The relationship between mental health and interaction, especially regarding the conditions at subclinical levels, still needs to be further investigated (Lovejoy et al., 2000; Parsons et al., 2012.; Tran et al., 2014). In this study, according to the initial hypothesis, the quality of the interaction was significantly related to the development of the child. Mothers of children with increased developmental risk offered less cognitive stimulation in the interactive situation, were more intrusive and unengaged and, therefore, less responsive when compared with mothers of children with normal development. The children with normal development, in turn, were more involved in the interaction.

Maternal responsiveness not only affected the overall development, but had a role in the following specific areas: language and fine motor skills. Other studies have shown that maternal responsiveness is associated with good coordination and fine motor skills (Amorim et al., 2009; Baltieri et al., 2010), is a strong predictor of receptive and expressive language (A. Murray & Yingling, 2000) and the acquisition of social skills (Assel et al., 2002), and facilitates the formation of secure attachments (A. Murray & Yingling, 2000; Wan & Green, 2009).

Conversely, the mothers of children at developmental risk were more intrusive, monitoring step by step what the child did, with unnecessary interventions, comments or frequent reprimands. Possibly, by acting this way they decreased the opportunities for exploratory behavior, inhibited experimentation and prevented the child from learning from its mistakes, which would explain the developmental impairment (Adam, Gunnar, & Tanaka, 2004).

The mothers of children with developmental risk and impairments in fine motor skills also showed low sensitivity during the interaction. In the study by Fonseca et al. (2010), high sensitivity of the mother was associated with the ability to interpret the baby and to make assumptions about their states, providing more individualized interventions and better conditions for development. Conversely, in situations where there were no adequate conditions for the caregiver to observe the subtle changes of motor behavior of the child, the children had delayed motor development (Baltieri et al., 2010).

With respect to the behavior of the children, those with normal development were more actively involved in the interactive episode, maintaining eye contact, exploring the environment, experimenting with new skills, and responding to the majority of the activities proposed by the mother. The children at risk were less involved and required the mother less. These data confirm the premise that from very early in life the child has an active role in its own acquisitions. If, in the initial interactions, the mother acts as facilitator for a significant number of developmental aspects of the child, the involvement of the child will elicit responsiveness and care from the agents with whom it interacts, allowing the caregiver to regulate her mediation and providing an environment favorable for the development (Cunha, Enumo, & Canal, 2006; Shin et al., 2008).

Among all the interactive behaviors, low maternal cognitive stimulation was the only predictor for developmental risk. Piccinini et al. (2007) observed that mothers who stimulated adequately, taking advantage of the day-to-day experiences, facilitated the children's learning of skills, through their role of mediator in promoting the cognitive development of the child, helping the child to achieve desirable performance in a task that it alone would not be able to successfully perform.

According to the Theory of Structural Cognitive Modifiability, when the mother serves as an interpreter for the environmental stimulation, she makes it meaningful and relevant to the child, providing a mediated learning experience, which, in studies with older children, promoted the enrichment of the adaptive behavior repertoire, helping the child to cope efficiently with the tasks or problems of the moment, as well as future activities. It is an interactive process, in which intentionality and reciprocity between partners ate indispensable (Farias, Maranhao, & Cunha, 2008). It can be assumed that in the present study, there was intentionality when the mother focused the attention of the child on the unique attributes and perceptual qualities of objects (color, how they move, etc.) and presented activities in an organized sequence of steps. Reciprocity can be inferred from the high correlation between the behaviors of the mother and child in the interactive situation, allowing the mother to regulate her mediation from the behavior of the child in response to the presented stimulus (Cunha et al., 2006).

Conclusion

Some methodological considerations and limitations of the present study should be mentioned. First, the high percentage of children presenting developmental risk may have been influenced by the detection of false-positive cases, since the children were tested only once, by a stranger, with a screening instrument, when they were passing through the critical phase of attachment. Furthermore, due to the difficulty of interacting with strangers in this phase, the verbal performance was not observed directly, but judged from the account of the mother, which may have underestimated the communicative repertoire of the child.

The Dyadic Interaction Assessment Protocol instrument used to assess the interactions from targeted categories for the more global aspects of the interaction, showed good concordance among the observers, particularly regarding the responsiveness. However, positive affectivity of the child and disengagement of the mother, which obtained rates below .80, need to be redefined. Since the instrument also considers the child's behavior, it allows for the active role of the child in this interaction and in its own development to be observed.

This study contributes to the comprehension of the mother-child interaction, from the beginning of life, as a process of exchange between the two agents. The results obtained support the direct relationship between the development of the child and the quality of the interaction. Children presenting developmental risk were less involved in the ludic situation and the mothers that, in turn, failed in their mediation function, were less responsive and provided less cognitive stimulation for the child. The data indicate the need to intervene in the mother/child relationship in order to avoid possible delays in child development.

doi: 10.1590/1982-43272459201407

Received: Oct. 28, 2013

1st Revision: Apr. 9, 2014

2nd Revision: July 2, 2014

Approved: July 17, 2014

References

Adam, E. K., Gunnar, M. R., & Tanaka, A. (2004). Adult attachment, parent emotion, and observed parenting behavior: Mediator and moderator models. Child Development, 75(1), 110-122. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00657.x

Amorim, R. C. A., Laurentino, G. E. C., Barros, K. M. F. T., Ferreira, A. L. P. R., Moura Filho, A. G., & Raposo, M. C. F. (2009). Programa de saude da familia: Proposta para identificacao de fatores de risco para o desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor. Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia, 13(6), 506-513. doi:10.1590/S1413-35552009005000065

Araujo, T. M., Pinho, P. S., & Almeida, M. M. G. (2005). Prevalencia de transtornos mentais comuns em mulheres e sua relacao com as caracteristicas sociodemograficas e o trabalho domestico. Revista Brasileira de Saude Materno Infantil, 5(3), 337-348.

Assel, M. A., Landry, S. H., Swank, P. R., Steelman, L., Miller-Loncar, C., & Smith, K. E. (2002). How do mothers'childrearing histories, stress and parenting affect children's behavioral outcomes? Child: Care, Health and Development, 28(5), 359-368. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2214.2002.00285.x

Baltieri, L., Santos, D. C. C., Gibim, N. C., Souza, C. T., Batistela, A. C. T., & Tolocka, R. E. (2010). Desempenho motor de lactentes frequentadores de bercarios em creches publicas. Revista Paulista de Pediatria, 28(3), 283-289. doi:10.1590/S0103-05822010000300005

Chabrol, H., Bron, N., & Le Camus, J. (1996). Mother-infant and father-infant interactions in postpartum depression. Infant Behavior & Development, 19(1), 149-152. doi:10.1016/S0163-6383(96)90053-3

Correia, L. L., & Linhares, M. B. M. (2007). Ansiedade materna nos periodos pre e pos-natal: Revisao da literatura. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 15(4), 677-683. doi:10.1590/S0104-11692007000400024

Cunha, A. C. B., Enumo, S. R. F., & Canal, C. P. P. (2006). Scale operationalization for analysis of maternal mediation patterns: A study with mother-child with visual impairment dyads. Revista Brasileira de Educacao Especial, 12(3), 393-412. doi:10.1590/S1413-65382006000300007

Engle, P. L. (2009). Maternal mental health: Program and policy implications. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 89(3), 963S-966S. doi:10.3945/ajcn.2008.26692G

Farias, I. M., Maranhao, R. V A., & Cunha, A. C. B. (2008). Interacao professor-aluno com autismo no contexto da educacao inclusiva: Analise do padrao de mediacao do professor com base na teoria da Experiencia de Aprendizagem Mediada (Mediated Learning Experience Theory). Revista Brasileira de Educacao Especial, 14(3), 365-384. doi:10.1590/S1413-65382008000300004

Feldman, R., & Klein, P. S. (2003). Toddlers' self-regulated compliance to mothers, caregivers, and fathers: Implications for theories of socialization. Developmental Psychology, 39(4), 680-692. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.39.4.680

Field, T. (2010). Postpartum depression effects on early interactions, parenting, and safety practices: A review. Infant Behavior & Development, 33(1), 1-6. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2009.10.005

Fonseca, V R. J. R. M., Silva, G. A., & Otta, E. (2010). Relacao entre depressao pos-parto e disponibilidade emocional materna. Cadernos de Saude Publica, 26(4), 738-746. doi:10.1590/S0102-311X2010000400016

Frankenburg, W. K., & Dodds, J. B. (1967). The Denver developmental screening test. The Journal of Pediatrics, 71(2), 181-191. doi:10.1016/S0022-3476(67)80070-2

Frizzo, G. B., & Piccinini, C. A. (2007). Depressao materna e a interacao triadicapai-mae-bebe. Psicologia: Reflexao e Critica, 20(3), 351-360. doi:10.1590/S0102-79722007000300002

Glasheen, C., Richardson, G. A., & Fabio, A. (2010). A systematic review of the effects of postnatal maternal anxiety on children. Archives of Women's Mental Health, 13(1), 61-74. doi:10.1007/s00737-009-0109-y

Goncalves, D. M., Stein, A. T., & Kapczinski, F. (2008). Avaliacao de desempenho do Self-Reporting Questionnaire como instrumento de rastreamento psiquiatrico: Um estudo comparativo com o Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR. Cadernos de Saude Publica, 24(2), 380-390. doi:10.1590/S0102-311X2008000200017

Klein, V C., & Linhares, M. B. M. (2006). Prematuridade e interacao mae-crianca: Revisao sistematica da literatura. Psicologia em Estudo, 11(2), 277-284. doi:10.1590/S1413-73722006000200006

Lima, M. C. P., Menezes, P. R., Carandina, L., Cesar, C. L. G., Barros, M. B. A., & Goldbaum, M. (2008). Common mental disorders and the use of psychoactive drugs: The impact of socioeconomic conditions. Revista de Saude Publica, 42(4), 717-723.doi:10.1590/S0034-89102008005000034

Lopes, R. C. S., Vivian, A. G., Oliveira, D. S., Deluchi, M., Tudge, J., & Piccinini, C. A. (2012). Sentimentos maternos frente ao desenvolvimento da crianca entre 24 e 28 meses. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 29(Supl. 1), 737-749. doi:10.1590/S0103-166X2012000500010

Lordelo, E. R., Fonseca, A. L., & Araujo, M. L. V (2000). Responsividade do ambiente de desenvolvimento: Crencas e praticas como sistema cultural de criacao de filhos. Psicologia: Reflexao e Critica, 13(1), 73-80. doi:10.1590/S0102-79722000000100009

Lovejoy, M. C., Graczyk, P. A., O'Hare, E., & Neuman, G. (2000). Maternal depression and parenting behavior: A metaanalytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 20(5), 561-592. doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(98)00100-7

Lyra, M. C. D. P., Silva, E. C. C., & Silva, A. C. A. (2012). Padroes de organizacao do sistema de comunicacao mae-bebe nas interacoes face a face: Estudo de cinco diades. Estudos de Psicologia (Natal), 17(1), 63-71. doi:10.1590/S1413-294X2012000100008

Maragno, L., Goldbaum, M., Gianini, R. J., Novaes, H. M. D., & Cesar, C. L. G. (2006). Prevalencia de transtornos mentais comuns em populacoes atendidas pelo Programa Saude da Familia (QUALIS) no Municipio de Sao Paulo, Brasil. Cadernos de Saude Publica, 22(8), 1639-1648. doi:10.1590/S0102-311X2006000800012

Mari, J. J., & Williams, P. (1986). A validity study of a psychiatric screening questionnaire (SRQ-20) in primary care in the city of Sao Paulo. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 148(1), 23-26. doi:10.1192/bjp.148.1.23

Murray, A. D., & Ymgling, J. L. (2000). Competence in language at 24 months: Relations with attachment security and home stimulation. The Journal of Genetic Psychology: Research and Theory on Human Development, 161(2), 133-140. doi:10.1080/00221320009596700

Murray, L., Halligan, S., & Cooper, P. (2010).Effects of postnatal depression on mother-infant interactions and child development. In G. Bremner & T. D. Wachs (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of infant development (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 192-220). Chichester, England: Wiley.

Parsons, C. E., Young, K. S., Rochat, T. J., Kringelbach, M. L., & Stein, A. (2012). Postnatal depression and its effects on child development: A review of evidence from low- and middle-income countries. British Medical Bulletin, 101(1), 57-79. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldr047

Pedromonico, M. R. M., Bragatto, E. L., & Strobilus, R. (1999). Teste de Triagem Denver II. Sao Paulo, SP: UNIFESP. Piccinini, C. A., Frizzo, G. B., & Marin, A. H. (2007). Interacoes diadicas e triadicas em familias com criancas de um ano de idade. In C. A. Piccinini & M. L. S. Moura (Orgs.), Observando as interacoes pais-bebe-crianca: Diferentes abordagens teoricas e metodologicas (pp. 176-211). Sao Paulo, SP: Casa do Psicologo.

Pinheiro, D. P. N. (2004).A resiliencia em discussao. Psicologia em Estudo, 9(1), 67-75. doi:10.1590/S1413-73722004000100009

Ribeiro, A. M., Silva, R. R. F., & Puccini, R. F. (2010). Conhecimentos e praticas de profissionais sobre desenvolvimento da crianca na atencao basica a saude. Revista Paulista de Pediatria, 28(2), 208-214. doi:10.1590/S0103-05822010000200013

Santa Maria-Mengel, M. R. S., & Linhares, M. B. M. (2007). Risk factors for infant developmental problems. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 15, 837-842. doi:10.1590/S0104-11692007000700019

Seidl-de-Moura, M. L., Ribas, A. F. P., Seabra, K. C., Pessoa, L. F., Nogueira, S. E., Mendes, D. M. L. F.,... Vicente, C. C. (2008). Interacoes mae-bebe de um e cinco meses: Aspectos afetivos, complexidade e sistemas parentais predominantes. Psicologia: Reflexao e Critica, 21(1), 66-73. doi:10.1590/S0102-79722008000100009

Shin, H., Park, Y. J., Ryu, H., & Seomun, G. A. (2008).Maternal sensitivity: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 64(3), 304-314. doi:10.m1/j.1365-2648.2008.04814.x

Silva, N. D. S. H., Lamy Filho, F., Gama, M. E. A., Lamy, Z. C., Pinheiro, A. L., & Silva, D. N. (2011). Instrumentos de avaliacao do desenvolvimento infantil de recemnascidos prematuros. Revista Brasileira de Crescimento e Desenvolvimento Humano, 21(1), 85-98.

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). (1997). (Version 7.5) [Programa de Computador]. Chicago: SPSS Inc.

Stein, A., Malmberg, L. E., Sylva, K., Barnes, J., & Leach, P. (2008). The influence of maternal depression, caregiving, and socioeconomic status in the post-natal year on children's language development. Child: Care, Health and Development, 34(5), 603-612. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00837.x

Tran, T. D., Biggs, B.-A., Tran, T., Simpson, J. A., Mello, M. C., Hanieh, S., ... Fisher, J. (2014). Perinatal common mental disorders among women and the social and emotional development of their infants in rural

Vietnam. Journal of Affective Disorders, 160, 104-112. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2013.12.034

Wan, M. W., & Green, J. (2009). The impact of maternal psychopathology on child-mother attachment. Archives of Women's Mental Health, 12(3), 123-134. doi:10.1007/s00737-009-0066-5

Debora Gerardo Ribeiro (2)

Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio

de Mesquita Filho", Botucatu-SP Brazil

Gimol Benzaquen Perosa

Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio

de Mesquita Filho", Botucatu-SP, Brazil

Flavia Helena Pereira Padovani

Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio

de Mesquita Filho", Botucatu-SP, Brazil

(1) Support: Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES).

(2) Correspondence address: Debora Gerardo Ribeiro. Avenida Bandeirantes, 55, Centro. CEP 86360000. Bandeirantes-PR, Brazil. E-mail: deboragerardo@gmail.com

Debora Gerardo Ribeiro holds a master's degree in Public Health from the Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho".

Gimol Benzaquen Perosa is a Professor of the Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu at the Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho".

Flavia Helena Pereira Padovani is a Professor of the Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu at the Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho".
Table 1
Correlation Between Maternal and Child Behaviors
During the Dyadic Interaction

                                          Maternal Behaviors

                                  Sensiti-     Cognitive     Positive
Child Behaviors                     vity      Stimulation   Affectivity

Involvement            rho (a)       .65          .70           .49
                          P         .001         .000          .000
Interaction              rho         .39          .40           .32
                          P         .001         .001          .009
Positive Affectivity     rho         .36          .30           .37
                          P         .003         .015          .002
Negative Affectivity     rho        -.52         -.26          -.39
                          P         .001          .03          .001

                                  Maternal Behaviors

Child Behaviors         Negative     Disengagement   Intrusiveness
                       Affectivity

Involvement               -.10           -.66            -.05
                          .407           .000            .721
Interaction               -.04           -.50            -.19
                          .778           .000            .129
Positive Affectivity      -.12           -.42            -.01
                          .350           .001            .927
Negative Affectivity       .46            .34             .27
                          .000           .006            .029

Note. (a) Spearman's correlation.

p < .05

Table 2
Comparison of Maternal and Child Behaviors During the Dyadic
Interaction in Children That Presented (or Not) Overall
Developmental Delays

Behaviors in the Interaction                         Denver

Category                          Maximum            Normal
                               Possible Score   Mdn (a) (min (b)
                                                   -max (c))

Sensitivity                          35         26.0 (6.00-35.0)
Cognitive Stimulation                35         20.0 (8.00-35.0)
Positive Affectivity/Mother          25         17.0 (8.00-29.0)
Negative Affectivity/Mother          25         5.00 (5.00-19.0)
Disengagement                        20         4.00 (4.00-18.0)
Intrusiveness                        25         5.00 (5.00-15.0)
Involvement/Child                    20         18.0 (8.00-20.0)
Interaction                          25         12.0 (5.00-17.0)
Positive Affectivity/Child           20         10.0 (2.00-18.0)
Negative Affectivity/Child           25         5.00 (5.00-19.0)

Behaviors in the Interaction        Denver

Category                             Risk         P (d)
                                Mdn (min-max)

Sensitivity                    23.0 (11.0-35.0)    .36
Cognitive Stimulation          12.5 (7.00-34.0)   .001
Positive Affectivity/Mother    14.0 (8.00-22.0)    .23
Negative Affectivity/Mother    5.00 (5.00-8.00)    .10
Disengagement                  8.5 (4.00-19.0)     .01
Intrusiveness                  6.00 (5.00-24.0)    .03
Involvement/Child              13.5 (5.00-20.0)    .01
Interaction                    10.5 (10.0-17.0)    .41
Positive Affectivity/Child     9.5 (4.00-20.0)     .55
Negative Affectivity/Child     5.00 (5.00-15.0)    .78

Note. (a) Median; (b) Minimum value; (c) Maximum value;
(d) Mann-Whitney.

p [less than or equal to] .05

Table 3
Comparison of Maternal and Child Behaviors During the
Dyadic Interaction, in Children That Presented (or Not)
Developmental Delays in the Personal/Social, Language,
and Fine Motor Skills Areas

Denver II                  Sensitivity          Cognitive
                           Mdn (a) (min        Stimulation
Categories     Level       (b)-max (c))            Mdn
                                                (min-max)

Personal/     Normal     25.5 (7.0-35.0)     20.0 (7.0-34.0)
Social        Suspect    21.0 (6.0-35.0)     14.0 (7.0-35.0)
               Delay     27.5 (24.0-34.0)   15.0 (13.0-34.0)
             [p.sup.1]         .12                 .28

Language      Normal     24.0 (11.0-35.0)   21.5 (13.0-34.0)
              Suspect    24.0 (15.0-34.0)   17.0 (7.00-35.0)
               Delay     25.0 (6.00-35.0)   12.0 (7.00-33.0)
             [p.sup.1]         .07                 .01

Fine Motor    Normal     25.5 (6.00-35.0)   19.5 (7.00-35.0)
Skills         Delay     17.0 (11.0-31.0)   11.0 (7.00-27.0)
             [p.sup.1]         .04                .004

Denver II                    Positive           Negative
                           Affectivity         Affectivity
Categories     Level           Mdn                 Mdn
                            (min-max)           (min-max)

Personal/     Normal     16.0 (8.0-29.0)    5.00 (5.00-19.0)
Social        Suspect    15.0 (8.0-21.0)    5.00 (5.00-9.00)
               Delay     18.5 (14.0-22.0)   5.00 (5.00-5.00)
             [p.sup.1]         .43                 .54

Language      Normal     17.0 (8.00-29.0)   5.00 (5.00-8.00)
              Suspect    18.5 (12.0-32.0)   5.00 (5.00-8.00)
               Delay     11.0 (8.00-20.0)   5.00 (5.00-19.0)
             [p.sup.1]         .08                .422

Fine Motor    Normal     17.0 (8.00-29.0)   5.00 (5.00-8.00)
Skills         Delay     14.0 (9.00-21.0)   5.00 (5.00-19.00)
             [p.sup.1]         .12                 .40

Denver II                 Disengagement       Intrusiveness
                          Mdn (min-max)       Mdn (min-max)
Categories     Level

Personal/     Normal     6.00 (4.00-9.00)   6.50 (5.00-8.00)
Social        Suspect    7.00 (4.00-18.0)   8.00 (5.00-22.0)
               Delay     6.00 (4.00-19.0)   6.00 (5.00-24.0)
             [p.sup.1]         .52                 .54

Language      Normal     4.50 (4.00-18.0)   5.00 (5.00-14.0)
              Suspect    6.50 (4.00-9.00)   8.00 (5.00-18.0)
               Delay     10.0 (4.00-19.0)   6.00 (5.00-24.0)
             [p.sup.1]         .05                 .10

Fine Motor    Normal     6.0 (4.00-19.00)   5.00 (5.00-11.0)
Skills         Delay     9.00 (4.00-13.0)   6.00 (5.00-24.0)
             [p.sup.1]         .05                 .05

Note. (a) Median; (b) Minimum value; (c) Maximum value;
[p.sup.1] Kruskal Wallis; [p.sup.2] Mann-Whitney.

p [less than or equal to] .05
COPYRIGHT 2014 Universidade de Sao Paulo. Programa de Pos-graduacao em Psicologia
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2014 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:articulo en Ingles
Author:Ribeiro, Debora Gerardo; Perosa, Gimol Benzaquen; Padovani, Flavia Helena Pereira
Publication:Paideia (Ribeirao Preto)
Date:Sep 1, 2014
Words:6688
Previous Article:Self-regulated learning in students of pedagogy/Autorregulacao da aprendizagem em estudantes de pedagogia/La autorregulacion del aprendizaje en...
Next Article:Beliefs of mothers, nannies, grandmothers and daycare providers concerning childcare/Crencas de maes, avos, babas e educadoras sobre cuidado de...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters