Printer Friendly

MANDIBULAR PREMOLARS WITH TOOTH SHAPE DEVIATION - PREVALENCE IN A SAMPLE OF ORTHODONTIC PATIENTS.

Byline: USMAN AHMED, AMJAD MAHMOOD and ROZINA NAZIR

Abstract

The aim of this study was to find out the prevalence of this anomaly in a sample of Pakistani population. Mandibular premolar (MnP) is a tooth that frequently shows variation in its morphology such as size and shape. One of these anomalies is the tooth shape deviation (TSD) in which there is increased mesiodistal and reduced faciolingual width.

Orthodontic records of 500 patients were examined to find out the presence of this anomaly. The male and female patients in permanent dentition stage were included in the study with exception to those having lower premolars missing or restored. The mesiodistal and faciolingual widths of lower premolars were measured on the plaster casts between the points of maximum widths, using needle pointed dividers, and the mesiodistal / faciolingual crown index was obtained for each tooth. The teeth with values >100 were labeled as MnP-TSD.

Out of 500 patients observed in total, 17 were found to have MnP-TSD giving an overall prevalence of 3.4%. The prevalence in males was 3.1% and that in females was 3.5% and the effect of gender was insignificant (p=0.83). The teeth found with this anomaly were 28 in total, with equal number of first and second premolars.

MnP-TSD is an anomaly that plays an important role in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning with a prevalence of 3.4% in the patients presenting for orthodontic treatment at our dental hospital. Therefore it should be carefully observed in every patient.

Key Words: Anomaly, Elongated, Mandible, Premolars, Tooth shape deviation.

INTRODUCTION

Anomalies of teeth include a range of variation in tooth shape, size and structure, most of which occur during the morpho-differentiation phase of development.1 This occurs primarily due to defects in certain genes, however, some other etiological events in the prenatal and postnatal periods have also been blamed for development of such anomalies.2,3

Mandibular second premolar (MnP) is a tooth that frequently shows anomalies like deviation of crown morphology, late eruption or sometimes complete agenesis. 4-6

One of the rare anatomic variations is the Tooth Shape Deviation (TSD) that usually occurs in these teeth. When compared with normal teeth, such premolars have an increased mesio-distal and a diminished facio-lingual dimension. The dental anomalies like these may present problems during the orthodontic treatment, because the altered mesiodistal dimension of one tooth may cause discrepancies in management of space as well as interdigitation of opposing teeth in dental arch, hence interfering in settling of occlusion. Tooth movements like derotation and torquing are also difficult in these teeth because of their imbalanced shapes and unusually broad mesiodistal root surface areas.7 Such anomaly may also be a cause of malocclusion as additional space is required for a tooth to be accommodated in dental arch.8

Considering the significance of this anomaly there is still little discussion about this in the literature consisting of only a few articles and case reports.4,7-9

The first reported case of such variation dates back to 1951 by Dahlberg10, after which various authors have reported this condition using different terminologies. The most recent term coined for this anomaly is mandibular premolar with tooth shape deviation (MnP-TSD) given by Peck.11

Although in Pakistan several authors have reported the prevalence of dental anomalies3,12-14 yet none of them has mentioned specifically about the occurrence of MnP-TSD. The aim of this study was, therefore, to determine the frequency of patients reporting with this dental anomaly in a sample of people presenting for orthodontic treatment at Margalla Dental College Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

METHODOLOGY

It was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted at the Orthodontic Department of Margalla Dental College. The Institutes Ethics Review Committee approved the project. Orthodontic records of 500 patients, who presented to the department for orthodontic treatment, were examined. Due to the limited amount of data available the patients could not be segregated on the basis of ethnicity so the study included patients from different areas of Rawalpindi and Islamabad only. Patients of both male and female genders who were in permanent dentition stage were included in the study. Patients were excluded if they had lower premolars as missing or having proximal restorations and crowns. Mesio-distal and bucco-lingual widths of the mandibular premolars were measured on the study casts using needle pointed dividers from the points of maximum widths of the teeth (Fig 1a and 1b).

The crown dimensions were measured using the mesiodistal/faciolingual (MD/FL) crown index developed by Peck H and Peck S11,15,16 as shown here.

Mesio-distal diameter in mm / Facio-lingual diameter in mm X 100

Those mandibular premolar teeth whose index was greater than 100 were labeled as MnP-TSD.

Data Analysis

Data were analyzed using the SPSS software version 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The descriptive statistics were calculated as frequency and percentage of occurrence of the anomaly. To test the difference between male and female patients, right versus left side and unilateral versus bilateral, Chi-square test was employed. The level of significance was set as p a$?0.05.

RESULTS

There were 500 patients observed in total, out of which 17 were found with MnP-TSD showing a prevalence of 3.4%. Out of the 500 subjects observed, 159 (31.8%) were males and 341 (68.2%) were females. The prevalence in male and female subjects is shown in Table 1. The results of Chi square test indicate that there is no effect of gender on the frequency of this anomaly (p = 0.83). Among these 17 patients with MnP-TSD, a total number of 28 teeth were found with this anomaly. Out of these 14 were first premolars (MnP1) and 14 were second premolars (MnP2), showing an equal distribution of 1:1 between first and second premolars. In some patients TSD was found in MnP1 whereas in some it was found in MnP2 only. There were a few more in which both MnP1 and MnP2 were affected simultaneously. This distribution is shown in Table 2 whereas unilateral and bilateral occurrence is shown in Table 3.

DISCUSSION

Dental anomalies occur by alteration in dental development due to genetic, epigenetic or environmental factors and may exhibit changes in number, form and structure to various degrees. Previous studies have revealed that occurrence of such anomalies is comparatively higher in Orthodontic patients and may cause discrepancies in function hence early diagnosis is important.17

Prevalence of several dental anomalies have been studied by different researchers throughout the world18,19 and within these studies mandibular premolars hold the significance for exhibiting a vast array of anomalies and developmental disturbances such as agenesis,19 impaction14 macrodontia20 and aberrations in root and canal morphology.21-24 MnP-TSD is a rare dental anomaly which has been reported by very few authors. In addition to causing malocclusion, such anomalies may also predispose the affected teeth as well as the adjacent teeth to caries owing to the displacement of contact points.8

In a study by Chate9, a detailed evaluation of such teeth has been done on 10,000 English patients and the prevalence of 0.6% has been reported in indigenous British population. Another study by Barnes25 has shown a prevalence of 0.5% in 4,000 black Ugandan children. In comparison to this our study shows a higher prevalence of 3.4%. The reason for such difference could be the selection of patients, Chate9 and Barnes25 conducted their studies in general population where as our study included only the patients who presented with malocclusion. Edger and Sciulli26 have also reported a somewhat higher prevalence of 3.06% which is closer to that of our study.

TABLE 1: PREVALENCE OF MNP-TSD

###Males###Females###Total

Number of patients###159###341###500

observed

Patients having###5 (3.1%)###12 (3.5%)###17(3.4%)

MnP-TSD

TABLE 2: DISTRIBUTION OF TSD IN MNP1 and MNP2

###Males###Females###Total

Patients having###2 (12%)###6 (34%)###8

MnP1-TSD

Patients having###3 (18%)###4 (24%)###7

MnP2-TSD

Patients having###0###2 (12%)###2

both MnP1-TSD and

MnP2-TSD

Total###5 (30%)###12 (70%)###17

TABLE 3: DISTRIBUTION OF UNILATERAL AND BILATERAL OCCURRENCE OF MNP-TSD

###Males###Females###Total

Unilateral occurrence###3 (18%)###5 (30%)###8

Bilateral occurrence###2 (12%)###7 (40%)###9

Total###5 (30%)###12 (70%)###17

Our results also indicate an equal prevalence in both genders with male to female ratio of 1:1. This is also different as compared to the results of studies by Chate9 and Garib and Peck7, which was reported to be 1.4:1 in both the studies showing a higher prevalence in males.

It has also been shown in this study that the prevalence of such anomaly is equal in first and second mandibular premolars. This is different from the study of Garib and Peck7 in which TSD is eight times more commonly seen in second than first premolars and the study of Chate9 which shows the occurrence of this anomaly three times more common in second than first premolars. This difference can be due to the method of assessment of MnP-TSD, in both the studies the mesiodistal and faciolingual widths were compared to those of their established norms in addition to their MD/FL crown index. The results of the study by Edger and Sciulli26 are, however, totally different with the anomaly being three times more prevalent in first than the second mandibular premolars. Their method of assessment was similar to that of our study however the difference could be due to the difference in ethnicity.

Present study also shows that when MnP-TSD, occurs there are higher chances of this anomaly to occur bilaterally as the percentage of bilateral occurrence was 53%. This is also in accordance with the previous studies. Garib and Peck7 have reported bilateral occurrence in 59% of subjects whereas the findings of Chate9 are even higher showing 69% of bilateral occurrence.

There are very few published studies which report the prevalence of MnP-TSD and none that represent its occurrence in a Pakistani sample. The studies by Abbas et al3, Sukhia et al12, Khan et al13 and Zahra et al14 have all shown the prevalence of dental anomalies in Pakistani population but yet none of these studies discuss about the MnP-TSD. This is the first study, in providing the information about one particular anomaly of MnP-TSD in mandibular premolars and its prevalence in the Pakistani patients requiring orthodontic treatment.

Meticulous observation of discrepancies in dental occlusion is a routine in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Tooth size discrepancy as proposed by Bolton27 has always been an important part of this due to its effect on establishing occlusion. Although it is present in only 5% of the population but owing to its significance it is observed in many orthodontic patients. Our study reports the prevalence of MnP-TSD in 3.4% of orthodontic patients, therefore, it is prudent to carefully observe this anomaly in every patient who is being planned for orthodontic treatment.

Due to the lack of local data the results could only be compared to those of the studies in other parts of the world and the obvious difference in results as compared to those of the previous studies mentioned may probably be due to difference of ethnicity in different populations. Moreover this study is only conducted on the patients being presented for the orthodontic treatment to our dental college and does not include the subjects representing general Pakistani population. The future studies should therefore be aimed in a larger population including general subjects and not just those requiring orthodontic treatment.

CONCLUSION

MnP-TSD is a dental anomaly that could play a significant role in the etiology of malocclusion as well as its treatment planning. Despite its importance only a few authors from all over the world have reported this anomaly. This is the first local study to discuss this anomaly reporting a prevalence of 3.4% in the patients presenting for orthodontic treatment at Margalla Dental College. Therefore it should be carefully observed in every patient.

REFERENCES

1 Gupta SK, Saxena P, Jain S, Jain D. Prevalence and distribution of selected developmental dental anomalies in an Indian population. J Oral Sci. 2011 Jun;53(2):231-38.

2 Uslu O , Akcam MO , Evirgen S , Cebeci L. Prevalence of dental anomalies in various malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 135:328-35.

3 Abbas Q, Aslam A, Naeem A, Amjad M. Frequency of dental Anomalies in various malocclusions in Orthodontic Patients. Pak Oral Dental J. 2010; 30(1):119-22.

4 Acharya S, Kumar Mandal P, Ghosh C. Bilateral Molariform Mandibular Second Premolars. Case Rep Dent. 2015;2015:809463.

5 Mangla N, Khinda VI, Kallar S, Brar GS. Molarization of mandibular second premolar. International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry. 2014 May;7(2):137. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014 May;7(2):137-39.

6 Rootkin-Gray VF, Sheehy EC. Macrodontia of a mandibular second premolar: a case report. ASDC J Dent Child. 2001 Sep- Dec;68(5-6):347-49.

7 Garib DG, Peck S. Extreme variations in the shape of mandibular premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Sep;130(3):317-23.

8 Costa GB, Ramos-Perez FM, Castro JF, Perez DE. Bilateral mandibular premolars with tooth shape deviation: a rare dental anomaly. J Morphol. 2014;31(1):70-73.

9 Chate RA. Odontometric evaluation of mandibular premolars with tooth shape deviation: A case-control study. Angle Orthod. 2012 Sep;82(5):785-89.

10 Dahlberg AA. The dentition of the American Indian. In: Laughlin W, editor. Papers on the physical anthropology of the American Indian. New York: Viking Fund; 1951.

11 Peck H, Peck S. An index for assessing tooth shape deviations as applied to the mandibular incisors. Am J Orthod. 1972 Apr;61(4):384-401.

12 Sukhia HR, Baloch DA, Javed A. Prevalence of dental anomalies in JMDC orthodontic patients. Pak Oral Dental J. 2007;27: 211-18.

13 Khan SQ, Ashraf B, Khan NQ, Hussain B. Prevalence of dental anomalies among orthodontic patients. Pak Oral Dental J. 2015;35(2):224-27.

14 Zahra F, Rasool G, Hussain T, Khattak IA, Hussain U. Prevalence of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. Pak Oral Dental J. 2016; 36(1):88-90.

15 Peck S, Peck H. Orthodontic aspects of dental anthropology. Angle Orthod. 1975 Apr;45(2):95-102.

16 Peck S. Tooth shape deviations of mandibular premolars. Dent Anthropol. 2004;17:63-64.

17 Fernanda RD, de Carli ML, do PG Pedreira R, Ramos PD, Pedreira MR, Robazza CR, Hanemann JA. Association between dental anomalies and malocclusion in Brazilian orthodontic patients. J Oral Sci. 2016;58(1):75-81.

18 Thongudomporn U, Freer TJ. Prevalence of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. Aust Dent J. 1998; 43:395-98.

19 Bjerklin K, Al-Najjar M, Karestedt H, Andren A. Agenesis of mandibular second premolars with retained primary molars. A longitudinal radiographic study of 99 subjects from 12 years of age to adulthood. Eur J Orthod. 2008 Jun;30(3):254-61.

20 Kyriazidou A, Haider D, Mason C, Parekh S, Bloch-Zupan A. Case report: Macrodont mandibular second premolars, a hereditary dental anomaly. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2013 Dec;14(6): 411-16.

21 Albuquerque D, Kottoor J, Hammo M. Endodontic and clinical considerations in the management of variable anatomy in mandibular premolars: a literature review. Biomed Res Int. 2014 May;2014:512574.

22 Prabhu NT, John R, Munshi AK. Aberrant root development of the mandibular premolars: a case report. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1999 Mar;9(1):49-51.

23 Iyer VH, Indira R, Ramachandran S, Srinivasan MR. Anatomical variations of mandibular premolars in Chennai population. Indian J Dent Res. 2006 Jan-Mar;17(1):7-10.

24 Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CC. Anomalous mandibular premolars: a mandibular first premolar with three roots and a mandibular second premolar with a C-shaped canal system. Int Endod J. 2008 Nov;41(11):1005-14.

25 Barnes DS. Tooth morphology and other aspects of the Teso dentition. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1969;30:183-93.

26 Edgar HJ, Sciulli PW. Elongated mandibular premolar: a new morphological variant. Dent Anthropol. 2004;17:24-27.

27 Bolton WA. Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1958 Jul;28(3):113-30.
COPYRIGHT 2017 Asianet-Pakistan
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2017 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Pakistan Oral and Dental Journal
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:9PAKI
Date:Dec 31, 2017
Words:2874
Previous Article:DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF PERCEPTION OF PATIENTS ABOUT MALOCCLUSION AND TREATMENT NEED IN ABBOTTABAD.
Next Article:LED LIGHT TIP DISTANCE EFFECT ON SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS: IN-VITRO STUDY.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |