Printer Friendly

Marriage is not a private affair.

IT'S NOBODY ELSE'S BUSINESS," THE FOOTBALL star stated calmly as he answered questions about his trial on charges of domestic abuse. He maintained that the abuse was mutual, that each party had attacked the other. He described these attacks, which resulted in injuries to both of them, as "normal" marital problems. Throughout the interview, he repeated that no matter what had happened between him and his wife, it was private. His wife, who testified on his behalf, and some members of the jury that acquitted him agreed with his assessment. Apparently, these individuals are saying that physical assaults on loved ones deserve no societal attention. Domestic violence is normal and nobody else's business.

I disagree.

We should begin by defining the terms. What is normal? Normal means typical, usual, standard, and common. Normal behavior is acceptable behavior. Accepted behavior is allowable and permissible. What is private? Private means concealed, secret, inaccessible, and off-limits. Therefore, to say that domestic abuse is normal and private is to say that it is, at once, both allowable and inaccessible.

What would life be like if such behavior were both allowed and ignored by society? The majority of people would be in conflict on a regular basis. Wives hitting husbands. Husbands choking wives. Parents beating children. Children retaliating.

The people involved in these incidents would never seek treatment for their behavior. Every day we would see bruises, broken bones, and scars. We would never comment upon our observations because the actions that caused them would be off-limits in polite conversation. We would walk, wounded among the wounded, without a healer in sight.

The world I have just described obviously does not exist. Domestic violence is not considered normal. The football star says that he is seeking treatment. This belies his contention of normality. If his actions are normal, for what is he being treated?

The more problematic issue is whether he is right when he says that the matter is private. The most frequently used argument favoring societal concern is that children raised in disruptive or violent homes have no basis upon which to build lives that are peaceful and useful. In their 1982 pastoral letter, "When I Call For Help," the U.S. Catholic bishops stated: "Domestic violence counselors teach that violence is learned behavior.... Abuse counselors say that a child raised in a home with physical abuse is a thousand times more likely to use violence in his own family." Even when we acknowledge that children are affected by violence, many of us are still seduced by the argument that, at the end of the day, it is not really our business.

THERE ARE FOUR EXPLANATIONS FOR OUR readiness to turn our backs. Two of these were explained by Christine E. Gudorf in "Sexual violence: it's sinful to remain silent" in the May 1993 issue of Salt magazine. One reason is the inclination of most people to avoid conflict and divisive situations. Another inclination is to blame the victims in a way that isolates us from their fate, which bolsters our desire to feel secure. "I can feel safe ... if the woman who got battered back-talked and the child who got abused comes from a trashy family ... If all the victims were complicit in their own victimization, then I, and those I love who are not complicit, are not at risk," Gudorf says.

This need to separate ourselves from the victims of abuse so that we can feel secure in our own lives results in an "us-them" mentality. "They" are not like "us," so we do not need to get involved.

The third reason for our detachment is the increased emphasis that has been placed on privacy. It has been called a constitutional right by the court; it is revered by the public as much as life and liberty. The focus of privacy has been the home. The concept that family is private and personal has been adopted by those on both ends of the political spectrum. The left decries government interference in personal decisions regarding procreation, while the right calls for more parental control in the education and discipline of children.

Any attempt to cover violence against others with the same shroud of privacy as other family issues displays a misunderstanding of the concept of the sanctity of the home. In the March 8, 1996 issue of National Catholic Reporter, Lisa Sowle Cahill rightfully asserts that this third reason is a facade: "Our culture, hypnotized by an ideal of `privacy' that is really a screen for selfish lack of interest in other people's welfare, has adopted an unprecedented policy of noninterference [with family problems]."

THE FINAL AND MOST BASIC REASON FOR noninvolvement is the lack of understanding of the nature of marriage. We do not understand what marriage is and who is involved in the making of a marriage. Marriage is not, and never has been, the private joining of two lives. People who wish to make a private commitment to each other are free to do so at any time and in any manner that they see fit.

Marriage is, by definition, a public commitment. People must meet certain criteria and follow certain rules to be married legally or to dissolve the marriage union. Civil marriage is a contract between three entities--husband, wife, and state. In Wisconsin, this concept is clearly presented in the section of the marriage law that states the legislative intent. It says: "Marriage is the institution that is the foundation of the family and of society. Its stability is basic to morality and civilization, and of vital interest to society and the state. The consequences of the marriage contract are more significant to society than those of other contracts, and the public interest must be taken into account always."

Christian sacramental marriage is equally communal. Like all sacraments, marriage is an outward sign of grace. Outward means nothing if it does not mean public. When a man and a woman participate in the sacrament of marriage, each one makes a promise to the other and to the church community as well. They are a sign of God's love for us, a symbol of the relationship between God and people. This symbol is essential because the way we relate to God is molded in part by the way we see husbands and wives relate to each other.

When all of us realize that, as members of the state or the church, we are a fundamental part of any marriage, we can begin to overcome the other reasons for noninvolvement. As a part of the union, there is no escaping the conflict that it sometimes produces; no "us" and "them"; no way to argue privacy. We have a responsibility to help a troubled married couple fulfill the promises they made to each other and to us.

I believe that families with problems would ultimately welcome the well-intended assistance and input of the community. No matter what else we are, we humans are sociologically and spiritually oriented to need interaction with and support from other people. Nowhere is this more crucial than in the complex realm of marriage and the family.

What would life be like in a society where domestic violence is viewed as abnormal and of public concern? In such a world, confronted with evidence that there was trouble in another's home, we would readily offer support. People who were harmed would feel no shame because they would be assured it was not their fault. Those who caused harm would more readily agree to treatment because their actions would not be tolerated and attempts to correct such behavior would be applauded.

This ideal world, like the dismal one described earlier, does not exist. Either world is possible; we will bring one or the other about by the way that we live. I prefer to live as if the better world existed. In that world, all of us would know that we are not alone, that others care for us and are concerned about our well-being. We would accept help when we needed it and, in return, give it to others. In that world, we would fulfill our commitment outlined in the U.S. Constitution to "build a more perfect union," and our directive from Jesus to "love one another as ourselves."


Each month, advance copies of Sounding Board are mailed to a representative sample of U.S. CATHOLIC subscribers. Their answers to questions about Sounding Board and a balanced selection of their comments about the article as a whole appear in Feedback.

A neighbor or family member should become involved in another couple's marriage when:

Abuse of any kind is involved.

Pamela Monaco

Broomall, Pa.

There is danger of physical harm for any person.

Father Jack W. Wehman

Cincinnati, Ohio

Children are the victims.

Sister Mary Jo Kearns, R.S.M.

Watchung, N.J.

There seem to be visible problems that continue, such as abuse, adultery, serious arguments, and serious lack of communication.

Lynda Shainayskas

Grandville, Mich.

As soon as there are indications of difficulty. Family or neighbors should let couples know that it is normal to experience difficulties.

Father Donald Caron

Lawrenceville, Ga.

Why must we wait until a problem occurs to get involved? Sharing a meal, taking kids to a ball game, and playing cards are sociable ways to get involved with other people's marriages. If you are already seen as part of the marriage, it is easier to be involved during the bad times.

David Cook

Knoxville, Tenn.
I place great value on privacy in my home.

90% agree
 6% disagree
 4% other

I would offer uninvited help to a troubled married couple any way I

44% agree
36% disagree
20% other

I have intervened in the marriage of a neighbor or relative because
abuse was occurring.

29% agree
59% disagree
12% other

When they ask for help. If it's someone close, then we can offer to help. We cannot help someone who does not want our help.

Shirley M. Noel

Northbridge, Mass.

The level of involvement is crucial: relationship difficulties may simply require a willing ear; abuse requires the intervention of the authorities.

Judy Novak

Port Washington, Wis.

There's a fine line of distinction between meddling and offering useful assistance. One must be fully and sensitively aware of the problem before getting involved.

Felicia Perna

Massapequa, N.Y.

Family members intervening is one thing--neighbors is another. I believe most couples would find family interference acceptable but would be ashamed to have neighbors know their problems.

Name withheld

Baldwin, N.Y.

Sometimes it is easier to talk with a spouse if one can explain to a neutral party the nature of one's thinking.

M. D. Holzaepfel

Saraland, Ala.

If marriage is a public affair, we should always be involved in others' marriages in whatever way is appropriate--prayer, public-policy advocacy, advice, intervention, and so on--without being inappropriately intrusive.

Name withheld

Ithaca, N.Y.
Much of the breakdown in society can be attributed to the breakdown
in families.

92% agree
 4% disagree
 4% other

Domestic abuse is unacceptable, but such problems should be solved
in the privacy of marriage and with the help of counselors, not the

42% agree
47% disagree
11% other

If the community took more responsibility for helping victims and
perpetrators of domestic abuse, more people would seek help.

84% agree
 8% disagree
 8% other

While marriage is a public commitment, the couple's personal
relationship is nobody else's business.

27% agree
59% disagree
14% other

I would define "normal" marital problems as:

Both partners maintain respect for one another in spite of their differences.

Evelyn F. Duffin

Alhambra, Ill.

Disagreements about money, career, sex, raising children, buying a house or a car, decisions on in-laws and friends. "Abnormal" begins when the issues that are not addressed become excuses for personal, physical attacks.

J. H. Schuler

Midlothian, Ill.

It may involve arguing--even yelling. But once the yelling becomes habitual, you have crossed the line into abnormal.

Lee W. Formwalt

Albany, Ga.

Keeping lines of communication always open.

Ed Guthrie

Lancaster, Pa.

Attempting to solve scheduling and time-constraint problems so as to have more time together.

Patricia Meckle

New York, N.Y.

One thing I would like my parish to offer to educate or support families in need is:

More direct sermons on the church's abhorrence of physical violence. Also, specifically where people in need can get help. It's nice of parishes to tell people in need to get help but better to give them names and telephone numbers and support them in their search for help.

Jeanette Pedder

Lanark Village, Fla.

Support groups for couples where they can meet and make friends with other married couples. I believe isolation increases the possibility of marital/family-abuse situations.

Chris Schupbach

Glendale, Ariz.

The "buddy" system--having a couple who has had problems and is doing better be available to contact a couple having problems and offer to accompany them to a seminar, suggest counselors, or talk with them.

Kay Limke

Tulsa, Okla.

Safe havens for battered spouses and children.

William P. Twine

Chesapeake, Va.
I condone a person intervening in someone else's marriage if they

98% physical child abuse
92% physical spousal
80% verbal or emotional
 child abuse
70% verbal or emotional
 spousal abuse
40% adultery
14% arguing
11% nagging
13% insensitivity

A good ministry to single-parent families.

Jim Casapulla

Palm Coast, Fla.

Sponsor workshops on abuse and also stress the positive aspects of a good marriage.

Linda Matyas

Portage, Mich.

The cost-free help of a trained marriage counselor.

Nora Turvey

Washington, D.C.

Classes on raising children. Times for couples to discuss their changing needs after a few years of marriage. Family fun nights.

Rita Coates

Central City, Iowa

Better pre-marriage instructions. Infertility is a matter that is not treated in pre-Cana and can put a great strain on a marriage especially when unthinking clergy "preach" that marriage is for childbearing.

Name withheld

Portsmouth, N.H.
People often confuse being helpful with meddling--busybody neighbors
butting in at every argument would do a marriage more harm than

88% agree
 7% disagree
 5% other

I don't see myself as a fundamental part of other people's

59% agree
37% disagree
 4% other

Most couples in troubled marriages would welcome the support and
help of the community.

40% agree
38% disagree
22% other

More marriage enrichment programs. We have engagement encounter and then nothing (except marriage encounter). How about a "5th Anniversary" program, a "10th Anniversary" program, and so on.

Spencer F. Stopa

Alamogordo, N.M.

To provide a baby-sitting roster so that parents can spend time together to improve and maintain their marriage.

Name withheld

San Jose, Calif.

General comments

All marriages celebrated by the parish require the prayerful support and, at times, direct assistance from the faith community to which they belong.

David E. Beauvais

Rockford, Ill.

The best way to avoid having victims and bullies in marriages is to teach children both at home and at school that neither God's law nor U.S. law tolerates violent behavior.

R. J. Windgassen

Venice, Fla.

I wish I had interfered 35 years ago when a small girl in our neighborhood was being physically abused by her mother. Little Patty often had bruises on her face ("My mom hit me," she'd say), and on the coldest Wisconsin winter days, her mother locked her out of the house until 6 p.m. She wandered from house to house until someone let her in. I wonder if the abuse continued to a second and third generation. I deeply regret my inaction.

Barbara L. Scholtz

Jacksonville, Fla.

There was a couple in our parish going through a very bitter divorce. They were both friends, so I decided to stay neutral and not get involved. I have always regretted that decision. If I had told them how concerned everyone was and how everyone was praying for them, maybe they still would have divorced, but they would have at least known that we, as a community, cared and hurt for them.

Peggy Sookikian

Columbia, S.C.

I have tried to help in the marriages of three of my sisters. When physical abuse was involved, I brought them into my home. Unfortunately, I didn't seem to help. I think they needed professional help.

Dorothy Grandinetti

Honolulu, Hawaii

At the very least, priests can preach mutual respect from the pulpit. There are many gospel stories that would lend themselves to a sermon on domestic violence.

Name withheld

St. David, Me.
Along with Mary Ann Perga, I believe that marriage is not a private

69% agree
20% disagree
11% other

There is already too much intrusion into our lives and values by government and busybody neighbors both of whom know "best" what's good for us. Repentance cannot be forced upon us by unwanted intrusion, unless laws are broken or complaints lodged by those involved.

Ed Conner

East Marion, N.Y.

(All comments used in Feedback must be signed, but we will withhold names on request. We regret that space limitations force us to condense letters and that many letters cannot be used at all. We try to reflect major opinion trends accurately. Our thanks to all who wrote. --The Editors)
COPYRIGHT 1996 Claretian Publications
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1996, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:includes survey results; domestic violence
Author:Perga, Mary Ann
Publication:U.S. Catholic
Article Type:Column
Date:Aug 1, 1996
Previous Article:Taking the plunge.
Next Article:How I came to speak Catholic.

Related Articles
Deadly secrets: violence in the police family.
Domestic Violence Becomes a Workplace Issue.
The Price of Alcohol, Wife Abuse, and Husband Abuse.
Dealing with domestic violence in law enforcement relationships.
Dear readers.
Domestic violence examined: qualitative research in India contributes to interventions to assist victims.
Screening for domestic violence: practice patterns, knowledge, and attitudes of physicians in Arizona.
The needs of pacific women when they are victims of family violence.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters