Printer Friendly

Malaria and Geohelminthiasis Coinfections in Expectant Women: Effect on Maternal Health and Birth Outcomes in a Malaria Endemic Region in Kenya.

1. Background

Parasitic infections such as malaria and geohelminthiasis are life-threatening as well as the leading cause of mortality in developing countries particularly in risky groups, such as children under five years and pregnant women [1]. Expectant mothers are more vulnerable to infections because, during pregnancy, there is a transient depression of cell-mediated immunity that allows foetal allograft retention which on the other hand interferes with resistance to various infectious diseases [2]. Immunological factors influence rates of co-infection because helminths modulate host immune responses both to themselves and to concurrent infections. That is why pregnant women, immunologically compromised, are highly susceptible to parasitic infections such as malaria and soil-transmitted helminthiasis [3]. Immunological studies show that the impact of geohelminths and malaria parasites is intensified when they coexist [4, 5].

A number of inconsistencies regarding the relationship between geohelminthiasis and malaria coinfection in pregnancy abound in literature. In a study undertaken in Nigeria, it was demonstrated that over 45% of Plasmodium-infected pregnant women also harbored various geohelminths [6]. A contrary study finding indicated no association between geohelminths and malaria parasites in pregnancy [7].

Infection with geohelminths particularly hookworms and malaria parasites is associated with decreased haemoglobin levels which lead to anaemia. These may have disastrous consequences in pregnancy [8, 9]. Furthermore, coinfection involving hookworms and Plasmodium falciparum has been reported to have additive impacts on haemoglobin by increasing the susceptibility to P. falciparum which have greater consequences on pregnancy outcome, because it results in intrauterine growth retardation, low birth weight, preterm delivery, and high neonate mortality [10].

A study done in Ghana found that anaemia in pregnant women, coinfected with geohelminths and malaria parasites, was associated with low birth weight, preterm delivery, and small birth weight for gestational age. Most of these adverse effects appeared to be driven by malaria parasite infection. The only significant effect of geohelminths alone was an increase in the risk of being small for gestational age [11].

In another related study, women coinfected with geohelminths and malaria had higher birth weights [12]. These inconsistencies necessitated further studies for a better understanding of these coinfections in pregnancy [13]. A hospital based study was carried out to determine the effect of geohelminths and malaria parasites coinfection on maternal health and birth outcomes among pregnant women residing in a malaria endemic region in Kenya.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design, Site, and Setting. A quantitative cross-sectional hospital based study was carried out from March 2016 to January 2017. Consecutive sampling was used to recruit 750 expectant mothers presenting for antenatal services. The study was carried out at Bungoma Country Referral Hospital (BCRH), located between latitude 0[degrees] 34'0"N and Longitude 34[degrees] 34' 0"E in Bungoma County, Kenya. The County is situated in a malaria endemic zone with perennial disease outbreaks. It has an estimated human population of 1,375,063 with an area of 3,032.2sq km, according to Kenya 2009, national census [14]. The County comprises 9 subcounties, namely, Kanduyi, Bumula, Sirisia, Kabuchai, Kimilili, Webuye East, Webuye West, Tongaren, and Mount Elgon. It has a tropical climate characterized by hot and humid conditions and two rainy seasons: the long rains (April to August) and the short rains (October to December). The predominant ethnic group is Luhyas (Bukusu), Teso, and Sabot, who practice subsistence farming. The referral hospital provides antenatal and delivery services to slum, rural, and urban communities.

2.2. Sample Size Determination. According to guidelines put forth by the World Health Organization (WHO), a sample size of 250 complying individuals in a geographically distinct community is needed to assess the prevalence and intensity of soil-transmitted helminth infections in each community [15, 16]. The study area covered three community units and an overall sample size of 750 pregnant women was considered appropriate.

3. Data Collection

3.1. Sampling Frame and Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria. Pregnant women seeking for delivery services at the Bungoma County Referral Hospital, aged between 18 and 49 years, who had lived in Bungoma County for the last 6 months and willing to consent were recruited in the study.

Expectant mothers, who were nonresidents, were below 18 and above 49 years of age, and those not willing to give consent and those on antimalarials or anthelmintics or haematinics were excluded from the study.

3.2. Stool Sample Processing and Geohelminths Identification. All consenting pregnant women were provided with labeled screw caped stool container plus a scoop and informed on how to transfer about 5 grams of fresh stool sample into a container. Each container was identified by the code number of the participant. Stool sample was collected from each participant during antenatal clinic (ANC) visit.

Kato-Katz thick smear technique was used to process stool, identify and quantify the number of geohelminths eggs per gram of faeces [17]. Each stool specimen was prepared by passing through a sieve to remove debris. Two slides for readers A and B were labeled. Filtered stool sample was transferred into a hole in a template mounted on each glass slide calibrated to hold 47.1mg of stool. Each preparation was covered with cellophane soaked in glycerin and malachite green. The preparations were then turned upside down on a flat surface and pressed gently to spread the stool sample evenly. Each slide was read by a separate qualified laboratory technologist to increase the sensitivity of geohelminths detection and verification of negative slides. The readings were done microscopically using x10 and x40 and average number of eggs in the two slides calculated. To ensure quality results, the slides were examined within one hour after preparation to avoid over clearing of hookworm eggs by glycerin. Specific helminth eggs and larvae were identified morphologically, counted, and recorded. As a quality control measure, 10% of already examined stool slides were reexamined by the principal investigator.

Haratamori technique [18] was used to culture and hatch hookworm eggs to differentiate Necator americanus filariform larvae from those of Ancylostoma duodenale. The procedure involved the use of filter paper strips of about 5 inches slightly tapered at one end for each stool specimen confirmed to contain hookworm eggs. One gram of each faecal sample was smeared at the centre of the strip. Four millilitres of distilled water was added to 15 millilitre conical centrifuge tube. The paper strips were inserted into the tube such that the tapered end was near the bottom of the tube with water level slightly below the faecal point. The tube was plugged using cotton wool and allowed to stand upright in a rack at 25[degrees]C for 10 days. Small amount of the fluid was withdrawn from the bottom of the tube and a smear was prepared on a glass slide. The preparation was cover slipped and examined microscopically using 10 x objective. Only Necator americanus filariform larvae were recovered from stool specimens. Filariform larvae of Necator americanus were identified based on their morphological features: average larval length 59[micro]m, pointed head and tail, oesophagus with thistle funnel shape (oesophageal bulb), presence of gap between oesophagus and intestine, and oesophagus length approximately 1/3 in relation to entire body length [18].

3.3. Blood Collection and Processing for Malaria Parasite Identification. Maternal peripheral blood was collected during antenatal clinic (ANC) visits. Cubital vein of each participants arm was sterilized using 70 % methylated spirit and 5 millilitres of blood was collected using a sterile syringe and needle. The blood was then transferred into a cryovial containing anticoagulant ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA).

For malaria parasites examination, two drops of blood was put on clean glass slide to prepare thick film and thin blood film and then air-dried in a horizontal position. Thick blood film concentrates malaria parasites for easier viewing while thin blood film facilitates malaria species identification by their morphological features. Thin blood films were fixed in 70% methanol for 30 seconds and air-dried. Both thin and thick films were stained using 10% Giemsa for 10 minutes. All asexual forms of malaria parasites (trophozoites and schizonts) in each preparation were identified microscopically using oil immersion objective x100 and recorded. Malaria parasites density per microlitre of blood was calculated by counting the number of malaria parasites against 200 white blood cells (WBCs) and multiplying by 8,000 to get malaria parasites/[micro]l of blood [19]. At least 100 high-power fields were examined before a film was declared negative. For quality control 10% buffered (pH 7.2) Giemsa stain was prepared for use after every 6 hours. Known malaria positive controls with low parasitemia were stained and examined daily to check the quality of the stain. 10% of read blood smears were reexamined for quality control. Part of the blood sample was used to assess haemoglobin and eosinophil levels and red blood cell (RBC) morphology.

3.4. Estimation of Haemoglobin and Eosinophil Levels. Maternal haemoglobin levels were measured using a portable haemoglobinometer (Hemocue Lee Diagnostic Inc. Switzerland) system by putting 2 microlitres (ul) of blood in a microcuvette preloaded with stabilising reagents. The microcuvette was then immediately placed into a portable spectrophotometric instrument and the digital reading of the haemoglobin concentration of each subject was read within 10-20 seconds. Control blood samples with known values of low haemoglobin levels (Hb<11.0g/dl) and high haemoglobin values (Hb 18g/dl) were run daily to validate the accuracy and reliability of the haemoglobinometer results

Coulter counter machine CBC5 (Coulter corporation Miami, FL, USA) was used to evaluate eosinophil levels. A cryovial containing 5mls of blood was placed in the coulter machine which sacks 10 [micro]l of blood following specific command and each subject result was read within 10-20 seconds. To diagnose iron deficiency (presence of hypochromic and microcytic red blood cells) peripheral blood films (pbf) were made from already collected blood, air-dried, and fixed using 70% methanol. Staining was done using 10% Leishman stain for 10 minutes and examined using oil immersion with x100 objective [19]. Microcytic hypochromic red cells were identified and recorded based on their small size and pale staining characteristics. Daily running of known control blood samples to validate accuracy of the Coulter counter and haemoglobinometer machine before running test samples was done. Weekly running of quality assurance (QA) to check the effectiveness of quality systems that are in place, for example, proper recording of the results, was also done.

3.5. Assessment of Neonatal Outcomes. Data for neonatal outcomes were obtained, recorded, and evaluated. Gestation period was assessed by palpation before delivery. After delivery, neonatal conditions (alive or stillbirth) were assessed, weight was measured to the nearest 0.1kg using an electronic balance, and appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration (APGAR) scale commonly were used to assess neonates health after birth. Based on the APGAR scale, the neonate's condition at birth was scored as normal, high chances of survival, low chances of survival, or dead.

3.6. Data Analysis

Data Analysis Was Performed Using SPSS Version16. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data and t-test was used to compare means. The relationship between geohelminths and malaria coinfection and different explanatory variables was done using chi-squire ([X.sup.2]) test. Multiple logistic regressions were used to determine the effect of malaria and helminth coinfection on maternal anaemia and birth outcomes. Statistically significant variables in bivariate analysis were entered into a model, odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, and P value was set as t< 0.05. Models were run for each adverse outcome separately, adjusting for maternal anaemia.

3.7. Ethical Considerations. The study was approved by Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology Institutional Review Board (approval number MMU/ COR403OO9 (57). Further approval was obtained from Bungoma County Referral Hospital. Oral and written informed consent was obtained from all study participants in any of the languages (English, Kiswahili). Pregnant women were explained to the study objectives and procedures. They were requested to sign written individual consent form. Study participants were given the option to withdraw from the study at any time they wished. Data was coded and kept strictly confidential. Information of the results was shared with study participants. Those infected with geohelminths and or malaria parasites were treated with antimalarial, anti-helminthic, and haematinic drugs free of charge at the hospital in accordance with clinical guidelines of WHO and Ministry of Health, Kenya.

4. Results

4.1. Characteristics of Pregnant Women and Their New-Borns. A total of 750 pregnant women were recruited in the study with gestation mean age of 24.63 [+ or -] 5.22 years. Majority of the participants (71.1%) were in the age range 18-27 years. The overall participant's characteristics are presented in Table 1.

4.2. Prevalence of Geohelminths and Malaria Parasites in Pregnancy. The occurrence of geohelminths, malaria parasites, and coinfection in this study was 24.7%, 21.6%, and 6.8%, respectively. The geohelminths identified were Ascaris lumbricoides, Necator americanus, Enterobius vermicularis, and Schistosoma mansoni. Malaria parasites identified were Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium malariae, and Plasmodium ovale.

4.3. Risk Factors for Maternal Anaemia. Although the mean haemoglobin level was 11.62 g/dl, 95% CI (11.49-11.74), a total of 367(48.9%) of expectant mothers were anaemic. Coinfection of Necator americanus and P. falciparum was associated with maternal anaemia 10.288, p=0.006). Majority of pregnant mothers coinfected with Necator americanus and P. falciparum had microcytic hypochromic red blood cells 24(47.1%), ([chi square] 24.866, p=0.001). Ascaris lumbricoides and P. falciparum coinfection was not associated with maternal anaemia 1.680, p=0.891). A total of 160(21. %) expectant mothers had eosinophilia. Although coinfection between Ascaris lumbricoides and P. falciparum showed the highest number of eosinophilia 25(51%), the association was not statistically significant ([chi square] 0.943, p=0.967).

Mothers who were infected with geohelminths alone were 4 times likely to have microcytic hypochromic red blood cells an indicator of iron deficiency anaemia (Table 2).

Expectant mothers who had malaria parasites alone were 3-fold likely to have low haemoglobin level (anaemia) Table 3.

Expectant mothers coinfected with geohelminths and malaria parasites were 4- and 5-fold likely to have low haemoglobin level and microcytic hypochromic red blood cells (anaemia) compared to those infected with either geohelminths or malaria parasites (Table 4).

4.4. Risk Factors for Adverse Neonatal Outcomes in Single Infections. Out of 185 pregnant women infected with geohelminths alone, 18 (9.7%) had preterm deliveries, 7 (3.8%) abortions, 11 (5.9%) stillbirth (borne dead), and 38 (19.9%) low birth weight and on APGAR score neonates who had low chances of survival were 3 (1.6%). Out of 162 mothers with malaria alone, 26 (16%) had preterm deliveries, 5 (3%) abortions, 8 (4.9%) stillbirth, and 44 (26.9%) low birth weight. On APGAR scale, neonates who had low chances of survival were 7 (4.3%). Mean birth weight for live neonates was 1.92 kg at birth. Chi-square test was used to analyze risk factors associated with adverse neonatal outcomes in single infections and the results presented in Table 5.

4.5. Risk Factors for Adverse Neonatal Outcomes in Coinfections. Expectant women coinfected with Necator americanus and Plasmodium parasites were more likely to experience an adverse birth outcome compared to noninfected women. Necator americanus and Plasmodium coinfection were associated with stillbirth, P value 0.048 OR 3.701, (1.008-13.579), preterm deliveries p value 0.006 OR 6.896 (1.755-.27.105), low birth weight p value 0.001 OR 9.820 (7.630-12.640), and, on APGAR scale, neonates with low chances of survival, P value 0.001 OR 5.310 (1.860-15.162). Logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors associated with adverse neonatal outcomes in coinfections and results presented in Table 6.

5. Discussion

Poly-parasitism is a public health problem in sub-Saharan Africa. Malaria parasites and geohelminths coinfection are currently receiving a lot of attention because of the likelihood of the complications arising from their coinfections. The observed occurrence of geohelminths and malaria parasites in this study is an indication of moderate transmission and coendemicity of these parasites in the study area.

Our study findings showed that coinfected mothers were at 4-fold increased risk of anaemia as compared to mothers who had either geohelminths or malaria parasites alone. These results are in agreement with a study in Ghana which revealed that coinfection between geohelminthiasis and malaria substantially increased the risk of anaemia in pregnancy [11]. The findings also collaborate with the work of Francis and others [20] who reported a high occurrence of anaemia in mothers coinfected with hookworms and P. falciparum. An explanation for this observation could be attributed to the additive effects in the pathogenic mechanisms of the individual the parasites species involved in total haemoglobin concentration. Adult hookworms produce a wide range of protein molecules that facilitate their feeding activities by aiding digestion of intestinal tissues in the process of feeding, while others act as anticoagulants. The anticoagulants ensure a steady blood flow from intestinal ulcers which provides a source of iron, nutrients, and oxygen for the worms. This explains why adult hookworms are associated with unhealing intestinal ulcers and chronic loss of blood and iron in gastrointestinal system. Malaria, on the other hand, is a haematologic disease that causes profound changes in haematological parameters among infected individuals including anaemia which may result from various parasite pathogenic mechanisms. Anaemia a common symptom of malaria may arise as a result of red blood cell (RBC) lysis due to direct parasite invasion, induced intravascular haemolysis, and reduced erythropoiesis in infected patients. Enhanced splenic clearance of infected and modified RBC in malaria patients may exacerbate anaemia. The most widespread and lethal Plasmodium species, P. falciparum, is consistently associated with bursting and loss of red blood cells during its blood stage, all contributing to haemoglobin loss and anaemia in patients with the coinfections [20].

It was also evident that geohelminths and malaria parasite coinfections were associated with various adverse birth outcomes. Compared to those infected with either geohelminths or malaria parasites, expectant mothers coinfected with geohelminths and malaria parasites were twice likely to give birth to low birth weight babies, 3.7 times likely to have still births, 6.8 times likely to have preterm deliveries, and 5 times likely to have newborn babies with low chances of survival. These findings are comparable to a related study where coinfected expectant women with malaria parasites and geohelminths were 3.0-fold and 2.6-fold at risk of low birth weight and preterm deliveries, respectively, compared with uninfected women [21]. The possible explanation is that adult intestinal worms compete with the host for food and interfere with the absorptive surface. The shared food resources may be insufficient to satisfy the needs of the parasites, the increased demand of the expectant mother, and the growing fetus. Interruption of nutrient acquisition by competition and destruction of absorptive surface in the mother leads to reduced nutrient supply to the fetus and subsequently retarded intrauterine growth and low birth weight. Transplacental transmission is possible during parasite migration in the body and this phenomenon enhances the chances of the parasite infecting fetus before birth. Infected neonates usually have low chances of survival. If not addressed early during pregnancy, this results in retarded foetal growth and low birth weight, stillbirth, and preterm deliveries. Furthermore, RBC infected with P. falciparum usually congregate in the placental vascular space. In an active infection in pregnant women, the fetus may be exposed to parasitized maternal RBC. This may induce immunological responses that contribute to early onset of labor and consequently preterm deliveries and still births. These findings highlight the serious adverse health effect of coinfections in pregnancy and the need for early screening and prompt treatment.

Contrary findings have been reported in a study in Nigeria in which no cases of still birth and low birth weight were recorded among pregnant mothers coinfected with malaria and geohelminths [22]. It is not clear whether the study subjects were allowed access to antimalarials, anthelmintics, or hematinics before or during the study. Treatment with these drugs could explain the reported findings because, when used, they modify maternal anaemia and/or birth outcomes. Also, there may have been undetected differences in the status of nutrition and other confounding factors.

A number of other factors are known to induce changes in haematological parameters and birth outcomes during pregnancy. These include, for instance, haemoglobinopathies (sickle cell, thalassemia, and G6PD deficiency), genetics, and environmental factors, nutritional status, and metabolic diseases. The prevalence of haemoglobinopathies is generally very low in any given population and were not reported or observed in any of the participants. During antenatal visits, expectant mothers are advised to keep environment clean at all times, maintain good nutritional status, and get assessed for any metabolic diseases. Therefore, the probability of environmentally or nutritionally induced haematological changes was very minimal and no cases of metabolic diseases were reported among the participants. In this regard, the maternal haematological findings and birth outcomes discussed were attributed to geohelminths and malaria infections under investigation though other factors may have played an insignificant and unobserved role. The potential significance of the coinfections involving geohelminths and malaria in the epidemiology of poly-parasitism is worth exploring in different transmission settings.

6. Conclusions

The study demonstrated that expectant mothers coinfected with geohelminths and malaria parasites were at an increased risk of high anaemia and adverse birth outcomes. Geohelminthiasis and malaria were prevalent in Bungoma County. We recommend that screening of these infections be incorporated in the antenatal care program to improve maternal and neonatal health.

https://doi.org/ 10.1155/2018/2613484

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate Bungoma County Referral Laboratory and Nursing staff for their support. Special thanks are due to Dr. Isaac Omeri for his support and approval for the project to be done at the hospital. And thanks are due to all those who reviewed the manuscript and offered constructive suggestions. The authors provided financial support for study.

References

[1] WACIPAC, "Why parasitic disease control?" 2008, http://98.130 .228.222/wacipac/index.php, accessed on January 10/2016.

[2] J. Trowsdale and A. G. Betz, "Mother's little helpers: Mechanisms of maternal-fetal tolerance," Nature Immunology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 241-246, 2006.

[3] B. J. Okoko, G. Enwere, and M. O. C. Ota, "The epidemiology and consequences of maternal malaria: A review of immunological basis," Acta Tropica, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 193-205, 2003.

[4] T. W. Mwangi, J. M. Bethony, and S. Brooker, "Malaria and helminth interactions in humans: an epidemiological viewpoint," Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, vol. 100, no. 7, pp. 551-570,2006.

[5] M. Yazdanbakhsh, A. van den Biggelaar, and R. M. Maizels, "Th2 responses without atopy: immunoregulation in chronic helminth infections and reduced allergic disease," Trends in Immunology, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 372-377, 2001.

[6] A. O. Egwunyenga, J. A. Ajayi, O. P. G. Nmorsi, and D. D. Duhlinska-Popova, "Plasmoduim/intestinal Helminth Coinfections among Pregnant Nigerian Women," Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 96, no. 8, pp. 1055-1059, 2001.

[7] M. Boel, V. I. Carrara, M. Rijken et al., "Complex interactions between soil-transmitted helminths and malaria in pregnant women on the Thai-burmese border," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 4, no. 11, article e887, 2010.

[8] A. Degarege, A. Animut, M. Legesse, and B. Erko, "Malaria and helminth co-infections in outpatients of Alaba Kulito Health Center, southern Ethiopia: a cross sectional study," BMC Research Notes, vol. 3, article 143, 2010.

[9] C. S. Mulambalah, D. N. Siamba, P. A. Ogutu, D. I. Siteti, and A. W. Wekesa, "Anaemia in Pregnancy: Prevalence and Possible Risk Factors in Kakamega County, Kenya," Science Journal of Public Health, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 216-222, 2014.

[10] R. W. Steketee, B. L. Nahlen, M. E. Praise, and C. Menendez, "Burden of malaria in pregnancy in malaria edemic areas," The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 64, pp. 28-35, 2001.

[11] N. J. Yatich, P. E. Jolly, E. Funkhouser et al., "The effect of malaria and intestinal helminth coinfection on birth outcomes in Kumasi, Ghana," The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 28-34, 2010.

[12] J. K. Fairley, D. Bisanzio, C. H. King et al., "Birthweight in offspring of mothers with high prevalence of helminth and malaria infection in coastal Kenya," The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 48-53, 2013.

[13] A. D. Blackwell, "Helminth infection during pregnancy: Insights from evolutionary ecology," International Journal of Women's Health, vol. 8, pp. 651-661, 2016.

[14] Government of Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, "The 2009 population and housing census," Ministry of state for planning, National development and Vision 2030, counting our people for implementation of Vision 2030 Vol 1. Government printer, 2010.

[15] A. D. Montresor, W. T. Crompton, A. Hall, D. A. P. Bundy, and L. Savioli, Guidelines for the Evaluation of Soil Transmitted Helminthiasis at Community Level Ministry of Health and Welfare, Government of Japan, WHO/CTD/SIP/98.1, 1998.

[16] K. S. Lwanga and S. Lemeshow, Sample Size Determination in Health Studies. A Practical Manual, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1991.

[17] World Health Organization, Basic Laboratory Methods in Medical Parasitology, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1991.

[18] U. Harata and O. Mori," A new method for culturing hookworm Yonago," Acta Medica, vol. 1, pp. 177-179,1955.

[19] M. Cheesbrough, District Laboratory Practice in Tropical Countries, Cambridge University Press, 1998.

[20] F. Zeukeng, V. H. Tchinda, J. D. Bigoga et al., "Co-infections of Malaria and Geohelminthiasis in Two Rural Communities of Nkassomo and Vian in the Mfou Health District, Cameroon," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 8, no. 10, 2014.

[21] N. A. Ntui, E. J. Pauline, P. C. April, A. T. Cornelius, and Z. Ku, "Effect of Malaria and Geohelminth Infection on Birth Outcomes in Kumasi, Ghana," International Journal of Tropical Disease & Health, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 582-594, 2014.

[22] R. Joseph, G. Chessed, L. Daniel, Y. Haruna, M. Demshemino, and R. Bagula, "Malaria and geohelminths co infection in pregnancy and its association with maternal anaemia and birth outcome among pregnant women attending Federal Medical Centre Yola and Specialist Hospital," Sokoto Journal of Medical Laboratory Science, vol. 1, pp. 221-227, 2016.

Wekesa Antony Wanyonyi, (1) Chrispinus Siteti Mulambalah (iD), (2) David H. Mulama, (1) Elizabeth Omukunda, (1) and Darwin Injete Siteti (3)

(1) Department of Biological Sciences, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, P. O. Box 190, Kakamega, Kenya

(2) Department of Medical Microbiology & Parasitology, College of Health Sciences, Moi University, P.O. Box 4606, Eldoret, Kenya

(3) Department of Clinical Medicine, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, P.O. Box 62000, Nairobi, Kenya

Correspondence should be addressed to Chrispinus Siteti Mulambalah; csmulambalah@gmail.com

Received 28 July 2018; Revised 13 October 2018; Accepted 14 November 2018; Published 29 November 2018

Academic Editor: Bernard Marchand
TABLE 1: Characteristics of pregnant women and their new-borns.

Variable       Number   Percentage

Age group
18-27           541        71.1
28-37           192        25.6
38-45            17        2.3
Residence
Rural           381        50.8
Slum            220        29.3
Urban           149        19.9
Employment
Employed        158        21.1
Farmer          252        33.6
Business         2         0.3
Not employed    338        45.1

TABLE 2: Association of geohelminths with changes in maternal
haematological parameters.

                       Geohelminths

Variable        OR          CI        P-value
Hb level
<11.5gm/dl     1.289    1.170-421      0.001
Pbf
M/h            8.683   5.407-13.943    0.001
Eosinophil
>6% Raised     0.001   0.000-0.004     0.001

                       Geohelminths

Variable        AOR        CI        P-value
Hb level
<11.5gm/dl     1.106   1.09-1.122     0.001
Pbf
M/h            4.341   3.569-5.282    0.001
Eosinophil
>6% Raised     1.465   1.304-1.647    0.001

* 95% CI = confidence interval and OR= odds ratio; P<0.05 was
considered significant.

* Hb = haemoglobin, Pbf=peripheral blood film, M/h= microcytic
hypochromic, and AOR= adjusted odds ratio.

TABLE 3: Association of malaria parasites with changes in maternal
haematological parameters.

                      Malaria parasites

Variable      OR         CI        P-value
Hb level
<11.5gm/dl   3.451   2.90-5.355     0.001
Pbf
M/h          3.575   2.784-5.429    0.001
Eosinophil
>6% Raised   2.271   2.150-2.840    0.001

                      Malaria parasites

Variable      AOR         CI        P-value
Hb level
<11.5gm/dl   2.545    2.249-2.879    0.001
Pbf
M/h          3.011    2.321-6.032    0.001
Eosinophil
>6% Raised   0.4457   0.310-0.675    0.001

* 95% CI=confidence interval and OR= odds ratio; P<0.05 was considered
significant.

* Hb= haemoglobin, Pbf=peripheral blood film, M/h= microcytic
hypochromic, and AOR= adjusted odds ratio.

TABLE 4: Association of geohelminths and malaria coinfection with
changes in maternal haematological parameters.

             Geohelminths and Malaria parasites co-infection
Variable      OR          CI        P-value
Hb level
<11.5gm/dl   6.921   5.486-8.731     0.001
Pbf
M/h          5.975   4.568-10.321    0.001
Eosinophil
>6% Raised   5.558   4.549-6.791     0.001

             Geohelminths and Malaria parasites co-infection
Variable      AOR        CI        P-value
Hb level
<11.5gm/dl   4.137   2.088-8.195    0.001
Pbf
M/h          5.412    4.913-732     0.001
Eosinophil
>6% Raised   2.586   1.896-3.967    0.001

* 95% CI = confidence interval and OR= odds ratio; P<0.05 was
considered significant.

* Hb = haemoglobin, Pbf = peripheral blood film, M/h = microcytic
hypochromic, and AOR = adjusted odds ratio.

TABLE 5: Analysis risk factors for adverse neonatal outcomes in single
infections.

Variable                        Geohelminths alone
                              Infected    Not infected

Gestation period
>37 weeks Term delivery      160(86.5%)    538(95.2%)
<37 weeks preterm delivery    18(9.7%)      23(4.1%)
< 28 weeks abortion           7(3.8%)        4(0.7)
Chi-square                     18.296
P-value                        0.001
Neonatal condition at birth
Live birth                   174(94.1%)    553(97.8%)
Fresh still birth             2(1.1%)       6(1.1%)
Macerated still birth          9(4.8)       6(1.1%)
Chi-square                     10.288
P-value                        0.006
Birth weight
>2500g Normal birth          158(85.4%)    532(94.2%)
<2500g Low birth eight       27(14.6%)      33(5.8%)
Chi-square                     14.511
P-value                        0.001
APGAR score
10 Normal                    153(82.8%)     531(94%)
7-9 High chances of survival  18(9.7%)      15(2.7%)
<6 Low chances of survival    3(1.6%)       7(1.2%)
0 Dead                        11(5.9%)      12(2.1%)
Chi-square                     24.590
P-value                        0.001

Variable                       Malaria parasites alone
                              Infected    Not infected

Gestation period
>37 weeks Term delivery      131(88.7%)    567(96.4%)
<37 weeks preterm delivery   26(16.0%)      15(2.6%)
< 28 weeks abortion            5(3%)         6(1.0)
Chi-square                     49.334
P-value                        0.001
Neonatal condition at birth
Live birth                   154(95.1%)    573(97.5%)
Fresh still birth             2(1.2%)       6(1.0%)
Macerated still birth         6(3.7%)       9(1.5%)
Chi-square                     3.128
P-value                        0.209
Birth weight
>2500g Normal birth          126(77.8%)    564(95.9%)
<2500g Low birth eight       36(22.0%)      24(4.1%)
Chi-square                     56.788
P-value                        0.001
APGAR score
10 Normal                    130(80.3%)    554(94.2%)
7-9 High chances of survival 17(10.5%)      16(2.7%)
<6 Low chances of survival    7(4.3%)       3(0.5%)
0 Dead                        8(4.9%)       15(2.6%)
Chi-square                     36.351
P-value                        0.001

* P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Table 6: Analysis of risk factors for adverse neonatal outcomes in
coinfections.

Variable                                Co-infection
                              P-value    OR        95% CI
Gestation period
< 37 weeks Preterm delivery    0.006    6.896   1.755-27.101
< 28 weeks Abortion            0.897    0.906   0.205-4.012
Neonatal condition at birth
Fresh still birth              0.048    3.701   1.008-13.579
Macerated still birth          0.750    0.750   0.098-5.768
Birth weight
Low birth weight               0.001    4.186   3.O94-8.369
APGAR
<6 Low chances of survival     0.001    5.310   1.860-15.162
7-9 High chances of survival   0.478    0.639   0.185-2.204
Dead                           0.911    1.111   0.177-6.990

* 95% CI=confidence interval and OR= odds ratio; P<0.05 was considered
significant.
COPYRIGHT 2018 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Wanyonyi, Wekesa Antony; Mulambalah, Chrispinus Siteti; Mulama, David H.; Omukunda, Elizabeth; Sitet
Publication:Journal of Parasitology Research
Date:Jan 1, 2018
Words:5346
Previous Article:Sensitivity of Different Cattle Breeds to the Infestation of Cattle Ticks Amblyomma variegatum, Rhipicephalus microplus, and Hyalomma spp. on the...
Next Article:"CLUPS": A New Culture Medium for the Axenic Growth of Entamoeba histolytica.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters