Printer Friendly

Major components of metabolic parameters and nutritional intakes in different genotypes of adiponectin +276 G>T Gene polymorphism in non-diabetes and non-alcoholic iranian fatty liver patients.


Background: Genetic and environmental factors are both involved in the etiology of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). Among the genetic factors, certain polymorphisms of adiponectin gene are associated with NAFLD. In the current study, we investigated the association between metabolic parameters with different genotypes of adiponectin +276 G>T polymorphism among the Iranian NAFLD patients, and the effect of nutritional intake with development of NAFLD.

Methods: In this study, 75 patients with NAFLD and 76 healthy individuals were enrolled. Dietary intakes were assessed using a semi- quantitative Food-Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ). Body Mass Index (BMI) and Waist to Hip Ratio (WHR) were calculated. Biochemical assays including FSG (Fasting Serum Glucose), liver enzymes, lipid profiles, Malondialdehyde, insulin resistance and Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC) were measured after 12 hr fasting. Gene polymorphism study was done by using of sequencing method.

Results: Although, T allele frequency was more prevalent in patients with NAFLD than control, adiponectin +276 G>T polymorphism was not associated with risk of NAFLD. Among the metabolic parameters, TAC in TT genotype was significantly lower 1.44(0.69 to 2.81) p>0.05, AST in GT, GG genotypes, and ALT in all three genotypes were higher in NAFLD patients in compared to healthy subjects (p<0.05). Patients with GT genotype have significantly lower fat consumption and vitamin E intake as compared to control group with the same genotype (p<0.05).

Conclusion: In this study, we showed the association of different genotypes of +276 G>T polymorphism in adiponectin gene with some metabolic parameters.

Avicenna J Med Biotech 2017; 9(3): 155-161

Keywords: Adiponectin, Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), Polymorphism


Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) is one of the most common hepatic disorders with unusual lipid deposition in hepatocytes (1). NAFLD is an epidemic metabolic liver disease observed in many countries and its prevalence is increasing worldwide (2). According to the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), the prevalence of NAFLD among chronic liver diseases grew from 47 to 75% between 1988 and 2008 (1).The prevalence of NAFLD in the adult general population was reported 21.5% in a large population-based study in southern regions of Iran in 2011 (3).

NAFLD is the hepatic manifestation of the metabolic syndrome because obesity and insulin resistance are in close inter-relationship with NAFLD (1,4). Numerous studies have suggested that insulin resistance is characteristic of NAFLD (5). Insulin resistant patients with NAFLD show decreased insulin sensitivity either at the level of muscle or at the level of liver and adipose tissue (6,7). Insulin resistance is related to increase of Free Fatty Acids (FFAs) flux that increases TG production and secretion of Very Low-Density Lipoprotein (VLDL) is stimulated in hepatocytes. Fat accumulation in liver is linked with lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress. (5) Oxidative stress phenomenon induces imbalance in the pro-oxidant/antioxidant equilibrium; a condition that may influence a number of pathophysiological events in the liver (8).

Genetic and environmental factors are both involved in etiology of NAFLD as a multifactorial disease; genetic polymorphisms and dietary intake have been identified as influencing factors in NAFLD development (9). The long-term excessive intake of dietary composition in food groups is associated with NAFLD progression (10).

Generally, lower antioxidant consumption, higher intake of energy, protein and carbohydrate stimulate hepatic lipid accumulation leading to development of fatty liver disease (11,12). Some studies mostly in animal models introduced diet as a potent modifier of NAFLD-related genes expression (10). An obvious genetic participation to NAFLD is estimated as 39% (13). The gene coding for adiponectin is located on chromosome 3q27 including 3 exons and 2 introns and contains 244 amino acids (2).

Adiponectin protein is involved in regulating glucose levels as well as fatty acid breakdown. Reduction in levels of adiponectin which is produced by adipocytes has been reported in several studies in patients with insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, obesity and NAFLD (2, 14-17). One of the most common Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) of adiponectin gene is rs1501299 (+276 G>T) in the intronic region which has been reported by some epidemiological studies (2,18). This variant (rs1501299) is associated with low adiponectin expression and it might be related to overweight and insulin resistance (2). In this research, our aim was to evaluate the, association of different genotypes of +276 G>T polymorphism in adiponectin gene with some metabolic parameters, and nutritional intake with development of NAFLD.

Materials and Methods


The present case-control study was performed among 151 volunteers aged 20-50 with Body Mass Index (BMI) between 25 and 39.9 kg/[m.sup.2] including 75 patients with NAFLD and 76 healthy individuals; these two groups were matched by age and gender with group matching. Diagnosis was confirmed by the physician based on the findings of ultrasonography. The patients had simple steatosis (grade 1-2). Control group was composed of the volunteers from university staff and relatives of patients. They were matched by age and gender with case group. Also ultrasonography was done for healthy volunteers to confirm the absence of NAFLD. Written informed consent was obtained from all of participants.

Patients with acute or chronic liver diseases, viral hepatitis, hemochromatosis, Wilson's disease, autoimmune or endocrine disorders, pregnancy or lactation, alcohol consumption, use of hepatotoxic medications and being on weight loss diets for at least 3 months prior to participation in study were excluded. These criteria were asked from volunteers; however some of them had valid medical history. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects before entering the study.

Anthropometric assessments

Weight of the subjects was measured with a calibrated scale (SECA, Hamburg, Germany) with the precision of nearest 0.1 kg, while they were in minimal clothing without shoes. Height was measured by non-stretchable measurement tape with the precision of 0.1 cm. The BMI was calculated as weight (Kg) divided by height squared ([m.sup.2]). Waist Circumference (WC) was carried out in standing position at the level of the umbilicus and Hip Circumference (HC) was measured at the maximum circumference between the hip and the buttock with a non-elastic tape.

Biochemical assessments

After an overnight fast, 7 ml venous blood samples were obtained from subjects. Approximately 2 ml of the blood was transferred into tubes containing Ethylene Diamine Tetra Acetic acid (EDTA) for genetic assays. Serum samples were extracted for biochemical assays from remaining blood. Measuring of Fasting Serum Glucose (FSG), Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), Total Cholesterol (TC), Triglyceride (TG) and High Density Lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) were assessed by Abbott ALCYON [TM] 300 auto analyzer using commercial ELISA kits (Pars-Azmoon, Tehran, Iran). Serum LDL-C was calculated by Friedewald formula (19). Insulin resistance was estimated by the homeostasis model (HOMA-IR) by following equation: fasting serum insulin ([micro]U/wl)Xfasting glucose (mg/dl)/405 (20). Measuring of serum Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC) was performed by colorimetric method using Randox Kit (Randox laboratories ltd., UK). Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels were measured by Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances (TBARS) method. Samples were heated with 0.6% thriobarbituric acid under acidic condition; the colored product was extracted into n-butanol after cooling. The color absorbance was measured at 530 nm. MDA standards were made with 1, 1, 3, 3--tetraethoxypropane. All of the biochemical assays were conducted by a trained lab assistant who was blinded to group assignments.

Dietary intake

Dietary intakes were assessed using a semi- quantitative Food-Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) adapted to the Iranian society (21). The FFQ included 168 food items with specified serving sizes commonly consumed by Iranians. Participants reported their average frequency intake of each food item during the previous year in terms of the number of specified serving sizes consumed per day/week/month/year, or never. The reported frequency of consumed foods and portion sizes for each food item were converted to a daily intake.

DNA extraction and genotyping

Genomic DNA was isolated from the blood cells by salting out method (22). DNA fragment analogous to the polymorphisms of +45T>G (rs2241766) and +276G>T (rs1501299) were amplified by primers, 5'- ATCAAG GTGGGCTGCAATA -3' as forward primer and 5'-TGGGAATAGGGATGAGGGT -3' as reverse primer, respectively. For doing Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), 1 [micro]l of genomic DNA, 0.2 [micro]l of Taq DNA polymerase and 1 [micro]l from each primers were added to 22 [micro]l of 1XPCR master-mix. PCR procedure included a primary denaturation at 95[degrees]C for 2 min followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95[degrees]C for 30 s, annealing at 61.3[degrees]C for 30 s, extension at 72 [degrees]C for 20 s and a final extension at 72[degrees]C for 5 min. Sequencing of PCR products (PCR products were directly used for sequencing) was carried out according to Sanger method using ABI 3730XL Capillary Sequencer. Sequencing results were compared with the sequence of normal adiponectin gene obtained from NCBI website:; also, sequence traces were assembled using Chromas software (version 2.4).

Statistical analysis

All data analysis was performed using the SPSS software (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The normality of variables was assessed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Variables are expressed as means[+ or -]Standard Deviation (SD) or numbers and percentages. The comparison of continuous variables between two groups was performed by independent sample t-test. Comparison of continuous variables between different genotypes was performed by Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) with adjustment for the confounder effect of age and sex. Categorical variables were also compared using the [chi square] test. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between anthropometric and biochemical variables with NAFLD genotypes adjusted for the confounding role of sex and age. p-value of less than 0.05 was considered to be significant.


The demographic characteristics are presented in table 1. WC and WHR in NAFLD patients were significantly higher as compared to healthy group (p<0.05). Serum HDL-C and LDL-C concentrations were lower and serum AST, ALT and TG concentrations were higher in NAFLD patients compared with control group (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively) shown in table 2. The genotype and allele frequencies of adiponectin +276 G>T gene polymorphism are shown in table 3. In NAFLD patients at position +276 of adiponectin gene, (44.0%), (42.7%) and (13.3%) subjects had GG, GT and TT genotype, respectively; in control group these frequencies were GG (51.3%), GT(36.8%), TT(11.8%). However, significant statistical difference was not achieved between groups. In accordance to our finding, T allele frequency was more prevalent in patients with NAFLD than in control, but this high frequency was not significant (p>0.05), (Table 3).

As shown in table 4, ALT level in patients with NAFLD was significantly higher than control group in all three genotypes (p=0.022); meanwhile AST level was higher in GT and GG genotypes in NAFLD group as compared to control (p<0.05). TAC level in TT genotype was significantly lower in patients as compared to healthy subjects with the same genotype (p<0.05), (Table 4).

Mean dietary intake including energy, protein, fat, vitamins C and E have not shown any significant differences between NAFLD and control group (p>0.05), (Table 5).

The comparison of dietary intakes according to +276 G>T adiponectin gene polymorphism between case and control groups is presented in table 6. Patients with GT genotype have significantly lower fat consumption and vitamin E intake as compared to control group with the same genotype (p<0.05). No significant difference was observed for other nutrients according to the genotypes of -276 G>T adiponectin gene polymorphism (p>0.05).


In the present study, we evaluated the possible association between +276G>T adiponectin gene polymorphism, metabolic parameters and nutritional intake among the Iranian NAFLD population. To our review of literature, this is the first report, which evaluates the association between different genotypes of +276 G/T polymorphism in adiponectin gene with metabolic parameters among the Iranian NAFLD patients. Our results showed no significant association between (+276 G/T) polymorphism and risk of NAFLD in the studied groups. Several studies have evaluated the effect of gene polymorphism of adiponectin gene on NAFLD in different populations (4,20,23,24).

Musso et al (23) found an association between +45 T/G and +276 G/T polymorphisms of adiponectin gene and risk of NAFLD in their study; however, their features included non-obese and normo lipidemic subjects. In another case-control study by Zhou et al (24), the G/T variant at +276 may decrease the susceptibility to NAFLD. In the line of our study, Wong et al (4) found no association between polymorphism of adiponectin at position +276 and NAFLD in Chinese patients. Also, in Japanese population different genotypes of adiponectin +276 G/T polymorphism did not show significant difference between NAFLD patients and control group (20).

Insulin resistance and central obesity are well-known characteristic associated with intra-abdominal fat accumulation which has been positively correlated with liver fat (25). In our study, insulin resistance and HOMA-IR did not show significant association with different genotypes of +276 G/T polymorphism in NAFLD patients; these findings were also supported by previous studies (26,27). However, these results were not consistent with Melistas et al (18) study and the mentioned parameters were significant according to genotype of TT in +276 G/T gene polymorphism. It can be explained that the subjects in cross-sectional study by Melistas et al (18) included non-diabetic women without any other disease.

In this study we aimed to evaluate the environmental impact, along with genetic factors in the outbreak of NAFLD. As we showed in table 6, normal samples with TT genotype had low calorie, fat and high vitamins E and C consumption (although this difference was not significant due to small sample size). So, we can say that individuals with mutant and pathogen genotype which have proper diet, can overcome the disease. But to evaluate any additional impact we should study this issue in larger sample sizes. In addition, we observed that NAFLD patients with GT genotype consumed small amounts of vitamin E in their usual diet. In this regard, Musso et al (27) reported a low dietary ascorbic acid and tocopherol intake in patients with non-alcoholoic steatohepatitis. Also, Erhardt et al (28) reported reduced tocopherol intake as dietary antioxidant compounds in patients with NASH compared to healthy group. In fact, oxidative stress is one of the most common factors involved in the pathogenesis of NAFLD; moreover vitamins C and E are well-known antioxidants capable in blocking distribution of radical reactions. These antioxidants play important roles in histological improvement of inflammation in NAFLD (29).

On the other hand, hepatic de novo lipogenesis can be affected by dietary macronutrients; high fat intake reduced hepatic de novo lipogenesis in obese hyper insulinemic subjects compared to obese normo insulinemic subjects (30). Therefore, dietary recommendation should be based on individual status (4) and even genetic background (31). It is clear that dietary modification is the easiest and even the most efficient way to reduce risk factors of chronic disease (32).


Overall, among the metabolic parameters, TAC in TT genotype was significantly lower, AST in GT, GG genotypes, and ALT in all three genotypes were higher in NAFLD patients as compared to healthy subjects. Also non-statistical significance of other results might be attributed to the difference in the stage of disease; on the other hand, this is the first study to compare nutritional intakes according to adiponectin +276G/T gene polymorphism in patients with NAFLD.

One limitation of this study was its relatively small sample size. Therefore, further studies with larger sample size and interventional designs are needed to confirm the effect of dietary compounds in different +276 G/T genotypes in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.


We appreciate all the participants in the current study. We also thank Nutrition Research Center of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences and Cellular and Molecular Research Center of Qazvin University of Medical Science for providing laboratory facilities.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.


The study has been supported by a grant from Qazvin University of Medical Sciences.

Ethical approval

Study protocol was approved by the Ethics committee of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences (Identifier code: 11013).


(1.) Wei[beta] .J, Rau M, Geier A. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: epidemiology, clinical course, investigation, and treatment. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2014;111(26):447-452.

(2.) Hashemi M, Hanafi Bojd H, Eskandari Nasab E, Bahari A, Hashemzehi NA, Shafieipour S, et al. Association of adiponectin rs1501299 and rs266729 gene polymorphisms with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepat Mon 2013;13(5):e9527.

(3.) Lankarani KB, Ghaffarpasand F, Mahmoodi M, Lotfi M, Zamiri N, Heydari ST, et al. Non alcoholic fatty liver disease in southern Iran: a population based study. Hepat Mon 2013;13(5):e9248.

(4.) Wong VW, Wong GL, Tsang SW, Hui AY, Chan AW, Choi PC, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of adiponectin and tumor necrosis factor-alpha and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Chinese people. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;23(6):914-921.

(5.) Gaggini M, Morelli M, Buzzigoli E, DeFronzo RA, Bugianesi E, Gastaldelli A. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its connection with insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease. Nutrients 2013;5(5): 1544-1560.

(6.) Bugianesi E, Zannoni C, Vanni E, Marzocchi R, Marchesini G. Non-alcoholic fatty liver and insulin resistance: a cause-effect relationship? Dig Liver Dis 2004;36(3): 165-173.

(7.) Lomonaco R, Ortiz-Lopez C, Orsak B, Webb A, Hardies J, Darland C, et al. Effect of adipose tissue insulin resistance on metabolic parameters and liver histology in obese patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2012;55(5):1389-1397.

(8.) Videla LA, Rodrigo R, Orellana M, Fernandez V, Tapia G, Quinones L, et al. Oxidative stress-related parameters in the liver of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients. Clin Sci (lond) 2004; 106(3):261-268.

(9.) Moore JB. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: the hepatic consequence of obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Proc Nutr Soc 2010;69(02):211-220.

(10.) Le[and] or [conjunction] KA, Bortolotti M. Role of dietary carbohydrates and macronutrients in the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2008;11 (4):477-482.

(11.) Hashemi kani A, Alavian SM, Esmaillzadeh A, Adibi P, Azadbakht L. Dietary quality indices and biochemical parameters among patients with non alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Hepat Mon 2013;13(7):e10943.

(12.) Kalafati IP, Borsa D, Dedoussis GVZ. The genetics of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: role of diet as a modifying factor. Curr Nutr Rep 2014;3(3):223-232.

(13.) Barrera F, George .J. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: more than just ectopic fat accumulation. Drug Discov Today Dis Mech 2013;10(1-2):e47-e54.

(14.) Pagano C, Soardo G, Esposito W, Fallo F, Basan L, Donnini D, et al. Plasma adiponectin is decreased in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Eur J Endocrinol 2005;152(1):113-118.

(15.) Medina-Bravo P, Meza-Santibanez R, Rosas-Fernandez P, Galvan-Duarte R, Saucedo-Garcia R, Velazquez-Lopez L, et al. Decrease in serum adiponectin levels associated with visceral fat accumulation independent of pubertal stage in children and adolescents. Arch Med Res 2011;42(2):115-121.

(16.) Leu HB, Chung CM, Lin SJ, Jong YS, Pan WH, Chen JW. Adiponectin gene polymorphism is selectively associated with the concomitant presence of metabolic syndrome and essential hypertension. PLoS One 2011 ;6(5):e19999.

(17.) Wong VW, Hui AY, Tsang SW, Chan JL, Tse AM, Chan KF, et al. Metabolic and adipokine profile of Chinese patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4(9): 1154-1161.

(18.) Melistas L, Mantzoros CS, Kontogianni M, Antonopoulou S, Ordovas JM, Yiannakouris N. Association of the +45T>G and +276G>T polymorphisms in the adiponectin gene with insulin resistance in nondiabetic Greek women. Eur J Endocrinol 2009;161(6):845-852.

(19.) Mohseni F, Rashvand Z, Najafipour R, Hadizadeh S, Moghbelinejad S. Evaluating -238 G>A polymorphism association in TNF-[alpha] gene with metabolic parameters and nutritional intakes among the Iranian NAFLD patients. Biochem Genet 2016;54(4):685-695.

(20.) Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972;18(6):499-502.

(21.) Tokushige K, Hashimoto E, Noto H, Yatsuji S, Taniai M, Torii N, et al. Influence of adiponectin gene polymorphisms in Japanese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Gastroenterol 2009;44(9):976-982.

(22.) Mirmiran P, Esfahani FH, Mehrabi Y, Hedayati M, Azizi F. Reliability and relative validity of an FFQ for nutrients in the Tehran lipid and glucose study. Public Health Nutr 2010;13(5):654-662.

(23.) Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from nucleated cells. Nucleic Acid Res 1988;16(3): 1215.

(24.) Musso G, Gambino R, De Michieli F, Durazzo M, Paga-no G, Cassader M. Adiponectin gene polymorphisms modulate acute adiponectin response to dietary fat: Possible pathogenetic role in NASH. Hepatology 2008;47(4):1167-1177.

(25.) Zhou YJ, Li YY, Nie YQ, Yang H, Zhan Q, Huang J, et al. Influence of polygenetic polymorphisms on the susceptibility to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease of Chinese people. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;25(4):772-777.

(26.) Utzschneider KM, Kahn SE. Review: The role of insulin resistance in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91(12):4753-4761.

(27.) Musso G, Gambino R, De Michieli F, Cassader M, Rizzetto M, Durazzo M, et al. Dietary habits and their relations to insulin resistance and postprandial lipemia in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology 2003;37(4):909-916.

(28.) Wang ZL, Xia B, Shrestha U, Jiang L, Ma CW, Chen Q., et al. Correlation between adiponectin polymorphisms and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with or without metabolic syndrome in Chinese population. J Endocrinol Invest 2008;31(12): 1086-1091.

(29.) Erhardt A, Stahl W, Sies H, Lirussi F, Donner A, Haussinger D. Plasma levels of vitamin E and carotenoids are decreased in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Eur J Med Res 2011;16(2):76-78.

(30.) Oliveira CP, Stefano JT. Genetic polymorphisms and oxidative stress in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH): a mini review. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2015;39 Suppl 1:S35-40.

(31.) Schwarz JM, Linfoot P, Dare D, Aghajanian K. Hepatic de novo lipogenesis in normoinsulinemic and hyperinsulinemic subjects consuming high-fat, low-carbohydrate and low-fat, high-carbohydrate isoenergetic diets. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;77(1):43-50.

(32.) Solga S, Alkhuraishe AR, Clark JM, Torbenson M, Greenwald A, Diehl AM, et al. Dietary composition and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Dig Dis Sci 2004;49(10):1578-1583.

(33.) Loktionov A. Common gene polymorphisms and nutrition: emerging links with pathogenesis of multifactorial chronic diseases (review). J Nutr Biochem 2003; 14(8):426-451.

Fatemeh Mohseni, Sahar Moghbelinejad (*), and Reza Najafipour

Cellular and Molecular Research Center of Qazvin University of Medical Science, Qazvin, Iran

(*) Corresponding author:

Sahar Moghbelinejad, Ph.D., Cellular and Molecular Research Centre, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran

Tel: +98 2813336001

Fax: +98 2813324970


Received: 16 Nov 2016

Accepted: 21 Jan 2017
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of study subjects

Variable            NAFLD          Control        Mean Difference
                    (n =75) n(%)   (n=76) n(%)    (95%CI)
   Male n (%)        36 (48%)       29 (38.2%)    -
   Female n (%)      39 (52%)       47 (61.8%)    -
Age (years)          40.65 (8.41)   38.87 (8.2)   1.78 (-0.89 to 4.46)
BMI (kg/[m.sup.2])   31.78 (4.17)   31.38 (4.04)  0.40 (-0.92 to 1.72)
WC (cm)             103.12 (9.46)  100.14 (8.72)  2.98 (0.55 to 5.90)
WHR                   0.92 (0.06)    0.89 (0.06)  0.02 (0.002 to 0.04)

Variable            p (*)

   Male n (%)       0.252
   Female n (%)
Age (years)         0.189
BMI (kg/[m.sup.2])  0.549
WC (cm)             0.046
WHR                 0.031

BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; WHR. waist to hip ratio.

(*) p-value for gender based on Chi-Square Tests and p-value for other
variables based on 2- tailed independent T-test using equal variable.

Table 2. Biochemical parameters of study subjects

                           NAFLD                  Control
Variable                   (n=5) mean (SD)        (n=76) mean (SD)

TC (mg/dl)                 183.44(36.91)          187.96(28.89)
HDL (mg/dl)                 43.24(11.4)            48.29(11.6)
LDL (mg/dl)                104.11(34.62)          111.52(26.43)
FSG (mg/dl)                 90.59(11.24)           89.59(9.93)
ALT (IU/l)                  49.96(25.958)          26.84(9.814)
AST (IU/l)                  32.99(14.86)           23.08(6.12)
TG (mg/dl) (*)             152.00(114.00-225.00)  118.50(79 50-198.00)
MDA (nmol/ml)                2.82[+ or -]1.01       2.75[+ or -]1.03
TAC ([micro]m/L)             1.45[+ or -]0.26       1.58[+ or -]0.28
Insulin ([micro]U/ml) (*)   19. 10(13.80-27.30)    17 70(13 00-22.10)
HOMA-IR (*)                  4.01(3.21-6.21)        3.72(2.71-5.33)

                           Mean Difference        p[dagger]
Variable                   (95%CI)

TC (mg/dl)                 -4.52(-15.17 to 6.13)   0.403
HDL (mg/dl)                -5.05(-8.75 to-1.35)    0.008
LDL (mg/dl)                -6.81(-16.71 to 3.09)   0.030
FSG (mg/dl)                 0.63(-2.78 to 4.03)    0.717
ALT (IU/l)                 23.12(16.82 to 29.41)  <0.001
AST (IU/l)                  9.91(6.26 to 13.55)   <0.001
TG (mg/dl) (*)             -                       0.004
MDA (nmol/ml)              -0.056(-0.38-0.27)      0.734
TAC ([micro]m/L)            0.12(0.03-0.21)        0.005
Insulin ([micro]U/ml) (*)  -                       0.107
HOMA-IR (*)                -                       0.139

TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; HDL, high density cholesterol;
LDL, low density cholesterol; FSG, fasting serum glucose; ALT, alanine
amino transferase; AST, aspartate amino transferase; MDA,
malondialdehyde; TAC, total antioxidants, HOMA-IR, homeostasis model
assessment insulin resistance.

[dagger] P-value for TG, Insulin and HOMA-IR based on Mann-Withney;
otherwise based on independent T-test using equal variable.

(*) TG, Insulin and HOMA-IR are presented based on median (P25-P75)
and other variables data are presented based on mean

Table 3. Genotypes and allele distribution of -276 G>T gene
polymorphism of adiponectin in study population

Polymorphism  NAFLD          Control        OR [double dagger](95% CI)
              (n =75) n (%)  (n =76) n (%)

   GG          33(44.0)      39(51.3)       1
   GT          32(42.7)      28(36.8)       1.40(-8.75 to 4.99)
   TT          10(13.3)       9(11.8)       1.44(0.69 to 2.81)
+276 G>T
   G           98(65.3)      52(34.7)       1.00
   T          106(69.7)      46(30.3)       1.28(0.78 to 2.10)

Polymorphism  p[dagger]

   GT         0.489
   TT         0.344
+276 G>T
   G          0.321
   T          -

[dagger] P-value based on Chi-Square Tests.

[double dagger] Odds Ratio (OR) based on logistic regression analysis
adjusted for age and gender (p>0.05).

Table 4. The comparison of study Anthropometric indices and biochemical
parameters according to +276 G>T polymorphism of Adiponectin between
study group

Variable               Genotype  NAFLD (n=75) mean (SD)

BMI (kg/[m.sup.2)
                       GG         32.18(3.19)
                       GT         31.95(4.48)
                       TT         31.51(4.21)
                       GG          0.92(0.07)
                       GT          0.92(0.05)
                       TT          0.91(0.06)
WC (cm)
                       GG        104.77(11.13)
                       GT        103.36(8.92)
                       TT        102.40(9.67)
Cholesterol (mg/dl)
                       GG        192.20(28.70)
                       GT        184.28(41.42)
                       TT        179 96(34.91)
HDL (mg/dl)
                       GG         43.20(8.62)
                       GT         44.37(10.24)
                       TT         42.15(13.26)
LDL (mg/dl)
                       GG        113.16(28.59)
                       GT        109.05(38.26)
                       TT         97.95(32.19)
                       GG         46.90(27.69)
                       GT         50.75(25.88)
                       TT         50.12(26.26)
                       GG         34.39(17.7)
                       GT         33.03(12.57)
                       TT         28.2 (13.79)
FSG (mg/dl)
                       GG         87.70(12.66)
                       GT         91.21(9.01)
                       TT         90.84(12.85)
TG (mg/dl) (*)
                       GG        136.50(125.25-240.50)
                       GT        151.50(109.00-182.50)
                       TT        171.00(117.50-236 50)
MDA (nmol/ml)
                       GG          2.69(1.01)
                       GT          2.90(1.19)
                       TT          2.78(0.83)
TAC (mg/dl)
                       GG          1.42(0.29)
                       GT          1.50(0.23)
                       TT          1.38(0.22)
Insulin ([micro]U/ml)
                       GG         18.90(15 37-25.82)
                       GT         18.10(13.55-26.95)
                       TT         19.70(14.00-29.15)
                       GG          3.91(3.11-6.57)
                       GT          3.94(2.91-6.07)
                       TT          4.29(3.25-6.38)

Variable               Control (n=76) mean (SD)

BMI (kg/[m.sup.2)
WC (cm)
Cholesterol (mg/dl)
HDL (mg/dl)
LDL (mg/dl)
FSG (mg/dl)
TG (mg/dl) (*)
MDA (nmol/ml)
TAC (mg/dl)
Insulin ([micro]U/ml)

Variable               Mean Difference (95% CI)  p[double dagger]

BMI (kg/[m.sup.2)
                         2.76(-0.16 to5.54)       0.060
                        -0.12(-2.47 to 2.22)      0.917
                         0.26(-1.53 to 2.04)      0.773
                         0.02(-0.04 to 0.08)      0.436
                         0.03(4.04 to 0.07)       0.050
                         0.01(-0.01 to 0.04)      0.398
WC (cm)
                         8.68(-0.23 to 17.59)     0.056
                         1 95(-2 73 to 6.65)      0.408
                         2.22(-2.10 to 6.55)      0.309
Cholesterol (mg/dl)
                        30.58 (3.91 to 57.26)     0.027
                        -6.42 (-25,92 to 13.07)   0.512
                       -10.20 (-25.43 to 5.03)    0.186
HDL (mg/dl)
                        -2.72(-13.64 to 8.19)     0.603
                        -3.31(-9.05 to 2.42)      0.252
                        -5.66(-11.17 to 0.15)     0.044
LDL (mg/dl)
                        25.48(-3.11 to 54.08)     0.077
                        -3.90(-22.19 to 14.38)    0.671
                       -15.85(-29.52 to -2.19)    0.024
                        24.67(7.75 to 41.56)      0.007
                        20.64(10.18 to 31.10)    <0.001
                        26.03(18.04 to 34.02)    <0.001
                        11.67(5.88to 17.45)      <0.001
                         9.88(4.30 to -15.47)     0.001
                         8.11(-1.5 to 17.74)      0.092
FSG (mg/dl)
                        -3.94(-15.66 to 7.78)     0.485
                         0.13 (-4.86 to 5.12)     0.959
                         1.49(-4.12 to 7.11)      0.598
TG (mg/dl) (*)
                       -                          0.814
                       -                          0.166
MDA (nmol/ml)
                         0.78(-0.96 to 0.80)      0.467
                         0.78(-0.96 to 0.80)      0.098
                        -0.005(-0.33 to 0.34)     0.677
TAC (mg/dl)
                         0.78(-0.96 to 0.80)      0.061
                        -0.05(-0.36 to 0.26)      0.225
                        -0.16(-0.24 to -0.07)     0.022 (*)
Insulin ([micro]U/ml)
                       -                          0.513
                       -                          0.941
                       -                          0.814
                       -                          0.772
                       -                          0.166

BMI. body mass index; WC, waist circumference; WHR, waist to hip ratio;
FSG. fasting serum glucose; MDA. malondialdehyde; TAC, total
antioxidants, HOMA-IR, homeostasis mode! assessment insulin resistance.

[double dagger] P-value based on ANCOVA adjusted for age and gender.

* TG, Insulin and HOMA-IR are presented based on median (P25-P75) and
other variables data are presented based on mean (SD).

Table 5. Comparison of energy, macro and micronutrient intakes between
study groups

Variable              NAFLD             Control
                      (n=7S) mean (SD)  (n=76) mean (SD)

Calories (kcal)       2815.06(536.35)   2794.93(448.64)
Protein (g/day)         93.88(21.62)      88.88(16.60)
Carbohydrate (g/day)   437.38(89.72)     438.49(79.58)
Total fat (g/day)       89.70(27.03)      91.52(24.35)
Vitamin E (mg/day)      14.08(5.60)       14.63(4.11)
Vitamin C (mg/day)     127.14(66.09)     140.59(64.18)

Variable              Mean Difference (95%CI)    p (*)

Calories (kcal)       -20.13(-179.29 to 139.03)  0.803
Protein (g/day)        -4.99(-11.20 to 1.20)     0.113
Carbohydrate (g/day)    1.10(-26.18 to 28.39)    0.936
Total fat (g/day)       1.82(-6.45 to 10.10)     0.664
Vitamin E (mg/day)      0.80(-1.03 to 2.12)      0.496
Vitamin C (mg/day)     13.44(-7.50 to 34.39)     0.207

(*) P-value of variables based on independent T-test using equal
COPYRIGHT 2017 Avicenna Research Institute
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2017 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Original Article
Author:Mohseni, Fatemeh; Moghbelinejad, Sahar; Najafipour, Reza
Publication:Avicenna Journal of Medical Biotechnology (AJMB)
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:7IRAN
Date:Jul 1, 2017
Previous Article:Polymorphisms in the estrogen receptor Beta Gene and the Risk of unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion.
Next Article:Lactococcus lactis: A New Strategy for Vaccination.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |