Medical Students Perception of Current Undergraduate Anatomy Teaching/Percepcion de Estudiantes de Medicina de la Ensenanza Actual de Anatomia en el Pregrado.
Anatomy knowledge is very important in the career of any surgeon, which helps in diagnosis, interpret clinical images, treatment and how to operate. Poor knowledge of anatomy reflects negatively on patients and their outcomes. Therefore, better knowledge of anatomy by developing effective modalities for teaching anatomy can lead to safer practice of medicine (Estai & Bunt, 2016; Iqbal, 2016; Sbayeh et al., 2016; Choi-Lundberg et al., 2016; Ghosh, 2017).
There are varieties of strategies for teaching anatomy such as theoretical lectures, cadaveric dissection, multimedia and 3D models. Every model could have its advantages and disadvantages. There is much debate about suitable methods of delivering anatomical knowledge. The faculty responsible for delivering anatomy teaching sessions are mainly by non-surgeons in the first three years which also could have an effect on the way of delivering and explaining the information to students (Peterson & Mlynarczyk, 2016; Shiozawa et al., 2017; Bandyopadhyay & Biswas, 2017; Alhassan & Majeed, 2018; Eppler et al., 2018).
Medicine is the compassionate art of healing through a detailed understanding of the tissues and structures of the body. Therefore, we will explore the views of medical students and newly graduated doctors regarding the best method for teaching anatomy (Turney, 2007; Kerby et al., 2011).
MATERIAL AND METHOD
A prospective multi-centric study was conducted on 313 medical student from May 2018 to August 2018. Students included in this study were either 6th year medical students or newly graduated students doing their internship year. Students eligible for inclusion were Jordanian universities undergraduates.
The questionnaire was developed after thorough review of the literature and its items were chosen following consultation with senior medical colleagues and educationalists.
The aim of the questionnaire was to evaluate our undergraduate anatomy teaching and explore the best method to deliver anatomy and maximize the benefit from the current teaching methods. The study examined the relationship between our current methods of anatomy teaching and students ability of interpreting radiological pictures and endoscopic views. In addition, the study assessed students satisfaction from current methods in teaching anatomy and their opinion regarding being taught anatomy by surgeons.
The questionnaire was created using 8-item liker scale so as to enforce an answer and avoid neutral answer. This questionnaire was done taking in mind importance of protection the students privacy. Data were collated and analyzed from electronic records.
Questionnaires was distributed to the eligible medical students electronically via Google forms (Tayyem, 2018).
Data were collated and analyzed from electronic records using SPSS software.
The 313 Medical students from 4 registered medical schools (University of Jordan, Jordanian University of Science and Technology, Hashemite University and Mutah University) completed the questionnaire. 251 participants (80.2 %) were 6th year medical students, and the remainder (19.8 %) were internship students. 212 students (67.7 %) were a females and 101 (32.3 %) were males.
Regarding the methods of teaching anatomy, 153 students (48.9 %) said that they got their anatomy teaching via lectures and cadaveric dissection, whereas 60 students (19.2 %) said that they were taught by lectures, cadaveric dissection, and multimedia. 44 students (14.1 %) mentioned that they were taught anatomy just by lectures (Fig. 1).
Regarding the student opinion about the best method of teaching anatomy, 123 students (39.3 %) supported the combination of (cadaveric dissection and multimedia), whereas 43 (13.7 %) and 42 (13.4 %) respectively thought that multimedia alone and cadaveric dissection alone is best. Combination of (lectures, multimedia, and cadaveric dissection ) was chosen by 41 students (13.1 %) (Fig. 2).
Examination methods of anatomy were varying between (MCQ and on cadaver examination) 35.8 % and MCQ alone 34.5 %. Students opinion regarding best methods of examining anatomy also varied as the following: 75 students (24 %) preferred cadaver method only, 41 students (13.1 %) supported the MCQ method alone and 28 students (8.9 %) preferred both methods together.
Fig. 1. How your anatomy teaching was delivered? Number of Students Cadaveric 3 Dissection Cadaveric Dissection 44 Lectures Lectures 153 Cadaveric Lectures 60 Cadaveric Lectures 1 Cadaveric Lectures 8 Cadaveric Lectures 18 Multimedia Lectures, Other 4 Multimedia 15 Other 2 Note: Table made from bar graph. Fig. 2. In your opinion: Which method of teaching anatomy is best? Number of Students Cadaveric 42 dissection Cadaveric 123 dissection Cadaveric 8 dissection Cadaveric 3 dissection, Others Lectures 12 Lectures 17 Cadaveric Lectures 41 Cadaveric Lectures 15 Cadaveric Lectures 7 Multimedia Multimedia 43 Others 2 Note: Table made from bar graph.
Students perception of their anatomy knowledge level was rather shocking demonstrating loss of confidence! Most students 86 (27.5 %) rated their level slightly above average (5 out of 8), whereas 14 students (4.5 %) rated their knowledge as 1 out of 8 and just 6 students (1.9 %) rated their knowledge as 8 out of 8 (Fig. 3).
The majority of students were not taught anatomy by surgeons in first 3 years of medical schools: 243 students (77.6 %) answered negatively and 70 students (22.4 %) said yes. Expectedly, students were in favor for being taught anatomy by surgeons in the first 3 years of medical schools: 98 students (31.3 %) said that they strongly support this suggestion and 27 students (8.6 %) were strongly disagree with this option. Most of the students support that anatomy should be taught by surgeons to improve their knowledge in Anatomy (Fig. 4).
In response to the question if the current anatomy teaching is adequate to understand the Laparoscopic view, radiology images, and endoscopic view respectively; most of the students were not satisfied by the currents methods of anatomy teaching (Fig. 5).
Finally, just 26 students (28.3 %) showed interest to pursue a career in anatomy or surgery / surgical subspecialties.
This multi-center study is the first of it is kind in Jordan regarding the relevance and relationship between anatomy education and educational and clinical outcomes in association with the medical curriculum.
The results of the present study indicate that students have different perceptions of anatomy education and anatomical knowledge. We will discuss the results in light of the literature to arrive at implications for several areas of anatomy teaching.
Anatomy is a subject which is unique by its huge set of facts which is the base for all medical specialties. Giving the huge amount of information, anatomy needs a special way in teaching and delivering the information. Generally, there are two approaches in learning, the surface approach which depends on memorizing the information and deep approach which depends on understanding the given information by manipulating the information to make sense of them in relation to their meaning in the material. Many methods were used to teach anatomy. The majority of our students preferred cadaveric dissection in combination with multimedia because these methods potentially give an easier way to understand anatomy. They also provide visual and practical aids to relate the huge amount of information regarding the various anatomical structures which in comparison to the classical way only encourages the memorizing approach. These methods of teaching can also help to understand the relationship between anatomy and diseases (Norman, 2009).
Another important issue was the low confidence of students of using their knowledge of anatomy in clinical practice like reading the radiological images and understanding the endoscopic and laparoscopic views. This issue is a well recognized problem by the clinicians when they are involved in educating medical students. Yet, there is no formal educational strategy to overcome such a problem. In addition, students do not just need to memorize information but they need to learn how to apply information in clinical practice. Norman suggested strategies to enhance transfer, such as embedding a concept in a problem, encouraging active learning and mixed and distributed practice. Chariker et al. (2011) provided a good example and successful experience in using a combination of methods to teach neuro-anatomy which reflected in better learning, transfer, and retention of anatomical knowledge.
Finally, it is important to teach anatomy by surgeons as they could be the best personnel to teach medical students how to apply anatomical knowledge in clinical practice. Surgeons who teach anatomy by whole-body dissection are an extremely valuable and rare resource. They are essential to the provision of a clinical context to students. This was discussed by Burgess & Ramsey-Stewart (2014) who discusses what motivates surgeons to teach dissection anatomy to medical students.
Anatomy is one of the most important basic medical sciences. The results of this study showed that the approach of teaching should be changed to be the combination of multiple techniques specially cadaveric dissection and multimedia for better understanding of the information and therefore easier memorizing. In addition, medical schools are encouraged to utilize surgeons to teach anatomy which could help medical students learn how to translate their knowledge of anatomy into clinical practice .
TAYYEM, R.; QANDEEL, H.; QSOUS, G.; BADRAN, D. & BANI-HANI, K. Percepcion de estudiantes de medicina de la ensenanza actual de anatomia en el pregrado. Int. J. Morphol., 37(3):825-829, 2019.
RESUMEN: La anatomia es una de las ciencias basicas que forma parte de los primeros 3 anos del curriculo de ensenanza en las escuelas de medicina. El objetivo de esta encuesta fue explorar la percepcion de los estudiantes de medicina en la ensenanza de la anatomia en diferentes escuelas de medicina e identificar los puntos debiles y el area en que podrian ayudar a mejorar el proceso de ensenanza con obtencion de mejores resultados. Se realizo un estudio prospectivo multicentrico, entre mayo de 2018 y agosto de 2018, aplicandose un cuestionario a 313 estudiantes de medicina en su ano de pasantia y 6[degrees] ano. El cuestionario se envio a los estudiantes teniendo en cuenta la importancia de proteger la privacidad de los mismos. El cuestionario se elaboro despues de una revision exhaustiva de la literatura y sus items se seleccionaron luego de consultar con colegas medicos y educadores de alto nivel. El cuestionario se creo utilizando una escala de Likert de 8 elementos para imponer una respuesta y evitar una respuesta neutral. De los 313 estudiantes: 212 eran mujeres (67,7 %) y 101 (32,3 %) hombres; 123 estudiantes (39,3 %) apoyaron la combinacion de diseccion de cadaveres y multimedia como mejores metodos de ensenanza. La mayoria de los estudiantes pensaron que los metodos clasicos de ensenanza pueden no ser muy utiles para comprender las imagenes radiologicas y las vistas intraoperatorias laparoscopicas. La mayoria de los estudiantes sugirio que involucrar a los cirujanos en la ensenanza de anatomia podria mejorar su conocimiento clinico en anatomia. Nuestros resultados mostraron que el enfoque de la ensenanza podria mejorarse combinando multiples tecnicas, especialmente la diseccion de cadaveres y las sesiones multimedia. Los resultados tambien indican que las escuelas de medicina deberian involucrar a los cirujanos en la ensenanza de la anatomia.
PALABRAS CLAVE: Ensenanza de anatomia; Estudiante de medicina; Cirujano; Percepcion de la ensenanza por parte del estudiante.
Alhassan, A. & Majeed, S. Perception of Ghanaian medical students of cadaveric dissection in a problem-based learning curriculum. Anat. Res. Int., 2018:3868204, 2018.
Bandyopadhyay, R. & Biswas, R. Students' perception and attitude on methods of anatomy teaching in a Medical College of West Bengal, India. J. Clin. Diagn. Res., 11(9):AC10-4, 2017.
Burgess, A. & Ramsey-Stewart, G. What motivates surgeons to teach dissection anatomy to medical students and surgical trainees? Adv. Med. Educ. Pract., 6:11-6, 2014.
Chariker, J. H.; Naaz, F. & Pani, J. R. Computer-based Learning of neuroanatomy: a longitudinal study of learning, transfer, and retention. J. Educ. Psychol., 103(1):19-31, 2011.
Choi-Lundberg, D. L.; Cuellar, W. A. & Williams, A. M. Online dissection audio-visual resources for human anatomy: Undergraduate medical students' usage and learning outcomes. Anat. Sci. Educ., 9(6):545-54, 2016.
Eppler, E.; Serowy, S.; Link, K. & Filgueira, L. Experience from an optional dissection course in a clinically-orientated concept to complement system-based anatomy in a reformed curriculum. Anat. Sci. Educ., ll(l):32-43, 2018.
Estai, M. & Bunt, S. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review. Ann. Anat., 208:151-7, 2016.
Ghosh, S. K. Cadaveric dissection as an educational tool for anatomical sciences in the 21st century. Anat. Sci. Educ., 10(3):286-99, 2017.
Iqbal, H. Anatomy "Peer Teaching" in Medical School: A literature review. MedEdPublish, 5(2):6, 2016. Available from: https://www.mededpublish.org/manuscripts/412
Kerby, J.; Shukur, Z. N. & Shalhoub, J. The relationships between learning outcomes and methods of teaching anatomy as perceived by medical students. Clin. Anat., 24(4):489-97, 2011.
Norman, G. Teaching basic science to optimize transfer. Med. Teach., 31(9):807-11, 2009.
Peterson, D. C. & Mlynarczyk, G. S. Analysis of traditional versus three-dimensional augmented curriculum on anatomical learning outcome measures. Anat. Sci. Educ., 9(6):529-36, 2016.
Sbayeh, A.; Qaedi Choo, M.A.; Quane, K. A.; Finucane, P.; McGrath, D.; O'Flynn, S.; O'Mahony, S. M. & O'Tuathaigh, C.M. Relevance of anatomy to medical education and clinical practice: perspectives of medical students, clinicians, and educators. Perspect. Med. Educ., 5(6):338-46, 2016.
Shiozawa, T.; Butz, B.; Herlan, S.; Kramer, A. & Hirt, B. Interactive anatomical and surgical live stream lectures improve students' academic performance in applied clinical anatomy. Anat. Sci. Educ., 10(1):46-52, 2017.
Tayyem, R. The medical students perception of the undergraduate anatomy teaching survey: Hashemite University / Faculty of Medicine 2018. Google Forms, 2018. Available from: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSd4elyZPjufA5VGSFtHK4VnVnHGPw5feeYI5AbVqERGLM7ag/viewform
Turney, B. W. Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl., 89(2):104-7, 2007.
Raed Tayyem (1); Haitham Qandeel (1); Ghaith Qsous (2); Darwish Badran (3) & Kamal Bani-Hani (1)
(1) General surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Hashemite University, Al-Zarqa, Jordan.
(2) General surgery Department, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.
(3) Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Hashemite University, Al-Zarqa, Jordan.
General surgery Department
Faculty of Medicine
TAYYEM, R.; QANDEEL, H.; QSOUS, G.; BADRAN, D. & BANI-HANI, K. Medical students perception of current undergraduate anatomy teaching. Int. J. Morphol., 37(3):825-829, 2019.