Medical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia in the light of available evidence / Mevcut kanitlar isiginda benign prostat hiperplazisinin tibbi tedavisi.
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is an age-related androgen dependent progressive disease. It is associated with bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms which prove detrimental to the quality of life for both the effected men and their partners. With an aging population elderly people constituting greater proportion of population, the prevalence of BPH is on the rise with a significant impact on medical sector. Initial investigations using simple diagnostic tools can be offered to the patient suspected of having BPH as first diagnostic step in primary care setting and can help in minimizing the delay in diagnosis and management. Due to extensive work done recently in understanding the natural history of BPH and the knowledge of physiological effects of various medical interventions has greatly helped us in choosing therapeutic options for individualized treatment. This has resulted inconsiderable reduction in the rate of transurethral prostatectomy seen during the last couple of decades. Development of adrenoceptor blockade and hormonal manipulation has moved increasing number of men away from surgery towards pure medical management of BPH. We reviewed the current status of medical management in light of the evidence in support of each agent, and the correct selection of treatment.
Key words: Benign prostatic hyperplasia; bladder outlet obstruction; prostate.
Submitted (Gelis tarihi): 08.08.2010
Benign prostat hiperplazisi (BPH) yasla iliskili ve androjen bagimli ilerleyici bir hastaliktir. Hastalar ve esleri icin yasam kalitesinde bozulmalara yol actigi gosterilen rahatsiz edici alt uriner semptomlara neden olur. Ileri yastaki bireylerin toplumun cogunlugunu olusturdugu yaslanan bir topiumda, BPH prevelansi artmakta, bu da tip sektoru uzerinde onemli etkiler olusturmaktadir. Birinci basamakta BPH suphesi olan hastalarda ilk degerlendirme basit tanisal yontemler ile yapilarak tani ve tedavide gecikme en aza indirilebilir. BPH'nin dogasina yonelik son yillarda yapilan yogun calismalara bagli olarak, cesitli tibbi tedavilerin fizyolojik etkileri uzerine elde edilen bilgiler, bireysellestirilmis tedavi uygulamalarinin seciminde buyuk olcude yardimci olmaktadir. Bu durum gectigimiz birkac on yilda transuretral prostatektomi oranin yadsinamaz dususe neden olmustur. Adrenoreseptor biokaji ve hormonal tedavilerin gelismesi ile artan sayida hasta cerrahi yerine sadece tibbi yaklasimla tedavi edilmektedir. Her ajan icin mevcut kanitiar isiginda benign prostat hyperplazisinin tibbi tedavisinin guncel durumunu ve dogru tedavi secim yaklasimlarini gozden gecirdik.
Anahtar sozcukler: Benign prostat hiperplazisi; mesane cikim obstruksiyonu; prostat.
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is an age-related, androgen dependent progressive disease with an increasing incidence within an aging population (occurring in 70% of men older than 60 years). (1) The term BPH actually refers to a histological condition characterized by stromal-glandular hyperplasia within the prostate gland (2) and when it is associated with bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) it attains clinical relevance. These LUTS (Table 1) prove detrimental to the quality of life for both the effected men and their partners. (3), (4) Beyond symptomatology, health and economic implications of BPH are indisputable. However, the relationship between BPH and LUTS is very complex. Not all men with histological BPH will develop significant LUTS while LUTS can be present in patients without BPH. Benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) is a related entity but different from BPH. Not all men with histological BPH develop BPE; neither do all men with LUTS have concomitant BPE. Similarly, not all men with BPE will have bothersome LUTS. (2) Bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) results from pressure gradient at the bladder neck/prostatic urethra. BOO may cause compression of urethra leading to compromised urine flow and subsequent back flow changes in upper urinary tract with renal failure. Men with BPH/BPE and LUTS do not necessarily have BOO; meanwhile there can be causes of bladder outlet obstruction other than BPH/BPE, though these are commoner. It is important to remember when treating patients with LUTS or BOO, to exclude other conditions (Table 2) before initiating treatment for BPH. The prevalence of LUTS varies with age, in European countries it ranges from 14% for men in fourth decade of life to greater than 40% for men in their sixth decade. (5) There is little cultural variation seen in prevalence of LUTS in these countries. Furthermore, with an ageing population and elderly people constituting greater proportion of population the prevalence of BPH is on the rise with a significant impact on medical sector. In clinical practice LUTS are the common determinants in diagnosis of BPH. There are simple yet effective investigations, which can accurately diagnose LUTS because of BPH. According to European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines, evaluation in men with LUTS suggestive of bladder obstruction should initially include conducting a physical examination, creatinine measurement, urinalysis, flow rates, measurement of post void residual urine (PVRU) and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) in addition to clinical history using a validated questionnaire to assess symptoms. (6) American Urological Association (AUA) does not include measurement of creatinine, PVRU or flow rates in initial evaluation. (7) High correlation between diagnosis based on medical history, serum PSA, digital rectal examination (DRE) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and those based on various investigations including ultrasonography and uroflowmetry has been demonstrated. (8) Initial investigations using simple diagnostic tools can be offered to the patient suspected of having BPH as first diagnostic step in primary care setting and can help in minimizing the delay in diagnosis and management with appropriate referral for specialized care. (8) Extensive work done recently has helped us to better understand the natural history of BPH. The knowledge of physiological effects of various medical interventions guides us in choosing therapeutic options for individualized treatment in each clinical setting. Rate of transurethral prostatectomy has considerably reduced from the level reported by American national survey of urologists in 1989, facilitated largely by the development of non operative management of BPH. (9), (10) Development of adrenoceptor blockade and hormonal manipulation has moved increasing number of men away from surgery and towards pure medical management of BPH. We analyse the current status of medical management in light of the evidence in support of each agent, and the correct selection of treatment.
Table 1. Lower urinary tract symptoms Obstructive Symptoms Irritative Symptoms Hesitancy Frequency Straining Nocturia Weak stream Urgency Narrow stream Urge incontinence Terminal dribbling Small voided urine volume Prolonged voiding Overflow incontinence Suprapubic pressure/pain Initial hematuria Table 2. Differential diagnosis of benign prostate hyperplasia Symptoms Conditions Frequency, Diabetes mellitus normal urine flow and volume Irritative Cystitis (infectious, radiation, voiding interstitial) symptoms Bladder cancer (adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, transitional cell carcinoma, carcinoma in situ) Bladder stone Irritative and Prostatitis (acute, subacute, obstructive chronic) voiding symptoms Large bladder diverticulum Neurological conditions (congenital spina bifida, myelomeningocele, spinal cord injury, multiple cerebrovascular accidents, followig radical pelvic surgery) History of ingestion of medicine (nticholinergic, antidepressants, tranquilisers, decongestants) Obstructive Prostate cancer voiding symptoms Urethral stricture (post-instrumentation: catheterization/cystoscopy, post infection: non-specific/gonococcal) Bladder neck stricture or contracture
BPH: natural history and progression
Progression according to expert review of evidence is defined as worsening of symptoms, increase in prostate volume (PV), deterioration of urinary flow rate, acute urinary retention and need for surgery either for symptoms or acute urinary retention (AUR). (11) Although rarely encountered, renal insufficiency and recurrent urinary tract infection have been included as additional events as measure of BPH progression in clinical trials. (12) Most of the clinical evidence on natural history and progression of BPH we have is from placebo arms of clinical trials. Until recently we had little data about natural history of BPH defined by urodynamic criteria of bladder outlet obstruction. Thomas et al. (13) reported little urodynamic or symptomatic deterioration in men who initially opted for no treatment. In that series, 83% men did not need treatment after a minimum of 10 years follow up after urodynamic diagnosis of obstructive BPH. (13)
Olmsted County study, a large longitudinal study conducted in USA on a sample of 2,115 men aged 40-79 years reported a [greater than or equal to]3-point increase in AUA symptom index (AUA-S1) in 31% of participants at 92 months follow-up. (14) The mean annual increase in the AUA-SI was 0.34 points. (14) The AUA-SI is identical to the seven symptom questions of the IPSS. The Medical Therapy of Prostate Symptoms (MTOPS) study allowed placebo observation of 737 men. (12) Clinical progression of BPH in the placebo arm was defined as an increase in AUA-SI of [greater than or equal to]4 points, AUR, urinary incontinence, recurrent urinary tract infection or renal insufficiency. The rate of overall clinical progression in MTOPS study over a period of 4.5 years was 17.4%. (12) Deterioration of symptoms was the most common (78%) of progression event seen in the study. (12) In comparison, AUR (12%) and invasive treatment due to BPH (5%) were less common but none the less important in view of their financial and emotional consequences.
Relationship between age and markers of progression of BPH has been demonstrated by several studies. In one study, 0.1% of men aged 40-49 years required prostatectomy in contrast to 9.5% of men in eighth decade. (15) In Olmsted County study the percentage of men with moderate to severe urinary symptoms increased from 13% in men aged 40-49 to 28% in men aged >70 years. (16) Similar increase in symptom severity has been observed in Asian men as well. The incidence of AUR in Olmsted County study in those with moderate to severe LUTS increased from 3.0/1,000 person years in those aged 40-49 years to 34.7/1,000 person years in those aged 70-79 years. (16) The overall risk of AUR was estimated to be 23% for an average 60 year old man if he survives for another 20 years. (16) In a recent study on 1,859 men with symptomatic BPH, PV was shown to increase with age from a mean of 27.7 mL in men aged 40-49 years to 52.3 mL in those aged 70-80 years. (17) Men with PV of [greater than or equal to]30 mL are more likely to suffer moderate to severe symptoms, decreased flow rates and AUR compared to men with PV <30 mL. (18) Enlarged prostate also predicts the need for BPH related surgery but PV is underestimated by DRE by as much as 55%. (19) Transabdomenal ultrasound can assess PV but with limitations in imaging prostate compared to the more invasive transrectal ultrasound. (20) Proscar Longterm Efficacy and Safety Study (PLESS) was placebo controlled observation of 1,500 men with BPH. Data from the placebo arm of PLESS has demonstrated PSA to be a strong predictor of enlarged prostate or the one likely to increase, as well as the risk of developing LUTS, poor urinary flow, AUR and BPH related surgery. (21) Relationship between PSA and prostate growth may show individual variation. (17), (22) Data from PLESS showed PSA threshold for detecting PV [greater than or equal to]30 mL as [greater than or equal to]1.3 ng/mL, [greater than or equal to]1.5 ng/mL, and [greater than or equal to]1.7 ng/mL in men with BPH aged 50-59, 60-69 and 70-79 years respectively. (23) Study on Dutch patients showed 89% of the patients with PSA [greater than or equal to]1.5 ng/mL had a PV >30 mL. (17) Correlation between serum PSA and PV is also seen in Asian men. (24), (25) Analysis of data suggest that PSA can be used to estimate degree of prostatic enlargement and it showed a sensitivity in predicting prognosis of BPH comparable to the five variable model (comprising of serum PSA, symptoms, peak flow rate, urinary frequency and hesitancy). (26) For this reason, current EAU guidelines use PSA instead of PV in evaluation of risk of developing AUR or requiring surgery in management of BPH. (6) Serum PSA has the advantage of being easily measured and helps in identification of those men most likely to suffer disease progression in BPH. Recently, symptom score and PVR volume worsening have been shown to be good predictors of AUR in men with LUTS suggestive of BPH. (27)
Inflammatory infilterate within prostate biopsies is another variable predictive of poor outcome. Progression increased from 13% to 21% and incidence of AUR increased from 0 to 5.6% in those with inflammatory infilterate. (12)
In a study to evaluate alfuzosin in real life setting with no IPSS or peak flow restriction, history of an episode of urinary retention managed non-operatively was by far the most powerful predictor for future retention. (28) An IPSS bother score of > 3 and deterioration while on treatment further increased the risk of AUR. (28)
In the UK and USA, AUR resulted in prostatectomy in 24-42% of men and those patients who avoided surgery through a successful trial without catheter are still at a higher risk of requiring surgery within a year. (29) Furthermore, in the Veteran Affairs study in USA, 36% of men with BPH randomized to watchful waiting required invasive therapy within 5 years of enrolment. (30)
As has been previously mentioned BPH progression can take a variety of forms. LUTS is the most common complaint but patient surveys suggest that risk of surgery is a far greater concern for patients than factors such as symptoms or quality of life. (31), (32) In a study, men treated with finasteride, 88% respondents rated reducing the risk of major urological complications as very or extremely important and 93% regarded reducing the need for surgery as very or extremely important. (32) In a survey of men with BPH in European Countries (PROBE), 58% of patients were concerned about risk of developing AUR 56% of requiring prostate related surgery. (33) Reducing the risk of surgery by half was considered more important outcome of drug treatment than rapid symptom relief by more than three quarter of the men in this study.
Over the past decade, medical therapy has become the most frequently used treatment option for management of symptoms associated with BPH with a decline in popularity of surgery. Moreover, patients with mild to moderate symptoms can be managed primarily in primary case setting with referral to urologist required for evaluation and management of complicated cases.
BPH causes obstruction due to a dynamic component of stromal mesenchyme (mainly smooth muscle) and a static component of epithelial glandular tissue. (34) Smooth muscle cells comprise about 40% of the total prostate volume. (35) The adrenoceptors are found in high concentration with in the dynamic component of the prostate gland and influence the resting tone of the smooth muscle with in the prostate and bladder neck. (36) Since the first reports of alpha adrenoceptor influence on benign prostatic obstruction in 1970 based on the non specific a blockade of phenoxybenzamine, (37) much research has allowed description of four subtypes of [[alpha].sub.1] adrenoceptors with highest affinity for prostate stromal tissue in the [[alpha].sub.1A] receptor. (38) The alpha blockers work by inhibiting [[alpha].sub.1] mediated sympathetic stimulation and thereby promote relaxation of bladder neck and prostatic smooth muscle. These also act on bladder and central nervous system. (39) Alpha-blockers as a treatment option are included in EUA guidelines in case of BPH with bothersome LUTS with no absolute indication for surgery. Alpha-blockers have a rapid onset of action with a 30-45% improvement in symptom scores after 3-month treatment. (40) However, the overall long-term risk of AUR or BPH related surgery is not reduced after treatment with alpha-blockers. (12), (41) There are certain collateral benefits of adrenoceptor antagonism such as lowering blood pressure and lipid profile and enhancing erectile function. (42-44)
Terazosin is selective for [[alpha].sub.1] receptors, has no specificity for any 4 subtypes. (45) It shows durable efficacy compared to placebo. (46) Tachyphylaxis is not seen with this drug and it is probably due to stromal apoptotic effect or more central mediated effects. (47), (48) Doxazocin has similar profile as terazosin, (49) a 45% reduction in the risk of symptom progression (defined as four point increase in AUA-SI) was noted with doxazosin as compared to placebo in MTOPS study. (12) Symptom relief and improvement in urinary flow rates occur irrespective of prostate volume. (50) Doxazosin delayed the time to AUR in the MTOPS study, but the cumulative incidence at 4 years remained similar to placebo, nor did it significantly reduce the incidence of invasive therapy. (12) Alfuzosin also is not a sub selective agent. (51) In Alfuzosin Long Term Efficacy and Safety Study (ALTESS) study over 1,500 men were randomized to placebo or treatment with 10 mg alfuzosin once daily and analysis done after 2 years. (41) There was reduction in symptom deterioration (IPSS points [greater than or equal to] 4) from 16.8 % to 11.7%, but alfuzosin too did not reduce the risk of AUR as compared to placebo (2.1 % vs. 1.8%). (41) A lower incidence of BPH related surgery was seen in alfuzosin arm compared to placebo but it was statistically not significant (6.5% vs. 5.1%, p=0.18). (41) These observations can be due to the fact that alpha blockers have no significant effect on PV. Indeed in MTOPS study there was a 24% increase in PV after follow-up of 4.5 years in patients receiving doxazosin which was similar to that seen in placebo group. (12) ALTESS is a relatively young study and long-term studies need to be done to confer the effects of alfuzosin on BPH progression over a longer period of time. There is evidence to suggest that men not responding to alfuzosin treatment (IPSS stable or worsening, and bother score >3 under treatment) are at a greater risk of AUR or BPH related surgery. (27) Alfuzosin can thus be tried as a first line treatment and help in selecting patients at high risk of BPH progression and optimizing management. Alfuzosin for Acute Urinary Retention study for men with acute urinary retention undergoing trial without catheter examined 360 men with first episode of spontaneous AUR randomized to placebo or alfuzosin 10 mg once daily. (52) Successful trial without catheter was observed in 61.9% of men receiving alfuzosin versus 47.9% receiving placebo (p=0.012). (52) Sustained treatment over 6 month period resulted in reduction in BPH related surgery from 24.1% to 17.1%. (53) A residual volume of >1 L and age >65 years increased the risk of failed trial without catheter. (52) No other alpha-blocker had shown any effect in the setting of AUR. Tamsulosin currently is the only [[alpha].sub.1A] selective adrenoceptor antagonist available. (54), (55) Since tamsulosin reached the market in 1995 its efficacy in improving symptoms and urodynamic parameters has been demonstrated by several trials. (56-58) Side effects like dizziness and postural hypotension are observed with alpha blockers, with alfuzosin and tamsulosin better tolerated than terazosin and doxazosin. (40) Overall incidence of treatment discontinuation due to adverse effects was low and comparable to placebo. The vascular mediated side effects can be minimized by new gastrointestinal therapeutic system and makes dose titration unnecessary. (59) A higher incidence of abnormal ejaculation compared to placebo has been seen with tamsulosin. (57), (60), (61)
5[alpha] reductase inhibitor
Epithelial component of prostate depends on androgen stimulation for growth. Intracellular conversion of testosterone to much more active dihydrotestosterone (DHT) is catalyzed by Sex reductase. (62) Research into this enzyme as a therapeutic target was led by the observation in 1974 that men deficient in Sex reductase had hypoplastic prostate gland. (63), (64) Finasteride was first described to reduce DHT levels in canine prostate in 1986 and has since become an established 5a reductase inhibitor (5ARI) in clinical use. (65) The two forms of 5ARI, type I and type II are encoded by different genes located on chromosome 5 and 2, respectively. (66) Distribution of each enzyme differs, type II is found in prostatic tissue exclusively, whereas type I is also present in skin, liver and other organs. (67) Selective type II Si reductase inhibition by finasteride can only reduce circulating DHT levels to 20-40% of norrnal. (68) The search for an alternative to finasteride lead to the production of combined type I and type II SARI dutasteride. Therefore, dutasteride treatment results in a greater degree and consistency of DHT suppression compared to finasteride. (69), (70) In a study of men with BPH, mean decrease in DHT was 94.7% with 0.5 mg dutasteride as compared to 70.8% suppression observed with 5 mg finasteride (p<0.001). (69) Current EUA guidelines recommend SARI for the treatment of bothersome LUTS in men with a PV >30-40 mL with no absolute indications for surgery. (6) Others include PSA [greater than or equal to] 1.5 ng/mL in addition to PV >30 mL as indication for use of SARI as first line treatment. (71) Significant improvement in symptom scores (2.6 vs. 1.0 points) was seen with finasteride compared to placebo in 4 year PLESS study (p<0.001). (23) The risk of symptom progression was reduced by 30% with finasteride as compared to placebo (p=0.016) in MTOPS study. Finasteride reduced the overall clinical progression (an increase in AUA-SI [greater than or equal to] 4 points, AUR, urinary incontinence, renal insufficiency or recurrent urinary tract infection) risk by 34% relative to placebo. (12) Dutasteride showed a 4.5 point improvement in symptoms at 2 years as compared with 2.3 points with placebo (p<0.001). Significant improvement in symptoms occurred after three months in some and six months in majority of patients. (70) Continuous improvement was seen in symptoms; after the end of further two years, improvement in symptom score increased to 6.5 points. (p<0.001 vs. 2 years of dutasteride treatment). (72)
Finasteride reduced the risk of AUR by 57% compared to placebo (7% for men receiving placebo and 3% for men receiving finasteride) and surgery by 55% (10% of men receiving placebo and 5% of those receiving finasteride) after 4 years in PLESS study. (23) The MTOPS study also showed significant reduction in AUR and need for surgery in patients receiving finasteride monotherapy as compared to placebo after 4.5 years (p<0.001). (12) Similar results have been demonstrated in studies with dutasteride, with a reduction in relative risk of AUR (57%) and surgical intervention (48%) as compared to placebo (p<0.001) after 2 years of treatment which was maintained at 4 years of treatment. (70), (72) The reduction in risk of AUR and BPH related surgery with SARIs is probably due to the effect on PV. Finasteride reduced PV by 18% compared to 14% increase seen with placebo in PLESS study (p<0.001) (23) and in MTOPS study PV was seen to be reduced by 19% in patients receiving finasteride compared to 24% increase in those receiving placebo. (12) Dutasteride caused a 26% reduction in PV relative to placebo with significant reduction observed from 1 month after initiation of treatment. (70), (72) The SARIS are generally well tolerated. The most commonly reported side effects are sexual adverse events, (73) but the incidence of these decreases during prolonged treatment. (23), (74) The rates of decreased libido and impotence were identical in finasteride and placebo group after 2 years in PLESS study. (23) Similarly, there was a trend towards reduction in the rate of sexual adverse events over time observed with treatment with dutasteride over a 4-year period. (74) SARI therapy reduces serum PSA in a predictable manner and does not effect the diagnostic performance of PSA for detecting prostate cancer. Serum PSA is reduced by approximately 50-60% after 6 months of SARI treatment. So, by either establishing a new baseline PSA level or by doubling the PSA values from 6 months onwards in men treated with SARI, the clinical utility of PSA in detection of prostate cancer can be preserved irrespective of the PSA level. (75), (76) Finasteride treatment may even enhance the sensitivity of PSA for detecting all prostate cancers and high grade disease in particular, because of preferential suppression of PSA related to BPH as shown by the data from Prostrate Cancer Prevention trial. (77)
The additional effects of finasteride, such as the successful treatment of BPH related hematuria have been shown in various small randomized studies. (78), (79) This effect on vascularity of the prostate is thought to be mediated through vascular growth factors (80) and can be used to explore the possibility of reduction of intra operative blood loss in patients undergoing transurethral prostatectomy. (81)
Alpha-blockers offer a rapid symptomatic relief without any effect on underlying disease process, while 5ARIs provide mid and long-term symptom relief as well as a reduction in the risk of disease progression. This complimentary effect provides the rationale for the use of 5ARI/aipha-blocker combination therapy to provide greater and durable benefits than either monotherapy and is a recommended treatment option. (6) Initial studies for the assessment of finasteride in combination with terazosin, doxazosin or alfuzosin were of short duration (6 months to 1 year) and failed to establish a benefit for combination therapy over placebo or alpha blocker monotherapy in terms of symptom improvement. (82-84) During this short duration significant response to finasteride was unlikely to occur. In contrast, MTOPS study demonstrated risk reduction of long term clinical progression by 66% with combination therapy (p<0.001 vs. placebo) and this reduction was greater than with either finasteride or doxazosin monotherapy (34% and 39% respecti ve ly). (12) Significant improvement in symptom scores was seen with all treatments with combination therapy being superior to either doxazosin (p=0.006) or finasteride (p<0.001) monotherapy. The risk of AUR and BPH related surgery was significantly reduced over the 4-year period with combination and finasteride monotherapy but not with doxazosin as expected. (12) On recent data analysis of MTOPS it has been concluded that men with PV [greater than or equal to]25 mL and PSA [greater than or equal to]1.5 ng/mL may benefit from combination therapy. (85) A large scale study to examine the effects of the dual SARI dutasteride, both as monotherapy and in combination with tamsulosin on the symptoms and progression of BPH is underway. The combination of Avodart and Tamsulosin (CombAT) study is a 4-year multicentre study with additional entry threshold of PV (>30 mL) and PSA([greater than or equal to]1.5 ng/mL) used to select patients at a higher risk of disease progression. (86) Assessment of symptom relief and risk of AUR and surgery in CombAT trial would allow examination of parameters contributing to the overall treatment effect. It would allow for assessment of those patients most likely to benefit from combination therapy rather than evaluating the role of combination therapy. At 2 years a sustained symptom improvement with combination therapy was demonstrated which was significantly greater than the improvement with either dutasteride or tamsulosin monotherapy. (87), (88) At 24 months, the reductions in IPSS were -6.2 with combination therapy, -4.9 with dutasteride (p<0.001 vs. combination) and -4.3 with tamsulosin (p<0.001 vs. combination). (88) Improvement in BPH symptoms in first 12 months of treatment with combination therapy compared to monotherapy were shown for the first time in any study. (87) A significant improvement with combination therapy vs dutasteride was evident from month 3 and tamsulosin from month 6. (88) Improvement of quality of life was significantly greater for combination therapy than for either monotherapy at month 24. (88) In addition, improvements in real flow rate from baseline were significantly better than with either monotherapy from 6 month onwards upto 24 months. Mean change from baseline at 24 months were +2.4 mL/sec with combination therapy, +1.9 mL/sec with dutasteride and +0.9 mL/sec with tamsulosin. (88) Similar proportion of adverse effects were reported in each treatment group. In studies on combination therapy, symptom relief was maintained after withdrawal of alpha blockers in majority of patients with moderate symptoms, whereas there was worsening experienced by the patients with severe symptoms. (89), (90)
Alpha-blocker with anticholinergics
Storage or tilling symptoms in BPH are attributable to detrusor instability and interfere with daily life activities of the patient and have a negative impact on quality of life. Detrusor instability is thought to occur in up to 40-60% of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. (91) Keeping in mind the prevalence and severity of symptoms due to detrusor instability, addition of an anticholinergic agent to therapy has been tried to further improve quality of life. Athanosopoulon reported a series of 50 men with bladder outlet obstruction who had urodynamic proved detrusor instability. (92) Considerable improvement in quality of life was observed with combination therapy of tamsulosin and tolterodine without any detrimental effect on bladder emptying. Comparative studies have shown addition of anticholinergic agent to be safe in patients with bladder outlet obstruction. (93) Anticholinergic therapy is unlikely to interfere significantly in voiding phase of bladder function with a low likelihood of AUR.
Phytotherapy for treatment of LUTS is popular in some countries, notably France and Germany with upto one third of the market share of all preparation used for treatment of symptomatic BPH in western countries taken by these. (94) Numerous agents like palm plant, nettle, rye grass, pumpkin seed and cactus flower derivatives have been used for centuries. Each of these preparations contains single or a combination of active compounds. Though their mode of action remains unclear, these products are thought to produce their effects through hormonal effects and interference with normal cellular metabolism. (95-97) Large prospective randomized trials have shown efficacy of phytotherapy comparable to alpha receptor blockade and finasteride, above what could be expected of placebo. (98), (99) Well-designed clinical trials are needed before these can be recommended.
Benign prostatic hyperplasia is a chronic, complex progressive disease that affects many men. Although symptom deterioration is the most frequent progression event, patients are often more concerned about events like AUR and BPH related surgery. The significant discomfort, pain, emotional, and economic burden associated with AUR and prostate surgery mandates an approach, which reduces the risk of progression as well as achieves symptom relief Alpha-blockers promote rapid and long-term symptom relief whereas SARIS not only provide continued symptom improvement, but also reduce the risk of progression of disease. Men with an enlarged prostate (PV >30 mL) are at a particularly high risk for disease progression and an effective strategy should be particularly directed towards them. As it is difficult to accurately measure PV by means of DRE, an elevated serum PSA can accurately predict an enlarged prostate once prostate cancer has been ruled out. A PSA [greater than or equal to] 1.5 ng/ mL should be used to identify the patients at high risk of BPH progression, however a PSA level >4 ng/ mL requires further evaluation and biopsy of prostate should be considered. Symptom scores and PVR volume are dynamic variables, which may be helpful in predicting men at risk for AUR. Alpha reductase inhibitors are the only agents that alter the underlying disease process and thereby prevent BPH progression. Although SARIS reduce the PSA levels by 50% after 6 months of therapy, they do not mask the PSA changes. Indeed, recent data suggests that SARI may enhance the sensitivity of serum PSA in detecting prostate cancer. Medical treatment is the initial choice in management of lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of bladder outlet obstruction, but ultimate choice of first-line treatment rests at the discretion of the prescribing doctor.
Conflict of interest
(1.) Garraway WM, Collins GN, Lee RJ. High prevalence of benign prostatic hypertrophy in the community. Lancet 1991;338:469-71.
(2.) Roehrborn CG. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: an overview. Rev Urol 2005;7:3-14.
(3.) Girman CJ, Jacobsen SJ, Tsukamoto T, Richard F, Garraway WM, Sagnier PP, et al. Health-related quality of life associated with lower urinary tract symptoms in four countries. Urology 1998;51:428-36.
(4.) Sells H, Donovan J, Ewings P, MacDonagh The development and validation of a quality-of-life measure to assess partner morbidity in benign prostatic enlargement. BJU Int 2000;85:440-5.
(5.) Speakman MJ, Kirby RS, Joyce A, Abrams P, Pocock R, The British Association of Urological Surgeons. Guideline for the primary care management of male lower urinary tract symptoms. BJU Int 2004;93:985-90.
(6.) Madersbacher S, Alivizatos G, Nordling J, Sanz CR, Emberton M, de la Rosette JJ. EAU 2004 guidelines on assessment, therapy and follow-up of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPH guidelines). Eur Urol 2004;46: 547-54.
(7.) AUA Practice Guidelines Committee (2003) Chapter 1: Diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 2003;170:530-47.
(8.) Carballido Rodriguez J, Badia Llach X, Gimeno Collado A, Regadera Anechina L, Dal-Re Saavedra R, Guilera Sara. M. Validity of tests for initial diagnosis and its concordance with final diagnosis in patients with suspected benign prostatic hyperplasia. Actas Urol Esp 2006;30:667-74.
(9.) Holtgrewe HL, Mebust WK, Dowd JB, Cockett AT, Peters PC, Proctor C. Transurethral prostatectomy: practice aspects of the dominant operation in American urology. J Urol 1989;141:248-53.
(10.) Xia Z, Roberts RO, Schottenfeld D, Lieber MM, Jacobsen Si. Trends in prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia among black and white men in the United States: 1980 to 1994. Urology 1999;53:1154-9.
(11.) Emberton M, Andriole GL, de la Rosette J, Djavan B, Hoefner K, Vela Navarrete R, et al. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: a progressive disease of aging men. Urology 2003:61:267-73.
(12.) McConnell JD, Roehrborn CG, Bautista OM, Andriole GL Jr, Dixon CM, Kusek JW, et al. Medical Therapy of Prostatic Symptoms (MTOPS) Research Group. The long-term effect of doxazosin, finasteride, and combination therapy on the clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2387-98.
(13.) Thomas AW, Cannon A, Bartlett E, Ellis-Jones J, Abrams R The natural history of lower urinary tract dysfunction in men: minimum 10-year urodynamic follow-up of untreated bladder outlet obstruction. BJU Int 2005;96:1301-6.
(14.) Jacobson SJ, Girman CJ, Jacobsen DJ, Liebert MM. Long-term (92-month) natural history of changes in lower urinary tract symptom severity. BJU Int 2000;86:248-9.
(15.) Jacobsen SJ, Jacobsen DJ, Girman CJ, Roberts RO, Rhodes T, Guess HA, et al. Treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia among community dwelling men: the Olmsted County study of urinary symptoms and health status. J Urol 1999;162:1301-6.
(16.) Jacobsen SJ, Jacobson DJ, Girman CJ, Roberts RO, Rhodes T, Guess HA, et al. Natural history of prostatism: risk factors for acute urinary retention. J Urol 1997;158:481-7.
(17.) Mochtar CA, Kiemeney LA, van Riemsdijk MM, Barnett GS, Laguna MP, Debruyne FM, et al. Prostate-specific antigen as an estimator of prostate volume in the management of patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol 2003;44:695-700.
(18.) Anderson JB, Roehrborn CG, Schalken JA, Emberton M. The progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia: examining the evidence and determining the risk. Eur Urol 2001;39:390-9.
(19.) Roehrborn CG. Accurate determination of prostate size via digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound. Urology 1998;51(Suppl 1)19-22.
(20.) Applewhite JC, Matlaga BR, McCullough DL, Hall MC. Transrectal ultrasound and biopsy in the early diagnosis of prostate cancer. Cancer Control 2001;8:141-50.
(21.) Roehrborn CG, Boyle P, Bergner D, Gray T, Gittelman M, Shown T, et al. Serum prostate-specific antigen and prostate volume predict long-term changes in symptoms and flow rate: results of a four-year, randomized trial comparing finasteride versus placebo. PLESS Study Group. Urology 1999;54:662-9.
(22.) Rhodes T, Girman CJ, Jacobsen SJ, Roberts RO, Guess HA, Lieber MM. Longitudinal prostate growth rates during 5 years in randomly selected community men 40 to 79 years old. J Urol 1999;161:1174-9.
(23.) McConnell JD, Bruskewitz R, Walsh P, Andriole G, Lieber M, Holtgrewe HL, et al. The effect of finasteride on the risk of acute urinary retention and the need for surgical treatment among men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Finasteride Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Study Group. N En g1 J Med 1998;338:557-63.
(24.) Chang YL, Lin AT, Chen KK, Chang YH, Wu HH, Kuo JY, et al. Correlation between serum prostate specific antigen and prostate volume in Taiwanese men with biopsy proven benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 2006;176:196-9.
(25.) Shim HB, Lee JK, Jung TY, Ku JH. Serum prostate-specific antigen as a predictor of prostate volume in Korean men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2007;10:143-8.
(26.) Roehrborn CG, Malice M, Cook TJ, Girman CJ. Clinical predictors of spontaneous acute urinary retention in men with LUTS and clinical BPH: a comprehensive analysis of the pooled placebo groups of several large clinical trials. Urology 2001;58:210-6.
(27.) Emberton M. Definition of at-risk patients: dynamic variables. BJU Int 2006;97(Suppl 2):12-5; discussion 21-2.
(28.) Pickard R, Emberton M, Neal DE. The management of men with acute urinary retention. National Prostatectomy Audit Steering Group. Br J Urol 1998;81:712-20.
(29.) Choong S, Emberton M. Acute urinary retention. BJU Int 2000;85:186-201.
(30.) Flanigan RC, Reda DJ, Wasson JH, Anderson RJ, Abdellatif M, Bruskewitz RC. 5-year outcome of surgical resection and watchful waiting for men with moderately symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: a Department of Veterans Affairs cooperative study. J Urol 1998;160:12-6; discussion 16-7.
(31.) Kawakami J, Nickel JC. Acute urinary retention and surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia: the patient's perspective. Can J Urol 1999;6:819-822.
(32.) Teillac P. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: patients' perception of medical treatment and their expectations. Results of a French survey involving patients treated with finasteride. Therapie 2002;57:473-83.
(33.) Emberton M, Marberger M, de la Rosette J. Understanding patient and physician perceptions of benign prostatic hyperplasia in Europe: The Prostate Research on Behaviour and Education (PROBE) Survey. Int J Clin Pract 2008;62:18-26.
(34.) Caine M. Alpha-adrenergic mechanisms in dynamics of benign prostatic hypertrophy. Urology 1988 Dec;32(6 Suppl):16-20.
(35.) Peters CA, Walsh PC. The effect of nafarelin acetate, a luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone agonist, on benign prostatic hyperplasia. N Engl J Med 1987;317:599-604.
(36.) Lepor H, Tang R, Shapiro E. The alpha-adrenoceptor subtype mediating the tension of human prostatic smooth muscle. Prostate 1993;22:301-7.
(37.) Caine M, Pfau A, Perlberg S. The use of alpha-adrenergic blockers in benign prostatic obstruction. Br J Urol 1976;48:255-63.
(38.) Andersson KE, Lepor H, Wyllie MG. Prostatic alpha 1-adrenoceptors and uroselectivity. Prostate 1997;30:202-15.
(39.) Schwinn DA. The role of alpha 1-adrenergic receptor subtypes in lower urinary tract symptoms. BJU Int 2001;88(Suppl 2):27-34; discussion 49-50.
(40.) Djavan B, Chapple C, Milani S, Marberger M. State of the art on the efficacy and tolerability of alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonists in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 2004;64:1081-8.
(41.) Roehrborn CG. Alfuzosin 10 mg once daily prevents overall clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia but not acute urinary retention: results of a 2-year placebo-controlled study. BJU Int 2006;97: 734-41.
(42.) Levy D, Walmsley P, Levenstein M. Principal results of the Hypertension and Lipid Trial (HALT): a multicenter study of doxazosin in patients with hypertension. Am Heart J 1996;131:966-73.
(43.) Daae LNW, Westlie L. A five-year comparison of doxazosin and atenolol in patients with mild to moderate hypertension: effects on blood pressure, serum lipids, and coronary heart disease risk. Blood Press 1998;7:39-45.
(44.) De Rose AF, Giglio M, Traverso P, Lantieri P, Carmignani G. Combined oral therapy with sildenafil and doxazosin for the treatment of non-organic erectile dysfunction refractory to sildenafil monotherapy. Int J Impot Res 2002;14:50-3.
(45.) Lepor H, Gup DI, Baumann M, Shapiro E. Laboratory assessment of terazosin and alpha-1 blockade in prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 1988;32:21-6.
(46.) Boyle P, Robertson C, Manski R, Padley RJ, Roehrborn CG. Meta-analysis of randomized trials of terazosin in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 2001;58:717-22.
(47.) Oesterling JE. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review of its histogenesis and natural history. Prostate Suppl 1996;6:67-73.
(48.) Chon JK, Borkowski A, Partin AW, Isaacs JT, Jacobs SC, Kyprianou N. Alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonists terazosin and doxazosin induce prostate apoptosis without affecting cell proliferation in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 1999;161:2002-8.
(49.) Elliott HL, Meredith PA, Sumner DJ, McLean K, Reid JL. A pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessment of a new alpha-adrenoceptor antagonist, doxazosin (UK33274) in normotensive subjects. Br J Clin Pharinacol 1982;13:699-703.
(50.) Bendix Holme J, Christensen MM, Rasmussen PC, Jacobsen F, Nielsen J, Norgaard JP, et al. 29 weeks doxazosin treatment in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Scan J Urol Nephrol 1994;28:77-82.
(51.) Lefevre-Borg F, O'Connor SE, Schoemaker H, Hicks PE, Lechaire 3, Gautier E, et al. Alfuzosin, a selective alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist in the lower urinary tract. Br J Pharmacol 1993;109:1282-9.
(52.) McNeill SA, Hargreave TB; Members of the Alfaur Study Group. Alfuzosin once daily facilitates return to voiding in patients in acute urinary retention. J Urol 2004;171:2316-20.
(53.) McNeill SA, Hargreave TB, Roehrborn CG; Alfaur study group. Alfuzosin 10 mg once daily in the management of acute urinary retention: results of a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Urology 2005;65:83-9; discussion 89-90.
(54.) Wilde MI, McTavish D. Tamsulosin. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic potential in the management of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Drugs 1996;52:883-98.
(55.) Richardson CD, Donatucci CF, Page SO, Wilson KH, Schwinn DA. Pharmacology of tamsulosin: saturation-binding isotherms and competition analysis using cloned alpha 1-adrenergic receptor subtypes. Prostate 1997;33:55-9.
(56.) Abrams P, Schulman CC, Vaage S. Tamsulosin, a selective alpha 1 c-adrenoceptor antagonist: a randomized, controlled trial in patients with benign prostatic 'obstruction' (symptomatic BPH). The European Tamsulosin Study Group. Br J Urol 1995;76:325-36.
(57.) Chapple CR, Wyndaele JJ, Nordling J, Boeminghaus F, Ypma AF, Abrams P. Tamsulosin, the first prostate-selective alpha 1A-adrenoceptor antagonist. A metaanalysis of two randomized, placebo-controlled, multicentre studies in patients with benign prostatic obstruction (symptomatic BPH). European Tamsulosin Study Group. Eur Urol 1996;29:155-67.
(58.) McNicholas TA, Abrams P, Tammela T, Duclos JM, Berges R, The ESPRIT Group European pressure-flow investigation of tamsulosin in men with LUTS suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO); the ESPRIT study. Br J Urol 1998;81:21-2.
(59.) Fitzpatrick JM, Desgrandchamps F. The clinical efficacy and tolerability of doxazosin standard and gastrointestinal therapeutic system for benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int 2005;95:575-9.
(60.) Lepor H. Long-term evaluation of tamsulosin in benign prostatic hyperplasia: placebo-controlled, double-blind extension of phase III trial. Tamsulosin Investigator Group. Urology 1998;51:901-6.
(61.) Schulman CC, Cortvriend J, Jonas U, Lock TM, Vaage S, Speakman MJ. Tamsulosin: 3-year long-term efficacy and safety in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction: analysis of a European, multinational, multicenter, open-label study. European Tamsulosin Study Group. Eur Urol 1999;36:609-20.
(62.) Bartsch G, Rittmaster RS, Klocker H. Dihydrotestosterone and the concept of 5alpha-reductase inhibition in human benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol 2000;37:367-80.
(63.) Walsh PC, Madden JD, Harrod MJ, Goldstein JL, MacDonald PC, Wilson JD. Familial incomplete male pseudohermaphroditism, type 2. Decreased dihydrotestosterone formation in pseudovaginal perineoscrotal hypospadias. N Engi J Med 1974;291:944-9.
(64.) Imperato-McGinley J, Guerrero L, Gautier T, Peterson RE. Steroid 5alpha-reductase deficiency in man: an inherited form of male pseudohermaphroditism. Science 1974;186:1213-5.
(65.) Brooks JR, Berman C, Games D, Giltinan D, Gordon LR, Malatesta PF, et al. Prostatic effects induced in dogs by chronic or acute oral administration of 5 alpha-reductase inhibitors. Prostate 1986;9:65-75.
(66.) Russell DW, Wilson JD. Steroid 5 alpha-reductase: two genes/two enzymes. Annu Rev Biochem 1994;63:25-61.
(67.) Thigpen AE, Silver RI, Guileyardo JM, Casey ML, McConnell JD, Russell DW. Tissue distribution and ontogeny of steroid 5 alpha-reductase isozyme expression. J Clin Invest 1993;92:903-10.
(68.) Gormley GL, Stoner E, Rittmaster RS, Gregg H, Thompson DL, Lasseter KC, et al. Effects of finasteride (MK-906), a 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor, on circulating androgens in male volunteers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1990;70:1136-41.
(69.) Clark RV, Hermann DJ, Cunningham GR, Wilson TH, Morrill BB, Hobbs S. Marked suppression of dihydrotestosterone in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia by dutasteride, a dual 5alpha-reductase inhibitor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004;89:2179-84.
(70.) Roehrborn CG, Boyle P, Nickel JC, Hoefner K, Andriole G; AR1A3001 ARIA3002 and ARIA3003 Study Investigators. Efficacy and safety of a dual inhibitor of 5-alpha-reductase types 1 and 2 (dutasteride) in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 2002;60:434-41.
(71.) Bartsch G, Fitzpatrick JM, Schalken JA, Isaacs J, Nordling J, Roehrborn CG. Consensus statement: the role of prostate-specific antigen in managing the patient with benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int 2004;93:27-9.
(72.) Debruyne F, Barkin J, van Erps P, Reis M, Tammela TL, Roehrborn C; ARIA3001, ARIA3002 and ARIB3003 Study Investigators. Efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with the dual 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor dutasteride in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol 2004;46:488-94; discussion 495.
(73.) Thompson IM, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, Lucia MS, Miller GJ, Ford LG, et al. The influence of finasteride on the development of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;349:215-24.
(74.) Schulman C, Pommerville P, Hofner K, Wachs B. Long-term therapy with dual 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor dutasteride is well tolerated in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int 2006;97:73-9.
(75.) Andriole GL, Guess HA, Epstein J1, Wise H, Kadmon D, Crawford ED, et al. Treatment with finasteride preserves usefulness of prostate-specific antigen in the detection of prostate cancer: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. PLESS Study Group. Proscar Long-term Efficacy and Safety Study. Urology 1998;52:195-201; discussion 201-2.
(76.) Andriole GL, Marberger M, Roehrborn CG. Clinical usefulness of serum prostate specific antigen for the detection of prostate cancer is preserved in men receiving the dual 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor dutasteride. J Urol 2006;175:1657-62.
(77.) Thompson IM, Chi C, Ankerst DP, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, Lippman SM, et al. Effect of finasteride on the sensitivity of PSA for detecting prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:1128-33.
(78.) Foley SJ, Soloman LZ, Wedderburn AW, Kashif KM, Summerton D, Basketter V, et al. A prospective study of the natural history of hematuria associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia and the effect of finasteride. J Urol 2000;163:496-8.
(79.) Kearney MC, Bingham JB, Bergland R, Meade-D'Alisera P, Puchner PJ. Clinical predictors in the use of finasteride for control of gross hematuria due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 2002;167:2489-91.
(80.) Pareek G, Shevchuk M, Armenakas NA, Vasjovic L, Hochberg DA, Basillote JB, et al. The effect of finasteride on the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and microvessel density: a possible mechanism for decreased prostatic bleeding in treated patients. J Urol 2003;169:20-3.
(81.) Sandfeldt L, Bailey DM, Hahn RG. Blood loss during transurethral resection of the prostate after 3 months of treatment with finasteride. Urology 2001;58:972-6.
(82.) Lepor H, Williford WO, Barry MJ, Brawer MK, Dixon CM, Gormley G, et al. The efficacy ofterazosin, finasteride, or both in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Study Group. N Engl J Med 1996;335:533-9.
(83.) Kirby RS, Roehrborn C, Boyle P, Bartsch G, Jardin A, Cary MM, et al. Prospective European Doxazosin and Combination Therapy Study Investigators. Efficacy and tolerability of doxazosin and finasteride, alone or in combination, in treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: the Prospective European Doxazosin and Combination Therapy (PREDICT) trial. Urology 2003;61:119-26.
(84.) Debruyne FM, Jardin A, Colloi D, Resel L, Witjes WP, Delauche-Cavallier MC, et al. Sustained-release alfuzosin, finasteride and the combination of both in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. European ALFIN Study Group. Eur Urol 1998;34:169-75.
(85.) Kaplan SA, McConnell JD, Roehrborn CG, Meehan AG, Lee MW, Noble WR, et al. Medical Therapy of Prostatic Symptoms (MTOPS) Research Group. Combination therapy with doxazosin and finasteride for benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and a baseline total prostate volume of 25 ml or greater. J Urol 2006;175:217-20; discussion 220-1.
(86.) Siami P, Roehrborn CG, Barkin J, Darniao R, Wyczolkowski M, Duggan A, et al. CombAT study group. Combination therapy with dutasteride and tamsulosin in men with moderate-to-severe benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate enlargement: the CombAT (Combination of Avodart and Tamsulosin) trial rationale and study design. Contemp Clin Trials 2007;28:770-9.
(87.) Roehrborn C, Siami P, Barkin J, Damido R, Montorsi F and CombAT Study Group. The effects of dutasteride, tamsulosin, and combination therapy on lower urinary tract symptoms and Qmax in men with BPH and prostatic enlargement: two-year results from the Combination of Avodart[R] and Tamsulosin (CombAT) study. Urology 2007;70:19.
(88.) Roehrborn CG, Siami P, Barkin J, Damiao R, Major-Walker K, Morrill B, et al. CombAT Study Group. The effects of dutasteride, tamsulosin and combination therapy on lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatic enlargement: 2-year results from the CombAT study. J Urol 2008;179:616-21.
(89.) Baldwin KC, Ginsberg PC, Roehrborn CG, Harkaway RC. Discontinuation of alpha-blockade after initial treatment with finasteride and doxazosin in men with lower urinary tract symptoms and clinical evidence of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 2001;58:203-9.
(90.) Barkin J, Guimardes M, Jacobi G, Pushkar D, Taylor S, van Vierssen Trip OB. Alpha-blocker therapy can be withdrawn in the majority of men following initial combination therapy with the dual 5alpha-reductase inhibitor dutasteride. Eur Urol 2003;44:461-6.
(91.) Rosier PF, de la Rosette JJ, Wijkstra H, Van Kerrebroeck PE, Debruyne FM. Is detrusor instability in elderly males related to the grade of obstruction? Neurourol Urodyn 1995;14:625-33.
(92.) Athanasopoulos A, Gyftopoulos K, Giannitsas K, Fisfis J, Perimenis P, Barbalias G. Combination treatment with an alpha-blocker plus an anticholinergic for bladder outlet obstruction: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Urol 2003;169:2253-6.
(93.) Athanasopoulos A, Perimenis P. Efficacy of the combination ofan alphal-blocker with an anticholinergic agent in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with bladder outlet obstruction. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2005;6:2429-33.
(94.) Levin RM, Das AK. A scientific basis for the therapeutic effects of Pygeum africanum and Serenoa repens. Urol Res 2000;28:201-9.
(95.) DiSilverio F, D'Eramo G, Lubrano C, Flammia GP, Sciarra A, Palma E. Evidence that Serenoa repens extract displays an antioestrogenic activity in prostatic tissue of benign prostatic hypertrophy patients. Eur Urol 1992;21:309-14.
(96.) Stauch G, Perles P, Vergult G, Gabriel M, Gibelin B, Cummings S, et al. comparison of Finasteride (Proscar) and Serenoa repens (Permixon) in the inhibition of 5-alpha reductase in healthy male volunteers. Eur Urol 1994;26:247-52.
(97.) Vacherot F, Azzouz M, Gil-Diez-De-Medina S, Colombel M, DeLa Taille A, Lefrere Belda MA, et al. induction of apoptosis and inhibition of cell proliferation by lipido-sterolic extract of Serenoa repens (LSESr, Permixon) in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostate 2000;45:259-66.
(98.) Carraro JC, Raynaud JP, Koch G, Chisholm GD, Di Silverio F, Teillac P, et al. Comparison of phytotherapy (Permixon) with finasteride in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized international study of 1089 patients. Prostate 1996;29:231-40.
(99.) Debruyne F, Koch G, Boyle P, Da Silva FC, Gillenwater JG, Hamdy FC, et al. Comparison of phytotherapeutic agent (Permixion) with an alpha-blocker (tamsulosin) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a 1-year randomized international study. Eur Urol 2002;41: 497-507.
Zahoor Ahmed Naikoo, Mohammed Saleem Wani, Arif Hamid Bhat
Sher E. Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India
Correspondence (Yazisma): Zahoor Ahmed Naikoo. Sher E. Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, 190011 Srinagar, India.
Phone: 0194-2401353 e-mail: email@example.com
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Naikoo, Zahoor Ahmed; Wani, Mohammed Saleem; Bhat, Arif Hamid|
|Publication:||Turkish Journal of Urology|
|Date:||Dec 1, 2010|
|Previous Article:||Yirmi yas sonrasi sunnetsizlerin benlik algisi ve benlik saygisi ozelliklerinin cocukluk caginda sunnet olan eriskinlerle karsilastirilmasi / A...|
|Next Article:||Retroperitoneal liposarcoma presenting as inguinoscrotal mass / Inguinoskrotal kitle ile ortaya cikan retroperitoneal liposarkom.|
Care and treatment
Development and progression