Printer Friendly

Mad Bomber in Chief.

Contrary to what you heard in Campaign 2000, the U.S. military is not experiencing a readiness crisis. It's experiencing a deployment crisis, says Ivan Eland, director of defense studies at the Cato Institute and author of a recent study, "A Hollow Debate on Military Readiness."

Eland argues that the "bone-crushing dominance" of the U.S. military won't soon be rivaled. In 1999 we spent $270 billion on our armed forces--more than the next seven biggest-spending countries combined. The real problem faced by our soldiers, says Eland, comes from serving under a government that deploys the military for everything from nation-building in Somalia to bombing a pharmaceutical factory in Sudan. By Eland's count, President Clinton set a record for major troop deployments, with 25 in his eight-year tenure. (The notoriously hawkish Ronald Reagan sent U.S. troops out into the world only half as often.) Says Eland, "These deployments take money and time away from training for major wars, and they wear out the force, causing morale to go down."
COPYRIGHT 2001 Reason Foundation
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2001, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:how Bill Clinton's decisions to deploy the military affected its readiness
Author:Lynch, Michael W.
Publication:Reason
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Feb 1, 2001
Words:170
Previous Article:The Sex Exception.
Next Article:City of Pompano Beach.
Topics:


Related Articles
Bill Clinton's War.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |