Printer Friendly



Scapula forms an important component of the shoulder girdle. The triangular shape of the scapula is a characteristic feature of mammals and is not due to forces applied during development. Scapular shape has undergone modifications which can be expressed as scapular index indicating relationship of length to breadth of the bone. Shape change is mostly in the infraspinatus portion.

Acromion process of scapula has been classified by many researchers into three types. Type 1 flat; type 2 curved; type 3 hooked. Variations of acromion has been associated with sub acromial impingement syndrome and rotator cuff tear. Glenoid cavity is considered as the head of the scapula. Different shapes of the glenoid cavity have been described; pear shaped, round, oval or inverted comma shaped. Variations in shape is important clinically, especially for shoulder arthroplasty. Variations in suprascapular notch with or without an anomalous superior transverse scapular ligament is a cause for suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome.

Determination of sex using scapular measurements is very useful in medicolegal cases, natural disasters and in circumstances where other bones are fragmented or not available.

Scapular measurements can be used for comparative anatomy, for surgical procedures and for manufacturing prosthetics. The dimensions of scapula are important in the case of rotator cuff diseases, shoulder arthroplasty and in recurrent shoulder dislocation.


Fifty adult dry human scapulae were included in the study of which 25 were of the left side and 25 of the right. The study was conducted in Government T D Medical college Alappuzha, Kerala.

Study Design

Descriptive study.

The Parameters Related to Scapula as a whole, Acromion Process and Glenoid Cavity were Measured using Vernier Callipers. They were

* Length of scapula in mm is taken as the distance between the summit of the superior angle and the inferior angle.

* Scapular breadth is the distance between the spine intersecting the medial border of scapula and the middle of outer border of glenoid cavity.

* Infraspinatus length is the distance between the point of intersection of spine of scapula to medial border and tip of inferior angle.

* Scapular index and infraspinatus index were measured using the above readings as follows.

Scapular index = breadth/length x 100.

Infraspinatus index = breadth/infraspinatus length x 100.

* Length of acromion process in mm is the distance between the tip and the posterior border of acromion process.

* Breadth of acromion process is the distance between the medial and lateral borders at the midpoint of acromion process.

* Thickness of acromion process was measured at the anterior part.

* The acromiocoracoid distance is the distance between the tip of acromion process and tip of coracoid process (fig. 7C).

* The acromioglenoid distance is the space between tip of acromion process and the supraglenoid tubercle (fig. 7B).

* Length of glenoid cavity (superior-inferior glenoid diameter): maximum distance between most inferior point on glenoid margin to supraglenoid tubercle.

* Breadth of glenoid cavity 1 (anteroposterior glenoid diameter 1): maximum breadth of articular margin of glenoid cavity perpendicular to glenoid cavity length (fig. 7A).

* Breadth of glenoid cavity 2 (anteroposterior glenoid diameter 2): breadth of upper half of glenoid cavity at the midpoint between superior margin and middle of glenoid cavity (fig. 7A).

* Shapes of acromion process and glenoid cavity were observed.

* Suprascapular notch types were observed and classified according to the classification by Polguj et al.

Type I

Notch with longer maximum depth (MD) than transverse diameter (fig. 8).

Type II

Equal depth and superior transverse diameter (STD) and mid transverse diameter (MTD) (fig. 9).

Type III

Longer superior transverse diameter than mid transverse diameter (fig. 10).

Type IV

Bony foramen (fig. 11).

Type V

Discrete notch (fig. 12).

Suprascapular notches may be absent (fig. 13).

Statistical Analysis

All measurements of left and right scapulae were made and tabulated. Mean and standard deviation were calculated manually.

In order to test whether the various parameters of left and right scapulae were different significantly, the equality of measure was tested using a small sample test, student 't test, for unpaired independent samples. Values of t was computed using an online calculator, the URL of which is

Figures Showing Measurements of Scapula


The total length of scapula in the present study ranged from 110.3 mm to 148.3 mm on the left side and 105 to 149.9 mm on the right (table 1) with mean value of 130.8 & 130.11 and standard deviation of 11.05 & 10.96 respectively, which was statistically insignificant (t = 0.7, p = 0.4)

Increased breadth was seen on right scapulae compared to those on the left as shown in table 2 but was insignificant statistically (t = 0.45, p = 0.32).

Infraspinatus length more on right scapulae in comparison to left scapulae (table 3). (t = 0.29, p value = 0.38. p>0.05).

Higher scapular index was noticed in right scapulae (table 4) and shows statistical significance. (t = -2.02, p value = 0.024), p<0.05.

Correlation between breadth and infraspinatus length of scapula (infraspinatus index) was in the range of 81.3 -103.6 on the left and 82.1 - 105 on the right (table 5) and was not significant statistically (t = -0.643, p value = 0.26).

Left scapulae showed longer acromion processes than right ones (table 6) but was not significant statistically. (t=-0.114, p value = 0.45).

Broader acromion processes were seen on right scapulae with mean value of 24.86 on the left and 27.36 on the right side and is statistically significant (t = -2.763, p value = 0.004) p<0.05 as seen in table 7.

Thickness of acromion process was higher on the right scapulae with mean values of 6.52 and SD 1.22 on left and 7.52 and SD 1.77 on right (table 8) which is significant statistically. (t = -2.15, p value = 0.017).

Acromiocoracoid distance was not significantly different on both scapulae (t = 0.31, p = 0.37) as shown in table 9.

Acromioglenoid distance of both sides did not differ significantly (table 10).

Table 11 shows statistically significant increase of glenoid cavity length on right scapulae with mean value of 34.92 and SD 2.14 on the left and mean value 36.92 and SD 1.81 on the right.

Table 12 shows no significant difference of glenoid cavity breadth in the upper part.

(t = -0.31, p value = 0.37) No significant difference observed in maximum breadth of glenoid cavity (Table 13).

13 left scapulae had pear shaped, 5 had oval shaped & 7 had inverted comma shaped glenoid cavity among the study group and 9 right scapulae showed pear shaped, 6 showed oval shaped and 10 showed inverted comma shaped glenoid cavity (table 14 & chart 1).

Table 15 and chart 2 shows distribution of acromion process shape among the study group.

Type II suprascapular notches were more commonly seen on left scapulae whereas Types II & III were equally seen and more common on right scapulae (Table 16 & Chart 3).


Since the scapula varies in morphology, its measurements have importance in shoulder girdle pathologies. Each individual presents with variations in shoulder anatomy, overall conditioning and fitness and degrees of shoulder laxity that makes the precise evaluation of pathologic lesions difficult. [1] The slope and length of the acromion and the height of the arch are most closely associated with degenerative changes. [2]

Scapular Length

Mean scapular length was 132.38 mm with standard deviation of 11.05 on left scapulae and 130.11 mm with SD of 10.96 on right scapulae in our study. Gupta [3] et al reported mean scapular length of 135.3 mm with SD of 10.9 which is similar to our study. Maximum scapular height is the maximum distance between the highest point of the superior angle and the lowest point of the inferior angle. [4]

Scapular Breadth

Maximum scapular breadth is the maximum distance between the point on the longitudinal axis of the glenoid cavity and the point on the prolongation of the inferior boundary of the closed margin of the spine. The mean breadth of scapula was 89.68 mm with SD of 8.88 on left scapulae and 90.9 mm with SD of 6.20 in the present study which was in accordance with Gupta et al.

Infraspinatus Length

The change in shape of scapula is more common in infraspinatus region. The mean infraspinatus length was 98.54 mm with SD of 10.41 on left scapulae and 99.32 mm with SD of 8.02 on the right, while Krishnaiah [5] et al reported a higher value of 107.71 mm with SD of 7.6.

Scapular Index

Scapular indices help in determining the race. The mean scapular index observed in our study was 67.72 with SD of 3.72 on the left and 70.01 with SD of 4.09 on the right scapulae which is less than those of Krishnaiah's study which showed 73.99 with SD of 4.6.

Infraspinatus Index

The present study showed a mean infraspinatus index of 90.93 with SD of 4.96 on left and 91.90 with SD of 5.48 on right scapulae.

Length of Acromion Process

Acromion process plays a significant role in formation and stability of shoulder joint. Our study showed a mean acromial length of 42 mm with SD of 5.23 on left and 42.11 mm with SD of 4.14 on right scapulae whereas Mansur [6] et al found mean length of 45.57 mm with SD of 5.1 on left and 46.46 mm with SD of 5 on right acromion in Nepalese population.

Breadth of Acromion

The mean breadth of acromion in our scapulae were 24.86 mm with SD of 2.88 on the left and 27.36 mm with SD of 3.81 on right acromial processes, while Mansur et al found mean breadth of 27.23 mm with SD of 3.06 on left and 26.63 mm with SD of 3.55 on the right acromion processes, which is in accordance to our study.

Acromial Thickness

Acromial thickness showed a mean value of 6.52 mm with SD of 1.22 on the left and 7.52 mm with SD of 1.77 on the right indicating an increase on the right acromia.

Shape of Acromion

44% of scapulae on left revealed tubular acromion processes whereas 56% were rectangular on the right. The second commonest was rectangular (40%) on left and tubular (28%) on the right. Acromion process was classified into three types on the basis of its shape into triangular, quadrangular, and tubular by Mansur et al. Curved acromia were also seen. The under surface of anterior one third of acromion was pointed out by Neer [7] as the area responsible for impinging upon the components of the rotator cuff especially the supraspinatus tendon. Rotator cuff lesions are common where subacromial space is narrow.

Acromiocoracoid Distance and Acromioglenoid Distance

No significant difference of these were noted between scapulae of both sides in the present study.

Glenoid Cavity Length

Height of the glenoid cavity is the maximum distance from inferior point of glenoid margin to the most prominent point on supraglenoid tubercle. Mean value of 34.92 mm with SD of 2.14 was noted on the left and 36.92 mm with SD of 1.81 on the right glenoids and the difference was highly significant and was similar to the study by Patil et al. The left glenoid cavities were slightly shorter in length in comparison to the right.

Glenoid Cavity Breadth 1

Glenoid cavity breadth is the maximum breadth of the articular margin, perpendicular to glenoid cavity height. The mean of maximum diameter of lower part of glenoid cavity was 22.19 mm with SD of 1.52 on the left and 23.91 mm with SD of 2.91 on the right.

Glenoid Cavity Breadth 2

The mean of diameter of upper part of glenoid cavity was 16.27 mm with SD of 2.51 on left and 16.52 with SD of 2.48 on the right glenoids and was in accordance with Patil [8] et al. But Iannoti [9] et al found a mean diameter of 23 mm with SD of 2.7 which is higher than that of our study.

Shape of Glenoid Cavity

The glenoid cavity has been classified into pear shaped, inverted comma or oval, based on the presence of a notch on the anterior glenoid rim, [10] Pear-shaped glenoids were more frequently seen on left scapulae (52%) and inverted comma shaped ones (40%) on the right.

Suprascapular Notch

Suprascapular notch is a depression on the lateral part of superior border of scapula, medial to the coracoid process. It is bridged by superior transverse scapular ligament which may ossify and the foramen then transmits suprascapular nerve to supraspinatus fossa. [11,12] Bony foramina were seen in 12% of left scapulae while none was found on the right. This notch is an important landmark of suprascapular nerve during arthroscopic shoulder surgery. [13,14] Rengachary's [15] classification of suprascapular notches says that in type 1, the superior border of scapula present a depression from the medial superior angle to the base of coracoid process; type II is described as a wide blunted V shaped notch, occupying nearly a third of the superior border with the widest point along the superior border. Type III is a symmetric and "U" shaped notch while type IV is described as a very small "V" shaped notch frequently presenting a shallow groove near the notch; type V is similar to type III with partial ossification of medial border of the notch and with minimum diameter along superior border of scapula. Type VI is described as a bony foramen with a completely ossified superior transverse scapular ligament. In the present study, suprascapular notches were classified by Polguj's [16] classification and type II was more common (36%) on left scapulae than that on right (32%) whereas type III showed equal distribution (32% each) on both sides. Suprascapular notch was absent in 12% on the left and 16% on the right.

In the whole population, approximately 1-2% of all shoulder pain is caused by suprascapular nerve impingement syndrome. [17] According to Albino, [18] suprascapular entrapment syndrome is more likely to be associated with type III notch because of its peculiar features.


Scapular index indicates the relationship of breadth to length of scapula and reveals modifications in shape of the bone and is useful to compare racial differences. Right scapulae of the study group showed higher indices than left scapulae.

Acromion thickness and acromial breadth were slightly more in right-sided scapulae. The different shapes and curvature of acromion has a role in impingement syndrome.

Glenoid cavity was longer on right scapulae in the present study and may be of significance to surgeons in shoulder arthroplasty.

Type II and type III Suprascapular notches were predominantly seen. Occurrence of a completely ossified superior transverse scapular ligament can have a genetic influence and can cause suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome.


[1] Warner JJ, Deng XH, Warren RF, et al. Static capsuloligamentous restraints to superior-inferior translation of the glenohumeral joint. Am J Sports Med 1992; 20(6):675-85.

[2] Edelson JG, Taitz C. Anatomy of the coraco-acromial arch. Relation to degeneration of the acromion. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992; 74(4):589-94.

[3] Gupta C, Priya A, Kalthur SG, et al. A morphometric study of acromion process of scapula and its clinical significance. CHRISMED J Health Res 2014; 1(3):164-9.

[4] Patel SM, Shah MA, Vora RK, et al. Morphometric analysis of scapula to determine sexual dimorphism. Int J Med Public Health 2013; 3:207-10.

[5] Krishnaiah M, Nagaraj S, Kumar PM, et al. Study of scapular measurements and scapular indices of Andhra Pradesh region. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences 2014; 13(6):117-20.

[6] Mansur DI, Khanal K, Haque MK, et al. Morphometry of acromion process of human scapulae and its clinical importance amongst Nepalese population. Kathmandu Univ Med J 2012; 38(2):33-6.

[7] Neer CS. Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1972; 54(1):41-50.

[8] Patil GV, Kolagi SI, Ramdurg U. Morphometrical study of scapular glenoid cavities. Global Journal of Medical research 2014; 14(2).

[9] Iannotti JP, Gabriel JP, Schneck SL, et al. The normal glenohumeral relationship. An anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 1992; 74(4):491-500.

[10] Prescher A, Klumpen T. The glenoid notch and its relation to the shape of the glenoid cavity of the scapula. Journal of Anatomy 1997; 190(Pt 3):457-60.

[11] Ajmani ML. The cutaneous branch of the human suprascapular nerve. J Anat 1994; 185(Pt 2):439-42.

[12] Standring S, Ellis H, Healy J, et al. Gray's anatomy-the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 39th edn. New York, Elsevier Churchill Livingstone. Pectoral girdle, shoulder region and axilla 2005:821-2.

[13] Bigliani LU, Dalsey RM, McCann PD, et al. An anatomical study of the suprascapular nerve. Arthroscopy 1990; 6(4):301-5.

[14] Shishido H, Kikuchi S. Injury to the suprascapular nerve during shoulder joint surgery: an anatomical study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001; 10(4):372-6.

[15] Rengachary SS, Neff JP, Singer PA, et al. Suprascapular entrapment neuropathy: a clinical, anatomical and comparative study. Part 1: clinical study. Neurosurgery 1979; 5(4):441-6.

[16] Polguj M, Sibinsky M, Grzegorzewski A, et al. Variation in morphology of suprascapular nerve as a factor of suprascapular nerve entrapment. Int Orthop 2013; 37(11):2185-92.

[17] Polguj M, Jolzejewski KS, Podgorski M, et al. Correlation between morphometry of the suprascapular notch and anthropometric measurements of the scapula. Folia Morphol 2011; 70(2):109-15.

[18] Albino P, Carbone S, Candela V, et al. Morphometry of the suprascapular notch: correlation with scapular dimensions and clinical relevance. Biomed Central Musculoskeletal disorders 2013; 14:172.

Susan Varghese (1), Manju Madhavan Chandramathi Amma (2)

(1) Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Government T. D. Medical College, Alappuzha.

(2) Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram.

Financial or Other, Competing Interest: None.

Submission 07-08-2017, Peer Review 05-09-2017, Acceptance 11-09-2017, Published 18-09-2017.

Corresponding Author:

Dr. Manju Madhavan Chandramathi Amma, Kadukkara Veedu, T.C. 16/4040, Koyikkal Lane, Kumarapuram, Medical College PO, Thiruvananthapuram.


DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2017/1164

Caption: Figure 1. Scapular Length

Caption: Figure 2. Scapular Breadth

Caption: Figure 3. Infraspinatus Length

Caption: Figure 4. Acromial Length

Caption: Figure 5. Acromial Breadth

Caption: Figure 6. Glenoid Length

Caption: Figure 7A. Glenoid Cavity Breadth 1 & 2

Caption: Figure 7B. Acromioglenoid Distance

Caption: Figure 7C. Acromiocoracoid Distance

Caption: Figure 8. Type I

Caption: Figure 9. Type II

Caption: Figure 10. Type III

Caption: Figure 11. Type IV

Caption: Figure 12. Type V

Caption: Figure 13. Absent Notch

Caption: Chart 1. Shape of Glenoid Cavity

Caption: Chart 2. Shape of Acromion Processes

Caption: Chart 3. Types of Suprascapular Notches
Table 1. Total Length of Scapula

Parameter        Left             Right

Number            25               25
Range       110.3-148.3 mm    105-149.9 mm
Mean           130.38 mm        130.11 mm
S.D.             11.05            10.96

Table 2. Breadth of Scapula

Parameter     Left          Right

Number         25            25
Range       73-113 mm   77.4-101.3 mm
Mean        89.68 mm       90.0 mm
S.D.          8.88          6.20

Table 3. Infraspinatus Length

Parameter       Left            Right

Number           25              25
Range        81-123.4 mm    84.2-113.8 mm
Mean          98.54 mm        99.32 mm
S.D.            10.41           8.02

Table 4. Scapular Index

Parameter    Left       Right

Number        25         25
Range       61-76.8   62.9-82.9
Mean         67.72      70.01
S.D.         3.72       4.09

Table 5. Infraspinatus Index

Parameter      Left       Right

Number          25          25
Range       81.3-103.6   82.1-105
Mean          90.93       91.90
S.D.           4.96        5.48

Table 6. Length of Acromion Process

Parameter      Left           Right

Number          25             25
Range       33.4-51 mm    31.6-48.2 mm
Mean           42 mm        42.11 mm
S.D.           5.23           4.14

Table 7. Breadth of Acromion Process

Parameter      Left         Right

Number          25            25
Range       19-30.4 mm   20.5-34.8 mm
Mean         24.86 mm      27.36 mm
S.D.           2.88          3.81

Table 8. Acromion Thickness

Parameter      Left          Right

Number          25             25
Range       4.5-9.1 mm    4.2-10.3 mm
Mean          6.52 mm       7.52 mm
S.D.           1.22           1.77

Table 9. Acromiocoracoid Distance

Parameter       Left           Right

Number           25             25
Range       18.2-41.2 mm    18-31.8 mm
Mean          26.02 mm       26.67 mm
S.D.              5            4.15
T = -0.47

Table 10. Acromioglenoid Distance

Parameter      Left        Right

Number          25           25
Range       14-26.2 mm   13.6-22 mm
Mean         18.87 mm     18.10 mm
S.D.           2.77         2.74

(t = 0.99. p value = 0.16).

Table 11. Length of Glenoid Cavity

Parameter      Left        Right

Number          25           25
Range       32-40.6 mm   30-42.9 mm
Mean         34.92 mm     36.92 mm
S.D.           2.14         1.81

(t = -2.210, p value = 0.015) p<0.05.

Table 12. Glenoid Cavity Breadth 1

Parameter      Left        Right

Number          25           25
Range       19-25.3 mm   18.2-29 mm
Mean         22.19 mm     23.91 mm
S.D.           1.52         2.91

(t = -1.32, p value = 0.095)

Table 13. Glenoid Cavity Breadth 2

Parameter       Left          Right

Number           25             25
Range       11.4-21.8 mm   11.7-21.3 mm
Mean          16.27 mm       16.52 mm
S.D.            2.51           2.48

Table 14. Shape and Frequency of Glenoid Cavity

Shape            Left    Right

Pear             (52%)   (36%)
Oval             (20%)   (24%)
Inverted Comma   (28%)   (40%)

Table 15. Shape and Frequency of Acromion Process

Shape           Left      Right

Rectangular   10 (40%)   14 (56%)
Tubular       11 (44%)   7 (28%)
Triangular     1 (4%)     1 (4%)
Curved        3 (12%)    3 (12%)

Table 16. Frequency of Suprascapular Notch Types

SSN         Left      Right

Type I     1 (4%)    4 (16%)
Type II    9 (36%)   8 (32%)
Type III   8 (32%)   8 (32%)
Type IV    3 (12%)      0
Type V     1 (4%)    1 (4%)
Absent     3 (12%)   4 (16%)
COPYRIGHT 2017 Akshantala Enterprises Private Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2017 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Original Research Article
Author:Varghese, Susan; Amma, Manju Madhavan Chandramathi
Publication:Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences
Article Type:Report
Date:Sep 18, 2017
Next Article:H1N1 IN PREGNANCY.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters