Printer Friendly

Mating and egg-laying behavior of Hasarius adansoni (Araneae: Salticidae) and the influence of sexual selection.

Salticid spiders have excellent vision (Levi & Levi 1990; Hill & Richman 2009) and most of their behaviors are visually guided (Richman & Jackson 1992). Courting behavior is no exception, and males from this family arc known for performing extravagant visual and vibratory displays to attract females (e.g., Jackson & Macnab 1989a, b; Hill & Richman 2009; Girard et al. 2011). In many species, females respond with their own display behavior (Levi & Levi 1990; Cross et al. 2007). Recent work has shown that jumping spiders also produce vibratory signals, and these are often complex and coordinated with visual displays (Foelix 2011; Elias et al. 2012). For these reasons, salticids are important models for studies of the evolution of communication, including hypotheses about signal elaboration, multi-modal signals, and signal function across diverse habitats. Moreover, male sexual displays in Salticidae are important in speciation and can be key characters for taxonomic classification (Richman 1982; Masta & Maddison 2002). Richman (1982) presented a comprehensive description of the displays of species across genera, information that is critical for salticid systematics. However, as is the case for many spider families, behavioral data are available for relatively few species, and there are entire genera with little or no information available. In the case of salticids, behavioral studies are concentrated in groups of the genera Habronattus F.O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1901 and Phidippus C.L. Koch. 1846, focusing mostly on breeding behavior (e.g., Sivalinghem et al. 2010; Elias et al. 2012: but see Clark & Morjan 2001 and Lim et al. 2007 for examples in other genera). This hampers studies of the evolutionary history of this group and precludes comparative analyses of signal evolution.

Here, we examine the breeding behavior and sexual signals of Hasarius adansoni (Audouin. 1826), a salticid that is common in urban environments throughout the tropics (Levi & Levi 1990). Despite its widespread distribution, (Levi & Levi

1990; Zabka & Pollard 2002), this species has been the subject of only one behavioral study to date. Cloudsley-Thompson (1949) provided some descriptive notes about H. adansoni sexual behavior, including display, copulation and egg-laying behaviors. However, this was based on a very small sample size, largely anecdotal observations, and since no viable eggs were produced it is unclear whether matings were successful. However, Cloudsley-Thompson's description suggests H. adansoni males produce visual signals, and this is also suggested by their sexually dimorphic coloration; while females are cryptic brown, males are black with conspicuous white patches on their palps (Levi & Levi 1990; Fig. 1). Thus. the objective of this study is to describe this species' display, copulation and egg-laying behaviors. Specimens of both sexes of H. adansoni are deposited in the arachnid collection of the Universidade de Brasilia (UnB), Laboratorio de Aracnideos, collection number 4304.


Rearing.--A total of 94 animals were used in mating experiments. We captured H. adansoni juveniles before their last instar on urban walls and buildings around the city of Brasilia. Brazil (I5[degrees]45'47.4" S. 47[degrees]52'14.3" W) and brought them to the Laboratorio de Comportamento Animal in Universidade de Brasilia (UnB) where mating trials were conducted. Vibratory signals produced by one pair were recorded at the University of Toronto Scarborough (43[degrees]47'1.47" N. 79[degrees]11'15.66" W). We could not repeat vibratory analysis with other pairs, since most of those transferred to Canada were part of other experiments. No permits were needed to transport the live spiders to Canada. All animals were kept in cylindrical glass containers measuring 9 cm x 4.5 cm in natural photoperiod and room temperature. A piece of wet cotton was kept inside each container to maintain moisture. Spiders brought to Canada were maintained in similar conditions. Animals were fed every four to seven days. In each feeding episode, individuals were given 10 to 15 Drosophila spp. and one young Gryllus cricket. We also fed the spiders on the day before conducting the mating experiment described below.

Vibratory signals.--Since substrate-borne vibratory signals are common in salticid spiders (Foelix 2011), we used one pair of spiders to determine whether such signals occur for this species. The pair was placed together in a circular mating arena (11 cm diameter) on a turntable covered in stretched nylon and with all sides composed of a clear plastic wall. This type of arena has been previously shown to transmit salticid courtship signals (Elias et al. 2003). Laser Doppler vibrometry (LDV. PDV100 portable laser vibrometer, Polytec, Tustin CA. USA) was used to detect the occurrence of substrate vibrations during the pair's interactions. Vibratory signals were recorded. along with detailed videos with sound available that made it possible to detect any movements causing vibrations by the animals. Three small pieces of lightweight reflective tape (~1 mm) were placed near the center of the nylon-covered turntable and used as measurement points for the laser. Laser output was fed through a speaker to allow real-time audio monitoring of vibratory signals. Simultaneously, the pair was filmed using a digital high-speed camera (500 frames [s.sup.-1] ; PCI 1000; RedLake Motionscope, San Diego, CA, USA) while the spiders were illuminated with a Minifill light, manufactured by Frezzi. For this exploratory analysis, we monitored the highspeed video while listening to the LDV output to determine candidate body movements that might generate vibratory signals (e.g., Elias et al. 2012).

Mating trials.--A total of 47 mating trials were recorded on digital video during the experiments (excluding the trial on vibratory signals), and males and females were used only once. For these trials, the mating arena consisted of a square acrylic container (13 cm x 13 cm x 4 cm) with two opaque dividers that allowed two spiders to be held simultaneously without visual contact. The container also had niches in the four corners where spiders could avoid each other. For every trial. one adult male and one adult female were held inside the arena but kept apart by the opaque dividers, which were simultaneously opened to start the experiment after a 1-h acclimatization period (Fig. 2). Age. measured as days since last molt. were 50.8 ([+ or -]70.2) days for males and 51.2 ([+ or -]73.81) days for females. Each pair was videotaped for 3h (Kodak Zxl Pocket Video Camera), from the upper side of the arena, and all experiments were conducted under a natural light-simulating lamp (Arcadia Bird lamp. Model FB 36).

The videos were then analyzed to develop an ethogram of the three stages of breeding for both males and females: (i) precopulation display and response; (ii) copulation behavior; and (iii) post-copulation behavior (i.e.. egg-laying behavior). Below we describe the behavioral repertoires, time spent in each of these phases and number of eggs and young produced by H. adcmsoni.

Measurements.--Before every trial, males were weighed to the nearest 0.00lg. After each trial males were measured and then sacrificed, and their palps and front legs (used in the courtship, see below) removed for measurement. Every measurement was done by photographing the animals with a stereomicroscope, keeping a ruler in the image for scale. Images were then entered in ImageJ for measurement. Carapace width was used as a measure of animal size. We also measured front leg length, white patch area and percentage of pedipalp covered with the white patch area. Areas were calculated drawing a polygon around palps and white patches and then extracting the area of the polygon. To summarize male morphology, cephalothorax width, leg length. male mass, white patch area and percentage of white patch cover were entered in a Principal Component Analysis (PCA). All morphological measurements were taken using pictures similar to those in Fig. 3. We assessed whether any morphological traits predicted mating success, using a regression analysis including the number of copulations as the response variable, along with male morphology (as predicted by the PCA) and male condition as predictive variables. Total duration of copulations was used as response variable in non-parametric regression analysis, since these data were highly overdispersed. Male condition was calculated as the residuals of the regression between male weight and male cephalothorax width, as proposed by Jakob et al. (1996). Results are presented as mean [+ or -] standard deviation.


Mating trials.--We had nine trials in which animals did not see each other, and were considered unsuccessful and thus excluded from further analysis. Among our 38 successful trials (where animals saw each other). 23 (60.5%) resulted in copulations. Among those that did not result in copulations, only four were because males did not attempt copulation and one was because the female cannibalized the male. The other 10 were because females did not accept males (see description below).

When the male orients and moves towards the female, he typically spreads the first pair of legs and his palps (33/38 successful trials). Given the location of the white patches, this would reveal them to a female oriented towards him. From seeing a female and starting a display, males took a mean of 10.6 [+ or -]14 s, showing high variation in latency to court. The male then walks towards the female in a zig-zag fashion. Here. the female may respond in three ways: (i) facilitate palp insertion by curling her legs close to her abdomen and staying motionless; (ii) avoid palp insertion, by running away or (iii) avoid palp insertion, by attacking the male. If the first option happens (23/38 successful trials), the male can approach and mount the female, and she then exposes the side of her abdomen and this facilitates palp insertion. Latency to adopt receptive posture once the male is courting was 11.8 [+ or -]10.8 s, again showing high variation. Males courted females an average of 53.3 [+ or -] 30.86% of times they saw females. On the other hand, females rejected a mean of 45.5 [+ or -] 36.6% of males' attempts.

Palps are not inserted simultaneously, thus each insertion was counted as a separate copulation. Mean palp insertion duration was 22.96 [+ or -] 14.86 s. Pairs that copulated did so an average of 5.82 times (min = 1; max = 18). Although two separate insertions could happen in a row, multiple copulations were usually separated by a period of other behaviors, such as wandering around the arena, self-grooming, and many times, spiders lost visual contact with each other. Usually. males continued courting and mounting the female multiple times until she moved out of the receptive posture. Once this happened, females frequently adopted the second possible response to courtship (i.e., attacking or running away from the male). Cannibalism of the male by the female was extremely rare, and was observed only once in our 47 trials.

All the behaviors related to reproduction are represented in the ethogram in Table 1.

Vibratory signals.--We confirmed the presence of substrateborne vibrations during courtship from both male and female. These appeared to be primarily tremulations, a type of substrate-borne vibration signal in which a part of the spider's body vibrates but does not touch the substrate. The energy of such vibrations, however, is transferred to the substrate by the spiders' legs and allows communication (Uhl & Elias 2011).

In this exploratory trial, when the male started moving towards the female, he used tremulation of the abdomen to create vibrations that were detected by the LDV and likely were also available to the female (Elias et al. 2004, 2005, 2006, 2012; Sivalinghem et al. 2010). Once in the receptive posture (i.e.. legs curled but still touching the substrate), the female started her own abdominal tremulations as the male approached.

Reproduction.--An average of 36.25 [+ or -] 29.92 days after mating, females build a silk cocoon and stay enclosed for an average of 21.21 [+ or -] 12.1 days while laying eggs. Usually, after the female leaves the cocoon, the young molt for the first time and only then do they disperse. Among the females that mated, 69.5% (n = 23) laid viable eggs. Considering just the females that copulated, the number of copulations did not predict the likelihood of laying viable eggs (Binomial Model: [beta] = 0.054; P = 0.567).

Mated females laid between zero and nine clutches (mean = 3.13) after mating. The number of young per clutch varied from zero (eggs failed to hatch) to 41. The number of young per clutch decreased over the laying bout for each female (Fig. 4), as shown by a mixed-model with Gaussian error distribution, entering the number of young as response variable, clutch as predictor and female identity as a random factor. Number of young correlated negatively with clutch number ([beta] = -l.87; P <0.01), but did not correlate with female size (Spearman's p = 0.07; P = 0.6, n= 19). Female condition predicted the number of young (Spearman's p = 0.64; P = 0.002. /;= 19). However, such a relationship disappeared after the removal of one single outlier (Spearman's p = 0.19; P = 0.44, n= 18).

Morphology and mating success.--The first principal component of the PCA explained 63.9% of the total variance in the traits measured and was highly correlated with leg length. cephalothorax width, and mass; and moderately correlated to white patch area. The second principal component explained another 23.28% of the variance and was highly correlated to percentage of white patch cover and also moderately correlated to white patch area (Table 2). This shows that the variance in white patch area is partly associated with both body size and percentage of cover. Thus, we used the first principal component as a measure of body size and white patch size and the raw values of percentage of white patch cover in subsequent regression models.

Among the females that copulated, number of copulations was not predicted by male size or percentage of white patch cover (Negative Binomial Model; PCI: [beta] = -0.29, P = 0.18; white cover: [beta]= 1.44; P = 0.58). Among these females, number of copulations also did not correlate with male condition (Negative Binomial Model; Condition: [beta] = 56.52; P = 0.43).

The probability of copulation was not predicted by male size or percentage of patch cover (Binomial Model; PCI: [beta] = 0.47. P = 0.26; Percentage of white cover: (3 = -5.4, P = 0.43). Furthermore, male condition and probability of copulation were not correlated (Binomial Model; Condition: (3 = -82.55, P = 0.44).

Total copulation time did not correlate with any of the predictor variables (PCI: Spearman's p = 0.15, P = 0.47; Percentage of patch cover: Spearman's p = -0.15. P = 0.45: Condition: Spearman's p = 0.11. P = 0.52).


Jumping spiders produce relatively intricate displays (Richman & Jackson 1992) and our observations show complex, multimodal displays are also a feature of mating in H. adansoni, with males producing tremulations during approach. and females responding with their own tremulations in turn. Even though our sample size for vibratory signals is just one, we confirmed tremulation by both sexes and previous studies have found abdomen vibrations to be ubiquitous in the Salticidae (Uhl & Elias 2011). so we believe it is also common in H. adansoni. We found high levels of prolonged courtship by male H. adansoni, and clear receptivity postures among females. Multiple copulations were common within pairs that mated. Among mating females, the first clutch typically had the most offspring, and this number declined with subsequent clutches. Surprisingly, despite a high frequency of mate rejection (11/38 pairings), we could detect no relationships between male body size and condition, or the white patch on male palps and any of our measures of mating success or copulation frequency. Notwithstanding these results, it remains clear that this species may be useful to test hypotheses about breeding behavior and sexual selection, given the combination of visual and vibrational signals in the male displays, and the different behavioral and vibrational responses from females.

The features that compose the visual display in H. adansoni (i.e., leg spreading, zig-zag walking and palp spreading) have been observed in other salticid species (Richman 1982). Similarly, substrate-borne vibrations have also been observed during courtship in many Salticidae, although the type of vibrations and repertoire size vary substantially (Elias et al. 2003, 2005, 2010, 2012; Sivalinghem et al. 2010; Girard et al. 2011). Such conspicuous traits and displays usually play a role in sexual selection and mate choice (Andersson 1994). Both visual (Huber 2005; Uhl & Elias 2011), and vibratory displays (Elias et al. 2004. 2005. 2006, 2010; Sivalinghem et al. 2010) are used by female jumping spiders to assess potential males for mating during courtship. These display characteristics typically convey male condition, which may influence brood survival and success (Uhl & Elias 2011). For another salticid species, Habronattus pyrrithrix (Chamberlin. 1924). male coloration is related to diet (Taylor et al. 2011), and males without sexual displays are not chosen by females (Taylor & McGraw 2013, but see Taylor et al. 2014). Vibratory signals are also important in female choice in the same genus (Elias et al. 2004, 2005). In Phidippus, another well studied genus, vibration is also important for female mate choice (Sivalinghem et al. 2010). In contrast to these results, in H. adansoni, no morphological character we measured, nor the white patch area or percent of white coverage were related to female response. However, we found that H. adansoni also exhibits vibratory signals that might be important in sexual selection. but these have not yet been explored. Moreover, although white patch area does not predict female choice, it is possible that colorimetric variables, such as reflectance in different wave lengths, play a role in sexual selection. Finally, for such multi-modal signals, it may be a combination of traits that is critical for female preference (see Girard et al. 2011). We had a big variation in age of animals in our experiments. Although we did not have a large enough sample size to add it as another factor in our models, we believe this should be focus of future studies, since age might play a role in sexual selection and mate choice.

Most of the pairs that failed to copulate did so because of female rejection. Remating of the same pair, as observed here, has been reported in other jumping spiders (Jackson & Macnab 1989a,b). Females usually determine the end of remating by not accepting further attempts by a particular male. Long copulation durations have been suggested as a strategy of mate guarding in other spiders. Since monogamy is rare in spiders (Schneider & Andrade 2011). and first sperm priority is common (Huber 2005), males may try to prolong copulations (Huber 2005; see also Drengsgaard & Toft 1999). which may partly explain the high copulation rates observed in this study. In the field, males and females have territories with very little overlap (personal observation), which may select for both sexes to engage in copulation multiple times and for long durations if the encounter rates are low in natural populations.

This is the first study to describe the breeding behavior of H. adansoni in detail and, as expected for a jumping spider, male courtship was complex and involved multimodal features.

Morphological traits did not predict male mating success, and future work should focus on the vibratory display and reflectance of the white patch to fully understand female mate choice in this species.


We thank the Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) for the scholarship provided to Leonardo B. Castilho and CNPq for a fellowship for Regina H. Macedo. For financial support we also thank Global Affairs Canada's International Scholarships Program (ISP). We thank Sen Sivalinghem for the help with vibratory measurements. We thank Dr. Rosana Tidon and her staff for providing food for the spiders. We are also grateful to everyone who helped collect spiders for this project, especially Vitor Renan. We thank Dr. Paulo Cesar Motta and his student Mariana Vasconcelos for sending us the collection numbers for the spider specimens deposited. Finally, we are grateful to two anonymous reviewers who helped improve the quality of the manuscript.


Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press. New Jersey.

Clark, L.D. & C.L. Morjan, 2001. Attracting female attention: the evolution of dimorphic courtship displays in the jumping spider Maevia inclemens (Araneae: Salticidac). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 268:2461-2465.

Cloudsley-Thompson, J.L. 1949. Notes on Arachnida. 12. Mating habits of Hasarius adansoni. Entomologist Monthly Magazine 85:261-262.

Cross. F.R.. R.R. Jackson & S.D. Pollard, 2007. Male and female mate-choice decisions by Evarcha culicivora, an cast African jumping spider. Ethology 113:901-908.

Drengsgaard, I.L. & S. Toft. 1999. Sperm competition in a nuptial feeding spider. Pisauria mirabilis. Behaviour 136:877-897.

Elias. O.D., E.A. Hebets & R.R. Hoy. 2006. Female preference for complex novel signals in a spider. Behavioral Ecology 17:765-771.

Elias, O.D., E.A. Hebets, R.R. Hoy & A.C. Mason. 2005. Seismic signals are crucial for male mating success in a visual specialist jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidac). Animal Behaviour 69:931 938.

Elias, D.O., W.P. Maddison. C. Pcckmezian. MB. Girard & A.C. Mason. 2012. Orchestrating the score: complex multimodal courtship in the Habronattus coecatus group of Habronattus jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidac). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 105:522-547.

Elias, O.D., A.C. Mason & R.R. Hoy. 2004. The effect of substrate on the efficacy of seismic courtship signal transmission in the jumping spider Habronattus dossenus (Araneae: Salticidae). Journal of Experimental Biology 207:4105-4110.

Elias, D.O., A.C. Mason. W.P. Maddison & R.R. Hoy. 2003. Seismic signals in a courting male jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae). Journal of Experimental Biology 206:4029-4039.

Elias, O.D., S. Sivalinghem. A.C. Mason, M.C.B. Andrade & M.M. Kasumovic. 2010. Vibratory communication in the jumping spider Phidippus clarus: Substrate-borne courtship signals arc important for male mating success. Ethology 116:990-998.

Foelix, R.F. 2011. Biology of Spiders. 3rd ed. Oxford. New York.

Girard, M.B., M.M. Kasumovic & D.O. Elias. 2011. Multi-modal courtship in the peacock spider, Maratus volans (O.P.-Cambridge, 1874). PLoS One 6:1-10.

Hill. D.E. & D.B. Richman. 2009. The evolution of jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae): a review. Peckhamia 75:1-7.

Huber. B.A. 2005. Sexual selection research on spiders: progress and biases. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 80:363-385.

Jackson, R.R. & A.M. Macnab. 1989a. Display behaviour of Corythalia canosa, an ant-eating jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae) from Florida. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 16:169-183.

Jackson. R.R. & A.M. Macnab. 1989b. Display, mating, and predatory behaviour of the jumping spider Plexippus paykulli (Araneae: Salticidae). New Zealand Journal of Zoology 16:151-168.

Jakob, E.M., S.D. Marshall & G.W. Lietz. 1996. Estimating fitness: A comparison of body condition indices. Oikos 77:61-67.

Levi. H.W. & L.R. Levi. 1990. A Golden Guide: Spiders and their Kin. Golden Press. New York.

Lim, M.L.M.. M.F. Land & D. Li. 2007. Sex-specific UV and fluorescence signals in jumping spiders. Science 315:480-481.

Masta, S.E. & W.P. Maddison. 2002. Sexual selection driving diversification in jumping spiders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99:4442-4447.

Richman. D.B. 1982. Epigamic display in jumping spiders (Araneae. Salticidae) and its use in systematica. Journal of Arachnology 10:47-67.

Richman. D.B. & R.R. Jackson. 1992. A review of the ethology of jumping spiders (Araneae. Salticidae). Bulletin of the British Arachnology Society 9:33-37.

Schneider, J. & M. Andrade. 2011. Mating behaviour and sexual selection. Pp. 215-274. In Spider Behaviour: Flexibility and Versatility, (M.E. Herberstcin, ed.). Cambridge University Press, New York.

Sivalinghcm, S., M.M. Kasumovic, A.C. Mason. M.C.B. Andrade & D.O. Elias. 2010. Vibratory communication in the jumping spider Phidippus clarus; polyandry, male courtship signals, and mating success. Behavioral Ecology 21:1308-1314.

Taylor, L.A. & K.J. McGraw. 2013. Male ornamental coloration improves courtship success in a jumping spider, but only in the sun. Behavioral Ecology 24:955-967.

Taylor. LA., D.L. Clark & K.J. McGraw. 2011. Condition dependence of male display coloration in a jumping spider (Habronattus pyrrithrix). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65:1113-1146.

Taylor, L.A., D.L. Clark & K.J. McGraw. 2014. Natural variation in condition dependent display colour does not predict male courtship success in a jumping spider. Animal Behaviour 93:267 278.

Uhl, G. & D.O. Elias. 2011. Communication. Pp. 127-189. In Spider Behaviour: Flexibility and Versatility (M.E. Herberstcin. ed.). Cambridge University Press, New York.

Zabka, M. & S.D. Pollard. 2002. A check-list of the Salticidae (Arachnida: Araneae) of New Zealand. Records of Canterbury Museum 16:73-82.

Manuscript received 9 December 2016. revised 24 April 2018.

Leonardo B. Castilho (1), Maydianne C.B. Andrade (2) and Regina H. Maccdo (3): (1)Programa de Pos-graduacao em Ecologia. IB - Universidade de Brasilia, Brasilia. Brazil, 70910-900, E-mail:; (2) Department of Biological Sciences, and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto Scarborough. Toronto. Canada M1C1A4; (3) Laboratorio de Comportamento Animal. Departamento de Zoologia - IB, Universidade de Brasilia. Brasilia, Brazil, 70910-900
Table 1.--Elhogram of mating behaviors of the jumping spider Hasarius

Behaviors            Description

Male behaviors
Leg spreading        Spreading the first and, sometimes, second pair
                     of legs in the horizontal plane
Tremulation          Vibrating the abdomen, but not touching it on the
                     substrate. Vibrations are of long duration (~0.5s)
                     and high amplitude
Zig-zag approaching  Walking towards the female in a zig-zag fashion
                     while performing leg spreading and tremulation
Palp insertion       Inserting the palp in the female epigynum. It
                     happens right after zig-zag walking.
                     Male is mounted on the female's dorsal side,
                     facing her abdomen. Right palp is inserted in left
                     epigynum or left palp is inserted in right epigynum
Female behaviors
Receptive posture    Female curves all 8 legs towards the center of
                     the body and stands motionless
Tremulation          Vibrating the abdomen, but not touching it on
                     the substrate. It happens while performing
                     posture and vibrations arc of short duration
                     (~0.25s) and low amplitude
Abdomen turning      Performed when the male is executing palp
                     insertion. It consists of a small torsion
                     of the abdomen in
                     the vertical plane that facilitates palp
                     insertion by the male

Table 2.--Correlations (r) between raw variables and the six
components from the PCA.

                                     Principal Components
Variables               PCI   PC2    PC3    PC4    PC5     PC6

Weight                  0.93  -0.14   0.04   0.13   0.3     0.04
Cephalothorax width     0.89  -0.12   0.22   0.31  -0.18   -0.03
From leg 1              0.93  -0.20  -0.20  -0.16   0.003  -0.15
Front leg 2             0.93  -0.15  -0.21  -0.13  -0.12    0.14
White patch             0.62   0.66   0.31  -0.27  -0.00    0.004
% of white patch cover  0.17   0.93  -0.26   0.20   0.002  -0.01
COPYRIGHT 2018 The American Arachnological Society
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Castilho, Leonardo B.; Andrade, Maydianne C.B.; Maccdo, Regina H.
Publication:The Journal of Arachnology
Geographic Code:3BRAZ
Date:Sep 1, 2018
Previous Article:Bad tenants: female sheet-web spiders, Cambridgea foliata (Araneae: Desidae), lose feeding opportunities when cohabiting with males.
Next Article:Fitness effects of nuptial gifts in the spider Pisaura mirabilis: examination under an alternative feeding regime.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters