Printer Friendly

Management of Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) Through Agronomic Practices in Onion Field Plots.

Byline: Abdul Khaliq, Muhammad Afzal, Azhar Abbas Khan, Abubakar M. Raza, Muhammad Kamran, Hafiz Muhammad Tahir, Muhammad Anjum Aqeel and Muhammad Irfan Ullah


Onion, Allium cepa (L.) is very important and highly valuable vegetable crop all over the world. Amongst the insect pests, onion thrips, Thrips tabaci Linedman (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) has been proved to be the most important factor for onion yield reduction. In the present study effects of intercropping and plant spacing were recorded in onion field plots as a management tool against T. tabaci. For this purpose, four intercrops (chili, tomato, okra and cotton) and five plant spacings (10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 cm) were used in onion field crop. Minimum thrips density per plant was recorded in onion plots intercropped with cotton during the study period of two years. The maximum thrips density was recorded in control plots (26.19+-5.67), F4,250= 7.79; P< 0.001. Onion plots intercropped with cotton gained the highest bulb weight and yielded maximum onion/plot followed by tomato, chilli and okra, respectively.

No difference in mean bulb weight of control and onion plot intercropped with okra was recorded in the current study. However, bulb weight of onion in both of these plots was significantly lower as compared to onion plots intercropped with cotton. Minimum thrips density per plant was recorded in onion plots in which plant to plant space was 30 cm followed by 25 cm, 20 cm, 15 cm and 10 cm plant spacing during both experimental years. The thrips density was increased with the decrease of plant to plant spacing. Further, single bulb weight with 30 cm plant spacing was significantly higher as compared to lowest plant spacing (10 cm). In both years, onion plots with minimum plant spacing (10 cm) produced more yield/plot but with lowest bulb weight and vice versa. Therefore, it was concluded that cotton should be intercropped with onion as a trap crop and medium onion plant spacing should be practiced for reducing thrips infestation and suitable bulb size with optimum yield.

Key words

Agronomic practices, Eco-friendly, IPM, Onion thrips


Thrips tabaci is an important insect pest of onion (Lorbeer et al., 2002; Nawrocka 2003; Jensen et al., 2003; Waiganjo et al., 2008), during the high infestation period its population may reached to 100 thrips/plant (Ullah et al., 2010). In addition to direct damages it serves as a vector of different diseases and causes economic losses in onion production. The eco-friendly management practices are required to keep pest population below economic damages by assuring safe mode to beneficial (Khaliq et al., 2014). The way of using cultural and agronomic practices are considered important for the management of thrips and to increased crop yield (Cheema et al., 2003; Msuya et al., 2005). Several sustainable practices are being used worldwide in reducing thrips infestation of vegetable crops. These practices are very helpful in reducing the injudicious use of broad spectrum insecticides (Martin et al., 2003; Rueda and Shelton, 2003; Ullah et al., 2007), which cause severe effects on the economy of a country.

Intercropping and plant spacing are very important agronomic techniques that keep thrips population below economic injury level in onion crop (Finckh and Karpenstein-Machan, 2002; Malik et al., 2003). Intercropping has wide range of benefits including suppression of weeds, improvement in soil fertility, conservation of natural predatory fauna and higher production (Trdan et al., 2005, 2006; Blaser et al., 2007; Kabura et al., 2008; Rao et al., 2012). Reasonable plant spacing alters the behavior of insects by reducing appropriate egg laying site and shelter leading to healthy plant growth and lower risks of pest outbreak and diseases (Anyim, 2002; Ferro, 2002).

Intercropping is considered as an important component of crop production system in developing countries (Sodiya et al., 2010). Onion and clover (Trifolium) intercropping cause reduction in onion thrips population and higher onion yield (Hildenhagen et al., 1995; Trdan et al., 2006). Chilies intercropped with garlic and onion showed lower pest infestation levels with higher yield (Aswathanarayanareddy et al., 2006). A significantly higher population of thrips was observed in the single or mono cropping rather than mixed-cropping (Pankeaw et al., 2011). Up to 15.7% thrips reduction was achieved by intercropping onion crop with spider plants (Gachu et al., 2012).

Appropriate row spacing reduces insect pest infestation (Asiwe et al., 2005; Ihejirika et al., 2008; Sarwar, 2008; Akinkunmi et al., 2012). Row to row distance of 30 cm and plant to plant distance of 20 cm distance has been reported to be most suitable to suppress the thrips population and better yield (Malik et al., 2003). More plant spacing help in bulb expression and also minimize competition for nutrient and light (Saud et al., 2013). The present study was designed to evaluate the impact of some intercrops and different plant spacing on the management of thrips population in onion fields.


Effect of intercropping

The study was conducted at the University College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan during 2010-2012. The onion was intercropped with chili (Capsicum annum L.), tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.), okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) and cotton (Gossypium hersutum L.). Fifteen plots [three for each treatment and three controls plots with only onion and no intercropped] were used for each experiment. Each plot was 800 cm long and 180 cm wide. Six alternate rows including intercrops and onion were planted in each plot, which counts 50 onion plants and 25 plants of intercrops in each row. The row to row distance between plants was 30 cm while plant to plant distance between onion and intercrop was 15 cm and 30 cm, respectively. A distance of 90 cm was maintained between each experimental plot. Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) was used.

Plots were irrigated using canal water on weekly basis during early three irrigations, while the duration was prolonged to 10-14 days afterward. The fertilizers in granular form were applied in three split doses (i) at sowing, (ii) seedling transplantation and (iii) onion bulb formation time. The recommended fertilizers doses (kg/ha) of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium at a ratio of 35: 35: 25 were applied.

Data collection

Fifteen plants were randomly selected (5 plants/row) from each experimental field plot for thrips population estimation. The adults and larval thrips population per leaf was visually counted on weekly basis by using magnifying hand lens of 4X power. The weight of single bulb (g), yield/ plot (kg), and overall yield/hectare (tons) from control and treated plots was also recorded.

Effect of onion plant spacing

Onion seedlings of 10 weeks' old were shifted from nursery to experimental field plots during mid of January. Impact of five plant spacing's (i.e., 10cm, 15cm, 20cm, 25cm, and 30cm) was observed on onion thrips density. In total, 15 experimental plots [three for each of four treatments and three untreated controls] were utilized for each experiment. The distance between each experimental plot was 90 meters. In each plot, there were three rows of onion seedlings. In 1st row there were 75 plants and plant to plant space was 10m. In the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th row the numbers of plants were 50, 38, 30, 25 cm and plant to plant distance was 15, 20, 25 and 30 cm, respectively. In all treatment plots row to row distance was 30 cm. A distance of 9 meter was maintained between experimental plots. The design used was Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD). Irrigation and fertilizer application patterns were same as described in the intercropping experiment.

Statistical analyses

Before the analysis of data, the normality was assessed using Kolmogrorov-Smirnov normality test. Parametric tests were performed on normal data. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's test was used to compare the treatments. Pearson correlation was performed to find out the relationship of thrips density and plant spacing. Results were considered significant if P-value was <0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 16) and Minitab (version 14.1)



Non-significant difference was found between two years (2011 and 2012) however minimum thrips density was recorded in the onion plots which were intercropped with cotton followed by tomato, chilli and okra, respectively (Table I). The maximum thrips density was recorded in control plots (i.e., 26.19+-5.67). Statistically significant difference was found in the thrips densities among treatments (F4,250= 7.79; P< 0.001 for 2011 and F4,250= 9.77; P< 0.001for 2012). Onion plots intercropped with cotton yielded highest bulb weight followed by tomato, chilli and okra, respectively. No difference in mean bulb weight of control and onion plot intercropped with okra was recorded. However, bulb weight of onion in both of these plots was significantly lower compared to the onion plots intercropped with cotton (Table I)

Table I.-Impact of intercropping on thrips population, onion bulb weight, yield/plot and yield/hectare in onion field plots.

Treatments###Mean thrip density (MTD)###Bulb weight (g)###Yield/plot (kg)###Yield (T.ha)



Chili###19.42+-4.26 b###23.03+-4.4b###50.82+-2.9ab###48.51+-2.1b###7.62+-0.43ab###7.27+-0.47ab###10.15+-0.62ab###10.44+-0.86ab

Tomato###18.01+-3.97 b###20.75+-3.98b###51.38+-3.04ab###49.73+- 2.64b###7.70+-0.45ab###7.46+-0.39ab###11.06+-0.68ab###10.70+-0.55ab


Cotton###8.21+-1.6 a###10.72+-1.94a###55.45+-3.64b###53.51+-2.41c###8.31+-0.54b###8.02+-0.59b###11.93+-0.78b###11.52+-0.73b

Table II.-Impact of plant spacing on thrips population, onion bulb weight, yield/plot and yield/hectare in onion field plots.

Treatments###Mean thrip density (MTD)###Bulb weight (g)###Yield/plot (kg)###Yield (T.ha)




10 cm###24.31+-5.07c###30.56+-6.78c###50.81+-2.97a###37.86+-2.67a###7.62+-0.57b###8.22+-0.63b###16.40+-0.82b###12.22+-0.72b

20 cm###19.64+-4.15b###24.31+-5.50b###66.46+-3.04b###51.07+-2.84ab###4.98+-0.34a###5.71+-0.31a###10.73+-0.49a###8.21+-0.44a

25 cm###17.28+-3.67b###21.82+-4.95b###71.57+-2.14b###58.68+-2.11b###4.29+-0.27a###5.28+-0.24a###9.24+-2.55a###7.52+-2.16a

30 cm###14.85+-3.16a###19.55+-4.6a###73.29+-2.55b###59.93+-2.35b###3.66+-0.19a###4.49+-0.16a###7.89+-0.27a###6.45+-0.24a

When the onion yield (tons/hectare) was compared among treatments, no difference in the onion plots intercropped with chilli, okra and tomato was found. However, yield of control plots (without intercropping) was significantly less compared to the onion crop intercropped with cotton. Over all, there was significant difference among treatments for bulb weight (F4,14= 5.19; P< 0.01), yield/plot (F4,14= 5.15; P< 0.01), and onion yield tons/hectare (F4,14= 5.17; P<0.01).

Plant spacing

Minimum thrips density was recorded in the onion plots where plant to plant space was 30cm followed by 25cm, 20cm, 15cm and 10cm plant spacing, respectively (Table II). Thrips density was increased with the decrease of plant to plant space (Table II). Statistically non-significant difference was recorded in the thrips densities between plots with 10cm and15cm plant spacing. Similarly, there was no difference in thrips densities between the plots in which plant to plant spacing was 20cm and 25cm. However, the thrips density in the plots with 30cm plant spacing was significantly lower compared to the all other treatment plots (F4,50= 2.62; P= 0.036 during 2011 and F4,50= 1.88; P= 0.11 was observed during 2012). There was a significant negative correlation between plant spacing and thrips density (Pearson correlation= -0.997; P< 0.001).

Similarly, onion plots with 30cm plant spacing yielded highest bulb weight but a non-significant difference in mean bulb weight of onion plots with 20cm, 25cm and 30cm plant spacing was observed. However, these plots differed significantly from the plots with 10cm plant spacing (Table II). Maximum onion yield tons/hectare was found in plot with 10cm plant spacing followed by control plots with 15cm plant spacing. However, no significant difference was observed in yield tons/hectare among treatments with plant spacing 20cm, 25cm and 30cm. Over all, there was a significant difference among treatments for bulb weight (F4,14= 6.55; P= 0.007), yield/plot (F4,14= 9.19; P= 0.002) and onion yield tons/hectare (F4,14= 9.2; P= 0.002).


Cultural practices such as intercropping are very important component of eco-friendly management of many economic pests. In the present study, thrips population reduction in year 2011 was observed as 68.6%, 31.2%, 25.8% and 9.6% when onion was intercropped with cotton, tomato, chili and okra, respectively as compared to control. Almost similar trend was observed in 2012. These findings are in agreement with Gachu et al. (2012) who observed up to 45.2% and 21.6%, reduction of onion thrips density when onion crop was intercropped with spider plant and carrot, respectively. Present results are also in accordance with Afifi et al. (1990) as they reported 80% reduction in onion thrips infestation by intercropping of onions and garlic with tomato in Egypt and in England, Uvah and Coaker (1984) observed 50% decreased in onion thrips population with mixed planting of carrot and onion.

When onion was intercropped with cotton, the thrips population moved towards cotton seedlings. Faircloth et al. (2002) also reported that cotton seedlings are more susceptible to thrips attack. So cotton can be used as trap crop in onion and when thrips populations reached to a certain level, the trap crop should be sprayed with insecticide (Alston and Drost, 2008).

In addition to reducing thrips population, the intercropping also showed positive effects on onion yield (Table I). Trdan et al. (2006) also obtained similar results of thrips suppression and higher onion bulb yield when onion intercropped with white clover, but Lacy phacelia intercropped in onion reduced onion yield. The reason behind the reduction in onion bulb yield could be competition between intercrops for nutrients, light, and water (Trdan et al., 2006). Similarly, Kabura et al. (2008) revealed that onion and pepper intercropping did not affect bulb size. They also recorded higher total and marketable onion yield in monocrop onion than intercrop. Gombac and Trdan (2014) also found least thrips damage to leek plants when intercropped with birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.) but significantly lower yield was obtained as the intercrop remained pretty competitive with leek plants.

In present study inverse relation between plant spacing and thrips population in onion field crop was noted. Present study showed 13.40% reduction in thrips infestation and 11.39 % increase in onion bulb weight when plant to plant distance was increased from 15 cm (control) to 20 cm in year 2011 and same trend was observed in 2012. Similar results were obtained by Malik et al. (2003) and they recommended 30 cm row to row and 20 cm plant to plant distance, most suitable thrips suppression and also produce better yield. Abdel-Rahman and Hamid (2013) suggested that onion seedlings transplanted on ridges at 10 cm distance ensure better onion bulb size and ultimately produce better yield.

The increase in bulb weigh with increase in plant spacing in current study is an agreement with the results of Saud et al. (2013) who noted significant increase in average bulb weight with more plant spacing (Table II). The same result was observed by Farrag (1995) who mentioned that single onion bulb weight increase with higher plant spacing. Increase plant spacing provide more space to bulb for expression and reduce competition for nutrient and light Saud et al. (2013), affect food searching and egg laying behavior of insect pests (Ferro, 2002) and reduced pest damage with increase in plant spacing Anyim (2002).

The lower plant spacing produces more yield per plot and enhance total yield because of more number of plants. Stoffella (1996) and Kahsay et al. (2013) found that onion yield increased with higher plant density but at the expense of smaller bulb size. Asaduzzaman et al. (2012) recommended wider plant spacing for quality onion seed production. Khan et al. (2003) reported that wider plant spacing gave larger onion bulb size which was not better for storage purpose and for consumer demand while closer spacing produces small bulb size which was not suitable for consumer choice. Therefore, medium bulb size with optimum plant spacing is recommended in onion to minimize the thrips density, maintain the bulb size and with better ultimate yield.


The current investigations revealed that if cotton is intercropped with onion as a trap crop and are planted with spacing of 20-25 cm thrips infestation is reduced. Moreover the bulb size as well as the yield is also increased.

Statement of conflict of interest

Authors have declared no conflict of interest.


Abdel-Rahman, A.M. and Hamid, M.E., 2013. Impact of FFS on farmer's adoption of IPM options for onion: A case study from Gezira State, Sudan. World J. agric. Sci., 9: 38-44.

Afifi, F.M.L., Haydar, M.F. and Omar, H.I.H., 1990. Effect of different intercropping systems on tomato infestation with major insect pests, Bemisia tabaci Genn. (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), Myzus persicae Sulzer (Homoptera: Aphididae) and Phthorimaea operculella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Bull. Fac. Agric., Uni. Cairo, 41: 885-900.

Akinkunmi, O.Y., Akintoye, H.A., Umeh, V.C. and Ade-Oluwa O.O., 2012. Influence of spacing on the feeding activities of major pests of sunflower and their associated damage. Agric. Biol. J., 3: 233-236.

Alson, D.G. and Drost, D., 2008. Onion thrips thrips tabaci, Pest fact sheet. Utah State University Extension and Utah Pest Diagnostic Laboratory, pp. 7.

Anyim, A., 2002. Effect of planting dates on the population dynamics of the pod sucking bug Nezzare viridula L. (Hemiptera: Penatatomidae) in South Eastern Nigeria. Procc. 36th Ann. Conf. Agriculture Society of Nigeria, pp. 71-74.

Asaduzzaman, M., Hasan, M.M., Hasan, M.M., Moniruzzaman, M. and Howlander, M.H.K., 2012. Effect of bulb size and plant spacing on seed production of onion Allium cepa L. Bangladesh J. agric. Res., 37: 405-414.

Asiwe, J.A.N., Nokoe, S., Jackai, L.E.N. and Ewete, F.K., 2005. Does varying cowpea spacing provide better protection against cowpea pests. Crop Prot., 24: 465-471.

Aswathanarayanareddy, N., Ashok, K.C.T. and Gowdar, S.B., 2006. Effect of inter cropping on population dynamics of major pests of chili, Capsicum annuum L. Indian J. agric. Res., 40: 294-297.

Blaser, B.C., Singer, J.W. and Gibson, L.R., 2007. Winter cereal, seeding rate and intercrop seeding rate effect on red clover yield and quality. Agron. J., 99: 723-729.

Cheema, K.L., Saeed, A. and Habib, M., 2003. Effect of sowing date on set size in various cultivars of onion, Allium cepa L. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 5: 185-187.

Faircloth, J.C., Bradley, J.R. and Duyn, J.W., 2002. Effect of insecticide treatment and environmental factors on thrips population, plant growth and yield of cotton. J. entomol. Sci., 374: 308-316.

Farrag, M.M., 1995. Influence of planting method and plant density on growth, yield and bulbs quality on onion growth from sets. Assiut J. agric. Sci., 26: 73-84.

Ferro, D.N., 2002. Cultural control. The university of Minnesota and equal opportunity educator and employer: 7.

Finckh, M.R. and Karpenstein-Machan, M., 2002. Intercropping for pest management. In: Encyclopedia of pest management (ed. D. Pimentel). Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton FL, London, New York, Singapore. pp. 423-425.

Gachu, S.M., Muthomi, J.W., Narla, R.D., Nderit, J.H. and Olubayo, F.M., 2012. Management of thrips, Thrips tabaci in bulb onion by use of vegetable intercrops. Int. J. agric. Sci., 2: 393-402.

Gombac, P. and Trdan, S., 2014. The efficacy of intercropping with birdsfoot trefoil and summer savoury in reducing damage inflicted by onion thrips Thrips tabaci, (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on four leek cultivars. J. Pl. Dis. Prot., 1213: 117-124.

Hildenhagen, R., Richter, E. and Hommes, M., 1995. Vorkommen und gezielte Bekampfung von Thrips tabaci an Porree und Zwiebeln. Mitt. Dtsch. Ges. Allg. angew. Ent., 10: 183-187.

Ihejirika, G.O., Ibeawuchi, I.I. and Ogbedeh, K.O., 2008. Assessment of planting technique and planting density on insect's damage, defoliation and pod-rot of groundnut. Life Sci. J., 52: 58-62.

Jensen, L., Simko, B., Shock, C.C. and Saunders, L.D., 2003. A two-year study on alternative methods for controlling onion thrips, Thrips tabaci L. in Spanish onions. Oregon State Univ. agric. Exp. Stat. Sp. Rep., 1048: 94-106.

Kabura, B.H., Musa, B. and Odo, P.E., 2008. Evaluation of the yield components and yield of onion, Allium cepa L. and pepper, Capsicum annum L. intercrop in the Sudan savanna. J. Agron., 7: 88-92.

Kahsay, Y., Abay, F. and Belew, D., 2013. Intra row spacing effect on shelf life of onion varieties (Allium cepa L.) at Aksum, Northern Ethiopia. J. Pl. Breed. Crop Sci., 5: 127-136.

Khaliq, A., Khan, A.A., Afzal, M., Tahir, H.M., Raza, A.M., Khan, A.M., 2014. Field evaluation of selected botanicals and commercial synthetic insecticides against Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) populations and predators in onion field plots. Crop Prot., 62: 10-15.

Khan, M.A., Hasan, M.K., Miah, M.A.J., Alam, M.M. and Masum, A.S.M.H., 2003. Effect of plant spacing on the growth and yield of different varieties of onion. Pak. J. biol. Sci., 6: 1582-1585.

Lorbeer, J.W., Kuhar, T.P. and Hoffmann, M.P., 2002. Monitoring and forecasting for disease and insect attack in onions and Allium crops within IPM strategies. In: Allium crop science: Recent advances (eds H.D Rabinowitch and L. Currah). CABI, Wallingford, UK pp. 293-309.

Malik, M.F., Nawaz, M. and Hafeez, Z., 2003. Inter and intra row spacing effect on thrips Thrips spp. population in onion Allium cepa. Asian J. Pl. Sci., 29: 713-715.

Martin, N.A., Workman, P.J. and Butler, R.C., 2003. Insecticide resistance in onion thrips Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). N. Z. J. Crop Hortic. Sci., 312: 99-106.

Msuya, D.G., Reuben, S.O.W.M., Mbilinyi, L.B., Maerere, A.P., Msogoya, T. Mulungu, L.S. and Misangu, R.N., 2005. Evaluation of field performance and storage of some tropical short-day onion Allium cepa L. cultivars. W. Afr. J. Ecol., 8: 10-18.

Nawrocka, B., 2003. Economic importance and the control method of Thrips tabaci Lind. on onion. IOBC/WPRS Bull., 26: 321-324.

Pankeaw, K., Ngampongsai, A., Permkam, S. and Rukadee, O., 2011. Abundance and distribution of thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in mangosteen, Garcinia mangostana L. grown in single-and mixed-cropping systems. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol., 333: 263-269.

Rao, M.S., Rama-Rao, C.A., Srinivas, K., Pratibha, G., Vidya-Sekhar, S.M., Sree-Vani, G. and Venkatswarlu, B., 2012. Intercropping for management of insect pests of castor, Ricinus communis, in the semi-arid tropics of India. J. Insect Sci., 12: 1-10.

Rueda, A. and Shelton, A.M., 2003. Development and evaluation of a thrips insecticide bioassay system for monitoring resistance in Thrips tabaci. Pest Manage. Sci., 59: 553-558.

Sarwar, M., 2008. Plant spacing, a non-polluting tool for aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) management in canola, Brassica napus. J. entomol. Soc. Iran, 272: 13-22.

Saud, S., Yajun, C., Razaq, M., Luqman, M., Fahad, S., Abdullah, M. and Sadiq, A., 2013. Effect of potash levels and row spacing on onion yield. J. Biol. Agric. Hlthcare., 316: 118-127.

Sodiya, A.S., Akinwale, A.T., Okeleye, K.A. and Emmanuel, J.A., 2010. An integrated decision support system for intercropping. Int. J. Decis. Suppo. Syst. Tech., 2: 51-66.

Stoffella, P.J., 1996. Planting arrangement and density of transplants influence sweet Spanish onion yields and bulb size. Hortic. Sci., 37: 1129-1130.

Trdan, S., Milevoj, L., Zezlina, I., Raspudic, E. and Andjus, L., 2005. Feeding damage by onion thrips, Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on early white cabbage grown under insecticide-free conditions. Afr. Entomol., 13: 85-95.

Trdan, S., Znicdarcic, D., Valic, N., Rozman, L. and Vidrih, M., 2006. Intercropping against onion thrips, Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in onion production: on the suitability of orchard grass, Lacy phacelia, and buckwheat as alternatives for white clover. J. Pl. Dis. Prot., 113: 24-30.

Ullah, A., Ashraf-Bhatti, M., Gurmani, Z.A. and Imran, M., 2007. Studies on planting patterns of maize Zea mays L. Facilitating legumes intercropping. J. agric. Res., 45: 113-118.

Ullah, F., Maraj-ul-Mulk, Farid, A., Saeed, M.Q. and Sattar, S., 2010. Population Dynamics and Chemical Control of Onion Thrips (Thrips tabaci, Lindemann). Pakistan J. Zool., 42: 401-406.

Uvah I.I.I. and Coaker, T.H., 1984. Effect of mixed cropping on some insect pests of carrots and onions. Ent. Exp. Appl., 36: 159-167.

Waiganjo, M.M., Mueke, J.M. and Gitonga, L.M., 2008. Susceptible onion growth stages for selective and economic protection from onion thrips infestation. Afr. J. Hortic. Sci., 1: 82-90.
COPYRIGHT 2016 Asianet-Pakistan
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2016 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Khaliq, Abdul; Afzal, Muhammad; Khan, Azhar Abbas; Raza, Abubakar M.; Kamran, Muhammad; Tahir,Hafiz
Publication:Pakistan Journal of Zoology
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:9PAKI
Date:Dec 31, 2016
Previous Article:Evaluation of Radiosensitizing and Anti-Angiogenesis Activity of Chelidonium majus Extract in Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma Transplanted Mice.
Next Article:A Study on Branching of Aortic Arch in the Greater Flamingo (Phoenicopterus roseus, Pallas 1811).

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters