Printer Friendly

Making 'Big Brother' obsolete.

Making "Big Brother' obsolete

As computer systems proliferate, more and more organizations routinely exchange information about individuals. People are losing the ability to control the way information about them is used. Moreover, they have no way of knowing if the information is inaccurate, obsolete or inappropriate. "The foundation is being laid for a dossier society, in which computers could be used to infer individuals' life-styles, habits, whereabouts and associations from data collected in ordinary consumer transactions,' says David Chaum of Amsterdam's Center for Mathematics and Computer Science in the Netherlands.

In the October COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, Chaum outlines a scheme that he says effectively solves the problem by protecting privacy and maintaining security for both individuals and organizations. In Chaum's novel approach, an individual uses a different account number or "digital pseudonym' with each organization --a credit card company, retail store, the government, or whatever. Although pseudonyms, created by a special random process, can't be linked, businesses like banks would still be able to ensure that transactions are legitimate.

Present systems also emphasize the one-sided security of organizations attempting to protect themselves from individuals, says Chaum. His scheme allows all parties to protect their own interests. It relies on individuals keeping secret, cryptographic keys from organizations and organizations devising other secret keys that are kept from individuals. During transactions, parties use these keys to provide each other with specially coded confirmation of transaction details--but no further information that could be used for other purposes.

Unlike current systems, in which organizations issue and usually control the use of "tokens' like plastic cards with magnetic strips or embedded microcomputers, individuals would have their own "personal card computers.' Such a credit cardsized computer would keep the necessary records and provide the needed pseudonyms and secret keys. "These card computers,' says Chaum, "are already technically feasible.'

Individuals stand to gain increased convenience and reliability and improved protection against abuses by individuals and organizations--a kind of parity with organizations, says Chaum, "and, of course, monitorability and control over how information about them is used.'
COPYRIGHT 1985 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1985, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:computers and right of privacy
Publication:Science News
Date:Nov 2, 1985
Words:340
Previous Article:Call for population control.
Next Article:New animal welfare rules.
Topics:


Related Articles
Are you being watched?
Electronic Records and the Right to Privacy.
Big Brother: Net-Style Privacy -- A Communication Nightmare?
First phase of HIPAA gets underway; next compliance deadline is Oct. 16. (Front Page).
Naked at work: pssst! The boss is watching.
Who owns business data on personally owned computers?
Electronics recycling bill advances.
Marshfield's West keeps nerves in check as he prepares for a spin at state meet.
Blocking the Courthouse Door: How the Republican Party and Its Corporate Allies Are Taking Away Your Right to Sue.
Autumn issue: Bravo.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters